Body shaming, forcing liquor and drugs, online ragging made punishable in Kerala draft anti-ragging bill
The draft bill, the Kerala Prohibition of Ragging (Amendment) Bill, has also brought 'any form of ragging committed through the internet or in any digital mode' under the ambit of the criminal act of ragging for which severe punishment has been prescribed.
Ragging including any form of ragging committed through internet or digital mode shall be a cognizable offence.
The drat Bill, while amending some of the key provisions of the principal act, Kerala Prohibition of Ragging Act, has widened its ambit to cover all the educational institutions including universities, deemed to be university, including teaching departments, higher educational institutions, schools and other institutions under general education department, elements and constituent units of such institutions, all their premises in Kerala.
Also Read | Six students booked for ragging junior in Kerala's Kozhikode
Teaching branches of all government departments, institutions of national importance established by an Act of Parliament, Central Universities, and all coaching and tuition centres have been brought under the definition of educational institutions.
The draft legislation also covers academic and residential premises of all such institutions, besides the playgrounds, canteens located within and outside the campuses, bus stands, home stays, all means of public and private transportation facilities accessed by students for the pursuit of studies in such institutions in Kerala.
A host of criminal acts committed as part of the ragging including abetment to ragging, criminal conspiracy, unlawful assembly, rioting, public nuisance, and committing obscene and sexual acts committed while ragging will come under the ambit of the draft Bill.
Causing bodily harm during the act of ragging, stripping, theft, extortion, dishonest misappropriation of property, criminal breach of trust, criminal trespass, criminal intimidation will also come under the scope of the Bill, according to the draft legislation.
The State had witnessed a series of public protests following the death of J. S. Sidharthan, a 20-year-old student. He was found dead at the College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad, in February 2024, allegedly following brutal ragging.
Recently, the Kerala High Court had asked the State government to provide a copy of the draft Anti-Ragging (Amendment) Bill, 2025, to the Kerala State Legal Services Authority and the University Grants Commission on a petition filed by the Authority.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Illegal betting apps case: ED questions Rana for 4 hrs
Hyderabad: Enforcement Directorate (ED) officials questioned Tollywood actor Rana Daggubati for four hours Monday over the alleged promotion of unauthorised online betting applications. The case is being probed under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, following predicate offences registered by Hyderabad and Cyberabad Police. The investigation focuses on whether celebrities, including actors and influencers, knowingly endorsed betting apps banned in Telangana, and the financial transactions involved, officials said. Rana was originally summoned on July 23, but he had sought more time citing professional commitments. He eventually appeared before ED Monday, and was asked about promotional campaigns and payments received. His statements will be matched with other evidence and testimonies collected in the case, sources said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad ED has so far summoned 29 people — including actors, YouTubers, and social media influencers — in connection with the probe, seeking to determine whether these endorsements were isolated acts or part of a coordinated strategy to bypass legal restrictions. Actor Prakash Raj appeared before the agency on July 30 and Vijay Deverakonda on Aug 6. Manchu Lakshmi is expected to appear on Aug 13. While Deverakonda has stated that he only promoted a gaming app, not a betting platform, Rana refrained from commenting when entering or leaving the ED office Monday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Officials indicated that more celebrity summons are likely as the investigation widens. The investigation began after a Miyapur resident, PM Phanindra Sarma, filed a complaint on March 19, alleging a rise in online betting among youth in his locality due to celebrity promotions. Under Telangana Gaming (Amendment) Act, 2017, all forms of online betting and stake-based games — whether skill-based or chance-based — are prohibited in the state. This includes rummy and fantasy sports. The law bars both hosting and participating in such games, with violators facing criminal prosecution. Telangana govt has defended the ban, citing rising cases of debt, family disputes, and youth addiction linked to online betting. Officials argue that flashy celebrity endorsements of such platforms glamourise gambling, drawing minors and vulnerable sections into risky financial behaviour, and undermining efforts to curb the menace. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Kerala High Court imposes ₹50,000-fine on litigant
The Kerala High Court has imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on a litigant, who appeared as party-in-person in a case, for allegedly threatening the judge who was hearing his case. The litigant reportedly said that he had filed a complaint against the judge before the President of India and the other authorities. While imposing the fine amount, a Single Bench of Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan observed that he was discharging his duty in accordance with the Constitution of India, and that he was not bothered about such threats. He added that he was exercising his judicial powers in accordance with the law and the Constitution. Such litigants who appear in person must be familiar with the basics of courtroom decorum and must also know the consequences of making unnecessary submissions even after a warning, the judge said. The same litigant had earlier been warned by the court for allegedly attempting to engage in 'forum shopping', after he asked the court to avoid his case. He had also engaged in similar behaviour before other High Court Benches as well.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Chhattisgarh police officer faces social boycott over marriage, HC reprimands community
RAIPUR: A distressed Chhattisgarh Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Mekhlendra Pratap Singh facing social boycott from his own community for marrying a woman of his choice, lodged an FIR in his home town Bilaspur claiming that his marriage was performed as per the social tradition. Singh, 35, who hailed from 'Satgarh Tanwar' community (Scheduled Tribe), is posted in Kanker district where he is engaged in the ongoing anti-Maoist operations. He claimed his wife too is from the same tribal caste. The community leaders however got further antagonised after the case was registered against them and approached the high court filing a petition that the FIR was lodged on baseless ground. They also alleged before the court of being harassed by the police with repeated notices served to them. 'Chhattisgarh high court has rebuked the community leaders warning them not to act like a Khap panchayat and dismissed their petition. But the community leaders remain adamant to continue their diktat and my entire family is socially ostracised. They are now threatening us to impose heavy punitive fine', the DSP told TNIE while sharing his mental agony.
