Michael moved to a Uniting Church farmhouse in Brisbane to escape homelessness. Now his landlord is evicting him to build more houses
The home, at the centre of a 28-hectare former chicken run, is just an uninsulated 'four-bedroom shack', he says. At $280 a week it was all he and his partner could afford; they were without other options, so they were happy to stay.
But on Monday, the Queensland civil and administrative tribunal signed off on an eviction notice for their landlord, the Uniting Church of Australia.
Guettler believes they will be forced back into his car by the church's decision.
He says despite the church billing itself as 'a strong advocate for social and affordable housing and ending homelessness', the decision was 'unchristian'.
'Where does Jesus fit into all of this?' he says.
Guettler and his partner have been caught up in a fight over the historic lot at 76 Kooya Road, Mitchelton. The church plans to remove the house to make way for a 92-dwelling estate.
Many locals oppose the scheme. If approved, it would mean the subdivision of the last of what were once many farms in Mitchelton.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Guettler claims he and his partner have been offered no alternative housing to the Mitchelton estate and cannot find anywhere on the private market they can afford on the disability support pension. This is a claim the Uniting church denies.
'The property managers operating on behalf of the Uniting Church have offered ongoing assistance with suitable alternative properties, rental applications and references, and the church has been offering ongoing social support,' a spokesperson for the church says.
Brisbane's rental vacancy rates are near record lows at just 1%. The couple, meanwhile, have been on the social housing waiting list for about six years along with 47,818 other Queenslanders.
'We've got an application approved with the Department of Housing – which is as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike,' Guettler says.
Development was the last thing on the mind of Greg Hungerford, the former owner of Hungerford Farm. His family had called 76 Kooya Road home since the 1920s as the suburb rapidly grew around them.
Once just a scattered handful of semi-rural homes at Brisbane's north-west edge, the 1950s arrival of the car turned Mitchelton into one of Brisbane's fastest-growing suburbs. Unlike other landholders, the Hungerfords resisted selling, continuing to run their free-range poultry farm into the 70s, selling eggs to their increasingly numerous neighbours.
Surrounded by suburbia on three sides and the Enoggera army barracks on the fourth, it remains untouched by development today. Curlews, bandicoots and even kangaroos continue to visit regularly.
Greg Hungerford, who inherited the property, described it as 'like paradise in the city'. He died in 2015.
In his will he directed his lawyers to sell the land to the Brisbane city council, that it 'be protected from commercial development, that its environmental and natural values be protected' and that it be converted into parkland 'for the benefit of the public in general'.
The trustees were released from any obligation to obtain a fair market rate for the land; one of its few conditions of sale was that the park be named for his mother, Pearl.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
A spokesperson for Brisbane city council says it attempted to buy the site but 'sadly the executors of the will did not agree'.
Instead, in 2020, it was sold to the Uniting Church of Australia property trust.
The church reportedly considered converting the huge field into something like an aged care home but decided against doing so. In 2022, it submitted plans for a housing subdivision to Brisbane city council.
Calling themselves 'Friends of Hungerford Farm', scores of neighbours wrote to the council to oppose the church development application. Many homes in the area display corflutes calling for a 'better deal for development at 76 Kooya Road' organised by the federal MP Elizabeth Watson-Brown.
The Greens MP says the site lacks public and active transport access but is 'ideal for mixed-use development, maximising the benefit to the community'.
A spokesperson from the Uniting Church in Australia's Queensland synod says 'the development application is now in its final stages'.
'The current situation highlights the overwhelming need for more affordable housing to be brought online as quickly as possible in Queensland.'
As a tenant, rather than an owner, Guettler believes he has virtually no rights in the face of development.
Brisbane's median rents for a house have increased from $461 to $752 since the beginning of the pandemic. The city passed Melbourne to become Australia's third-most expensive city and then Canberra to be second-most, both in 2024. Prices continue to increase, due to record-low development approvals.
Guettler's tenancy will be terminated on 30 June, with a warrant of possession issued for 1 July.
Guettler says he feels overwhelmed, anxious and stressed about returning to potentially being homeless.
'We're a first world developed country, it's really becoming so shameful,' he says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Rapid overhaul of Australia's environment laws among flurry of pledges from productivity roundtable
Labor will introduce to parliament a long-awaited overhaul to national environmental laws before Christmas, after an expedited process was agreed upon at the economic reform roundtable. The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, said the three-day event had agreed the environment minister, Murray Watt, should proceed more quickly than a planned 18-month timeline. It was one of a flurry of announcements, including progress on road user charging for electric vehicles and a longer-term process to consider major tax reform. Labor had agreed on a deal with the Greens to pass changes to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act – including the creation of a national environment protection agency – at the end of 2024. But the plan was scuttled by Anthony Albanese over concerns from electorally sensitive Western Australia. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Chalmers said more detail on the new timeline would be forthcoming soon. The changes being considered would focus on stronger standards, faster approvals and more transparency, he said. Stakeholders expect progress from Watt by Christmas. 'He's [Watt] made a heap of progress, and it feels like that hard work that he's put into it is bearing fruit,' Chalmers said. Almost five years have passed since Graeme Samuel handed his review of the EPBC Act to the Morrison government, exposing how the systemic failures of successive governments had left Australia's unique species in unsustainable decline. Labor has pledged to speed up project approvals, including cutting cumbersome regulations. Similar moves are planned on housing developments, through the National Construction Code and work to progress a backlog of tens of thousands of applications. A mooted pause on changes to the code did not eventuate, with the housing minister, Clare O'Neil, instead charged with reducing complexity around the rules. The shift to electric vehicles around Australia is costing the budget due to falling fuel excise. Chalmers said a new system of road user charging for EV drivers represented 'an idea whose time has come'. State treasurers will meet in early September to discuss an options paper, after delay from national cabinet since 2023, following the high court's decision to overturn rules put in place by Victoria. Chalmers said there was healthy consensus on solving the problem, even if a final model was not settled. He said there was division on whether a new scheme should be introduced through a phased-in approach or a swifter model. Participants in the roundtable talks considered tax reform options on Thursday. They agreed another lengthy external review of the tax system would not be advantageous, and instead Treasury will work on options, with some external consultation. Change could focus on intergenerational fairness in the system, incentivising business investment rules to promote growth and making the system simpler. In recent days, Chalmers and Albanese had sought to downplay expectations the event could lead to major tax reform in this term of parliament. Chalmers indicated future changes were possible, but disagreed the talks at Parliament House represented a mandate for the government to act. 'I think our tax system is imperfect, and one of its most troubling imperfections is best seen through intergenerational lens,' Chalmers said. Chalmers announced 10 areas of consensus on immediate reform directions for Labor's second term, covering a huge span of policy priorities – such as simplified processes for trade, better regulations and better recognition of workers' skills and qualifications. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Currently tens of thousands of skilled migrants are working below their qualification level in Australia, with barriers even present across state and territory boundaries. Longer term reforms include more changes to foreign investment rules, a move to more prefabricated and modular housing and new rules for AI. The attorney general, Michelle Rowland, will consider copyright law reform options and guidelines for the technology's application in the public service. Business groups praised the 'constructive' roundtable process, and said they were ready to continue to work with the government to progress the priorities identified by the treasurer. 'It's been a very productive three days,' Bran Black, the chief executive of the Business Council of Australia, said. 'It's easy to be cynical: that not much was achieved, or we should have done more. We've started on a pathway of making Australia a better place to work and to invest. 'There's a lot of work to be done around tax. There's recognition that we need to make our tax system work better for business, and we'll get down and do the hard work to achieve that.' Andrew McKellar, the chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, said, 'we want to see the government developing an ambitious agenda for reform that will drive productivity and economic growth in the years ahead'. 'They've taken a very consultative approach to this. We appreciate that, and we want to continue forward in the spirit that we've had in the past three days.' Employer groups had entered into the roundtable meetings with some fears of a repeat of Labor's jobs and skills summit in September 2022, which they believe was cover for the newly elected Albanese government to introduce major workplace reforms. Innes Willox, the head of the Industry Australia Group, said: 'I still have nightmares' about that summit. 'This was a totally different process, a totally different feel and vibe,' Willox said. 'There was a very clear commitment from the government to get consensus where it could, agreement where it could and understandings where it could – to bring everyone together.' Sally McManus, the secretary of the ACTU, said while there were clear differences within the cabinet room, 'in the end there was a lot of common ground' around the need for smart regulation of AI. 'None of us want to see AI used in a way that's going to destroy jobs. None of us want to see AI leading to theft, as is happening now, of the work of creatives and journalists and also academics.'
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Punitive' new guidelines limit what ABC staff can say on social media and in private messages, union says
The journalists' union has labelled the ABC's new social media policy 'punitive' and urged its management to come up with another set of rules in consultation with staff. The Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (MEAA) on Thursday criticised the public broadcaster for its new 'public comment guidelines' which limit what staff can express and categorises well-known journalists as 'high-risk'. The national broadcaster introduced the new guidelines on Wednesday, two months after it lost an unlawful termination case against Antoinette Lattouf, who was sacked over a social media post while casually employed as a radio host. Sign up to get Guardian Australia's weekly media diary as a free newsletter The guidelines state that employees 'will not make any public comment that undermines your perceived or actual ability to perform your role; undermines the independence or integrity of the ABC or any ABC editorial content; implies ABC endorsement of your personal views; is on behalf of the ABC, or in a way that could be seen as representing the ABC, without prior authorisation'. While the guidelines apply to all staff, the policy document warns that the higher a worker's public profile or seniority, the greater the potential 'reputational' damage a breach of these standards may cause, both to the individual and the ABC. The national director of the MEAA's media section, Cassie Derrick, said the policy appeared to target particular ABC staff based on how public facing they were, rather than the level of control they had over the editorial process. 'The ABC's new public comment policy doubles down on the punitive approach the national broadcaster has taken for some time towards its staff, and appears to be a mechanism to further entrench insecurity within the workforce,' she said. According to the ABC policy, workers whose public comments carry the 'highest risk of undermining the independence and integrity of ABC content' include journalists, producers, news editors and senior leadership. The guidelines, which were endorsed by the ABC board, apply to any comments made by ABC workers on social media, at public events or in any context where comments may 'reasonably' be expected to reach a public audience. The broadcaster's managing director, Hugh Marks, confirmed the rules would extend to messages sent on WhatsApp. 'If you were doing a conversation with a journalist, that's a one-on-one WhatsApp message, then it would be reasonable to assume that that would also become public,' he told ABC radio on Thursday. Marks claimed the policy change reflected a general need for an update rather than being directly linked to the Lattouf case. 'It's a recognition that it's not just social media where comments by some of our people can potentially reflect in an adverse way upon the reputation of the ABC and that we needed something that captured that much broader environment,' he said. Sign up to Weekly Beast Amanda Meade's weekly diary on the latest in Australian media, free every Friday after newsletter promotion Derrick said the union would write to ABC management asking that they 'properly consult' with staff on a public comment policy that protected the broadcaster and its employees. The Walkley award-winning journalist and former ABC executive Alan Sunderland disagreed that the new policy was punitive and said it didn't significantly change the 'principles' that had already been in place. 'If you go to the heart of it, it's simply found newer, clearer language to explain the ongoing challenge between the rights of someone to just be a member of society and have their views and … working for an independent, impartial news organisations,' he said. An ABC journalist, who asked not to be named, accused the broadcaster of failing to consult staff and ignoring the findings in Lattouf's unlawful termination case. 'They have just come out of a court case where they have been told they are not allowed to sack someone for expressing a political opinion on social media,' the journalist said. 'It wasn't a secret, but they haven't consulted on the policy. No one's seen it before.' A spokesperson for the ABC said many people, including staff, provided feedback on the new policy. They said the guidelines reflected the ABC's legislated requirement to maintain its independence and integrity and to ensure its news and information services are accurate and impartial. 'Editorial staff providing news and information services have a particular responsibility to be mindful that the ABC's impartiality – and their own and that of their colleagues – is not undermined,' they said.
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Why a dramatic new proposal could spell the END of cash in Australia in just three years
Australia should phase out cash in three years in a bid to stamp out tax evasion, one of the country's leading economics professors has argued. Professor Richard Holden from the University of New South Wales said the black economy was costing the government $10billion a year in GST revenue - and depriving workers of income tax relief. Prof Holden, who studied at Harvard and was also an assistant professor at MIT, made the call as a key Reserve Bank official this week voiced concerns about whether Australia's only cash delivery company, Armaguard, could stay afloat. 'I acknowledge it would need to be a transition and some people are very attached to cash, but I really think it will go the way of cheques,' Prof Holden told Daily Mail. 'We could transition fully away from cash, I think it could be done in about three years or so - you'd probably start by eliminating the $100 bill and the $50 bill in a year and you work your way through. 'We have very, very high income taxes and if we're leaving several billion dollars a year on the table, by letting tax cheats use cash to evade the taxes the rest of us pay, I just don't have a lot of sympathy for those people.' Despite a decline in the use of banknotes, Treasurer Jim Chalmers is proposing a cash mandate that would come into effect in January 2026, requiring all businesses to offer the option of paying in banknotes. 'They're just playing politics,' Prof Holden said. 'I'm sure that's been focus grouped to death and that Jim thinks it's a political winner - that's fine, he's a politician, I'm an economist.' With banks closing down branches and taking away ATMs, Prof Holden said Australia Post outlets could have digital kiosks where staff helped the likes of the elderly pay their utility bills. 'As far as I'm aware, every town has an Australia Post outlet of some form or another,' he said. He also refuted the privacy argument about governments accessing our bank details, arguing this was based more on avoiding the Australian Taxation Office than standing up for civil liberties. 'The government can't just go and get your bank records without the appropriate legal right to do so,' he said. 'What are we trying to hide? What's the legitimate purpose of using cash to hide it from the ATO if it's not tax avoidance.' Cash delivery issues Michelle McPhee, a Reserve Bank assistant governor in charge of business services, said cash was difficult to transport around Australia, and feared for the future of Australia's near monopoly cash delivery company Armaguard. 'We saw cash use take a step level down during Covid and that created significant difficulties for those who distribute cash around the economy,' she told the Economic Society of Australia. 'One of the great challenges, as you point out in Australia, is our geography is so disparate and we have cash users in the regions so it creates a lot of difficulty to try and structure a cash distribution model that's effective if you have low volumes and you also have great distances to cover.' The nation's key cash deliverer company Armaguard Australia is struggling financially, despite having a near monopoly of banknote transportation The nation's key cash deliverer company Armaguard Australia is struggling financially, despite having a near monopoly of banknote transportation. The Big Four banks, supermarket giants Coles and Woolworths and retail group Wesfarmers last month helped stump up $25.5million for Armaguard that would last until December. 'Armaguard did find themselves in some difficulty - they merged with Prosegur and that organisation covers about 90 per cent of cash movements in this country,' Ms McPhee said. 'When you have one player who dominates to the extent that they do, it's a key risk for the infrastructure that provides cash.' The Council of Financial Regulators - which includes the Reserve Bank, Treasury and the Australian Prudential Regulator Authority - has recommended a Minister for Cash be appointed. 'It's very important that we do not make the cost of moving cash around so exorbitant that merchants can't sensibly access it and then we see those costs passed on to consumers,' Ms McPhee said. The regulators also suggested the government may have to intervene in the cash distribution business, with Reserve Bank data from 2022 revealing just 16 per cent of in-person transactions are done in cash. 'The decline in the use of cash for payments in Australia has challenged the economics of the cash distribution sector, upon which access to cash relies,' it said. 'Challenges in the cash distribution sector include the long-term decline in the use of cash for payments, and a high degree of concentration and limited competition in parts of the market.' Cash withdrawals at record highs But new Reserve Bank figures show a record $104.4billion worth of banknotes are in circulation with $245million worth of cash issued last week. In June, cash withdrawals in Australia were worth $9.2billion. Cash Welcome founder Jason Bryce said this data refuted a suggestion from the Australian Banking Association that consumers were turning away from cash. 'There has never been more cash on issue, showing strong demand and consumer support for cash,' he said. 'The Australian Bankers Association says consumers don't want or need physical banknotes and coins but these numbers tell a different story.' The ABA has consistently issued media releases suggesting cash use is in decline, arguing annual banknote withdrawals had fallen from $120billion in 2018 to $80billion in 2024. But a closer look at RBA data showed the total value of cash withdrawals during 2024-25 was worth $108billion. The Reserve Bank has said only a small proportion of in-person transactions are done in cash but a cash use attitudes report also found just 29 per cent in 2022 carried no cash at all in their wallet. Mr Bryce said that suggested 'that 70 per cent of Aussies carry cash every day'. But Prof Holden said cash was still useless during a blackout or a natural disaster. 'There's a mass power outage: shops aren't going to be open, supermarkets, convenience stores, nobody opens their shop when the power's out,' he said.
