MAX Power Expands Geological and Engineering Team for Natural Hydrogen in Saskatchewan
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA - March 7, 2025 (NEWMEDIAWIRE) - MAX Power Mining Corp. (CSE: MAXX; OTC: MAXXF; FRANKFURT: 89N) ("MAX Power" or the "Company") is pleased to announce important new additions to the Company's technical team to accelerate a North American-leading program for Natural Hydrogen exploration and development in Saskatchewan where historical data and work carried out by MAX Power point to game-changing possibilities for this rapidly emerging sector.
Prairie Hunter Exploration Ltd. (PHEL)
Prairie Hunter is a Saskatchewan-based geoscience and exploration consulting and advisement corporation owned and managed by Mr. Stephen Halabura, M.Sc., P.Geo., FEC (Hon.), FGC. Mr. Halabura has decades of successful experience in the province's resource sector and has a deep understanding of the geological controls on the accumulation of helium, hydrogen, and other industrial gases.
Mr Halabura, a Professional Geoscientist, was instrumental in the early formative stages of the only two Saskatchewan greenfield potash mines to come into existence in the 21st century, these being BHP's Jansen Project and K+S's Bethune mine. Jansen is the largest private investment ($14 billion) in Saskatchewan history and is located immediately north of the Regina-Moose Jaw Industrial Corridor, where a Hydrogen Hub has been proposed, and MAX Power's Rider Project.
While its focus is Saskatchewan, the PHEL team has global experience in project consulting, engineering and design, especially in the field of potash. However, it also has experience in oil and gas, geothermal, industrial gases (hydrogen, helium), Canadian critical minerals, coal, mineral water, and Indigenous economic development issues pertaining to resource development. As a new critical element, and potentially the world's first primary new energy source in decades, the PHEL team is excited to work with MAX Power on Natural Hydrogen and is modelling how Saskatchewan can become a driving global force in the discovery and commercialization of Natural Hydrogen.
Mr. Halabura commented: "Saskatchewan is truly elephant country for the exploration and discovery of emerging critical commodities, like Natural Hydrogen, and MAX Power has the real estate that ticks all the boxes for the potential of a Natural Hydrogen discovery."
Greg Vogelsang, P.Geo., P.Eng., FEC, FGC
Mr. Greg Vogelsang, sole practitioner and owner of consulting firm Earthview Environmental Engineering Ltd., is another key addition to the MAX Power technical team as the Company prepares for first drilling in Saskatchewan.
Mr. Vogelsang is a Professional Geoscientist with 35 years' experience in the mining and oil and gas industries in Canada and internationally. He has extensive experience related to Environmental Geoscience and Regulatory Management while working in both the public and private sectors, including many years with the Saskatchewan government. His expertise with the environmental regulatory regime, land permitting, land administration, and environmental engineering will be invaluable for MAX Power.
Like Mr. Halabura, Mr. Vogelsang is Past President of both Geoscientists Canada and The Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (APEGS) and holds fellowships from Engineers Canada and Geoscientists Canada. He holds a B.Sc. Geology (University of Regina) and a Diploma in Resource Engineering Technology from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (Edmonton).
Mr. Mansoor Jan, MAX Power CEO, commented: "We are thrilled to have added Prairie Hunter and Greg Vogelsang to the MAX Power team. This demonstrates my resolve and commitment to make MAX Power not just a Canadian leader in Natural Hydrogen exploration and development, but a global leader. We are growing the team and growing the opportunity."
MAX Power Updated Corporate Presentations & Videos
MAX Power directs investors to its website (www.MaxPowerMining.com) for its latest corporate videos as well as updated decks.
Links for the above are as follows:
MAX Power Natural Hydrogen PresentationMAXPowermining.com/MAXPower_Hydrogen_Mar72025.pdf
MAX Power Critical Minerals PresentationMAXPowermining.com/MAXPower_CriticalMinerals_Mar72025.pdf
MAX Power Corporate PresentationMAXPowermining.com/MAXPower_Corporate_Mar72025.pdf
MAX Power Corporate Video Learn more about MAX Power by clicking on the following link:https://vimeo.com/1050826855/79a9b5c0cc
Neil McMillan Videohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QoXfr5uki5A
About MAX Power
MAX Power is an innovative mineral exploration company focused on North America's shift to decarbonization. MAX Power is a first mover in the rapidly growing Natural Hydrogen sector, through strategic alliances with Calgary-based Chapman Hydrogen & Petroleum Engineering Ltd., and European- based Larin Engineering HHC. MAX Power also holds a portfolio of properties in the United States and Canada focused on critical minerals. These properties are highlighted by a recent diamond drilling discovery at the Willcox Playa Lithium Project in southeast Arizona.
On behalf of the Board of Directors,
MAX Power Mining Corp.info@maxpowermining.com
For further information, please contact:
Chad LevesquePh: 1-306-981-4753 Email: ChadLevesqueConsulting@gmail.com
Forward-Looking Statement Cautions
This press release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, relating to natural hydrogen, exploration and acquisition of natural hydrogen properties; ability to locate, discover and/or extract natural hydrogen from the subsurface, commentary as it relates to the opportune timing to carry out natural hydrogen exploration, and any anticipated increasing demand for natural hydrogen; any results and updates thereto as it relates to any future drill program, and the funding of that program; and upcoming press releases by the Company. Although the Company believes that such statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts. They are generally, but not always, identified by the words "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "interpreted", "intends", "estimates", "projects", "aims", "suggests", "often", "target", "future", "likely", "pending", "potential", "goal", "objective", "prospective", "possibly", "preliminary", and similar expressions, or that events or conditions "will", "would", "may", "can", "could" or "should" occur, or are those statements, which, by their nature, refer to future events. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company's management on the date the statements are made, and they involve number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Except to the extent required by applicable securities laws and the policies of the CSE, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include risks associated with possible accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, risks associated with the interpretation of assay results and the drilling program, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out its exploration plans, the risk that the Company will not be able to raise sufficient funds to carry out its business plans, and the risk of political uncertainties and regulatory or legal changes that might interfere with the Company's business and prospects. The reader is urged to refer to the Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis, publicly available through the Canadian Securities Administrators' System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR+) at www.sedarplus.ca for a more complete discussion of such risk factors and their potential effects.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China's Petrochemical Reliance on U.S. Outweighs Rare Earth Trade
US petrochemical producers may have found themselves on the front line of global trade wars, BNEF reports, with China's dependence on the US for feedstocks (see "Chinese Plastics Factories Face Mass Closure As US Ethane Supply Evaporates") blunting the impact of its dominations of exports of rare earth metals. China imported more than 565,000 barrels per day of petrochemical feedstocks from the US in 2024 according to the Energy Information Administration, with a value of over $4.7 billion. That dwarfed the $170 million of rare earths the US imported last year, about 70% of which came from China, according to the US Geological Survey. The figures show the dependence the US and China have developed on each other by ever tightening trade links over the past few decades. While China has a tight grip on refining many metals crucial for industry, it also takes in niche chemicals from the US that are difficult to buy elsewhere. China leans on naphtha to produce most base chemicals, which are processed further to end up in everyday items like electronics and clothing. However, some plants can switch to cheaper propane when the economics make sense, which they do regularly. Propane dehydrogenation plants however can't process alternatives like naphtha. The US accounted for over half of all China's propane imports in 2024. US producers have looked to China to buy their ballooning volumes of feedstock, the market value of which has almost quadrupled since 2020. China accounts for almost half of all new mixed-feed ethylene and propylene production capacity set to come online globally over the next four years, based on data compiled by BloombergNEF. A forced divorce The honeymoon period may be about to end. Following the implementation of tariffs by President Donald Trump's administration in April, China retaliated with its own on US imports — including a 125% tariff on feedstocks like propane and ethane. The duty effectively killed the economics of importing US feedstocks. Alternative sources of propane may be hard or expensive to come by, with producers in the Middle East sending most of their supplies to India, South Korea and Japan. While some rerouting could take place, Middle Eastern players could use the lack of alternatives for China's propane dehydrogenation plants to charge a premium. China's propane dehydrogenation operators, like Hengli Petrochemical, have already suffered from weak margins over the past years. Many may opt to shut their operations temporarily. A messy settlement China moved quickly to remove tariffs on US ethane as trade talks commenced. However, while China seems willing to buy US ethane, the US administration may no longer allow it. Enterprise Products Partners — the largest US-based exporter of petrochemical feedstocks — received a notice on Wednesday from the Bureau of Industry and Security at the US Department of Commerce, denying licenses to export ethane to China on the basis that such flows 'pose an unacceptable risk of use in or diversion to a 'military end use' in China.' Energy Transfer received a similar communication. China's ethane cracking capacity is dwarfed by its capacity to process naphtha and propane, but almost all of its ethane imports come from the US. The restrictions will have a significant impact on the Lianyungang and Tianjin plants, owned by Satellite Chemical, Sinopec and INEOS. SP Chemicals, a Singapore-based producer, sources most of its feedstock from Enterprise Products Partners. As the trade war continues, it appears commodities may lead the confrontation, with players on both sides set to feel the pain. By More Top Reads From this article on
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
John Schumacher, Headed I. Magnin, Bonwit Teller, Dies at 94
John Schumacher, former chief executive officer of Bonwit Teller and president of I. Magnin in the 1970s, died early Friday evening at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach. Schumacher was 94. According to his wife Barbara Cirkva, the former division president of fashion, watches and fine jewelry for Chanel, the cause of her husband's death is to be determined, but for the past several months he had been losing weight and stopped leaving his home. More from WWD Paolo Boffi Dies at 85 Roslyn S. Jaffe, the Revered Dressbarn Cofounder Who Empowered Women, Dies at 96 Beloved Footwear Executive Sonny Shar Dies at 86 'He was feisty. He lived well and was fun to be with,' Cirkva told WWD. 'John loved to go out and socialize, but when he didn't feel he could anymore, he just didn't want to.' Schumacher's career in retailing began at Lord & Taylor as a service manager in the millinery department and later a footwear buyer. 'He always liked to tell people that he started as a slipper buyer,' Cirkva recalled. 'I knew John since his I. Magnin days, when I was working at Neiman Marcus. I'd see him at all the fashion shows in Europe and New York,' said Neal Fox, former CEO of Mark Cross, Sulka, and the Garfinckel's and Raleigh's store chains. 'John was an interesting guy. He had this definite flair. He was most interested in restaurants and travel.' In fact, he encouraged Fox and his wife Martha to visit Capri, Italy, essentially introducing the couple to the island. 'The first time we went, we all stayed at the same hotel.' Schumacher had a meteoric retail career, quickly climbing the ranks of Lord & Taylor to senior vice president and general merchandise manager before joining the San Francisco-based I. Magnin, first as executive vice president before becoming president. 'It was an interesting time in fashion,' said Sonja Caproni, who was a buyer and later fashion director at I. Magnin working with Schumacher. Designers were emerging and Saint Laurent was very established, but not at I. Magnin until Schumacher felt it was important to include the French designer in the mix. 'Saint Laurent instantly became a huge business for us, and John had us opening boutiques,' in various I. Magnin stores including Los Angeles, Chicago and San Francisco. 'John was quick to respond to things,' Caproni said. 'He was very determined and competitive but for the right reasons. He always kept the store first and foremost in mind. He wanted I. Magnin to be the best on the West Coast, and I'm sure he mentored a lot of people along the way.' Eventually, Schumacher was recruited to become chairman and CEO of Bonwit Teller in New York by the store's parent company Genesco. During his tenure at Bonwit's, Schumacher improved the store's profitability and sales and kept a tight rein on expenses while also spending to renovate stores and install designer shops for a boutique-like ambience. However, after two years on the job, he was ousted over allegations by Genesco that he misused company funds for personal use. Bonwit Teller, I. Magnin and Lord & Taylor are no longer in business. After his abrupt departure from retail, Schumacher joined M. Ferrari, a maker of Italian women's clothes. A gourmet cook, he left the retail/fashion industry to become a restaurateur, launching La Colonna on 19th Street in Manhattan in the mid-1980s. 'John wanted the restaurant to be as Italian as it could be,' Cirkva said. 'He brought over from Italy the chefs and sous chefs and found them apartments near the restaurant.' She said he also hired Italian artists to paint the walls of the La Colonna. They used the eruption of Mount Vesuvius as the motif and also got 'playful,' as Cirkva recalled, with some depictions of the erotica lifestyle of ancient Pompeii. Schumacher's next restaurant venture was Q.V. on 63rd Street. In yet another business venture, Schumacher and Cirkva became co-owners of a gardens antique shop in Mount Kisco, N.Y., called Fleur. Schumacher's body will be cremated and his ashes flown to New York, where Cirkva plans to hold a reception honoring her husband, most likely in September, she said. In addition to his wife, Schumacher is survived by three daughters: Victoria Schumacher, Lisa Sumner and Pamela Schumacher; a grandson Christopher Dungan, and a sister, Carol Dougherty. Best of WWD Macy's Is Closing 66 Stores in 2025 — Here's the List, Live Updates Inside the Demise of Lord & Taylor COVID-19 Spikes Elevate Retail Concerns
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Panama Ports Buyers Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place
The consortium seeking to finalize a $23 billion deal to acquire dozens of ports from Hong Kong-based port operator CK Hutchison has reportedly held in-person discussions with China's antitrust regulator in recent weeks as the transaction remains in limbo. According to a report from the Financial Times, the talks came as Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock are exploring options to ensure China's State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) approves the acquisition in some form. More from Sourcing Journal US Pushes Global Partners for Trade Deals by Wednesday Trade Truce Crumbles as China Says US Violated Terms TuSimple Reportedly Shared Self-Driving Data With China The report indicates that the parties are discussing amendments that they hoped would satisfy the respective presidents of the U.S. and China—Donald Trump and Xi Jinping—amid their ongoing trade war. CK Hutchison supposedly has mulled a sale of some or all of its remaining 10 ports in China, separate from the existing deal. The report said that transaction was unlikely to occur until the MSC-BlackRock deal was complete. When the initial deal was first announced, all eyes were on the transfer of two ports on opposite sides of the Panama Canal from CK Hutchison to the BlackRock-MSC consortium. Hutchison can still opt to delay the Panama port sale. That part of the transaction came after weeks of rhetoric from Trump, who had repeatedly cited he wanted to 'take back' the Panama Canal. Concerns over Chinese influence over the waterway were a central sticking point in Trump's threats, with Washington considering Hutchison's ownership of the canal-adjacent Balboa and Cristobal ports a threat to U.S. national security. In the March announcement, CK Hutchison co-managing director Frank Sixt insisted that the acquisition of subsidiary Panama Ports Company, which operates the Balboa and Cristobal ports, was 'purely commercial in nature and wholly unrelated to recent political news reports.' But China's reaction to Hutchison's sale to a U.S.-headquartered asset management giant and the world's largest container shipping company suggested otherwise. National state media had gone on record to post their gripes with the deal, calling it 'spineless kneeling' and 'profit-seeking.' Additionally, reports had indicated that President Xi was angered over the transaction since Hutchison did not ask for approval of the deal in advance. Although the transaction was initially expected to be signed on April 2, the date went by without the ports changing hands. That portion of the deal would have shifted control of 43 global ports over to the consortium, with the two Panama ports handed over on a separate deadline. The Panamanian government also needs to approve the second part of the agreement. SAMR said after the sale's reported postponement that it would vet the deal. After an April report indicated that MSC's founding Aponte family had considered separating the Panama ports from the deal altogether, the regulator publicly warned CK Hutchison against a split as a means to circumvent antitrust review. Separating the Panama ports would ultimately require the parties to reach a new agreement. The BlackRock-MSC consortium and Hutchison are still under a 145-day exclusive negotiating window that lasts until late July. During CK Hutchison's annual meeting on May 22, the company put out a statement in rebuttal to SAMR, saying 'it is absolutely impossible for this transaction to take place in any unlawful or non-compliant circumstances.' At the meeting, Hutchison co-managing director Dominic Lai confirmed that MSC would be the main investor in the ports acquisition, and that his own firm would cooperate with Chinese authorities. Lai said during the meeting that the deal is subject to multiple reviews by different authorities, and reiterated the company's position that the group won't proceed with the sale until it obtains all necessary approvals. The Financial Times report said Hutchison could potentially bring in other investors or participants to amend the deal, including terminal operator DP World and Chinese ocean carrier Cosco Shipping. It remains unclear what roles either would have in a potential deal or possible agreement. While so much focus of the deal has been widened based on interests of the U.S. and China, Panama has had its own scrutiny of CK Hutchison and its prior agreement to run the canal-adjacent ports. Following the conclusion of a three-month audit, Panama's comptroller general said the Hong Kong conglomerate owed the country's government $300 million based on a contract breach. Hutchison subsidiary Panama Ports Company has denied the allegations. Others in Panama's government have been critical of Hutchison's operation of the two ports, with attorney general Luis Carlos Gómez finding in March that the 25-year contract extension signed in 2021 was unconstitutional. Panama's Supreme Court has yet to rule on the finding. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
