Watchdog probes Springbank baron over nuclear firm meeting
READ MORE:
Lord Duncan, who has also served as a junior climate minister, has been an adviser to Terrestrial Energy since 2020.
The company is developing a new type of nuclear reactor it claims can be built more quickly and cheaply than traditional power stations.
Although Lord Duncan has not received a salary for the role, he has been granted share options—allowing him to buy company shares at a preferential rate if the business becomes profitable.
Documents released under freedom of information legislation show that, in 2023, Lord Duncan forwarded a letter from Terrestrial Energy's chief executive, Simon Irish, to Mr Bowie.
In the letter, Mr Irish requested a meeting with the minister to introduce himself and brief him on the firm's products. He noted that, alongside a partner, the company had 'applied for a grant from [the] UK's nuclear fuel fund programme'.
In his accompanying email, Lord Duncan wrote: 'Sorry this letter has taken so long to get to you … The chap in question is in town week commencing 1 May, if you have any availability. I realise it's short notice but I thought it might be better than a Zoom. Good to see your youngster bobbing up on my timeline beaming away merrily. Please pass on my best wishes to [name redacted].'
A Whitehall official later replied confirming that Mr Bowie 'would be pleased' to meet Mr Irish and asked for his contact details.
The House of Lords Commissioners for Standards' website confirms that Lord Duncan is under investigation for a 'potential breach' of paragraph 9(d) of the 12th edition of the House of Lords Code of Conduct, which states that "Members must not seek to profit from membership of the House by accepting or agreeing to accept payment or other incentive or reward in return for providing parliamentary advice or services."
Responding to the Guardian last month, Lord Duncan denied breaching any rules, describing the meeting as a 'continuation of the dialogue' between Terrestrial Energy and the UK Government.
'In forwarding on this letter to Andrew Bowie, I was introducing a representative from a company already known to the government and with whom the representatives of the government had met previously,' he said.
Lord Duncan added that he had not received any additional share options or remuneration since 2020. 'Such options in private companies have no value when granted, and only have prospective value on an exit, which is entirely uncertain, and may be many years after the grant.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ITV News
8 hours ago
- ITV News
Minister rejects claim that recognising Palestinian state would break international law
A minister has rejected claims that plans to recognise a Palestinian state would break international law. Business minister Gareth Thomas told ITV News that the decision is a 'political judgement', after a group of peers raised concerns about the prime minister's announcement. Some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, have written to Attorney General Lord Hermer. As first reported by The Times newspaper, the peers warned Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. "I obviously respect what those lawyers and colleagues in the Lords have written, but I don't agree," Thomas told ITV News. "Over 140 countries have already recognised the state of Palestine. "And in the end, it is a political judgement that has to be made about whether to recognise a state or not. "The prime minister has been very clear this week and certainly has led the way in conversations with countries such as Canada, which have also just confirmed their intention to recognise the state of Palestine." Thomas said that the UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September at the UN General Assembly, "unless there is an end to the violence, unless the aid that is necessary gets in, and unless Israel commits to a two-state solution." In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government, as Hamas and Fatah are enemies. Lord Hermer has previously insisted that a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the government's approach to foreign policy. Among the respected lawyers who have signed the letter are Lord Pannick, who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda scheme, as well as KCs Lord Verdirame and Lord Faulks. Some of the British-Israeli hostages, including Emily Damari, have also criticised Starmer over the government's plans. In a post on X, Damari said the move "does not advance peace - it risks rewarding terror". In response, Starmer told ITV News he does "particularly listen" to hostages. 'I particularly listen to the hostages, Emily Damari, who I have spoken to, – I've met her mother a number of times, and they've been through the most awful, awful experience for Emily and for her mother," he said. 'And that's why I've been absolutely clear and steadfast that we must have the remaining hostages released. "That's been our position throughout and I absolutely understand the unimaginable horror that Emily went through." He continued: "Alongside that, we do need to do everything we can to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where we are seeing here children and babies starving for want of aid which could be delivered. "And that is why I've said that unless things materially change on the ground, and we'll have to assess this in September, we will recognise Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly in September."
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Hermer dismisses Palestine challenge by top lawyers
Lord Hermer has rejected claims that recognising Palestine as a state is illegal, despite 40 peers warning the opposite, The Telegraph understands. The Attorney General was directly challenged in a letter questioning the legality of Sir Keir Starmer's plan to recognise the Palestinian state formally in September. The signatories from the House of Lords argue that a Palestinian state would not meet the criteria for recognition laid out in the so-called Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. But it is understood Lord Hermer, a close personal friend of the Prime Minister since their days as fellow lawyers, does not agree with the arguments put forward. The Attorney General's position would likely be reflected in any legal advice issued to Sir Keir before the change in position was unveiled on Tuesday. A spokesman for Lord Hermer's office declined to comment, citing the long-standing convention not to disclose whether legal advice may or may not exist on particular issues. The Prime Minister said he would recognise Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel meets four conditions. He wants Israel to end the 'appalling' situation in Gaza and allow the UN to restart the supply of aid; reach a ceasefire; 'make clear' there will be no annexation in the West Bank; and commit to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution. Sir Keir also repeated calls for Hamas to release all remaining hostages captured on October 7, but that demand was not made an explicit condition for recognition to take place. That position has become a focal point for critics who argue it could provide an incentive for Hamas not to release hostages, since a ceasefire would, under the UK position, help block Palestinian statehood. The letter to Lord Hermer from the 40 peers, including prominent Israel supporters, first reported by The Times, argued that the Government's approach risked breaking international law. The signatories wrote: 'We call on you to advise him [Starmer] that this would be contrary to international law. 'You are on record as saying that a commitment to international law goes absolutely to the heart of this Government and its approach to foreign policy. 'You have said that a selective 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law. We look forward to your response.' The Montevideo Convention, signed in the Uruguayan capital, named four criteria for statehood in international law: that a state has a defined territory, a permanent population, a government and the capacity to enter into diplomatic relations with other states. The signatories questioned whether these four tests had been met. Lord Pannick, who represented the Government in the legal tussles over the Rwanda deportation scheme, put his name to the letter. So too did Lord Faulks KC, a prominent human rights lawyer, Lord Collins of Mapesbury, a former Supreme Court judge, and Lord Walney, the Government's former adviser on political violence and disruption. A spokesman for the Attorney General's office said: 'The Attorney General is the Government's chief legal adviser but, by long-standing convention, the fact he may have advised or not advised, and the content of his advice, is not disclosed outside government, as is reflected in the ministerial code. 'Decisions on policy are taken by the relevant Secretary of State and Departments as has been the case under successive governments.'
Rhyl Journal
9 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
PM says he ‘particularly' listens to hostages after Palestine backlash
The Prime Minister said there is a 'need to do everything we can to alleviate the human catastrophe in Gaza' after Emily Damari accused him of 'moral failure' over the move. Ms Damari said that Sir Keir is 'not standing on the right side of history' and that she was 'deeply saddened' by the decision. As well as Ms Damari's criticism, Wednesday also saw a group of peers warn that the pledge could break international law. Speaking to ITV West Country while on a visit to Swindon on Thursday, the Prime Minister said: 'I particularly listen to the hostages, Emily Damari, who I have spoken to, – I've met her mother a number of times, and they've been through the most awful, awful experience for Emily and for her mother. 'And that's why I've been absolutely clear and steadfast that we must have the remaining hostages released. That's been our position throughout and I absolutely understand the unimaginable horror that Emily went through. 'Alongside that, we do need to do everything we can to alleviate the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, where we are seeing the children and babies starving for want of aid which could be delivered. 'That is why I've said unless things materially change on the ground, we'll have to assess this in September, we will recognise Palestine before the United Nations General Assembly in September.' It comes as some 38 members of the House of Lords, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, wrote to Attorney General Lord Hermer. As first reported by the Times newspaper, the peers warned Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to recognise Palestine may breach international law as the territory may not meet the criteria for statehood under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. Business minister Gareth Thomas described the decision as a 'political judgment' and said ministers 'believe it is' compliant with international law. He told Times Radio 'In the end, recognition of another state is a political judgment and over 140 countries have already recognised Palestine, and we're determined to do so in September if Israel does not end the violence in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and agree to a lasting route towards a two-state solution, and to no annexation in the West Bank.' In their letter to Lord Hermer, the peers said Palestine 'does not meet the international law criteria for recognition of a state, namely, defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states'. There is no certainty over the borders of Palestine, they said, and no single government as Hamas and Fatah are enemies. In their letter, seen by the PA news agency, the peers added: 'You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the Government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law.' Lord Hermer has previously insisted a commitment to international law 'goes absolutely to the heart' of the Government's approach to foreign policy. Sir Keir announced earlier this week that the UK could take the step of recognising Palestine in September ahead of a gathering at the UN. The UK will only refrain from doing so if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months, the Prime Minister said.
