logo
What Credit Rating Cut Means for America's Economy

What Credit Rating Cut Means for America's Economy

Miami Herald22-05-2025

On May 16, Moody's lowered the U.S.'s credit rating from "Aaa" to "Aa1," stripping the country of the perfect score held since 1917 and casting an even brighter spotlight on Washington's long-running fiscal troubles.
"Successive U.S. administrations and Congress have failed to agree on measures to reverse the trend of large annual fiscal deficits and growing interest costs," Moody's wrote in its assessment. "We do not believe that material multi-year reductions in mandatory spending and deficits will result from current fiscal proposals under consideration."
"The U.S.'s fiscal performance is likely to deteriorate relative to its own past and compared to other highly-rated sovereigns," it added.
The White House has brushed aside the downgrade, describing it as largely symbolic and dismissing both the lagging indicator and the rater. The administration denies that the U.S. possesses anything other than strong fiscal footing and top-shelf creditworthiness.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN that he did not "put much credence" in Moody's rating and that the "trillions of dollars" coming into the U.S. thanks to President Donald Trump's recent Middle East tour was an encouraging enough signal of investor confidence and economic health.
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung called Mark Zandi, Moody's chief economist, a "Never Trumper" who had "been proven wrong time and time again."
"When you look at the world, the world has confidence in the United States of America and our economy," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said when asked to respond to the credit rating cut.
"So there's a lot of optimism in this economy, and the president disagrees with that assessment," she added.
Economists have told Newsweek that while the downgrade itself does not spell any new concerns for the American economy beyond potentially weakening already shaky market confidence, the conditions that prompted Moody's decision have long shadowed over the country's fiscal trajectory.
With the downgrade, Moody's joins the other two major credit rating agencies—Fitch and S&P—that withdrew the U.S.'s perfect rating in 2023 and 2011, respectively.
In its assessment, Moody's acknowledged that the U.S. "retains exceptional credit strengths such as the size, resilience and dynamism of its economy and the role of the U.S. dollar as global reserve currency." However, it said the decision to downgrade was based on the U.S.'s ballooning federal debt, which had helped push the deficit to a staggering $36 trillion.
"It is appropriate, I think, to downgrade the U.S. debt, given the size of current debt and deficits," said William Gale, the chair in federal economic policy at the Brookings Institution and a co-founder of the Tax Policy Center.
More significant, he told Newsweek, was the "implied disregard" for addressing these issues, exemplified by the current budget—the "one big, beautiful bill"—being advanced by Republican House leadership with the support of Trump.
The reconciliation bill in its current form includes a multitrillion-dollar hike to the nation's debt ceiling, an extension of Trump's 2017 tax cuts—with a view to making these permanent—and spending cuts that do little to offset these reductions in federal inflows.
"If the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is extended, which is our base case, it will add around $4 trillion to the federal fiscal primary (excluding interest payments) deficit over the next decade," Moody's wrote on Friday.
The GOP has not secured unanimous support for the bill in either chamber, the primary holdouts being fiscal hawks concerned about the unavoidable and significant increases to the deficit that would occur.
The White House has denied that the bill will add to the deficit, even as independent experts and budget watchdogs offer a conflicting assessment.
Gale said the bill would add to the risks posed by a ballooning debt "in every way." He added that if interest rates surpass economic growth, "then we are in for a particularly rocky ride, as the debt/GDP burden will start to spiral upward."
"We have the resources to cover our debt over the near term, and the long-term outlook is addressable provided politicians are willing to make some harder choices," said John Canavan, a lead financial market analyst at Oxford Economics. "The current reconciliation bill working through Congress suggests that politicians aren't yet prepared to make those choices."
The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) estimates that the reconciliation bill will add "roughly $3.3 trillion" to the national debt. "We should not pass any legislation that will add to deficits until we improve our fiscal situation, and the current form of the bill would—even after accounting for growth," Maya MacGuineas, the president of the CRFB, told Newsweek.
MacGuineas said Moody's announcement wouldn't "be a tipping point" as the information on which it was based was already known to investors. However, she added that it would contribute to "higher interest rates and market gyrations," which in turn have "a negative effect on growth."
Interest rates rose following Moody's announcement, the BBC reported, briefly surpassing 5 percent to reach their highest level since October 2023. The CFRB projected that the U.S. would pay close to $1 trillion in interest on its national debt in 2025, almost triple 2020 levels and surpassing the country's world-leading defense budget of $850 billion.
"We are now at the point with interest payments larger than spending on national defense. That makes us highly vulnerable in terms of geopolitics and national security," MacGuineas said. "Unfortunately, it is not an exaggeration to say that over time it will undermine our role as a superpower, as it has to other countries in the past."
Related Articles
Republicans Are Now Trapped by Their Own BudgetUS Warned of 'Death Spiral' of DebtNearly 3 Million Will Have Taxes Raised Under New PlanAmerican Socialists Are Bleeding Cash and a Democrat Is Celebrating
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chinese Nationals Accused of Pathogen Smuggling Sparks National Security Concerns Over CCP Infiltration
Chinese Nationals Accused of Pathogen Smuggling Sparks National Security Concerns Over CCP Infiltration

Epoch Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

Chinese Nationals Accused of Pathogen Smuggling Sparks National Security Concerns Over CCP Infiltration

FBI Director Kash Patel and some Republican lawmakers are sounding the alarm about threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), after two Chinese nationals were charged with smuggling a pathogen into the United States. 'This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply, which would have grave consequences ... putting American lives and our economy at serious risk,' Patel

Fact-Check: Is Flick Offers a Real Way to Make Money on Netflix—or a Scam?
Fact-Check: Is Flick Offers a Real Way to Make Money on Netflix—or a Scam?

Newsweek

time32 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Fact-Check: Is Flick Offers a Real Way to Make Money on Netflix—or a Scam?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors After a long day's work, it's hard to muster the energy to do anything other than heat up some food and binge your favorite Netflix shows like "Bridgerton" or "Stranger Things." But what if you could get paid just to watch Netflix? More Entertainment: Guillermo del Toro's Frankenstein – Everything We Know, Trailer, Release Date Flick Offers claims just that. According to the website, people can sit at home and watch and review Netflix content while making $36 per hour on your own schedule with "no talking required." The job has since gone viral on TikTok, with multiple users claiming that they are now living the couch potato dream. But is this actually a dream job or just a scam trying to take advantage of the masses? Let's dive deeper. Above is a stock image of the Netflix logo is displayed on the screen of an Apple MacBook Pro on November 20, 2019 in Paris, France. The streaming giant has revealed the incoming and outgoing... Above is a stock image of the Netflix logo is displayed on the screen of an Apple MacBook Pro on November 20, 2019 in Paris, France. The streaming giant has revealed the incoming and outgoing shows and films for its August 2023 Flick Offers Netflix Review Job Site a Scam? Let's cut to the chase: is Flick Offers real or just a scam? To put it bluntly, this site and other sites like it are some of the biggest scams online right now. According to Scam-Detector, Flick Offers has a score of 6.9 out of 100, meaning it is one of the least trustworthy sites possible. To make matters worse, Scam-Detector states that there are massive risk factors related to phishing, malware, and spam if you were to click any of the links on their web page. Additionally, it appears that the site is not affiliated with Netflix in any way, despite slapping a big red "N" on their front page. This is a massive red flag when considering the legitimacy of any website like this. The fact of the matter is, if a company were going to pay you to review their content, they wouldn't do it through a website that isn't affiliated with them. How to Actually Get Paid to Watch Netflix So it appears that Flick Offers and sites like it are a massive scam. Is there a way to actually get paid to watch Netflix? Actually, there is! More Entertainment: Netflix Releases Mysterious Trailer For Next 'Knives Out' Film Known as a Netflix tagger, these individuals are paid to watch, analyze, and categorize content. According to taggers make about $54,000 per year, or about $25 per hour. This is far off from the promised $36 per hour promised by Flick Offers. What Jobs is Netflix Hiring For? If you are looking to get a job with Netflix, your best bet would be to do it through their actual jobs website. While it doesn't seem that any tagger jobs are open at the moment, there are well over 500 open positions at the time of writing that are waiting to be filled. However, if you are looking for a quick way to make a ton of money just for binging your favorite series, it is best to look elsewhere. More Entertainment: How 'Karate Kid: Legends' is Connected to 'Cobra Kai'—Which to Watch First Fact-Check: Is Netflix's 'Adolescence' Series Based on a True Story? For more streaming and entertainment news, head on over to Newsweek Entertainment.

Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'
Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'

Fox News

time32 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Rep. Alford to introduce congressional stock trading ban mirroring Senate's 'PELOSI Act'

FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Mark Alford, R-Mo., on Wednesday will introduce legislation that would ban congressional stock trading, serving as the House companion bill to Sen. Josh Hawley's, R-Mo., "PELOSI Act" in the Senate. Alford's proposed bill would ban lawmakers and their spouses from holding, purchasing or selling individual stocks while in office, but it allows investments in diversified mutual funds, exchange-traded funds or U.S. Treasury bonds. If passed, current lawmakers would have 180 days to comply with the legislation. Likewise, newly elected lawmakers must achieve compliance within 180 days of entering office. "As public servants, we should hold ourselves to a higher standard and avoid the mere appearance of corruption," Alford said in a statement. "Unfortunately, too many members of Congress are engaging in suspicious stock trades based on non-public information to enrich themselves." "These gross violations of the public trust make clear: we must finally take action to ban members and their spouses from owning or selling individual stocks," he added. Under the proposed legislation, lawmakers who continue to make wrongful transactions would be required to hand over any profits they made to the U.S. Treasury Department. The House or Senate ethics committees could also impose a fine on such lawmakers amounting to 10% of each wrongful transaction. House Speaker Mike Johnson endorsed a stock trading ban on Wednesday, saying "a few bad actors" have ruined Americans' trust in lawmakers on the issue. "You want me to tell you my honest opinion on that? I'm in favor of that, because I don't think we should have any appearance of impropriety here," he told reporters during a press conference. President Donald Trump himself endorsed the same ban for members of Congress in an interview with Time magazine last month. "I watched Nancy Pelosi get rich through insider information, and I would be okay with it. If they send that to me, I would do it," he said of a trading ban. "You'll sign it?" the reporter pressed. "Absolutely," Trump responded. Democrats in the House of Representatives have also expressed support for a ban, with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., throwing his weight behind the proposal last week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store