Lowveld murder: Accused out on strict bail conditions
According to Lowvelder, Joubert (43) was granted bail of R15 000 with strict conditions in a judgment delivered today.
She must attend all court appearances, report to the Tonga Police Station twice a week, notify authorities of any address changes, remain within the district unless permitted, and avoid contact with state witnesses.
Should she fail to comply, a warrant for her arrest will be issued immediately, and her bail money will be forfeited to the state.
Bail appeal reveals procedural concerns
Joubert had appealed her bail refusal, initially denied on February 24.
The appeal hearing, presided over by Justice J Vukeya last Thursday, revealed inconsistencies in documentation, leading the judge to request a supplementary affidavit from Joubert's legal representative, Adv Hennie van Rensburg. Judgment was reserved until today.
Throughout the case, Joubert has changed attorneys multiple times, including appointing Johannesburg-based lawyer Marco Lamberti, who later withdrew due to non-payment.
Details of fatal stabbing
Joubert is accused of fatally stabbing Jurgens Nel at Lowhills Farm in the Nkomazi region in early February.
On February 1, she approached the KaMhlushwa police, alleging Nel had violated a protection order she had instituted against him. That night, officers visited the farm but did not directly confront Nel, as Joubert and her life partner Johann Möller claimed he was armed and aggressive.
According to Van Rensburg, officers remained at the premises from 22:00 to 02:00, observing Nel moving through the house, switching lights on and off.
Two days later, on February 3, a group of eight officers, led by investigating officer Sergeant Bonginkosi Given Nguyuza, returned to Lowhills Farm.
After retrieving the keys from Joubert and Möller, they entered the house and discovered Nel's body with six stab wounds to the upper body.
When questioned, Joubert told police she had stabbed Nel during a fight, during which she sustained a minor cut below her left eye and another on her finger.
She was arrested on February 4 and has been in custody since then.
Questions over evidence
The court raised concerns over the minor injuries Joubert sustained, as well as the missing murder weapon, casting doubt on her account. Additionally, it was revealed that Lowhills Farm had been sold at auction, leaving Joubert without a fixed residence.
Joubert attempted to use her ownership of Tswale, a domesticated elephant valued at over R1m, as collateral in her bail argument.
Nguyuza responded that he was unfamiliar with elephant auction prices.
With strict bail conditions in place, Joubert will remain under close supervision as her case progresses.
She is expected to return to court in June, when further evidence, including the post-mortem report and crime scene photo album, will be presented.
Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel.
Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal.
Read original story on www.citizen.co.za
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Can hate speech be defended as freedom of religion? Court to decide in LGBTQ discrimination case
A Gqeberha shop owner who put up a sign banning LGBTQIA+ patrons and ran an anti-LGBTQ WhatsApp group is at the centre of a landmark hate speech case. While he claims religious freedom, the Human Rights Commission argues that his conduct incites violence and violates the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act. The High Court has called for further submissions. The court battle between the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) and Gqeberha businessman Dawood Lagardien, accused of promoting hate speech by refusing to serve members of the LGBTQIA+ community, continues in the city's high court, where the presiding officer has called for supplementary submissions from both sides. While the latest court appearance took place last week, the matter dates back to mid-2023 when photographs started circulating of a chalkboard outside La Gardi Catering Plastics in Parkside. Shop owner Dawood Lagardien wrote: 'LGBTQ not welcome at La Gardi – Save our children'. Shortly thereafter it came to light that Lagardien was also the administrator of a WhatsApp chat group called Our rights – antiLGBTQ+. The SAHRC took the matter to court, claiming that Lagardien was in violation of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (Pepuda) and actively promoting hate speech and discrimination against people based on their sexual orientation. 'The commission submits that the impugned conduct – the establishment of a WhatsApp group and putting up of the sign outside the shop – constitutes hate speech. In this regard it must be recalled that the respondent has admitted to putting up the sign and establishing the WhatsApp group, so it is common cause that impugned conduct is attributable to him,' the SAHRC's heads of argument read. It further argued that Lagardien's sign offered no reasons for banning people from his shop and simply promoted discrimination. The commission also quoted messages shared on Lagardien's WhatsApp group, claiming clear Pepuda violations, hate speech and incitement to violence. One message read: 'LGBTQ is a blatant attack on Islam. Force is the only option… If only I had a powerful group to crush these sodomists […] and crush these evil vermin from.' As part of its claim, the SAHRC calls on Lagardien to issue a public apology to the LGBTQIA+ community and damages in the amount of R500,000 be paid to an NGO yet to be identified. In his responding documents, Lagardien does not deny putting up the sign or starting the chat group, but argues that he did not violate Pepuda, and rather that he was exercising his right to religious freedom as a devout Muslim. 'As part of his beliefs regarding Islam, he believes that same-sex relationships are un-Islamic and amoral. He also holds the belief that, under his faith, he is obliged to take steps to prevent children from being exposed to what his faith and spiritual beliefs dictate is amoral behaviour,' his responding heads of argument read. In addition to opposing the SAHRC application, Lagardien also brought a counter-application, alleging that the commission's investigation was defective and it failed to discharge its duties under the South African Human Rights Commissions Act. He recounted an incident in June 2023 where two homosexual men allegedly entered his store and engaged in 'sexually inappropriate behaviour' by kissing and touching each other's genitals in front of Muslim customers and their young children. When asked to leave the store, the men allegedly told Lagardien they could do as they pleased during Pride Month. He alleged that the following day his daughter was threatened by two men from the LGBTQ+ community inside the store, and further threats of violence followed when Lagardien requested that they leave the store. This incident prompted him to post the disputed sign outside his store. Days later he found the sign had been destroyed. He stated that the WhatsApp group was created to 'alert members of his community to the threats and intimidation from the LGBTQ community'and to communicate Islamic teachings on homosexuality. While he claimed no messages to incite violence were ever sent on the group, he also stated that none of the screenshots of messages contained in the SAHRC's documents were linked to his phone number or WhatsApp account. The group has since been closed, and Lagardien reiterated that the sign outside his shop had been destroyed in response to claims that he refused to remove it. Lagardien argues the SAHRC's claim against him violates his right to freedom of religion, while the SAHRC states that his conduct goes far beyond the Islamic stance against homosexuality. The matter returned to the Gqeberha High Court last Monday, 28 July 2025. The court determined that SAHRC, represented by Advocate Siphelo Mbeki, and Lagardien, represented by Advocate Feroze Boda, must submit supplementary heads of argument in the next few weeks before a final judgment can be made. DM
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
R446,000 cash and Toyota Fortuner forfeited as driver fails to explain money's origins
Jonisayi Maromo | Published 5 hours ago The High Court in Limpopo has granted a forfeiture order for a cash amount of R446,000 and a Toyota Fortuner sport utility vehicle, which were seized by police. The Hawks' asset forfeiture investigation unit and the National Prosecuting Authority's asset forfeiture unit (AFU) worked tirelessly to ensure the forfeiture of the money and the vehicle. 'This emanates from the arrest conducted by members of the South African Police Service attached to Musina in 2024. On 4 July 2024, police conducted a stop and search operation along the N1 road in Musina,' said Warrant Officer Lethunya Mmuroa, provincial spokesperson for the Hawks in Limpopo. During the operation, the police officers stopped the Toyota Fortuner which was driven by a foreign national. 'During a search, police found a plastic bag that contained South African bank notes underneath blankets inside the boot. Police interviewed the driver, and he failed to give a clear explanation for carrying the large amount of money inside the vehicle,' said Mmuroa. The driver was immediately arrested and the money was seized. The Hawks' asset forfeiture investigation unit was consulted for asset investigation. 'After completion of the investigations, the Hawks referred the matter to the National Prosecuting Authority's asset forfeiture unit for further handling. Following court processes, the High Court in Limpopo granted a preservation order for the Toyota Fortuner and the money in February, before the forfeiture order was granted last week. 'The cash was deposited into the criminal asset recovery account on 29 July. The forfeited Toyota Fortuner is about to be sold on auction,' said Mmuroa. Earlier this year, IOL reported that a 49-year-old man was arrested on charges of money laundering after being found in possession of about R1.2 million in cash. At the time, provincial police spokesperson in Mpumalanga, Lieutenant Colonel Jabu Ndubane, said the arrested man had allegedly tried to bribe police officers after the money was found. 'This achievement is the result of the dedication by members deployed for Operation Vala Umgodi, and the man was nabbed on 16 March 2025 at Tonga near Komatipoort,' said Ndubane. She said police officers received a tip-off about a man who was allegedly in possession of an unlicenced firearm. 'They then responded swiftly and followed the information, and upon arrival at Tonga View, they found the owner of the house and conducted a search and it was during that time when they discovered the large sum of money hidden under the bed as well as inside the wardrobe,' said Ndubane. 'The astute members continued searching in other rooms where they further found a bag full of money. It was during the process when the man tried his luck to bribe the police officials with R50,000, but his attempts failed dismally.' Ndubane said the money amounted to R1.2 million in banknotes and coins, while there was also Mozambican currency. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL News
18 hours ago
- IOL News
R446,000 cash and Toyota Fortuner forfeited to the State as driver fails to explain money's origins
Police in Limpopo searched a Toyota Fortuner driven by a Zimbabwean national on the N1 freeway and found R446,000 in a bag, which was then seized by the law enforcement authorities. Image: SAPS The High Court in Limpopo has granted a forfeiture order for a cash amount of R446,000 and a Toyota Fortuner sport utility vehicle, which were seized by police. The Hawks' asset forfeiture investigation unit and the National Prosecuting Authority's asset forfeiture unit (AFU) worked tirelessly to ensure the forfeiture of the money and the vehicle. 'This emanates from the arrest conducted by members of the South African Police Service attached to Musina in 2024. On 4 July 2024, police conducted a stop and search operation along the N1 road in Musina,' said Warrant Officer Lethunya Mmuroa, provincial spokesperson for the Hawks in Limpopo. During the operation, the police officers stopped the Toyota Fortuner which was driven by a foreign national. 'During a search, police found a plastic bag that contained South African bank notes underneath blankets inside the boot. Police interviewed the driver, and he failed to give a clear explanation for carrying the large amount of money inside the vehicle,' said Mmuroa. The driver was immediately arrested and the money was seized. The Hawks' asset forfeiture investigation unit was consulted for asset investigation. 'After completion of the investigations, the Hawks referred the matter to the National Prosecuting Authority's asset forfeiture unit for further handling. Following court processes, the High Court in Limpopo granted a preservation order for the Toyota Fortuner and the money in February, before the forfeiture order was granted last week. 'The cash was deposited into the criminal asset recovery account on 29 July. The forfeited Toyota Fortuner is about to be sold on auction,' said Mmuroa. Earlier this year, IOL reported that a 49-year-old man was arrested on charges of money laundering after being found in possession of about R1.2 million in cash. At the time, provincial police spokesperson in Mpumalanga, Lieutenant Colonel Jabu Ndubane, said the arrested man had allegedly tried to bribe police officers after the money was found. 'This achievement is the result of the dedication by members deployed for Operation Vala Umgodi, and the man was nabbed on 16 March 2025 at Tonga near Komatipoort,' said Ndubane. She said police officers received a tip-off about a man who was allegedly in possession of an unlicenced firearm. 'They then responded swiftly and followed the information, and upon arrival at Tonga View, they found the owner of the house and conducted a search and it was during that time when they discovered the large sum of money hidden under the bed as well as inside the wardrobe,' said Ndubane. 'The astute members continued searching in other rooms where they further found a bag full of money. It was during the process when the man tried his luck to bribe the police officials with R50,000, but his attempts failed dismally.' Ndubane said the money amounted to R1.2 million in banknotes and coins, while there was also Mozambican currency. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
