European Ministers To Hold Nuclear Talks With Iran Tomorrow: Report
The foreign ministers of Germany, France and Britain plan to hold nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart on Friday in Geneva, a German diplomatic source told Reuters.
The ministers will first meet with the European Union's top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, at Germany's permanent mission in Geneva before holding a joint meeting with the Iranian foreign minister, the source said.
The European initiative comes amid fears of a spiralling conflict in the Middle East after Israel launched wide-ranging military strikes on its arch-enemy Iran last week and Iran sent waves of missiles at Israeli targets in response.
President Donald Trump has declined to say whether the United States will join its ally Israel's military campaign, fuelling concerns that the crisis could intensify.
The aim of the talks between Iran and the Europeans, which the German source said are taking place in coordination with the United States, is to persuade the Iranian side to firmly guarantee that it will use its nuclear programme solely for civilian purposes.
According to the source, the talks are to be followed by a structured dialogue at the expert level.
Israel has said its goal is to eliminate Tehran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon. Iran denies that its nuclear programme is for military purposes.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has spoken out in support of Israel's attack and angered Tehran this week by saying the Iranians should de-escalate or face the threat of even greater destruction.
Meanwhile, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Wednesday appealed to Iran's leaders to work towards a solution that would involve assurances over its nuclear programme, telling them: "It's never too late to come to the negotiating table".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
23 minutes ago
- The Wire
India's Disastrous Isolation Around the World
It is pretty clear now that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will probably not join the elite G7 meeting in Alberta, Canada, scheduled from June 15 to 17. Alberta is not among the cities he seems to have seen so far in his 152 foreign visits to 72 countries in the last 11 years. So, it's a bit of a miss on both sides. However, what he may miss more is not being able to hug the new Canadian PM, Mark Carney (what a relief, after that hostile Trudeau!), the new German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz, and his known leaders, like PM Keir Starmer of the UK, French President Emmanuel Macron (after that dreadful family incident) and PM Shigeru Ishiba of Japan. One is not certain if the glamorous Italian PM, Giorgia Meloni, would welcome a public embrace. As for US President Donald Trump – even he does not know whether he'll hug Modi for photo ops, or punch him for denying repeatedly and vociferously that he brokered the Indo-Pak ceasefire. Best to stay clear of him while he plans how to pocket Canada as the 51st American is rather strange (and sad) that a fortnight before the big meet, there is no invitation sent to Modi. After all, he has been a fixture there, rubbing shoulders with the creme de la creme of the world's most powerful capitalist nations, who also flaunt their highest per capita GDP. It really did not strike his enthralled supporters back home that the USA has crossed USD 80,000 as GDP per person. Even the doddering Japan's per capita GDP is USD 32,000, while the sauntering India's is around USD 2,800. We hope the snobs did not use this tiny detail to stop Viksit Bharat at the club may, as well, utilise these pencil-marked 'G7 days' in his diary to flag off some more trains and fire some deadly guns at the opposition in Bihar, since buddy 'Dolun' Trump will not let him point the big guns towards Pakistan. Where Modi is concerned, everything is mumkin and he could actually plan a visit to Manipur after 25 long months, now that his tight schedule is annoyingly relaxed. Or, he may pose for some grim photos in Pahalgam's pristine but now infamous Baisaran Valley, where the clime is almost like Alberta's. There's some talk that he may actually prefer the sunny beaches of the whodunnit mystery deepens – who could have actually stopped Modi from hanging around and twiddling his thumbs as a guest, while the seven hosts attend to their more serious G7 business? After all, he has been attending these upper crust meets for the last 6 years. According to media reports, Canada has invited the political heads of Australia, South Africa, Brazil and even Ukraine, but not India. A good guess is that pesky Khalistanis pressured the Canadian PM not to invite Modi. But can Sikhs, who are just 2.1% of Canada's population, wield such disproportionate clout? It is believed that many (if not most) of them are not in favour of violence or of Khalistan. Or, is it that Canada's police and security don't want messy and TV-magnified anti-Modi demonstrations at the venue? The Five Eyes intelligence-sharing group, consisting of the US, the UK and its three white country cousins – Australia, Canada and New Zealand – were mighty cut up with India after the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, the Khalistani separatist leader in Canada. Like the UN Security Council, there is a closed door cabal of a handful of nations, the intelligence agencies of which are authorised to eliminate their enemies, wherever they be. Other than the CIA and MI-6, as well as FSS (Federal Security Service), Russia's successor of its deadly KGB, there is darling Israel's Mossad. But others are a strict no-no. This could be a signal by G7 to Modi to start behaving more diplomatically and within his station in life. This may explain why India had absolutely no country on its side, when it attacked terrorist bases deep inside Pakistan – after the unpardonable slaughter of 26 innocents at Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Only two arms suppliers, Russia and France, made some interesting noises, but the remaining 70 countries of the world that Modi has visited (in some cases, many, many times) remained mute spectators. It appears strange as they had assiduously supported India's innumerable international resolutions against terror. Obviously, our foreign office miscalculated, busy as it is in converting every Indian mission abroad into an extension camp for core Hindu values. They keep sharp watch on the many brilliant minds among the NRIs and OCIs lest they speak a bit too much in favour of democracy, secularism or constitutional propriety. Off then go their heads (Indian visas) if the conscientious OCIs doth speak too true. Shopkeepers, big businessmen, street-smart deal-makers and even truck drivers, labourers and sweepers of Indian origin abroad – legit or otherwise – have no such worries from our missions, as most are smitten by the infallible leader and swear by him. Never in Indian history have Indian missions abroad been viewed so strangely – like the Chinese or the Russian ones – despite the superb quality of most Indian diplomats and our long tradition of being a plural democracy. They are, after all, being cajoled into this by their former tribal chief, who acts more and more cranky since he was catapulted to the foreign minister's hot seat. He was selected precisely because he knows his flock and can ensure – a la Amit Shah – that there ain't no conscientious dissenters in this vast global network, that now spews whatever boss-man wants. Orders are orders – even if they mean glib-talking about Adani's dubious deals in, say, Kenya or Bangladesh – the backlash for both of which India faces today. One of the biggest irritants that hapless diplomats face nowadays is to work in tandem with the overseas Hindu Right and the 'Friends of India' organisations to round up Indians and fill stadiums when Modi visits. Nothing thrills him more than to address them in massive numbers – amidst wild cheers. Never mind that the expensive jamboree with Trump at Houston in 2019 has more than backfired and the 2023 event in Sydney was a starkly visible flop. Of course, several specific money-ony Indian social groups go into raptures at the very sight of the big man. But what about the impression left behind among the citizens and ruling groups in those countries? In many, Indians are usually accused of ghettoising and only chasing wealth, with little participation in community activities and in integrating. Foreigners there are as delighted as (say) Bangaloreans would be if a Bangladeshi ruler addressed huge numbers of legitimate visa-holding Bangladeshis there. Think of the backlash – because our external affairs ministry has stopped doing so. It looks stumped when it gets zero friends for any worthy cause. Indians were usually viewed in western countries as a peaceable, hardworking lot – unlike those from the Middle East. Monotheistic foreigners looked on as Hindus worshipped their multitude of gods – with Hare Krishna being the most prominent. Hinduism was seen as a less pronounced or disruptive foreign religion. Not any more. With the rapid growth of ostentatious, overwhelming Swaminarayan and associated temples everywhere, and the 'big bang' that follows, the older, quieter temples like those of Ganesh or Vishnu or Devi have been beaten into obscurity. No one pondered over the impact of extra-loud assertions on foreign soil of a religion that is increasingly being viewed as aggressive and intolerant of the world's two biggest religions. Hindu bashing has just begun and, god forbid, may get worse. The friendly Indian, in fact, the sentimental South Asian community that banded together, is now split into fierce groups – which does not enhance a nation's popularity. Loud protests by a vocal and powerful diaspora that takes umbrage at locals or at other brown people for the slightest insult further alienate foreigners about Indians. Anti-Indian demonstrations are on the rise – against attacks on minorities in India or for reasons that protestors consider condemnable. These were usually viewed by Indian diplomats as an occupational hazard. But, nowadays, the sound and ferocity with which each is shouted down by an undiplomatic foreign minister – to please his new Hindu extremist party, its members and the boss – again startles the more diplomatic diplomats. Not a single country or major leader has escaped the wrath of India's current foreign minister – who usually expresses his unduly-aggressive statements in the very countries he may recall how Nehru's pontifications on the big bad Cold War and the holier-than-thou attitude of Indian leaders and ambassadors were torn apart by both blocs. But now, the world sniggers at India's high flaunting principles and statements on world peace and democracy made by a regime that has the lowest credibility abroad. Not one country is India's friend and even a badly-cornered Pakistan has at least three strong supporters – two of which matter a lot. Trump 2.0 is an unmitigated disaster where India is concerned, but while lesser economies like Canada, Mexico and even Brazil gave him large pieces of their mind — and China outstared and out-dared him — India is viewed as a wimpy cringer. We have no Plan B and we refuse to play the China card to cut him to size. Besides, while the media and parliament in India have been beaten into silence by Modi about China's slaughter of 20 Indian soldiers at Galwan in Ladakh and its continued occupation, the whole world has seen how Modi has shied away from retaliation. He has, in fact, rewarded China thereafter, by almost doubling imports – from USD 65 billion in 2020. India's trade deficit with China has surged from USD 50 billion to almost USD 100 billion. Snapping at other countries at the every provocation is not self assertion, but surrendering economically to China is looked down upon by the informed world – but not by Modi's fans in India and (say) in the USA. India's untenable stand at the UN during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, just because Indian private sector refineries were making a cool additional profit of USD 30 billion in 2022-23, was intensely disliked by most countries. India's slimy support to Israel, that is carrying out an extermination programme in Gaza, may be overlooked by obscenely-rich autocratic Sheikhs, but not by conscientious citizens and countries all over the world. Now, we get why India was diplomatically isolated, as never before. It is puerile even to ask whether there is any chance that the seven so-called all-party delegations to 32 countries may swing the world in India's favour. Some 59 MPs and others – representing mainly the ruling alliance and establishment, as well as some who play footsie with them, may sing together with a few handpicked opposition MPs during their vishwa darshan. But we are stuck where we were. Modi has proved once again that Curzon was a child in the 'divide and rule' game and in one stroke, he has satisfied many whining ruling party loyalists who he could not give ministerial berths. But knowing MPs a bit leads me to believe that heart-burning would lap up the disproportionately meagre cost-benefits of the largest parliamentary exercise in global tourism.A couple of hours spent by these teams with a handful of 'intellectuals' or 'policy makers' in distant Congo, Guyana or Latvia are unlikely to convince 32 nations to clap for India and against Pakistan. The literal occupation of the Kashmir valley for five years from 2019 rankles just too many, as does the non-stop minority-bashing by cowardly religious fanatics. India's annoying arrogance-cum-swagger, which is well above its weight and strength, is quite clear to most well-read citizens and leaders across the globe. It is India and its leadership at home that has to introspect and make course corrections. Perhaps, Dale Carnegie's immortal How to Win Friends and Influence People, now priced at just Rs 120, may Sircar is a former Rajya Sabha MP of the Trinamool Congress. He was earlier Secretary, Government of India, and CEO of Prasar Bharati.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
GBU-57A/B myth vs reality: Trump unsure about bunker busters blasting Iran's Fordow nuclear plant; Israel's gamble to drag US into war may fail
Tensions rise as Israel urges the US to use a powerful bomb against Iran's nuclear site. Donald Trump is hesitant, fearing wider conflict. Israel says Iran is enriching uranium for weapons. Fordow, the Iranian nuclear site, is heavily fortified. Israel lacks the means to strike it alone. The US worries about escalating the conflict. The situation threatens regional stability. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Why Israel cannot act alone The bunker buster: capabilities and technical limits Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump's reluctance and escalation risks Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads As the Israel-Iran conflict escalates, US President Donald Trump faces mounting pressure from Israeli leaders to deploy America's most formidable non-nuclear weapon - the 30,000-pound GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) - against Iran's Fordow uranium enrichment facility. Yet, Trump's skepticism about the bomb's real-world effectiveness and concerns over regional escalation have left the U.S. response in limbo, highlighting the limits of even the world's most advanced bunker-busting Iran's primary uranium enrichment site , is buried deep within a mountain near Qom, approximately 80 meters below ground and encased in layers of reinforced concrete and arsenal lacks both the specialized munitions and the delivery platforms required to penetrate such formidable defenses. Specifically, Israel does not possess the B-2 Spirit stealth bombers needed to deploy the MOP, nor does it have any indigenous bomb capable of breaching Fordow's intelligence has sounded the alarm, warning that Iran has resumed weapons-grade uranium enrichment and accelerated its 'weapons group' activities. The survival of Fordow, they argue, could allow Iran to develop nuclear warheads within months. This urgency has driven Israeli President Isaac Herzog to publicly urge international action, declaring, 'We must put an end to (Iran's) empire of terror… They need to cease being a rogue state.'The GBU-57A/B MOP is the apex of deep-penetration bomb design. Weighing nearly 14,000 kilograms (30,000 pounds) and measuring 6.2 meters (20.5 feet) in length, the bomb carries a warhead of over 2,400 kilograms (5,342 pounds) of high-performance explosives, encased in a dense steel alloy designed to withstand the stresses of deep MOP is guided by an advanced GPS/INS navigation system, ensuring precision within meters of its intended target. Its Large Penetrator Smart Fuze (LPSF) allows for depth-triggered detonation, with void-sensing technology to maximize destructive effect inside underground bunkers. The bomb's penetration capacity is formidable: it can breach up to 60 meters of 5,000 PSI reinforced concrete, 40 meters of hard rock, or 8 meters of 10,000 PSI ultra-reinforced these specifications, the bomb's actual performance against a site like Fordow remains unproven. While the MOP has undergone successful flight and penetration tests in the U.S., it has never been used in combat, and its ability to destroy Fordow's most critical chambers is still Trump's hesitation is rooted in three main central question is whether the MOP can actually destroy Iran's most heavily fortified nuclear facility. Pentagon officials assure him of the bomb's capabilities, but the lack of combat data leaves room for is wary that striking Fordow could entangle the U.S. in a prolonged Middle Eastern war, especially given Iran's threats of massive retaliation and the ongoing missile exchanges between Iran and Israel.'I have been asked about it by everybody but I haven't made a decision,' Trump stated, maintaining a posture of deliberate uncertainty.U.S. officials acknowledge Israel's request for a 'surgical strike' on Fordow but emphasize Trump's red line: 'The end game for us is simple: no nuke… if it's within reason.'The standoff is unfolding amid daily Iranian missile attacks on Israel since June 14, in retaliation for Israeli strikes that killed over 200 Iranians. Israel's initial offensive targeted Iran's air defenses and nuclear infrastructure, exploiting what intelligence officials described as a 'golden opportunity' amid Tehran's weakened proxy networks. The humanitarian toll is mounting, with at least 24 Israelis and over 250 Iranians killed so push for U.S. intervention hinges on convincing Trump that the MOP can decisively eliminate Fordow, a case he remains unconvinced President Herzog put it, destroying Iran's nuclear sites is 'a bigger issue that the world should understand.'With Tehran vowing retaliation for any direct U.S. action, the stakes extend far beyond Fordow, threatening regional stability and global nonproliferation now, Trump's hesitation underscores a pivotal truth: even the world's most powerful conventional bomb is useless without unambiguous confidence in its mission and a clear strategy for what comes after.
New Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Israel-Iran conflict Trump privately approved Iran strike plans but withheld final order, says report
The Iran–Israel conflict entered its seventh day on Thursday with intense missile exchanges between the two nations. In a live address, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei asserted that the nation remains united and would not succumb to foreign pressure. Responding to US President Donald Trump's call for Iran to surrender, Khamenei warned that any American military involvement would cause 'irreparable damage to them.' European diplomats are preparing to hold talks with Iran on Friday. The United Nations Security Council, meanwhile, has scheduled a second emergency meeting on the conflict at the request of Russia, China and Pakistan. Offering to play a mediating role, Russian President Vladimir Putin suggested that Moscow could help broker a settlement - one that would allow Tehran to pursue a peaceful nuclear programme while also addressing Israel's security concerns. Meanwhile, In a video address to Israelis, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu expressed appreciation for Trump's support in the conflict, calling him 'a great friend of Israel' and praising the US help defending Israel's skies. Amid rising tensions, the Israeli military issued a warning on Thursday, urging residents to evacuate the area surrounding Iran's Arak heavy water reactor. The warning was shared in a post on X and featured a satellite image of the reactor - marked with a red circle, consistent with prior posts that preceded military strikes. The Arak facility is located about 250 kilometres (155 miles) southwest of Tehran. According to the Washington-based group Human Rights Activists, at least 639 people have been killed in Israeli attacks across Iran, as reported by Al Jazeera. The group also identified 263 of those killed as civilians and 154 as security personnel.
