Fact check: Viral Durban video misrepresents South Africa – DW – 07/28/2025
Claim: A post on X featuring a video allegedly showing recent lootings in South Africa, and captured: "This is Durban, South Africa," is currently going viral. The post was published by Alex Jones, a US-based far-right radio host known for promoting conspiracy theories. He claims: "This is what removing 'White Oppression' and replacing it with Soros NGO systems looks like. A glimpse into the future of ALL Western countries if changes are not made fast as already seen in the SH!T HOLE blue city's across America." The post had 1.6 million views at the time of publication.
DW Fact check: Misleading
The video posted on X does not show a recent situation in Durban, a city in the east of South Africa's KwaZulu-Natal province. While the footage does show a shopping street in central Durban, as the geolocation of the scene indicates, it was not recorded recently. A reverse image search by DW Fact check revealed that the video had already circulated on X and Facebook in 2021. Comparisons with official agency photos from that time confirm that the footage dates back to July 2021.
The video captures a moment during a period of unrest in South Africa, when parts of the country were engulfed in riots and widespread looting — sparked by the imprisonment of former President Jacob Zuma. He had been sentenced to 15 months in prison for failing to comply with a Constitutional Court order to testify before a commission investigating corruption during his presidency. His arrest triggered protests, particularly in his home province of KwaZulu-Natal, which includes Durban — the city featured in the video.
Zuma's supporters viewed his arrest as unjust and rallied to demand his release, criticizing the judiciary. However, Zuma's imprisonment was only one of several triggers for the unrest. Underlying causes included economic hardship, high youth unemployment, political disillusionment with the African National Congress (ANC), and opportunistic criminal activity. The riots ultimately left more than 300 people dead.
Since 2021, the video has resurfaced repeatedly across various social media platforms and in multiple languages. A similar claim using the same footage went viral again in March of this year.
Dhanaraj Thakur, a researcher at the Center for Democracy and Technology, sees this as part of a broader strategy: "a larger campaign with many different actors sharing similar kinds of messages," he told DW. "Some of these actors that have an intent to create misunderstandings and promote this kind of racist narrative."
The 2021 unrest has been exploited by several accounts known for spreading discriminatory content and disinformation. This is unsurprising, given that the claim implies that alleged current lootings in Durban are a direct consequence of the end of apartheid, — the system of institutionalized racial segregation that governed South Africa from 1948 to the early 1990s. In doing so, it reinforces racist and discriminatory narratives that link post-apartheid governance to urban collapse, looting, and chaos. "We see an undercurrent of racial tensions and a glorification of the apartheid system," said Juliet Nanfuka, a digital rights researcher at the Collaboration on International ICT Policy in East and Southern Africa (CIPESA). 'This is deeply concerning."
Similar forms of disinformation continue to be amplified by figures such as US President Donald Trump. Earlier this year, Trump claimed that a genocide was taking place against white farmers in South Africa — a statement for which no credible evidence or reliable data exists, as DW Fact check also debunked at the time. Billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk also echoed these claims on X , where his post received over 11 million views. Musk, who was born in South Africa, appeals to a US audience that, according to Nanfuka, is "ready to believe negative narratives about Africa."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Other fact-checking organizations like AfricaCheck have also reported on several videos or publicationsthat were taken out of context from the 2021 unrest. "All countries experience political protests and disruptive events from time to time," said Keegan Leech, a fact-checker at Africa Check. "It's easy to misrepresent South Africa because many international audiences don't know much about the country."
In the viral post, Durban is presented as a cautionary tale — a warning that Western countries could face similar chaos if they undergo comparable political or social changes. In the US context, Thakur explains: "It's about the politics around immigration, and the idea that certain groups are supposedly incapable of governing or managing public services — and that similar outcomes will follow if they are included in society." According to him, such narratives exploit existing societal fears, "especially during times of economic uncertainty."
This type of disinformation follows a familiar playbook: reuse old footage, strip it of context, and pair it with a sensational caption to provoke outrage or boost engagement. According to Thakur, this is part of a broader social media business model. "That includes content people react to — like racist or misogynistic posts."
In this case, some versions of the post suggest that South Africa is controlled by a network of NGOs funded by George Soros — a figure frequently invoked in right-wing global conspiracy theories. Soros has become a symbol of supposed globalist threats. "Soros has become a code word — a symbol to represent everything they're against," Thakur said.
While the viral video recycles falsehoods and fuels racial nostalgia, anti-immigration rhetoric, and conspiracy theories, it has not gone unchallenged. "It was promising to see quite a big pushback in the comments that followed," said Juliet Nanfuka. "South Africans and non-South Africans trying to correct the narrative." Still, she warns, such narratives don't spread by accident — and they don't target just one country.
DW Fact check saw similar narratives pushed against people of color and religious minorities living in Europe last year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Trump's EPA to roll back cornerstone of climate action – DW – 07/31/2025
The US Environmental Protection Agency under President Donald Trump is pushing to reverse a 2009 landmark declaration that deemed CO2 and other greenhouse gases harmful to people's health. What's at stake? US President Donald Trump's administration is forging ahead with a plan to revoke a scientific finding that's long been the cornerstone of US climate action. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin unveiled the move at a car dealership in the US state of Indiana, hailing it as "the largest deregulatory action in the history of the United States" and the "death of the Green New Scam." At the heart of the rollback is the Obama-era 2009 endangerment finding, grounded in the landmark Supreme Court case Massachusetts v. EPA. That ruling established the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants — a legal foundation for US efforts to curb emissions. If the endangerment finding is thrown out, the EPA would lose its ability to use the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases, a move experts warn would represent a "radical pivot in American climate and energy policy." "It represents a complete US step away from renewable energy and energy efficiency in favor of full embrace of expanded production and use of fossil fuels, including coal, oil, and natural gas," Barry Rabe, environmental and public policy professor at the University of Michigan, told DW. The second Trump administration is acting more aggressively in just about everything than the first, Michael Gerrard, professor at Columbia Law School, told DW. It is closely following the blueprint of Project 2025, a roadmap developed by conservative think tank, The Heritage Foundation. The 900-page document suggested an "update" of the endangerment finding. The finding is the basis for rules regulating climate pollution established under the Obama and Biden administrations. Rules on power plants, vehicles, airplanes, and landfills could now be repealed, said Jason Rylander, legal director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Climate Law Institute. At the same time, climate change continues to intensify across the US, fueling extreme heat, wildfires, floods, and billion-dollar weather disasters. "Climate change isn't going away. We are rapidly accelerating past 1.5 degrees. There will be additional public health and environmental harms that will result from that," Rylander said. The EPA has formally drawn up a proposal, which is now open for public comment until September. The agency will then review and respond to the feedback before issuing a final ruling, expected by the end of the year. There will then likely be lawsuits. "Groups like mine will certainly sue," Rylander said. The cases will first go to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and could then be appealed to the US Supreme Court. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It could take years for the case to reach the Supreme Court. But once the EPA issues its final decision, the endangerment finding will be revoked, Gerrard explained. "It stays revoked unless a court overturns it." The endangerment finding is based on decades of scientific conclusions from credible global sources about the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on climate change and public health. Rylander said the EPA was "slicing and dicing the statute to try to come up with some sort of loopholes," and that none of the arguments brought forward "really passed the laugh test." Still, with a six-to-three conservative majority, the US Supreme Court has repeatedly chipped away at federal climate regulations in recent years. "So, it is possible that the Supreme Court will uphold this," said Gerrard, who is also director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video One argument the agency is using to reverse the finding is that its economic and political significance is so great that it requires explicit authorization from Congress. And while the EPA under Obama and Biden assumed it was enough to show that greenhouse gas emissions caused by humans endanger the climate, the Trump administration wants to evaluate each gas individually and by sector. "And they are saying each chunk, like carbon dioxide from US power plants alone, has to endanger the climate," Gerrard said, adding that this is much harder to establish. "So, a court that is hostile to climate regulation might follow that approach and agree with the Trump EPA and say that the endangerment finding is not valid." The EPA proposal also argues the 2009 finding failed to consider the benefits of CO2 emissions alongside their costs. Rylander called this "a fallacious argument," comparing it to deciding whether a species is endangered under the Endangered Species Act. "That's not an economic decision. It's a question of science," he said, adding that it's the same with pollutants, like CO2. "Do they cause public health harm or do they not?" Rabe said a reversal would cause "a chilling effect on many existing federal policies for greenhouse gas emissions." Still, the EPA would retain authority to regulate other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, mercury, and coal ash from coal-fired power plants. "And many states are working to address pollution from cars and power plants, and they would do that under state law," said Rylander, adding that "US efforts to decarbonize will still continue." However, Gerrard said, "the best tool they have would be gone."
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Ivory Coast's Ouattara clears path to fourth-term presidency – DW – 07/31/2025
President Alassane Ouattara has amended the constitution, sidelined opposition candidates and announced his bid for a fourth term. As Ivory Coast approaches the October election, the nation is bracing for tensions. Alassane Ouattara will run for a fourth term as president of Ivory Coast, thanks largely to constitutional changes he implemented himself in 2016, which reset term limits. Nine years ago, he justified the move citing the country's ongoing "security, economic, and monetary challenges," which required "experienced leadership." Ouattara also previously said on several occasions he wanted to step down from office. "The security argument in the West African sub-region is well founded," says Alexander Stroh-Steckelberg, Chair of African Politics and Development Policy at the University of Bayreuth."However, the security argument is not necessarily a good argument for extending the mandate," he tells DW. Ouattara's ruling party, the Rally of Houphouetists for Democracy and Peace (RHDP), nominated him for the top job. The 83-year-old former banker has led Ivory Coast since 2011, and claimed in a video message on his X account that both the constitution and his health allow him to serve another term. Explaining his decision to break his earlier promise not to run again, he said, "Duty sometimes takes precedence over a promise made in good faith." Lawyer and analyst Geoffroy Kouao told DW: "It must be acknowledged that this outcome is not surprising, considering the party's activists unanimously endorsed Ouattara as the RHDP candidate for the 2025 presidential election. Although it still caught many people off guard." Last June, during the RHDP's second congress, party members unanimously endorsed a new candidacy for Ouattara, who also serves as the party's president. According to Sékou Dao of the RHDP political council, Ouattara's announcement is simply a positive response to the unified request from his political base. "I always expected President Ouattara to run again," Dao explained. "With only three months remaining before such a crucial election, it would be unthinkable to select a different candidate now. Doing so would even be disrespectful to the party's dedicated activists." The opposition views Outtara's running for a fourth term as yet another breach of the Ivorian constitution, and wants to challenge it in court. Damana Pickass Adja, vice-president of the party led by Outtara's predecessor Laurent Gbagbo, told DW: "Despite all our warnings, it is clear the president's word holds little weight." On Outtara's previous promises to step down, he says: "The president has deceived the entire nation, which is unacceptable. We will utilize every legal avenue available to ensure the constitution is upheld." Several opposition candidates were barred from the upcoming election, despite a joint campaign by the biggest parties demanding their party leaders be reinstates as presidential candidates. Tidjane Thiam (PDCI-RDA) was disqualified for formerly being an Ivorian-French dual citizen, even though Thiam renounced his French nationality. Thousands of his supporters took to the streets in Abidjan to protest against his disqualification. And former president Laurent Gbagbo, Charles Ble Goude, and former prime minister Guillaume Soro were also excluded, mainly due to legal convictions or restrictions stemming from past political conflicts. "Today's announcement by Ouattara constitutes a violation of our Constitution and a new attack on democracy," Thiam said. The disqualifications have been criticized domestically and internationally as damaging to Ivorian democracy and undermining the legitimacy of the electoral process. Ouattara's announcement comes amid political polarization and legal challenges, intensifying the already fraught political landscape ahead of the October election. A planned demonstration on August 2 was also banned by the prefecture in Abidjan. "In politics, every action provokes a reaction," political analyst Geoffroy Kouao told DW, adding: "The opposition will likely seek other lawful means to oppose what they deem a fourth term." Since the death of the Ivory Coast's first president, Felix Houphouet Boigny, in 1993, elections have historically sparked tensions. The country has yet to experience a peaceful transfer of power in 35 years of democracy. The ongoing dispute regarding the exclusion of opposition candidates is reminiscent of the violent electoral conflicts of the past, notably the 2010-2011 crisis that resulted in over 3,000 fatalities. Ouattara's contentious third-term campaign in 2020, which followed the death of his chosen successor, Amadou Gon Coulibaly, also ignited turmoil. Over 8.7 million Ivorians are registered to vote. Meanwhile, civil society organizations and religious figures, such as the Catholic Bishops' Conference, have voiced deep concern about the increasing political polarization across the nation.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Fact check: Aid groups contradict Israeli Gaza claims – DW – 07/31/2025
Netanyahu denies starvation in Gaza — but aid groups, doctors, and UN data point to a deepening hunger crisis. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu denies that Gazan are starving. "There is no starvation in Gaza, no policy of starvation in Gaza," Netanyahu saidon Sunday, during an event with Daystar, an evangelical TV network, held in Jerusalem. His remarks stand in stark contrast to mounting evidence from aid agencies, humanitarian organizations, and eyewitnesses who describe an escalating food crisis, particularly in the north of the enclave. A DW Fact check takes a closer look. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global hunger monitoring body, has warnedthat famine thresholds have been surpassed in parts of Gaza — particularly in Gaza City — calling the crisis a "worst-case scenario" now unfolding. According to the World Health Organization, 63 of the 74 malnutrition-related deaths recorded in Gaza this year occurred in July alone — including 24 children under the age of five and 38 adults. Meanwhile, aid workers on the ground reportthat they themselves are going hungry and Gaza's Health Ministry says dozens of people have died from starvation-related causes over the past three weeks. With international pressure rising, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that he would officially recognize a State of Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Israeli officials, however, including Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Oren Marmorstein, have rejectedthe malnutrition and starvation figures released by Gaza's health authorities and UN bodies, calling them exaggerated and unreliable. They argue that the numbers, some provided by Hamas,a group designated as a terrorist organization by Israel, the EU, and others, lack credibility. However, a new independent study says they are actually too low. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not alone in denying that Gaza is facing starvation. His comments have been echoed across social media by numerous online personalities and accounts that either downplay the severity of the crisis or claim reports of widespread hunger are fabricated. Israel imposed a complete blockade of food, fuel and other supplies in March and numerous politicians — including Netanyahu — have repeatedly said that no food would enter Gaza. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said in August 2024 that "it might be justified and moral" to let Israel "cause 2 million civilians to die of hunger" until the "hostages are returned." "This is the official line repeated by the Prime Minister, his cabinet, and the far-right media," Oren Persico of the Israeli independent outlet told DW. "They either deny that starvation is happening, blame Hamas for not surrendering, or even claim it's a good thing—because it supposedly helps pave the way for building Jewish settlements in Gaza." Several accounts challenge widely shared photos of severely emaciated children in Gaza, claiming they're misleading or lack context. One image — of Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq — featured in reports by several international news outletshas also circulated widely on social media alongside posts condemning the humanitarian crisis. Pro-Israel commentators, along with Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, later claimed the boy had a rare genetic muscular disorder and alleged that omitting this detail was an attempt to defame Israel. While some posts and reports did lack that context, outlets like CNNacknowledged his condition and noted that he had been living a healthier life before the war, thanks to therapy and adequate nutrition, writing: "He has a muscle disorder that requires physical therapy and specialized nutrition, and he faces life-threatening malnutrition as the humanitarian situation worsens due to ongoing Israeli attacks and the blockade." also confirmedhe suffered from malnutrition in addition to a pre-existing illness. Still, a large number of accounts continued to circulate the claim that such photos were being misused to falsely suggest starvation—something they insist does not exist. One widely shared post (see screenshot below) reads: "A boy from Gaza with a rare muscular disease is being exploited to promote the fake campaign of starvation in Gaza." DW Fact check identified dozens of nearly identical posts circulating the same image and text. Our team showed the picture shared by these posts to several pediatricians in Germany to verify the claims about the child's muscular disorder. They noted that the exact condition cannot be diagnosed from photos and videos alone. However, they emphasized that a pre-existing medical condition does not rule out malnutrition, and attributing all signs of emaciation solely to genetic disorders overlooks the broader impact of prolonged nutritional deficiency. For Oren Persico from the accusations from the Israeli government are part of a political strategy. "One tactic being used is to highlight non-representative examples and present them as proof that human suffering in Gaza isn't happening," he explained. "It's like conspiracy theories who fix on irrelevant details to distort the overall picture. In that sense, I would call it a disinformation campaign — one that cherry-picks fringe facts to deny the overwhelming body of evidence, including eyewitness accounts, data, and reports." A similar narrative surfaced around a piece of video published by outlets including the Jerusalem Post which shows a close-up of a vegetable stall in a Gaza market. The footage quickly spread across social media, where it was used by accounts seeking to challenge reports of famine in the territory. "…This is footage from today at Al-Sahaba market in Gaza City, completely packed with food. So much for starvation. The average Gazan eats better than you!", writes one account. DW Fact check spoke with Majdi Fathi, the journalist accredited for the video. He confirmed that the footage is authentic and shows a market inside Gaza, but added that it does not mean food is available for all. "These vegetables and fruits are very expensive," Fathi said. "The majority of people in Gaza cannot afford them. What Gaza lacks are other food items such as meat, milk, rice and eggs. I did not find anything else to film in the market."Other media reports support his view. A BBC investigation found that food packages delivered by local aid groups in Gaza often lack the nutritional variety needed for a healthy diet, leading to deficiencies and long-term health issues even when quantities are adequate. "Until now, meat, eggs, milk, and other essentials have not entered," Fathi said. "The problem is also the high prices. Since the beginning of the war, many families haven't been able to work and have no income to buy food." On his Instagram account, he shared another video showing Gazansat the market complaining about the soaring cost of basic goods. Israel's recent move to allow more aid deliveries has slightly eased prices in some areas, but the impact remains limited. While the aid is meant for free distribution, some supplies are being stored, diverted, or resold. With no clear oversight by aid groups, local authorities, or Israeli forces, the extent of diversion is unclear. Israeli officials have repeatedly claimed that Hamas is responsible for stealing this aid. However, The New York Times reports that Israeli military officials have confirmed there is no evidence that Hamas systematically looted UN humanitarian aid, including from UN convoys—it instead alleges sporadic theft from smaller actors, not organized diversion by Hamas. Between 120 and 200 aid trucks entered Gaza on Sunday, according to UN estimates, with an additional 260 trucks reportedly awaiting clearance as of Monday. But aid officials have described those efforts as inadequate and, in some cases, dangerous for civilians on the ground to collect them. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
