An expelled fire safety engineer has made my flat unsaleable
I am trapped in a shared-ownership flat, which is proving impossible to sell because the fire safety engineer who surveyed the block is accused of forging fire safety certificates required by mortgage lenders. I own 45% of my home and pay rent on the remaining 55% to Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing (MTVH). The building has a valid fire risk certificate signed by Adam Kiziak of Tri Fire, but because he was later suspended pending investigation, lenders of prospective buyers view my flat as risky. MTVH is unable to give a timeline of when this will all be sorted out, yet is happy to raise rents while I am stuck. Moreover, it waited three months to inform us, during which time my flat was pointlessly on sale. This is my first home, but it's beginning to seem like a prison.
ZV, Stevenage
Problems surrounding fire safety certificates have trapped hundreds of people in unsaleable flats, but yours is a particularly unpleasant situation. It was the tragedy of the Grenfell Tower fire that prompted the requirement for all residential blocks over 18 metres to be surveyed for, among other things, flammable cladding. Risky construction materials and a shortage of fire safety engineers have prevented many buildings from being issued with crucial certificates known as EWS1s. Without these, lenders won't lend.
An unknown number of residents are now paying the price of alleged malpractice by Adam Kiziak, whose firm, Tri Fire, has signed off hundreds of buildings since 2020. He was suspended from the Institution of Fire Engineers last November after allegations of unethical conduct and incompetence. The allegations were upheld after an investigation, and he has since been expelled after allegedly forging signatures on EWS1s during the suspension. He denies all wrongdoing. Your EWS1 was issued in 2020, but some lenders have since withdrawn mortgage offers on properties surveyed by Tri Fire.
MTVH confirmed it knew of the problem three months before residents were informed and said it had immediately asked your freeholder, Land Charter Homes, to commission a new fire safety assessment. This was agreed and announced shortly after you wrote to me. Land Charter Homes directed me to its managing agent, Six Hills Management Ltd, which said it had spent the intervening months seeking confirmation your building's EWS1 was legitimate before informing residents of the situation. Because of residents in your predicament, it undertook a new survey last month. This has just been completed and the final report is due imminently. In the meantime you have lost a buyer. Hopefully, armed with the new paperwork, you can start to move on by summer.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
09-06-2025
- Telegraph
London council to spend £100m from gold-plated pensions on homelessness
But experts questioned whether it was appropriate for Kensington and Chelsea to use its pension fund to 'indulge political objectives'. Neil Record, a former Bank of England economist, said: 'Local Government Pension Funds benefit from a de facto government guarantee which allows local councils to indulge their political objectives at the expense of prudent investment management. This is a particularly egregious example.' The Conservative-led council's pension scheme is worth £2bn, twice the amount needed to fully meet obligations to its members, meaning it is in rude health financially. The vast savings pot has become a target for councillors seeking to raise money for more spending without significantly increasing council tax bills. In February it was announced payments into Kensington and Chelsea's defined benefit scheme would be halted temporarily to save £9m earmarked for survivors of the 2017 Grenfell Tower fire. This went against the advice of the fund's actuaries who said it would be 'inappropriate' to lower contributions before next spring but agreed the move would 'not have a detrimental effect' on the council's ability to pay out pension benefits. Michael Hayles, of law firm Burges Salmon, said: 'The Kensington and Chelsea fund has a well-publicised strong funding level. 'However, as things stand, this investment will still need to stand up as an appropriate investment, with appropriate returns, bearing in mind the fiduciary duties of the pension fund when making investment decisions, notwithstanding the funding surplus.' There is no blanket legal guarantee that would compel the Government to meet the costs of all funds within the LGPS or make good their deficits. More than a quarter of schemes within the LGPS were in deficit in 2022, according to an official review published last year. Drawing down £100m is 'very low risk' Cllr Emma Will, who oversees property at the town hall, said more local authorities could follow Kensington and Chelsea's example, as many struggle to fund the costs of meeting their statutory obligations. She added: 'We are fortunate to have an extremely well-managed pension fund, it's been the best performing for 30 years [and] it's very over-funded, which is terrific.' Ms Will said that the unusual move was 'completely above board' and should not be discredited simply because 'it hasn't been done before'. She said that investing £100m was 'very low risk' because the council plans to pay its pension fund for use of the new properties with government grants it receives to tackle homelessness. 'It is innovative and we are quite excited. If we get this right it's like the holy grail. We believe it does work, and it's nil cost to the council and it's low risk and win-win for everyone.' Last year bills in Kensington and Chelsea for the average Band D property were £1,569.46 a year, up from £1,508.98 the previous year.
STV News
09-06-2025
- STV News
Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding
Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland are 'at risk' from cladding which has yet to be removed, despite the Grenfell Tower disaster, the Scottish Liberal Democrats said. There are about 13,400 blocks of flats higher than 11 metres in Scotland, according to figures published by the Scottish Government this month. However new figures show that an estimated 1,260-1,450 of them need remedial work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk. In statistics published by the Scottish Government in Scotland's cladding remediation programme, it was said that by April 30, two single building assessments (SBAs), based on specification published in June 2024, had been completed and a further 13 assessments had been started. By April 30, two completed assessments identified that remedial works were required, and work had begun for one but not the other, the statistics showed. In June 2024, the Housing (Cladding Remediation) (Scotland) Bill was passed, giving ministers powers to 'to assess and remediate certain types of buildings with unsafe cladding'. On Friday the Scottish Government said latest estimates indicate its cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. About 250 of the residential high-rise buildings in Scotland may require work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk, while 1,020-1,200 of the mid-rise residential buildings require work to alleviate the same issue, according to a breakdown of the figures. In contrast, by May 2025 in England, 2,477 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works, representing 49% of buildings within the programme. There is a target to complete the remediation of high-rise buildings by 2029 and for mid-rise buildings to have either been completely remediated by the date, or to have a plan in place with a date set. Of these, 1,652 buildings (33%) have been completed, according to UK Government statistics published in May. Scottish Liberal Democrat communities spokesman Willie Rennie MSP accused the Scottish Government of 'refusing to set' a similar deadline. He said the remediation work was happening 'inexplicably slowly' and called for progress. Mr Rennie said: 'In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers should be bending over backwards to remove unsafe cladding. 'But these figures show that the SNP are nowhere: they have made next to no progress, leaving so many homeowners and residents in a distressing limbo. 'The Scottish Government have repeatedly failed to appreciate the dangers posed by certain building materials. 'They have refused to set a deadline for removing cladding and they have taken an unbelievably blase approach to the problems of RAAC concrete. 'The SNP have acted inexplicably slowly. They must urgently step up the pace in remediating at-risk buildings and keep everyone who is potentially affected informed and updated on progress.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'We have moved at pace to try to identify buildings in Scotland with unsafe cladding. 'For our actions to be effective, legislation was necessary and since the Cladding Remediation Act came into effect in January we have launched a £10 million scheme to support the assessment of affected buildings. 'All relevant buildings that had previously been part of our pilot programme are now either undergoing assessment or will have an assessment funded through this £10 million programme. 'We will also be launching the second stage of that scheme later this month, allowing owners to be able to apply for Scottish Government funding for measures recommended by an assessment. 'Any homeowners, including social landlords or residents with concerns about cladding issues, are encouraged to contact the Cladding Remediation Programme directly.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Scotsman
09-06-2025
- Scotsman
Almost 1500 buildings in Scotland ‘at risk' from cladding
Latest estimates indicate the cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Almost 1,500 buildings in Scotland are "at risk" from cladding which has yet to be removed, despite the Grenfell Tower disaster, the Scottish Liberal Democrats said. There are about 13,400 blocks of flats higher than 11 metres in Scotland , according to figures published by the Scottish Government this month. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However new figures show that an estimated 1,260-1,450 of them need remedial work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk. In statistics published by the Scottish Government in Scotland's cladding remediation programme, it was said that by April 30 , two single building assessments (SBAs), based on specification published in June 2024 , had been completed and a further 13 assessments had been started. By April 30 , two completed assessments identified that remedial works were required, and work had begun for one but not the other, the statistics showed. In June 2024 , the Housing (Cladding Remediation) ( Scotland ) Bill was passed, giving ministers powers to "to assess and remediate certain types of buildings with unsafe cladding". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad On Friday the Scottish Government said latest estimates indicate its cladding remediation programme could cost £1.7 billion over a 15-year period. About 250 of the residential high-rise buildings in Scotland may require work to alleviate external wall system (EWS) life-safety fire risk, while 1,020-1,200 of the mid-rise residential buildings require work to alleviate the same issue, according to a breakdown of the figures. In contrast, by May 2025 in England , 2,477 buildings identified with unsafe cladding have started or completed remediation works, representing 49% of buildings within the programme. There is a target to complete the remediation of high-rise buildings by 2029 and for mid-rise buildings to have either been completely remediated by the date, or to have a plan in place with a date set. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Of these, 1,652 buildings (33%) have been completed, according to UK Government statistics published in May. Scottish Liberal Democrat communities spokesman Willie Rennie MSP accused the Scottish Government of "refusing to set" a similar deadline. He said the remediation work was happening "inexplicably slowly" and called for progress. Mr Rennie said: "In the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster, ministers should be bending over backwards to remove unsafe cladding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad "But these figures show that the SNP are nowhere: they have made next to no progress, leaving so many homeowners and residents in a distressing limbo. "The Scottish Government have repeatedly failed to appreciate the dangers posed by certain building materials. "They have refused to set a deadline for removing cladding and they have taken an unbelievably blase approach to the problems of RAAC concrete. "The SNP have acted inexplicably slowly. They must urgently step up the pace in remediating at-risk buildings and keep everyone who is potentially affected informed and updated on progress."
