Croatian MEP's wartime photo causes a stir in neighbouring Serbia
Picula, a member of Croatia's centre-left SDP party, tweeted on Tuesday to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the Operation Storm, a military operation that effectively put an end to the ethnic Serb parastate and the years-long war in the country.
In the photo, a visibly younger Picula in military uniform brandishes a heavy machine gun.
"Let us thank everyone who contributed to the defence of the sovereignty and freedom of the Republic of Croatia," the post read.
Picula fought on the side of the Croatian army and took part in the Operation Storm, and has previously publicly shared photos from the frontlines.
Reactions were swift. Following the condemnation on social networks and in Serbian media, opposition SSP party leader Dragan Đilas criticised Picula, saying the MEP "compromised his position ... because you can't be a rapporteur with an automatic gun in your hands."
"We believed you were a man of the future and not of the past. And it was like that until today," Đilas said in a statement on Tuesday.
Austrian MEP Harald Vilimsky from the far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) and European spokesperson for the Vienna FPÖ parliamentary group Maximilian Krauss slammed what they said was "disturbing and politically highly dangerous".
"It is completely inappropriate for an EU rapporteur, who plays a key role in the sensitive dialogue between the EU and Serbia, to post a picture in combat gear, thereby offending many people. This is a serious diplomatic misstep," Vilimsky said in a statement released on Tuesday.
"With this post, Picula has impressively demonstrated that he is unsuitable for this role. Anyone who publicly celebrates a military presence while simultaneously issuing constitutional recommendations to Serbia is squandering all credibility. This is an affront to all the victims and displaced persons of this tragedy," Krauss added.
The two FPÖ politicians have requested an immediate investigation into Picula's actions by relevant EU authorities, they said.
Operation Storm, which took place over the course of four days in early August 1995, remains a contested issue between the two neighbouring countries.
Croatia's declaration of independence from the former Yugoslavia in 1991 triggered a rebellion by minority ethnic Serbs who took control of about one-fifth of the country's territory in the Belgrade-backed parastate of the Republic of Serb Krajina. Croatia retook all of its territory in the 1995 military action.
UN estimated that around 150,000 ethnic Serbs fled to what is today Serbia and Montenegro, and between 10,000 and 15,000 arrived in the general area of Banja Luka in neighbouring Bosnia. Serbia claims the number surpasses 250,000, on top of numerous civilian victims during the offensive.
Most ethnic Serbs have not returned to Croatia following Operation Storm, and the minority now comprises around 3.2% of Croatia's population, according to the 2021 census, significantly less than 12.2% in 1991.
This is not the first time that Picula has faced criticism in Serbia. In May, Serbian Parliament Speaker Ana Brnabić accused Picula of interference in the domestic affairs of the Western Balkan country after Picula retorted that the statements of President Aleksandar Vučić were becoming "more and more bizarre".
Brnabić accused the Croatian MEP of being part of a witch hunt against a sovereign country, saying, "Picula, stay away from Serbia". Picula has repeatedly rejected accusations of harbouring "anti-Serb" sentiments.
Euronews has reached out to MEP Picula for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Estonia expels Russian diplomat over 'crimes against the state'
Estonia's foreign ministry said on Wednesday that it was expelling a Russian diplomat for interfering in its domestic affairs and several offences related to sanctions violations. The ministry declared the first secretary of the Russian embassy in Tallinn persona non grata and ordered the diplomat to leave Estonia. The individual has not been named. "The diplomat in question has been directly and actively involved in undermining the constitutional order and legal system of Estonia, as well as in dividing Estonian society," Estonia's Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said in a statement. The diplomat had also been "contributing to the crimes against the state, including several offences related to sanctions violations," Tsahkna said. He did not provide any detail about which sanctions had been violated. Russia has been hit by a wide range of sanctions by the West over its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. An Estonian citizen has been convicted of carrying out crimes in connection with the case, the ministry said, without any elaboration. "The Russian embassy's ongoing interference in the internal affairs of the Republic of Estonia must end," Tsahkna added. "By expelling the diplomat, we are demonstrating that Estonia will not allow any actions orchestrated and organised by a foreign state on its territory." In response to the expulsion, Moscow said it will take retaliatory measures. "This is by no means the first hostile act on the part of Estonia. I have to say that we have even already gotten used to it," Alexey Fadeev, Russian foreign ministry deputy press and information director, was quoted as saying by the TASS news agency. "We will provide comment in due time as to which measures we will take with regard to Estonian diplomats." As with the other Baltic countries, NATO and EU member Estonia's relations to neighbouring Russia have remained icy ever since independence in 1991. Those ties have deteriorated significantly in recent years following Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and Tallinn has been a strong supporter of Kyiv during the war. Estonia and Russia downgraded their diplomatic relations and ordered their ambassadors to leave their respective embassies in 2023 in a tit-for-tat move.
Euronews
17 hours ago
- Euronews
EU signs €500 million loan to secure Ukraine's energy security
The European Commission signed a guarantee agreement with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) to mobilise €500 million for Ukraine's energy sector. The loan, which would be financed under the EU's Ukraine Investment Framework, would allow Ukraine's state-owned Naftogaz to finance emergency gas purchases. The agreement aims to restore energy sources ahead of the autumn and winter months. Russia has recently intensified its attacks on energy infrastructure, causing storage reserves to drop to their lowest level in more than a decade, local media reported. "These attacks on civilian infrastructure occurring at increased intensity in the first half of 2025 have resulted in significant production losses and a stress situation on the reserves of the country ahead of the next winters," the European Commission wrote in a statement on Wednesday. The energy company confirmed it would source natural gas competitively from over 30 prequalified suppliers and that its contracts would meet European standards. "This is a clear signal that our partners understand the scale of the threat posed by Russia. Energy security today and energy independence in the future are our strategic priorities," Sergii Koretskyi, Chief Executive Officer of Naftogaz said. Ukraine's Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko called it a "record-breaking agreement for Ukraine" in a post on Telegram, adding that it is the EBRD's largest project in the country. "For the first time, such a loan is provided under EU guarantee, without Ukraine's state guarantee," Svyrydenko said. "This will allow Ukraine to better prepare for the heating season and provide Ukrainian homes with heat and light even on the most difficult days of winter," she added.
Euronews
20 hours ago
- Euronews
Zelenskyy warns Putin wants the rest of Ukraine's Donbas region
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants Kyiv to withdraw from the remaining parts of Ukraine's eastern Donbas region that it controls as part of a ceasefire deal. Speaking at a press briefing in the Ukrainian capital, Zelenskyy said Putin wants control over the 9,000 square kilometres of Donetsk under Kyiv's control, where the war's toughest battles are grinding on. He then reiterated that Ukraine would not withdraw from its own land, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. 'We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part—our territories are illegally occupied,' Zelenskyy told reporters at the briefing on Tuesday. 'Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive.' According to the Ukrainian leader, this is what occurred when Russia illegally annexed the Crimean Peninsula in 2014. In September 2022, Russia illegally and unilaterally annexed parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, the two administrative territories that comprise Ukraine's Donbas region, in a move rejected by Kyiv and the international community alike. Zelenskyy learned of plan from US officials The comments come as US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin prepare to meet in Alaska on Friday. It also comes as Russian forces on the ground have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk. On Tuesday, Zelenskyy said diplomatic discussions led by the US, focusing on ending Moscow's war, have not touched on security guarantees for Ukraine to prevent future Russian aggression, and that meeting formats currently being discussed do not include Europe's participation, both key demands of Kyiv. Zelenskyy said the necessity of territorial concessions was conveyed to him by US officials ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska and in further meetings at the level of national security officials. A call with Trump and special envoy Steve Witkoff after the latter's bilateral meeting with Putin gave more details about this, he said. Witkoff reportedly told Zelenskyy that Russia was ready to end the war and that there should be territorial concessions from both sides. Some European partners were also part of the call. Seeking Trump's ear before Friday's summit It remains unclear whether Ukraine would take part in the Alaska summit. European leaders have also been left out of the meeting. The concerns are growing as Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the EU, might secure favourable concessions from Trump and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. This Wednesday, European leaders are expected to make a fresh attempt to rally Trump to Ukraine's cause at virtual meetings convened by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Trump did not confirm whether he would take part, but did say on Monday, 'I'm going to get everybody's ideas,' before meeting with Putin. Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending Russia's war, now in its fourth year. Washington suggested a bilateral meeting with Russia, followed by a trilateral meeting with Ukraine, Zelenskyy said on Tuesday, referring to the arrangement for the current ceasefire talks. Europe is the only partner that can ensure security, especially as they were the ones funding the Ukrainian army, Zelenskyy said, explaining the importance of having their presence in the talks.
