Mum killed in horror house fire alongside three children 'was pregnant'
The woman, 43, died alongside her children in the fatal house fire on Saturday.
A mother killed in a horror house fire alongside her three children was reportedly pregnant.
The woman, 43, died after the home in Brent, northwest London, went up in flames in the early hours of Saturday. A 15-year-old girl and two boys aged eight and four were also found dead.
Firefighters said the mother and one of her children were rescued from the second floor but declared dead by air ambulance crews. A woman in her 70s and a teenage girl, who were both members of the family, were taken to hospital by paramedics.
Speaking to the MailOnline, a neighbour said the family is 'nice' and that the mother was pregnant.
Locals told how the family is of Pakistani origin and had lived on Tillett Close, in the Brent area, for a long time.
Floral tributes were left at the scene, with neighbours expressing their sadness and concern. Bunches of flowers and a blue teddy bear were left near the homes and crews wearing helmets and respiratory equipment were seen building scaffolding against the burnt out buildings.
Neighbour Cecilia Marquis, 60, said she was 'stunned by the devastation' of the blaze. Ms Marquis, who is a caterer at Brentford FC and witnessed the fire in her street, said: 'This will leave a devastating impact.
'I just feel numb. My clothes were smelling of the fire – I had to have a shower when I got in.'
Mohamed Labidi, a 38-year-old teacher who lives on Tillett Close, said he 'can't even look at the house '.
He said: 'We used to socialise together. I can't even look at the house right now.'
Police confirmed a 41-year-old man was arrested in the early hours outside the property.
In a statement on Saturday, Superintendent Steve Allen, from the Metropolitan Police's local policing team in north-west London, said detectives are leading the ongoing investigation into the cause of the fire.
He said: 'Despite the efforts of the emergency services, I can confirm a woman and three of her children died at the scene.
'A further two members of the same family were taken to hospital and continue to receive treatment. The wider family have been informed, and officers will continue to support them at this incredibly difficult time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How actress Gal Gadot became a lightning rod for anti-Israel hate
Hollywood actress Gal Gadot is currently dashing around the streets of London while filming her new movie The Runner. But the surrounding Metropolitan Police presence isn't part of this fictional action thriller: officers have been deployed to the set in response to demonstrators targeting Gadot due to her Israeli nationality. It's the latest incident in a concerted and increasingly vehement campaign. The prominent Wonder Woman star has become a lightning rod for anti-Israeli sentiment since the October 7 Hamas terrorist attack in 2023 and subsequent military escalation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Five people were arrested near Gadot's film set in Westminster on Wednesday. According to a Metropolitan Police statement, in recent weeks 'protestors have disrupted filming at various locations across London. They have done so solely because an actress involved in the production is Israeli.' The protestors were arrested for harassment and for wrongfully and unlawfully obstructing access to a workplace. Just a few days earlier, last Sunday morning, keffiyeh-wearing activists also gathered on Waterloo Bridge where Gadot was filming. They banged metal saucepan lids, blared sirens and shouted chants through megaphones like 'Gal Gadot, you can't hide'. The protestors also displayed Palestinian flags and signs with slogans such as, 'Trash Gadot not welcome in London!', and a large red banner with the message 'Stop starving Gaza'. Officers from Scotland Yard were called to the scene and moved the protestors away, although no arrests were made. The aggressive targeting of Gadot, 40, isn't confined to London, either. Earlier this week her star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in Los Angeles was defaced, with vandals writing 'Baby killer' in black pen and changing her surname from Gadot to 'Greestien' – the latter a misspelling of her Jewish family's original name Greenstein, which was changed before Gadot was born. The vandals also added a sticker reading 'Israeli snipers target children'. The Campaign Against Antisemitism denounced the defacement in a statement, saying: 'Medieval antisemitic tropes like the blood libel [a false accusation of ritualised murder] are alive and well. Parts of humanity really haven't progressed at all.' Gadot, who has not commented publicly on the protests, has previously spoken of her immense pride at receiving her star on the Walk of Fame. Speaking at the unveiling ceremony in March, she said: 'I'm just a girl from a town in Israel. This star will remind me that with hard work and passion and some faith, anything is possible.' But as pro-Palestinian protestors continue to target the very visible Gadot, is her Hollywood dream turning into a nightmare? Disney's dismal live-action version of Snow White, released in March, might have been a box office bomb anyway, but the surrounding political firestorm certainly didn't help its chances. In the PR circus in the run-up to the film's release, all of the focus was on the opposing views of its two stars and their reported rift. Rachel Zegler, playing the titular princess, drew criticism after she posted the movie's trailer online with the comment 'And always remember, free Palestine' – as did Gadot, for her support of Israel. Gadot was born in Petah Tikva to Jewish parents of European descent. Her mother, Irit, is the daughter of Holocaust survivors and, at the age of 11, Gadot was taken to visit Holocaust sites in Poland. Many of the activists now seeking to cancel the actress call her a 'soldier', citing her time in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). However, Gadot didn't choose to become a soldier: service in the IDF is compulsory. She was conscripted into the army aged 20, and spent much of her mandatory two years of service working as a combat trainer, teaching fitness. She also learned martial arts techniques such as Krav Maga. Speaking to Canadian magazine Fashion in 2016, Gadot said: 'There is something special in giving back to your community.' When the statuesque Gadot burst onto cinema screens as the new Wonder Woman in 2017, both reviewers and fans admired that military-honed strength and athleticism. The fact that she is a real-life ass-kicking woman with muscular limbs lent authenticity to this empowering female superhero. How times have changed: now that same history is held against her. Conversely, Gadot has also been criticised by her countrymen for her relatively measured statements. In 2019, responding to president Benjamin Netanyahu 's assertion that Israel is 'not a state of all its citizens', Gadot wrote a now-deleted post on Instagram striking a very different tone. 'Love thy neighbor,' she said. 'It is not a matter of right or left, Arabs or Jews, secular or religious. It is a matter of […] dialogue for peace, and of our tolerance for each other.' In 2021, during the Israel-Palestine crisis, Netanyahu's son Yair unfavourably compared Gadot's public statements with what he termed the 'antisemitic propaganda' coming from models Gigi and Bella Hadid, who are of Palestinian descent. Yair complained on Twitter that the only comparable high-profile Israeli celebrity, Gadot, had chosen to 'write a neutral post [on Instagram] as if she was from Switzerland'. But Gadot has been more vocal and more partisan since the horrific terrorist attack on her home country in October 2023. She posted the names of the 80 Israeli hostages on her social media along with hashtags like #BringThemBack and #ReleaseTheHostages. Speaking to Variety in March, she explained: 'When people were abducted from their homes, from their beds, men, women, children, elderly, Holocaust survivors […] I could not be silent. I was shocked by the amount of hate.' She concluded: 'I had to speak up.' Yet Gadot, who is a mother of four, added a clarification: 'I am praying for better days for all. I want everybody to have good life and prosperity, and the ability to raise their children in a safe environment.' That month she also made an impassioned speech at the Anti-Defamation League's Never Is Now event. 'None of us can ignore the explosion of Jew-hatred around the world any more,' said Gadot. 'My name is Gal, and I'm Jewish, and we have had enough of Jew-hatred.' Gadot, a vocal feminist, specifically addressed the horrific treatment of female Israelis attacked by Hamas, saying: 'On October 7, Jewish women were sexually terrorised, raped, murdered and kidnapped by Hamas.' She continued: 'We were all hoping to hear support from our sisters around the world and too often heard silence.' She backed Israel's entrant in the Eurovision Song Contest, Yuval Raphael, too, who was also the target of vociferous protestors, including an attempt by two people to scupper her performance by rushing the stage. The protests came despite the fact that Raphael sustained shrapnel injuries during the Nova festival massacre. In a video call ahead of the final, Gadot told Raphael (who would go on to storm into second place overall after winning the public vote): 'You've already won – now it's just about enjoying it.' But regardless of how, and how much, Gadot publicly engages with the complex and emotional issues surrounding Gaza, she is doing so as a private citizen – not a member of the Israeli government or military. She might be in London filming a glamorous movie for a six-figure salary, rather than trudging into an office, but she is still doing her job, as are her cast mates and crew. Does her A-lister fame mean she is fair game for protestors to interrupt her at work? Perhaps the bigger worry for the 40-year-old actress and mum is whether this could tank her career – either through boycotts of her movies, or the costs and headaches for studios of protecting her. Disney reportedly had to beef up security for Gadot after she received death threats during that ill-fated Snow White press tour. Not exactly a Hollywood happily ever after.
Metro
3 hours ago
- Metro
Peru Two drug mule warns Britons of 'hellish conditions' inside prison
A British woman who spent three years in a hellhole prison for drug smuggling has warned of the horrific consequences if found guilty. Michaella McCollum, one half of the Peru Two, was sentenced to six years and eight months in prison after trying to smuggle 12kg of cocaine from Ibiza to Peru in 2013. She applied for parole three years into her sentence and was expelled from Peru months later, in June 2016. Since then Michaella has featured in two documentaries and written a book about her experiences – but she's now speaking out again with a dire warning to young Brits about the dangers of drug smuggling and the awful conditions they face if convicted. It comes as two young Brits, 18-year-old Bella May Culley and 21-year-old Charlotte May Lee, have both hit the headlines facing drug smuggling charges. The two cases are unrelated: Bella is charged with trying to smuggle 14kg of cannabis into Georgia, while Charlotte faces similar charges in Sri Lanka relating to 46kg of synthetic drug kush. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Both of them face up to 20 years in prison if convicted. 'I could not do 20 years in a prison like that,' Michaella told MailOnline, 'I just couldn't. And that's what those girls are facing.' Michaella, now a 31-year-old mum of two, recalled her experiences with prison food writhing with maggots, cockroaches, and pushy guards. 'I remember how I'd lay all the rice out, to see which grains I could eat and which were maggots. Back home, it was reported that I'd gone on hunger strike, but I hadn't,' she said. '[My mum would] bring a whole chicken, which I'd eat with my fingers, and there would be cockroaches climbing up onto the table and I'd just flick them away. I mean, they didn't even bother me, by then. 'You become so used to it. And I suppose there is a level of guilt and shame that you feel it's acceptable, even though it isn't. I've got goosebumps, just talking about the cockroaches. But then… normal. It's astonishing what you adapt to, and how resilient you can be.' Michaella says she shared a 'bedroom' with hundreds of other inmates sleeping on concrete bunks. Prisoners would exchange sexual favours for basic items like water, and guards would take items from visitors' bags and never return them. She describes her decision to act as a drugs mule aged 19 as 'the greatest mistake of my life' – and while Michaella agrees she deserved her sentence, she's not sure if she could have survived for 20 years in the Lima prison, Ancon 2. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video She was arrested alongside 20-year-old Melissa Reid, from Scotland, who she'd never met before their trip to Ibiza, and she was offered £5,000 to smuggle the drugs. And Bella May Culley's arrest was 'almost exactly the same' as hers, Michaella said. 'Her mum had reported her missing, then it emerged that she'd been arrested. There were such parallels with my case,' she explained. 'I couldn't help but feel bad for them. They [Bella and Charlotte] are 18 and 21. 'Whatever they have done, it's so young to be caught up in something like this, and I know what they are going to go through. And their families. 'It's the worst thing anybody can have to face.' Bella has since told the court in Tbilisi that she is pregnant. Michaella commented: 'As a mum, I can't even begin to imagine what it would be like to give birth in that sort of place, and to potentially have the child taken from you and put into care. 'That adds a whole new, terrifying, dimension. It's just incredibly sad. 'It's easy to look at girls like this and think 'how could you be so stupid?' but I look back at myself and think exactly that. 'I don't know the circumstances in detail here, but I do know that of all the women I came across who had been involved in drug smuggling, only about 10% were doing it as a business, who knew the risks and accepted them. 'The vast majority were the victims of some sort of coercion, usually by men. Prisons all over the world are full of women who have been caught up in something like this. 'And the men at the top rarely get caught. The men who pulled all the strings in my case were never held to account. 'At the time I was so high (on cocaine) that I could barely walk. Yet the men around me were all sober. More Trending 'I thought they were my friends, but actually they didn't give a s*** about me. 'When you are 19 and 20 you are so hopelessly naive. You don't even know that there are such bad things in the world, never mind that it could happen to you. 'But in a lot of cases like mine the money isn't life changing, which makes me think even more that there is an element of being tricked into it. 'I mean who would risk spending 20 years of your life in prison for £3,000 or £4,000 or even £10,000. Even £50,000 isn't enough. No amount of money is worth your freedom.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Multiple people seriously injured after car crashes into pedestrians MORE: Man arrested after police officer injured when 'car reversed into him' MORE: Teenager and two adults killed in crash on M5 with motorway closed by police
The Guardian
8 hours ago
- The Guardian
Worried about weed: should London follow New York and decriminalise cannabis?
The last time London dabbled in decriminalising cannabis, it brought one part of the capital to a brief but giddy high. In 2001, an enterprising Scotland Yard borough commander empowered his officers in Lambeth to caution rather than arrest those carrying small amounts of the drug for personal use – freeing them, according to the scheme's proponents, to concentrate on more serious crimes. The softly-softly approach was controversial in some political and policing quarters, but wildly popular in the borough – and some of its results were dramatic. Over six months, more than 2,500 hours of police officers' time were saved on processing cannabis arrests, while arrests for dealing class A drugs rose by almost a fifth. Non-drug crime fell by 9% overall, with sharp declines in burglaries and street robberies. Almost two-thirds thought it had improved relations between the police and the community. The Lambeth experiment would end after a year, however, after the man behind it, Brian Paddick, was transferred following newspaper allegations about his private life – later acknowledged to be false. Lambeth's residents may have been dismayed, organising public meetings and petitions to call for Paddick's reinstatement ('He's not a very naughty boy, he's the Messiah,' read one poster) but Metropolitan police plans to introduce the measures across the capital were quietly shelved. Almost a quarter of a century on, could decriminalisation be back on the cards for London? Sadiq Khan this week indicated his support, after an independent commission into cannabis regulation, promised by the mayor in his 2021 election manifesto, published its findings. Classifying cannabis as a class B drug was disproportionate to its harms, it said, and the sanctions users were subject to for personal possession 'cannot be justified'. Instead, the panel recommended, 'natural' (but not synthetic) forms of the drug should be re-classified, allowing Londoners to use small quantities without penalty. They did not, however, call for full legalisation: those producing or supplying the drug would still be breaking the law. The move, the report said, would have the important added benefit of addressing racial inequalities in the way the Met polices cannabis possession by stop and search. Black people are nine times more likely to be stopped and searched by the police, according to 2021 figures – but are no more likely to be carrying cannabis. 'It is clear a fundamental reset is required,' said the commission's chair, Lord Falconer, and Khan agreed: 'I've long been clear that we need fresh thinking on how to reduce the substantial harms associated with drug-related crime in our communities.' As both men know, however, the mayor has no power to change drugs laws in the capital, and the government was quick to slap down any such suggestion. 'We have no intention of reclassifying cannabis from a class B substance under the Misuse of Drugs Act,' the Home Office said in a statement. The fact that, 24 years after the Lambeth experiment, the debate over cannabis feels so familiar may be a feature of the drug's ambivalent place in British consciousness. Legislators may be immovable on the issue today, but cannabis was briefly reclassified as a less harmful class C drug in 2004, only to be moved back to class B five years later – arguably, the report suggests, for political reasons. The British public are broadly in favour of loosening restrictions – but not overwhelmingly so. A YouGov poll this week found 54% supported decriminalising cannabis possession for personal use, with 34% opposed and 13% unsure. Asked if decriminalisation would lead to more drug use, almost exactly the same proportion (42%) said yes as those who said it would make no difference (43%). While almost a third of people have tried it at some point, cannabis use is actually falling across England and Wales – particularly sharply in London, where the proportion of those aged 16-59 who had used the drug in the past year was 6.2% in 2022-3, compared with 14.3% in 2001-2. From a health point of view, discussion of the harms of cannabis is nuanced. 'If you're looking at harm at a population level, the vast majority of the millions of people who've ever smoked cannabis in this country since the Beatles have not come to any real harm,' noted Harry Shapiro, director of the drug information service DrugWise. But while most health professionals agree that a low or moderate use of the drug is likely to be minimally harmful for most people, others are anxious to emphasise the risk to a minority, especially from the much stronger forms of the drug that increasingly dominate the market. Dr Emily Finch, chair of the addictions faculty at the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych), said: 'It's obvious to say that many people with cannabis have no problems at all, but there are several circumstances where it can be incredibly dangerous.' Most seriously, for a small proportion, she continued, cannabis greatly increases the risks of developing psychosis, but even among other users, there can be other risks. 'People say – would tell you – that cannabis isn't addictive. There's really good evidence that that isn't true, and that there is a significant group, maybe 5% of cannabis users, who do become dependent on cannabis use.' In addition, she said: 'We need to understand that it's not helpful for 11- to 15-year-olds to use large amounts of cannabis.' About a third of people who use cannabis develop a problem with the drug at some point in their lives, according to the RCPsych. The drug's increasing potency in the market has significantly increased the risk of it causing psychosis and other harms, agrees Sir Robin Murray, professor of psychiatric research at King's College London. 'People need to know that cannabis, particularly modern cannabis, is a risky drug to take every day … Probably a couple of joints at the weekend is not going to do you much harm, but certainly daily cannabis carries an increased risk. If you take skunk-like cannabis every day, you're about nine or 10 times more likely to go psychotic.' Finch broadly rejects the suggestion that cannabis is a gateway drug to stronger substances, however: 'For some people, it might be part of a pattern of overall illicit drug use but I don't think that's necessarily the case. For many people, it isn't.' Perhaps the most striking thing about Britain's agonised discussions of its drug laws is the degree to which the country is increasingly an international outlier. In recent years, Portugal, South Africa, and Luxembourg, the Australian Capital Territory and many states in the US are among places to have partially decriminalised or fully legalised recreational cannabis use and, in some cases, permitted the development of a new, entirely legal market. 'Cannabis is a commodity, it is circulated in markets and has a supply chain,' said Toby Seddon, professor of social science at University College London, who has researched international models of regulation and advised Khan's commission. 'The question we have as societies is: how do you want to regulate this? For the last 100 years, we've regulated it through using the criminal law. And we've observed how that's worked and not worked. 'If you prohibit something, you're trying to reduce it to as close to zero as possible. And that manifestly hasn't worked because it's still really easy under prohibition to get hold of cannabis.' Which has led many other countries to try another way. Non-medical cannabis is legal in Canada, where the federal government controls production licences but each territory can decide how it manages its sale. In Uruguay, the first country to legalise cannabis sales in 2013 to counter drug-related crime, there is a state-run, not-for-profit model, in which the government issues licences, sets prices and oversees the potency of products. Germany legislated last year to permit individual consumption and cultivation, though critics say its implementation has been hampered by red tape. A similar critique has also been levelled in New York, where recreational marijuana use was legalised in 2021. For a measure of how far apart the UK and US are on this issue, it is striking to recall that Kamala Harris, three weeks before last year's presidential election, pledged to fully legalise recreational marijuana at the federal level if elected; Donald Trump too has said he would support the measure in Florida. Any move towards that position in Britain, let alone Seddon's suggestion that the UK should nationalise cannabis production and control its sale as a state-run enterprise, seems inconceivable at present, as he acknowledged. As a result of that, he said, 'you might think, this [report] is just a waste of time. 'But you could also make a case that these things, in the long run, contribute to turning the dial a little bit,' he added. A similar critique, Seddon pointed out, was made of a major study in Canada in the 1970s that recommended legalising personal use and was largely ignored by the then prime minister, Pierre Trudeau. Decades later, his son Justin steered a similar measure into law.
