Opponents of assisted dying vow to fight on as MPs back Bill
Opponents of assisted dying have urged the House of Lords to give Kim Leadbeater's Bill 'the scrutiny that it needs' after MPs narrowly backed the legislation.
Ms Leadbeater's Bill passed what could be its final Commons hurdle by 23 votes, down from the majority of 55 it secured when MPs first voted on it in November.
The Spen Valley MP declared 'thank goodness' after the result while Rebecca Wilcox, daughter of campaigner Dame Esther Rantzen, said it was 'wonderful' the result had come ahead of her mother's birthday.
But opponents vowed to fight on against what they called a 'deeply flawed Bill'.
A group of 27 Labour MPs who voted against the legislation said: 'We were elected to represent both of those groups and are still deeply concerned about the risks in this Bill of coercion of the old and discrimination against the disabled, people with anorexia and black, Asian and minority ethnic people, who we know do not receive equitable health care.
'As the Bill moves to the House of Lords it must receive the scrutiny that it needs. Not about the principles of assisted dying but its application in this deeply flawed Bill.'
But Ms Leadbeater told the PA news agency she hoped there would be no 'funny games' in the Lords, as her Bill faces further tough hurdles in the upper chamber.
She added: 'I would be upset to think that anybody was playing games with such an important and such an emotional issue.'
Meanwhile, one of the leading opponents of the Bill, Conservative Danny Kruger, described its supporters as 'enemies', saying he felt 'like Evelyn Waugh at the time of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939'.
In a series of tweets on Friday night, the East Wiltshire MP accused assisted dying campaigners of being 'militant anti-Christians' who had failed to 'engage with the detail of the Bill'.
He added: 'It's the revenge of the middle-aged against their dependents.'
Ms Leadbeater's Terminally Ill Adults (End Of Life) Bill will now proceed to the House of Lords, where it will undergo further scrutiny before becoming law, should peers decide to back the legislation.
But some peers have already spoken out against the legislation, with the Bishop of London, Dame Sarah Mullally, saying they 'must oppose' the Bill as 'unworkable and unsafe'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Why Taxing the UK's Rich Less May Make Sense
The Laffer Curve does exist. You may not want it to, but it does. The UK's political class is in the process of learning this lesson. One of the first things Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves did was to make the global assets of those living in the UK but domiciled elsewhere for tax purposes (the 'non-doms') subject to UK inheritance tax. Those people have responded to that incentive exactly as one might expect. They are leaving. Exact numbers aren't available, but many financial advisers will tell you of their fast-vanishing high-net worth clients—heading for the United Arab Emirates, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Malta and maybe even the US (there are some 70,000 applications for information on the new ' gold Trump card ' visa, apparently). Henley and Partners, a global relocation company, backs this up. It reports that inquiries on how to become a resident elsewhere were three times higher in the first three months of 2025 than the same period in 2024.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'You cannot take away choice from girls'- reactions to possible school skirt ban
A GROWING number of schools across the UK are moving to ban skirts from their uniform policies — and the reaction from parents and residents has been anything but quiet. The latest flashpoint is Honywood School in Coggeshall, Essex. Earlier this month, the school announced that from September, students would only be permitted to wear trousers or knee-length tailored shorts — effectively banning skirts altogether. The school said the decision was due to ongoing issues with students rolling up their skirts. However, following a backlash from parents, the ban was postponed — though not entirely scrapped. The Gazette took to the streets to ask residents what they thought of the controversial move, and the community offered a range of strongly held views. Kerry Martin (Image: Newsquest Reporter) 'I think it's a little bit extreme that these schools are banning skirts,' said Kerry Martin, 36, an artist living in Blackheath. 'I understand that there are some concerns, and they are valid and they must have rules in place to ensure everyone is wearing the right length skirt. "However, they shouldn't take it away from everybody. Girls should be allowed to wear skirts if they choose to. Especially in this hot weather.' James Ferris (Image: Newsquest Reporter) James Ferris, 39, an engineer from Tollesbury, said he sees the issue from the perspective of a parent. He said: 'I don't think it's fair at all. As a girl dad, I fully believe that the girls should be allowed to wear whatever they want to wear. "They should have the right to choosing if they want to wear a skirt or trousers. You cannot take away choice from young women as they are growing up.' Anna Gayle (Image: Newsquest Reporter) Anna Gayle, 42, who works in HR and lives in Manningtree, said: 'As a mum, I feel that it seems unnecessary to ban the skirt. "If the length of the skirt is an issue, have stricter guidelines about what's the appropriate length. "As a parent, I believe schools should have the right to policy making, but you cannot take away choice from young women. "Have rules in place about what's the right length of the skirt permitted, and for kids who don't follow that rule, have a chat with their parents.' Matt Gayle (Image: Newsquest Reporter) Her husband, Matt Gayle, 43, a CBT therapist also from Manningtree, agreed that banning skirts goes too far. He said: 'I know girls tend to roll up their skirts, but a ban is over the top. If there is a certain uniform, have a guideline and make sure people abide by it. "Discipline is important but we cannot simply dictate girls to not wear skirts. "Skirt or trouser, the choice must be theirs and parents must also take full responsibility in making sure the girls wear the right length of skirt that is outlined in the school's uniform policy.' Matt Coowes (Image: Newsquest Reporter) Matt Coowes, 34, a production engineer, living in Clacton said: "Well my organisation had banned shorts last year actually, which we all sided with because it was from a health and safety standpoint. "So, this sort of uniform policy is only acceptable in my opinion if it's to safeguard the children from a health and safety perspective. But clearly that's not the case. "It's a case of taking away choice from young women to decide if they want to wear a skirt or a trouser, it's about controlling how they chose to express themselves. "Sure the girls roll up the skirts, then find a better way so they don't. Banning is not the solution." Linda Lloyd (Image: Newsquest Reporter) Linda Llyod, 56, a screening officer for a learning disability organization living in St Osyth, said banning skirts fails to address the real issue. She said: 'Well girls rolling up school skirts is very normal for their age. It's life, it's just girls for you. "Now it's absolutely ridiculous they want to ban skirts. I think they shouldn't ban it. Girls wear skirts and they should be allowed to wear it if they choose to. "The length is an issue, and that should be addressed in a better way. If your concern is girls' safety, make sure you outline it as a rule they wear knee-length skirts, but don't ban it entirely. "I see both sides of this argument but a ban... that's still a bit unfair and I hope they don't implement it.'
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Starmer Faces Brewing Rebellion Over £5 Billion Benefit Cut
By , Lucy White, and Joe Mayes Save UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is less than 10 days away from the biggest parliamentary challenge to his authority in his not-yet year-long tenure. Unpopular cuts to disability benefits unveiled earlier this year as part of Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' efforts to balance the country's books are due before the House of Commons for their first vote on July 1, with a large-scale rebellion brewing on the Labour back benches.
