Mahmoud Khalil: US won't release Columbia protester despite successful appeal
The Trump administration on Friday said it has no plans to release Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil after successfully appealing a recent court ruling.
A federal judge this week had ruled that the White House could not use US foreign policy interests to justify its detention of Mr Khalil, whose supporters hoped would be released on Friday.
"The Court did not order Respondents to release Petitioner Mahmoud Khalil," US Department of Justice lawyers wrote in a last-minute appeal, implying they could detain Mr Khalil on a different basis.
"An alien like Khalil may be detained during the pendency of removal proceedings regardless of the charge of removability," they added, explaining that in their view, Mr Khalil had to convince the Department of Homeland Security to release him, and that he had failed to do so.
The DOJ also asked that if federal District Judge Michael Farbiarz insisted on releasing the Columbia University student, they could pursue other legal options to keep him detained.
The judge acquiesced to the DOJ's arguments.
"The Respondents have now represented that the Petitioner is being detained on another, second charge," he wrote, adding that Mr Khalil retains the option of requesting bail through an application to an immigration judge presiding over his case.
On Wednesday, Judge Farbiarz said Mr Khalil's legal team had shown that his continued detention was causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his right to free speech.
Mr Khalil, who played a prominent role in pro-Palestine campus protests last year, is being detained in Louisiana after his March arrest.
The State Department revoked his green card under a little-used provision of immigration law granting the Secretary of State the power to seek the deportation of any non-citizen whose presence in the country is considered adverse to US foreign policy interests.
The White House has accused Mr Khalil of disseminating Hamas propaganda during the protests.
A judge in Louisiana previously ruled that the US government could proceed with efforts to deport him. He was denied furlough in late April to attend the birth of his first child.
His arrest was part of a Trump administration crackdown on so-called anti-Semitism on university campuses. The administration has deemed pro-Palestine protests to fall under this umbrella.
Mr Khalil has described himself as a political prisoner and said his arrest was indicative of anti-Palestinian racism in the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
6 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
White House reviews SpaceX contracts as Trump-Musk feud simmers, sources say
The White House earlier this month directed the Defense Department and NASA to gather details on billions of dollars in SpaceX contracts following the public blowout between President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, four people familiar with the order told Reuters. Sparking an ongoing review, the administration ordered the agencies to scrutinize Musk's contracts to ready possible retaliation against the businessman and his companies, these people said. As Reuters reported on Thursday, Pentagon officials are simultaneously considering whether to reduce the role that SpaceX, Musk's space and satellite company, may win in an ambitious new US missile defense system. Reuters couldn't determine whether the White House intends to cancel any of the approximately $22 billion in federal contracts SpaceX now has. But the review shows the administration is following through on a threat by Trump during his spat with Musk last week to possibly terminate business and subsidies for Musk ventures. 'We'll take a look at everything,' the president said, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on June 6. In an email to Reuters, a White House spokesperson didn't answer questions about Musk's business, saying the 'Trump administration is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' In a separate statement, a spokesperson at NASA said the agency 'will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' Neither SpaceX nor officials at the Defense Department responded to requests for comment. The people familiar with the order said the contract scrutiny is intended to give the administration the ability to move fast if Trump decides to act against Musk, who until recently was a senior advisor to the president and the head of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The review is 'for political ammunition,' one of the people said. Whether the US government could legally, or practically, cancel existing contracts is unclear. But the possibility underscores concerns among governance experts that politics and personal pique could improperly influence matters affecting government coffers, national security and the public interest. 'There's an irony here that Musk's contracts could be under the same type of subjective political scrutiny that he and his DOGE team have put on thousands of other contracts,' said Scott Amey, a contracting expert and general counsel at the Project on Government Oversight, a watchdog group based in Washington. 'Any decision shouldn't be based on the egos of two men but on the best interests of the public and national security.' Musk's SpaceX in recent years has become a crucial partner of the US government in much of its aerospace and defense work — launching satellites and other space cargo and potentially managing a crucial element of the 'Golden Dome' missile shield planned by Trump. Although Musk in recent days has sought to walk back some of his critiques of the president such as calling for Trump's impeachment last week and linking him to a convicted sex offender — his outbursts nonetheless highlighted the government's reliance on SpaceX. Before reversing course, Musk threatened to decommission the company's Dragon spacecraft. The spacecraft, as part of a roughly $5 billion contract with NASA, is the only U.S. vessel currently capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station. SpaceX is also building a network of hundreds of spy satellites under a classified contract with the National Reconnaissance Office, a U.S. intelligence agency. The contract was a pivotal transaction for SpaceX, deepening its ties with U.S. defense and intelligence services.
Gulf Today
6 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Has Newsom got what it takes to challenge Trump?
Sixty years is a very, very long time in fast-moving US politics. But that is how long ago it is since a US president ordered the national guard into a state without a request from the state governor. The line between federal and state-level law enforcement is one of the many very clear demarcations of authority in the US federal system. It is another hallowed line that Donald Trump has crossed. From a purely public order standpoint, Trump's dispatch to Los Angeles of a 4,000-strong contingent from the national guard, bolstered by 700 US marines, appears to be having the intended effect. The violent protests that erupted in response to the efforts of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to detain and deport people with no legal right to be in the United States have died down. Order has mostly been restored, and thousands are under arrest — whether for immigration violations, for violence, or for defying the city-imposed curfew. Smaller protests that subsequently broke out in other cities also appear to have been discouraged by Trump's characteristically unsubtle — and constitutionally contestable — application of presidential power. If the short-term effect looks close to being an unqualified success from the perspective of the White House and Trump's political base, there has to be a question, indeed several questions, about the longer term. How likely is it that the president's actions are storing up liabilities, either for him or his political heirs? One immediate effect has undoubtedly been to propel California's governor, Gavin Newsom, into the limelight again as a leader of the state-level opposition to Trump, as he became in Trump's first term. And it has to be said that the Democrats are in sore need of such leadership. Far from being energised by Kamala Harris's defeat, to refresh their party and rally around a new leader, Democrats have seemed at a complete loss as to how to combat the second-term Trump. Could the Democrats now find a new champion in Gavin Newsom - and is he equal to the task? Might he even be able to exploit his stand-off with Trump to become a plausible presidential contender for 2028? He certainly seems up for the challenge. Having said after Trump's victory — to the distress of some supporters — that he would work with the second-term president, Newsom has come out fighting over the ICE raids on illegal migrants and has threatened to sue through the courts over the deployment of the national guard. And whereas the last time the national guard was sent into a state without the governor's say-so - to protect civil rights protesters in Alabama — there was an element of covert politicking, there is nothing of that this time around. An argument can — and doubtless will - be made that immigration enforcement is a federal responsibility; that the ICE agents met violent resistance and that they required protection that the city of Los Angeles and the state of California either would not (or could not) give. Whether that justifies federal intervention, however, is a matter that may well be decided in court. So long as the national guard operate within their lawful parameters, which appears to be the case - and so long as the marines are not used to keep civil order, but only to protect the national guard - there may be no case for Trump to answer. What's more, however much Trump's opponents might like to present him as riding roughshod over states' rights to assert federal control, this is not entirely true either. The Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade on abortion rights, which was lauded by Trump, was as much of a reassertion of states' rights as a rolling back of the rights of women. A win on the issue of states' rights would undoubtedly project Newsom on to the national stage. Even then there could still be a question about his prospects of rising to lead a coherent Democratic Party opposition to Trump more broadly. Yes, he was a contender to become Kamala Harris's running mate - had an all-California ticket not been judged a potential liability (which, of course, it was). Yes, he became a thorn in the side of the first-term Trump on a host of issues. And yes, Ronald Reagan made the governorship of California a stepping stone to the presidency. But that might not be enough. Newsom has provoked vocal opposition within his own majority Democrat state, and there is little doubt that Trump would be up for a fierce rhetorical and political fight in defence of his programme. He has shown little but contempt for Newsom hitherto, whom he sees as left, liberal and weak, with an insatiable appetite for high taxes. He is to the great detriment, as he sees it, of California's wellbeing (a one-person equivalent, in a way, of Trump's other object of hatred, the EU). Many of Trump's loyal base will be of like mind. Then again, even if Newsom were to emerge as a politician capable of arguing the Democrat cause on the national stage, there are compelling reasons why this particular stand-off might not work in his favour in the bigger scheme of things. The problem for Newsom is that, even as Trump has been losing support nationally on other issues, support remains strong for his tough stance on migration. Appearing to support illegal aliens to remain in the US is probably not a hill Democrats will want to die on, either now, in the run-up to next year's midterm congressional elections, or in 2028. Trump may also be less vulnerable than many previous presidents to party political opposition. There is some new talk of impeachment (already), but he saw off two attempts before, and anyway, electorally, as a second-term president, he has little to lose, for all the loose talk he might try to change the constitution to make possible a third term. The awkward reality is that Republicans running for office are more dependent on him, than he is on them. Added to which, Trump is not a party creature. He is a one-off deal-maker turned president, who is testing constitutional power to its limits. His Republican badge is a flag of convenience, required by the political system. Traditional Republicans may be counting the days until their party can nominate a real, more predictable, Republican for the highest office. In the meantime, their political fortunes are tied to his, and his sights are set on what he will bequeath, which includes a country with fewer illegal migrants, where America - in his definition - comes first. Gavin Newsom may have a national future; but he might do well to rein in his fury and bide his time.
Khaleej Times
9 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Live coverage: Iran launches fresh wave of attacks on Israel, says revenge has started
June 13, 2025, 1:43 PM Iran's nuclear programme Before the Israeli strikes, Washington and Tehran engaged in multiple rounds of negotiations over Iran's nuclear programme, driven by growing international alarm over its accelerated development. This concern has deepened in recent years, particularly after the 2018 collapse of a landmark nuclear agreement. That deal — designed to limit Iran's nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief — began to unravel when the US unilaterally withdrew. Since then, Iran has significantly expanded its nuclear efforts. As of mid-May, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran's total enriched uranium stockpile had reached approximately 9,247.6kg — over 45 times the limit established by the 2015 accord. Of particular concern is the estimated 408.6kg of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity — dangerously close to the 90 perc ent threshold required for a nuclear weapon. Based on IAEA definitions, Iran now possesses enough near-weapons-grade material to potentially produce around 10 nuclear bombs if further refined. Click this link for a full list of Iran's nuclear key sites.
