Reeling from Trump rebukes, Europe weighs deeper ties with China
BARCELONA, Spain (AP) — Jilted, betrayed, dumped, or defiant. It's hard to describe the European Union after relentless attacks from its once-dependable ally, the United States. The threat from Donald Trump's second administration against Greenland, its sweeping tariff plans and courtship of Moscow have firmed up some European leaders' vows to reduce their reliance on America.
That has not gone unnoticed in another global power. China hopes for a Europe detached from the U.S. and is sensing an opportunity now to divide the West. For the past several years, the EU moved in lockstep with Washington to levy tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and sanction Chinese officials accused of rights violations.
Now, locked in a trade war with Washington that may be prolonged, Beijing sees the 27-nation bloc as a desirable partner in blunting the impact from Trump's tariffs and to maintain its strong global position.
But for EU leaders, meeting Thursday in Brussels to discuss China among a host of regional and global issues, managing ties with Beijing is no easy matter.
An upcoming summit in China in July to mark 50 years of ties might offer the first hint of new consensus between these two global behemoths.
Europe's hopes for China
The EU-China economic ties are hefty: bilateral trade is estimated at 2.3 billion euros ($2.7 billion) per day.
China is the EU's second largest trading partner in goods, after the United States. Both China and the EU believe it is in their interest to keep their trade ties stable for the sake of the global economy, and they share certain climate goals.
Like the U.S., Europe runs a massive trade deficit with China: around 300 billion euros last year. It relies heavily on China for critical minerals, which are also used to make magnets used in cars and appliances. As European companies are seeing declining profitability in China, Brussels is hoping Beijing will follow through on recent pledges, like one announced Thursday by the Ministry of Commerce, to ease restrictions on foreign business ventures.
'While other opened their market, China focused undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains,' said EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the G7 meeting in Canada. 'This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent."
Now, Europe, already fretting over the trade deficit, worries that Trump's tariffs could divert even more Chinese goods to Europe, destabilizing markets across the continent.
Such vulnerabilities could strengthen Beijing's negotiating position, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, a China analyst with the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank.
'China has built so many strategic dependencies that the EU is trapped in an asymmetric relationship,' she said, and Beijing could leverage them to 'get a deal in July" at the summit.
Beijing's new strategy for Europe
Analysts don't expect a grand bargain at the summit, but China will likely demand the EU lift tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles or even reopen the bilateral trade treaty, the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. Either or both would send a powerful signal to Washington.
But China's main goal is ensuring the EU remains an accessible and affluent market for goods that might not reach the U.S. because of Trump's tariff blitzkrieg. Despite a truce in the trade war, Chinese businesses are widening their global reach to be less dependent on the U.S.
Regardless of any deal, the summit itself will be the message, said Noah Barkin, an analyst of Europe-China relations at the German Marshall Fund think tank. For the EU, the main goal would be for von der Leyen to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, he said.
Whereas she was 'treated rather shabbily' on a 2023 trip to Beijing, Barkin said the Chinese this time will probably 'roll out the red carpet," keen to see 'pictures of Chinese and European leaders walking through gardens and sending a message of unity.'
Sun Chenghao, head of the U.S.-EU program at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy, expressed hope 'that the future of China-Europe relations can be more independent on both sides.'
'For Europe, that would mean shaping its China policy based on its own interests, rather than simply taking sides,' Sun told the German Marshall Fund in a podcast. 'And for China, this means building a more independent and nuanced approach to Europe.'
'It is precisely because most European decision-makers realize the necessity of strategic autonomy that they have made it clear that they must strengthen cooperation with China," said Yan Xuetong, dean of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University, to The Paper, a Shanghai-based news site.
"Even if China and Europe have differences on the Ukraine issue, there is still room for expanding cooperation in areas beyond the differences.'
Obstacles in EU-China ties
China's deepening ties with its historic allies in Europe like Hungary and Greece stand alongside fears across the continent about its human rights record, espionage, trade policies, military buildup and support for Russia.
European police arrested employees of the Chinese tech giant Huawei during an ongoing bribery investigation in Brussels. Czech intelligence services have claimed Beijing directed cyberattacks on its critical infrastructure. And the EU's criticisms of China's human rights violations remain unabated.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine has further disaffected Europe from China. Despite Beijing's claims of neutrality, Europe largely sees China as complicit in, if not covertly supporting Russia's war machine.
The EU recently cancelled a high-level economic and trade dialogue with China, due to a lack of progress on trade disputes. It also has moved to restrict Chinese participation in EU medical devices procurement.
U.S. warns Europe not to get closer to China
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called out Spain for its courtship of China, warning that countries seeking to get closer to China would be 'cutting their own throat' because Chinese factories will be looking to dump goods that they can't ship to the U.S.
By decoupling their positions on China, analysts say both Brussels and Washington have weaker hands dealing with Beijing. And that might hurt the U.S., which has vowed to prevail over China and retain its global dominance but, as many believe, needs help from its allies and partners.
'If we could just get Japan and the EU and the U.S. together on any issue, ... we could outweigh the Chinese at the negotiating table,' said Nick Burns, the U.S. ambassador to China in the Biden administration. 'President Trump, I think, because of his inattention to our allies and maybe even worse, his sometimes just acrimonious behaviors towards allies, has given away that leverage.'
Joerg Wuttke, former president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China and now a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group in Washington, argued that the fundamentals underlining EU-China relations have not changed as long as China does not take genuine steps to open its market and that the EU remains 'geared towards' the U.S., though he described Washington as a 'major backdrop noise.'
'We are not allies. We are trading partners,' Wuttke said of EU and China. 'And, so from my point of view is, what is there to worry for the United States?'
—
Tang reported from Washington.
Didi Tang And Sam Mcneil, The Associated Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
15 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Immigrant couples face new hurdles as USCIS tightens rules after Trump orders
In response to two executive orders signed by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20, his first day in office, the United States has imposed new requirements for another key immigration benefit. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a policy alert on Tuesday regarding this decision, which affects certain foreign nationals and their applications with the federal agency. According to USCIS, this is an 'update' to its Policy Manual, and the new measures took effect on March 3, 2025. They apply to 'requests pending or filed on or after that date.' USCIS changes rules on refugee and asylee marriages USCIS announced that it has updated its guidance in Volume 4 of the Policy Manual regarding valid marriages between a principal asylee or refugee and their claimed spouse. 'We are updating guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 4, on valid marriages between a principal asylee or principal refugee and their claimed spouse,' the agency stated. 'Under the updated guidance, all marriages between principal asylees or principal refugees and their claimed derivative spouses must be legally valid under the law of the jurisdiction where the marriage was celebrated in order to be considered valid for immigration benefit purposes.' Only marriages that meet these conditions will be recognized for immigration benefits such as a spousal petition. Applicants must still submit a separate Refugee/Asylee Relative Petition (Form I-730) for each eligible family member. In the case of spouses, USCIS officers are required to gather testimony and evaluate other relevant evidence to determine whether the relationship meets the criteria. 'The primary evidence for the petitioner's spouse is usually a marriage certificate issued by a civil authority in the country where the marriage occurred and, if applicable, proof of legal termination of previous marriages such as a divorce decree or death certificate,' USCIS stated. Read more: Major USCIS change after Trump's order: Key immigration form no longer accepted Trump's orders prompt USCIS policy changes USCIS confirmed that this policy change aligns with two immigration-related executive orders signed by Trump. 'This updated guidance is consistent with applicable Board of Immigration Appeals case law and other USCIS adjudications,' the agency said. 'It also aligns our policies with President Trump's Executive Order 14148, Initial Recissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, and Executive Order 14163, Realigning the United States Refugee Admission Program.' Executive Order 14148 criticizes the previous Biden administration for having 'embedded deeply unpopular, inflationary, unlawful, and radical practices across all agencies and offices of the Federal Government.' It also revokes several Biden-era policies related to gender equality and LGBTQ+ protections. While USCIS did not specify whether the updated guidance on refugee and asylee marriages is directly linked to the rollback of those specific policies, the agency emphasized that the new guidance is controlling and 'supersedes any related prior guidance.' Executive Order 14163 highlights the 'burden' placed on federal institutions due to mass immigration under Biden's administration and calls for a 'realignment' of the refugee admissions system.


Bloomberg
16 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Slovakia Vows to Veto Russia Sanctions Without Gas Guarantees
Slovakia is withholding support for the European Union's latest raft of sanctions against Moscow unless its concerns about energy security are taken into account. Prime Minister Robert Fico, whose landlocked country is still heavily reliant on Russian supplies, has called on the European Commission to provide safeguards to help mitigate the economic fallout.

Associated Press
17 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Trump grapples for upper hand in debate over damage caused by US strikes on Iran
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — President Donald Trump on Wednesday rejected an early intelligence assessment that U.S. strikes inflicted only a marginal setback on Iran's nuclear program, insisting that his country's spies did not have the full picture and defending his own swift conclusion that American bombs and missiles delivered a crushing blow. 'This was a devastating attack, and it knocked them for a loop,' Trump said as his administration scrambled to support his claims, made only hours after the attack, that Iranian nuclear facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Trump said Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other military officials would hold an 'interesting and irrefutable' news conference Thursday morning to 'fight for the Dignity of our Great American Pilots' who carried out the mission. He wrote on social media that 'these Patriots were very upset' by 'Fake News' reports about the limited impact of the strikes. The issue dominated Trump's attendance at NATO's annual summit in the Netherlands, which was otherwise focused on European security. The White House highlighted an Israeli statement that Iran's nuclear efforts were delayed by years, much longer than the few months determined by American intelligence. A spokesperson for the Iranian foreign ministry also said the facilities have suffered significant damage. But those comments fell short of Trump's hyperbole and did little to suggest that U.S. strikes had eliminated the threat of Iran developing a nuclear weapon. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking in an interview with Politico, limited his own assessment to saying Iran was 'much further away from a nuclear weapon today than they were before the president took this bold action.' Drawing reliable conclusions about the impact of the U.S. strikes remains difficult, especially only days after they took place. That makes the issue a breeding ground for competing claims that could determine how American voters view Trump's risky decision to join Israel's attacks on Iran. Jeffrey Lewis, a professor of nonproliferation at the Middlebury Institute, said Trump was trying to have it both ways. 'If it's too early to know, why is Trump saying it's obliterated?' he said. 'Either it's too early to know, or you know.' What's next? Also at stake are Trump's next steps in the Middle East, where diplomatic efforts could be required to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear program. Trump said U.S. and Iranian officials would meet soon, resuming a dialogue that was interrupted by nearly two weeks of war, even as he suggested that negotiations were no longer necessary. 'I don't care if I have an agreement or not,' Trump said, because Iran was too badly damaged to even consider rebuilding its program. 'They're not going to be doing it anyway. They've had it.' Iran maintains that its atomic ambitions are for peaceful purposes, while U.S. and Israeli leaders have described the country's nuclear program as the precursor to obtaining a nuclear weapon. The episode has triggered some of Trump's long-standing vendettas against leaks and intelligence officials, whom he has often viewed as a part of a 'deep state' dedicated to undermining his agenda. He also lashed out at media outlets that reported on the classified assessment, describing them as 'scum' and 'disgusting.' The intelligence assessment was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, which is part of the Pentagon. Out of all the country's spy services, it's usually 'the fastest on the draw' to produce preliminary results, said Frank Montoya, a former counterintelligence leader. 'They have to respond quickly to what the war fighters are looking for, but those preliminary assessments are still based on information that's out there,' Montoya said. Leon Panetta, who held top national security roles under President Barack Obama, said it's too soon to have a more complete understanding of the strikes' impact. 'Bottom line is, that's going to take an extended period of time, at least a number of weeks, before we have a full assessment of the damage done by the attack,' Panetta said. However, Trump administration officials have been chiming in with their own statements emphasizing the damage done by the American mission. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said there's 'a body of credible intelligence' showing 'several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Trump vs. the media Trump said questioning the effectiveness of the strikes was disrespectful to the military, which flew stealth bombers halfway around the world to attack with weapons designed to penetrate deep underground. The reports, he said, were 'very unfair to the pilots, who risked their lives for our country.' He described the American attack as a definitive conclusion to what he's dubbed 'the 12-day war,' much like the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki heralded the end of World War II. 'That ended that war,' he said. 'This ended the war.' During a news conference at the NATO summit, Trump briefly ceded the stage to Hegseth, who also lashed out at the media. 'There's a reason the president calls out the fake news for what it is,' he said. Hegseth said reporters were using a leaked intelligence assessment to politically damage Trump. 'They want to spin it to try to make him look bad,' he said. Trump pointed to satellite photos that showed the area around the nuclear facilities was 'burned black,' and he said that underground tunnels where uranium was enriched and stored were 'all collapsed.' He also suggested that Israel had sources on the ground in Iran, saying 'they have guys that go in there after the hit' to evaluate the damage. The bombing 'rendered the enrichment facility inoperable,' according to a statement distributed by the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The American strikes, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran's military nuclear program, have 'set back Iran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years,' the Israel Atomic Energy Commission said. In addition, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told Al Jazeera that there was significant damage from U.S. bombers. 'Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure,' he said. Where's the uranium? One critical question is whether enriched uranium, which could be developed into fuel for a nuclear bomb, was moved out of facilities before the U.S. strikes. 'I believe they didn't have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,' Trump said. He added that 'it's very hard to move that kind of material, and very dangerous.' In the wake of the leak, the White House going forward intends to try to limit the sharing of classified documents with Congress, according to a senior White House official. The official, who was not authorized to comment publicly on the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity, did not provide detail on how the administration would go about limiting the flow of classified information to lawmakers. The move, first reported by Axios, seems certain to be challenged by members of Congress. Classified briefings for lawmakers, originally scheduled for Tuesday, are now expected to take place Thursday and Friday.