The difference between wealth and health
It looks like the only way Congress can pay for tax cuts for billionaires is to cut spending on Medicaid and Medicare. Why? It's like the bank robber Willie Sutton said when someone asked him why he robbed banks, 'That's where the money is.'
Just in case that's the plan, let me tell you a story.
Sometime in 1990 a young man sat on a couch in my house and asked for help. He had a brain tumor. He was there because an older friend of his brought him and insisted that I was somebody who could help him. I wasn't so sure. I was in my first term as a state representative and was just feeling my way around. I didn't yet understand the power that having a title gave to a person. Louie, the older man, did.
He knew not only that that title gave me the power to help, it also gave me the responsibility to help.
The young man worked at a local lumber mill 'pulling chain'—removing and sorting boards coming off a chain conveyor at a very rapid rate. Sometimes, because of the tumor, he would black out, and the boards would come whizzing past him. His workmates covered for him during these spells and took on his share of the work until he snapped out of it and resumed working.
He had no medical insurance. He couldn't afford it, and even if he could have afforded it, it wouldn't have paid for the operation to remove the tumor because it was a 'pre-existing condition' that no insurance company would then cover.
At that time the only way a person who needed expensive medical care, but couldn't pay for it, was to get on a program called Social Security Disability Insurance. It usually took three years and required hiring a lawyer.
He was in a hard place. The only good news was that the tumor wasn't cancerous and would be easy to remove. But it was still growing, and his blackouts would get worse.
I decided to call a person I knew slightly who worked for Montana's Sen. Max Baucus and ask for her advice. Holly Luck answered and I explained the situation. She asked to talk with the young man, so I handed him the phone, but he didn't take it. He couldn't take it. He had blacked out.
When he came to, I gave him Holly's number to call. He did, and the Senator's office quickly got him on Social Security Disability Insurance, he had the surgery and was able to go back to work as a productive part of the American workforce.
That's the way it was before the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid Expansion. There were a lot of stories like that. Keeping people healthy keeps them working and contributing to a healthy economy. If we want that for America, the choice between subsidizing billionaires and keeping American workers working should be pretty clear.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
27 minutes ago
- NBC News
South Korean and U.S. militaries begin annual summertime drills to cope with North Korean threats
SEOUL, South Korea — South Korea and the United States began their annual large-scale joint military exercise on Monday to better cope with threats by nuclear-armed North Korea, which has warned the drills would deepen regional tensions and vowed to respond to 'any provocation' against its territory. The 11-day Ulchi Freedom Shield, the second of two large-scale exercises held annually in South Korea, after another set in March, will involve 21,000 soldiers, including 18,000 South Koreans, in computer-simulated command post operations and field training. The drills, which the allies describe as defensive, could trigger a response from North Korea, which has long portrayed the allies' exercises as invasion rehearsals and has often used them as a pretext for military demonstrations and weapons tests aimed at advancing its nuclear program. In a statement last week, North Korean Defense Minister No Kwang Chol said the drills show the allies' stance of 'military confrontation' with the North and declared that its forces would be ready to counteract 'any provocation going beyond the boundary line.' Ulchi Freedom Shield comes at a pivotal moment for South Korea's new liberal President Lee Jae Myung, who is preparing for an Aug. 25 summit with President Donald Trump in Washington. Trump has raised concerns in Seoul that he may shake up the decades-old alliance by demanding higher payments for the American troop presence in South Korea and possibly reducing it as Washington shifts its focus more toward China. Tensions on the Korean Peninsula remain high as North Korea has brushed aside Lee's calls to resume diplomacy with its war-divided rival, with relations having soured in recent years as North Korean leader Kim Jong Un accelerated his weapons program and deepened alignment with Moscow following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'What's needed now is the courage to steadily take steps toward easing tensions, grounded in a firmly maintained state of ironclad security readiness,' Lee said during a Cabinet meeting on Monday. South Korea also on Monday began a four-day civil defense drill involving thousands of public workers, often scheduled alongside the allies' summertime military exercises. Seoul's previous conservative government responded to North Korean threats by expanding military exercises with the United States and seeking stronger U.S. assurances for nuclear deterrence, drawing an angry reaction from Kim, who last year renounced long-term reconciliation goals and rewrote the North's constitution to label the South a permanent enemy. In his latest message to Pyongyang on Friday, Lee, who took office in June, said he would seek to restore a 2018 inter-Korean military agreement designed to reduce border tensions and called for North Korea to respond to the South's efforts to rebuild trust and revive talks. The 2018 military agreement, reached during a brief period of diplomacy between the Koreas, created buffer zones on land and sea and no-fly zones above the border to prevent clashes. But South Korea suspended the deal in 2024, citing tensions over North Korea's launches of trash-laden balloons toward the South, and moved to resume frontline military activities and propaganda campaigns. The step came after North Korea had already declared it would no longer abide by the agreement. When asked whether the Lee government's steps to restore the agreement would affect the allies' drills, the South's Defense Ministry said Monday that there are no immediate plans to suspend live-fire training near the Koreas' disputed western maritime border. While the allies have postponed half of Ulchi Freedom Shield's originally planned 44 field training programs to September, U.S. military officials denied South Korean media speculation that the scaled-back drills were meant to make room for diplomacy with the North, citing heat concerns and flood damage to some training fields. Dating back to his first term, Trump has regularly called for South Korea to pay more for the 28,500 American troops stationed on its soil. Public comments by senior Trump administration officials have suggested a push to restructure the alliance, which some experts say could potentially affect the size and role of U.S. forces in South Korea. Under this approach, South Korea would take a greater role in countering North Korean threats while U.S. forces focus more on China, possibly leaving Seoul to face reduced benefits but increased costs and risks, experts say.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The unusual GOP alliance pushing earmarks in this fall's funding fight
Conversations around government funding are ongoing. But so far, signs point to earmarks being one of the most viable pathways for breaking the impasse. It's a sweetener leaders can use to satisfy holdouts who want to be able to deliver wins for their districts — and represents a compromise for hard-liners like Harris who think this arrangement might present the best possible outcome for members who want to spend as little money as possible. Harris, who is also chair of the appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over the Department of Agriculture and FDA, has floated the year-long, flat-funded spending bill that contains earmarks — but paired with the guarantee that Congress will also pass several more rescissions packages to claw back funds already appropriated by Congress. He also wants the White House to send over a major package of pocket rescissions that would unilaterally cancel tens of billions of dollars. Unlike with a typical rescissions bill, where Congress has 45 days to pass it before the administration is forced to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended, a pocket rescissions measure is transmitted to Capitol Hill with 45 or fewer days left until the end of the current fiscal year — and if Congress doesn't take any action by that deadline, the money is considered revoked. There's no certainty Congress can even pass a second rescissions request, while legal experts and the federal government's top watchdog have questioned the legality of the pocket rescissions process. But the pitch could be appealing to even the likes of Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), who is chair of a House Oversight subcommittee tasked with identifying government waste. She said in a social media post earlier this month she was uninterested in 'another CR that will leave out much needed appropriation requests that benefit our districts.' 'Funding to support critical infrastructure projects like water, roads, and community projects will AGAIN be left not funded,' she said of a government spending bill without earmarks. Greene's position signals a critical opening for proponents of earmarks — and something of a change of tune for Republicans.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The GOP shift on earmarks
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— GOP eyes earmarks in shutdown talks— Schumer: Dems all in on energy cost attacks— Emergency alerts in peril post-rescissions Vulnerable Republican incumbents and GOP fiscal hawks are teaming up over a historically contentious issue: earmarks. Our Meredith Lee Hill reports that Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris and his allies are supporting the inclusion of so-called community project funding in a continuing resolution — as long as that short-term, shutdown-averting bill keeps other spending 'at least flat.' Moreover, says Meredith, House GOP leaders are seriously considering this compromise as they stare down an end-of-September deadline to avoid a federal lapse in funding. It's a change of tune for many Republicans who have long shunned the practice of steering federal dollars to pet projects back home as wasteful. In March, leadership nixed billions in previously-approved community project funding in the seven-month stopgap bill to appease fiscal conservatives. But deficit hard-liners now want to avoid having to vote for a larger, full-year package at higher spending levels, and they think earmarks could be what convinces other House Republicans to let a scaled-back measure go through. 'Allowing earmarks on a CR is a hell of a lot cheaper than an omnibus,' said one Republican with direct knowledge of the ongoing conversations. Rep. Mike Flood, who chairs the Republican Main Street Caucus, said in a recent interview he's promoting earmarks as a way to boost GOP incumbents in tough races next fall. His 83-member coalition is stacked with business-friendly lawmakers and front-liners who could use an opportunity to brag about delivering money for key investments back home. Speaker Mike Johnson's team is listening, says Flood, as leadership looks to hold onto its fragile majority in 2026. But Harris, who is also a top appropriator, isn't stopping with his demand for a flat-funded-CR sweetened with earmarks: He's pushing for a guarantee that Congress will pass more rescissions packages to claw back funding lawmakers have already approved. In addition, Harris wants the White House to send over a pocket rescissions package between now and the end of the current fiscal year on Sept. 30, which would have the effect of revoking billions of dollars in appropriated money on Oct. 1 if Congress doesn't act on the request. That could run afoul with many congressional Republicans who worry about the administration's steady encroachment on their 'power of the purse,' and are still sore from the last grueling round of clawback negotiations. The legality of pocket rescissions also remains in question. GOOD MONDAY MORNING. Email us: cdumay@ and crazor@ THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Schumer's August marching orders Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer thinks Democrats are hitting their stride this August break on one of his top priorities: slamming Republicans on rising energy costs. 'We will make sure people know why the electric bills are going up,' Schumer told Cassandra in an exclusive interview of the messaging strategy he's reinforcing inside his caucus. 'We're on the same page.' During constituent events this month, congressional Democrats have been highlighting the cuts to clean energy incentives which Republicans baked into their massive, party-line tax and spending package. Those tax credits were established in the Democrats' 2022 climate law, which turned three years old over the weekend. The incentives led to major green investments in red states and districts, but they continue to be politically polarizing, and Republicans rolled back and weakened many of them as part of the newly enacted megabill. Schumer told Cassandra that Democrats are sounding the alarm that these actions will lead to job losses and more expensive utilities. He also pointed to the millions of dollars environmental groups have already spent on ads to bolster this message, which he predicts will be 'one of the [Republicans'] weakest' points ahead of the midterms. 'We are letting people know they're losing their jobs because Trump and Senate Republicans repealed the energy tax credits,' Schumer said. POLICY RUNDOWN RUSSIA SANCTIONS BLEAKER BY THE DAY — Democrats are increasingly doubtful they'll get to vote to put sanctions on Russia for its aggression against Ukraine when the Senate returns from recess next month. 'This next set of sanctions could be more impactful,' Sen. Chris Murphy told NBC's Meet the Press Sunday. 'The problem is, in the Senate, the Republican leader won't even bring up a vote, a debate on this bill because Donald Trump doesn't even want a discussion about these sanctions because he's so worried that it might upset his great friend Vladimir Putin.' Murphy's pessimism comes as Trump left his Alaska summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin this past Friday without securing a ceasefire agreement, his long-stated goal for the confab. Instead, Trump said he would pursue a broader peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine, around which there continues to be enormous skepticism about a successful outcome. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has so far been mum. However, Sen. Lindsey Graham — who has been leading the Russian sanctions effort on Capitol Hill but is also one of Trump's most loyal allies — said following the Alaska meeting he is now feeling hopeful and will defer to the president on next steps for a legislative response to force Putin's hand. Trump is scheduled to meet with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the White House this afternoon. LAWMAKERS TEE UP ACTION ON DC — Competing measures are in the works on Capitol Hill to either end or extend Trump's federal takeover of the District of Columbia's police force. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced a resolution Friday that would grant Trump the authority to maintain federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department 'for as long as necessary to restore law and order' — a measure also backed by Rep. Andy Ogles, a member of the House Freedom Caucus. That same day, D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton rolled out a joint resolution with fellow Democratic Reps. Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia that would terminate Trump's action, with Sen. Chris Van Hollen prepared to offer a companion resolution in his chamber. There's little chance Democrats make headway on their proposal, while Trump could put pressure on GOP leaders to take up the Luna measure — though it would likely have difficulty getting the votes to clear a necessary procedural hurdle in the Senate. FALLOUT FROM RESCISSIONS 1.0 — Public radio and TV stations are scrambling to keep disaster-warning systems alive following Congress' vote to nix $1.1 billion in funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Kylie Williams and Avril Silva report. The impact is widespread. Station managers in Alaska — where news stations serve rural communities and tribal villages — say funding has already dried up. PBS outlets in Northern California towns that send alerts during earthquakes are facing shutdowns. And stations in Oklahoma are unable to replace aging transmitters that provide warnings for emergencies. Craig Fugate, who led the Federal Emergency Management Agency during the Obama administration, said lawmakers may not realize how much certain communities rely on public broadcasting: 'It's important that a lot of senators and a lot of representatives start to hear from folks and start to realize the ramifications at the local level.' The CPB, which provided over 500 grants to more than 1,500 public radio and TV stations, is winding down operations with plans to fully shutter after January. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: THE BEST OF THE REST Midterm Fight Over Trump Bill, Tariffs Starts Early at Iowa Fair, from Erik Wasson at Bloomberg Georgia GOP fears bruising primary in race to unseat Ossoff, from Caroline Vakil, Al Weaver and Brett Samuels at The Hill The Democrats' biggest Senate recruits have one thing in common, from Russell Berman at The Atlantic CAMPAIGN STOP DEMS ADVANCE REDISTRICTING FIGHT IN CA — The Democrats who serve in the Texas legislature but left town to block the GOP majority's ability to approve new congressional maps are returning home to expected defeat — but their counterparts in the blue state of California are preparing to pick up the fight. California Democrats will circulate a long-awaited redistricting proposal among members of their own state legislature this week — and lawmakers are expected to approve the maps and related legislation by Thursday, Melanie Mason, Blake Jones and Dustin Gardiner report. Gov. Gavin Newsom announced a Nov. 4 special election for voters to green light the mid-decade redistricting effort. In the plan released Friday, Democrats have drawn themselves hefty advantages in districts currently held by GOP Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao, Ken Calvert and Darrell Issa. At the same time, the new maps would provide some protection to other vulnerable Democrats, deepening the advantage for Reps. Adam Gray in the Central Valley, Derek Tran and Dave Min in Orange County and George Whitesides in Los Angeles County. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Rep. Jay Obernolte … former Reps. Toby Moffett and Louie Gohmert … Erik Wemple … WSJ's Sadie Gurman … Scott Haber-Katris … Megan Scully … H.R. Bert Peña … POLITICO's Lee Hudson … CNN's Simone Pathe … Bryan Greene of the National Association of Realtors … Roger Zakheim … Elizabeth Letter … Jordan Baugh … former Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner … Bob Woodruff … Jules Polonetsky (6-0) … Ben Wermund … Robert Lynch TRIVIA FRIDAY'S ANSWER: Nikki Bannister correctly answered that New Hampshire and Vermont are the two states where governors serve two-year terms. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Cassandra: Who was the first painter to depict an African American in a Capitol mural? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@