logo
Charles III to give ‘Speech from the Throne' in Canada: What to know

Charles III to give ‘Speech from the Throne' in Canada: What to know

Al Jazeera27-05-2025

King Charles III and Queen Camilla are on their first official visit to Canada since Charles became the British monarch in 2022.
The two-day trip, though brief, carries symbolic weight at a time when Canada has faced tariffs and threats from US President Donald Trump.
Here's what you need to know about the visit.
A major highlight of Charles's visit is his scheduled address on Tuesday from the Canadian Senate.
Often referred to as a 'Speech from the Throne', the address is traditionally used to open a new session of Parliament and is usually delivered by the governor general on the monarch's behalf.
The speech is ceremonial and not tied to any new legislative session. It is expected to include reflections on Canada's democratic institutions, messages of unity, and an emphasis on reconciliation with Indigenous peoples.
Although symbolic, the speech is a rare opportunity for Canadians to hear directly from the monarch in a parliamentary setting. It also serves as a public reaffirmation of the king's role as head of state in Canada.
It is the first such address to be delivered by a British monarch in Canada since 1977.
In a statement on Monday, Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney said the speech will outline the government's plan to deliver the change Canadians 'want and deserve'.
This includes defining 'a new economic and security relationship with the United States … to bring down the cost of living, and to keep communities safe,' Carney said.
Charles is set to deliver the speech shortly after 11am local time (15:00 GMT).
The royal couple are in Canada for a two-day tour, which began on Monday.
They came at Carney's invitation. While the visit is short, it has included several important engagements that reflect Canada's historical ties to the monarchy.
The itinerary features official ceremonies, cultural events, and meetings with Indigenous leaders, according to the Canadian government's official website.
Charles's visit to Canada serves multiple purposes, both symbolic and practical. Primarily, it aims to reinforce the enduring relationship between Canada and the Crown, highlighting shared values and historical ties.
The timing of the visit is particularly noteworthy as it coincides with heightened tensions following US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs as well as controversial remarks suggesting the annexation of Canada.
Carney's invitation for Charles to deliver the 'Speech from the Throne' has been viewed as seeking to reaffirm Canada's sovereignty and constitutional framework.
Barbara Messamore, professor of history at the University of the Fraser Valley, said Canadians have found comments by Trump about turning the country into the 51st US state 'deeply offensive'.
'I think it is a good moment to show the world that we are a distinct nation with a distinct history, and we'd like to keep it that way,' Messamore told Al Jazeera. 'We value, of course, our relationship with our American friends and neighbours, but we don't want to join them.'
While members of the British royal family have frequently toured Canada over the years, visits by the reigning monarch are relatively uncommon. Queen Elizabeth II, for example, visited Canada 22 times during her seven-decade reign.
This is Charles's first time visiting the country as monarch. He last visited in 2022, when he was still the prince of Wales.
What is Canada's connection to the monarchy?
Canada is a constitutional monarchy, which means the country recognises the king as its official head of state.
While the role is largely ceremonial, the Crown plays a critical function in Canada's political system. The king's duties are carried out in Canada by the governor general, currently Mary Simon, who represents the monarch at the federal level.
The monarchy is built into Canada's constitutional framework. The Constitution Act of 1867 established the king – or queen – as part of the Parliament of Canada, alongside the House of Commons and the Senate.
Beyond politics, the Crown holds particular importance in Indigenous relations. Many historical treaties were made directly with the British Crown, not with the government of Canada.
This has been largely highlighted in local media coverage, Messamore said.
'Indigenous nations are front and centre, and they value that kinship relationship,' she said.
Although support for the monarchy varies across Canada, with many Canadians questioning its relevance, the institution remains embedded in the nation's political and legal foundations.
This is because it has always provided a 'bulwark against American ambitions', Messamore said.
'These moments are really important ones about Canadian patriotism. The reaction to the king's visit has been very positive,' she said.
'We don't always all agree on our form of governance, but we've made it very difficult to change that fundamental aspect of our Canadian Constitution.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best
Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best

Al Jazeera

time8 hours ago

  • Al Jazeera

Democrats wooing Musk after the Trump breakup is US plutocracy at its best

It's official: United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest person, Elon Musk, have broken up. At the end of last month, Musk departed from his post as the head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), where he oversaw the mass firing of federal employees and dismantling of various government agencies – all the while benefitting from his own companies' lucrative contracts with the government. Anyway, US 'democracy' has never met a conflict of interest it didn't like. Musk's service at the White House initially appeared to end on an amicable note as Trump praised him for the 'colossal change' he had achieved 'in the old ways of doing business in Washington'. The former head of DOGE in turn thanked the president for the opportunity. But soon after his departure, Musk publicly criticised the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', a tax and spending bill that Trump is currently obsessed with passing, slamming it as a 'disgusting abomination'. There ensued predictably dramatic social media exchanges between the two right-wing billionaires with Trump pronouncing Musk 'so depressed and so heartbroken' after leaving the White House and offering the additional coherent analysis: ' It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome. We have it with others, too. They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different, and they become hostile.' Musk has repeatedly taken credit for Trump's 2024 election victory on account of the gobs of money he donated to the president's campaign and those of other Republican candidates. Now that the relationship is over, Trump has wasted no time in warning Musk that he'll face 'very serious consequences' if he chooses to fund Democratic campaigns in the future. But some Democratic ears, at least, have perked up at the possibility of getting the planet's richest person back on their side – which he abandoned in favour of Trump after having extended support to Democratic former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The political switcheroo was hardly extreme. At the end of the day, ideology matters little when you're just in the business of buying power. California Congressman Ro Khanna, for example, recently opined that Democrats should 'be in a dialogue' with Musk in light of their shared opposition to Trump's big beautiful bill. As per Khanna's view, 'we should ultimately be trying to convince [Musk] that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with.' He went on to list a few of these alleged values: 'A commitment to science funding, a commitment to clean technology, a commitment to seeing international students like him.' Never mind that Musk's main 'value' is a commitment to controlling as much of the earth – not to mention the whole solar system – as he possibly can for the benefit of himself and himself alone. Beyond his mass firing activities while head of DOGE, a brief review of Musk's entrepreneurial track record reveals a total lack of the 'values' that Democrats purport to espouse. Over recent years, reports have abounded of sexual harassment and acute racism at Musk's Tesla car factories. In October 2021, a federal jury in San Francisco ordered Tesla to pay $137m to a Black former employee who claimed he was told to 'go back to Africa' among other abuses suffered at his workplace. Along with violating federal labour laws, Musk as chief executive of Tesla threatened workers over the prospect of unionisation. When the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, he violated local regulations to keep his factories up and running, underscoring a general contempt for human life that, again, should not be a 'value' that anyone aspires to. To be sure, not all Democrats are on board with the proposal to woo Musk back into the Democratic camp – but he may be getting a growing cheering squad. In addition to Khanna's advocacy on his behalf, New York Democratic Congressman Ritchie Torres seems prepared to give Musk his vote as well: 'I'm a believer in redemption, and he is telling the truth about the [big beautiful] legislation.' Anthony Scaramucci, Trump's former White House director of communications, has, meanwhile, suggested that Democrats could 'bring Elon Musk back into the fold as a prodigal son' by foregoing more left-wing policies – as if there's anything truly left-wing about the Democratic Party in the first place. Newsweek's write-up of Scaramucci's comments observed that 'It would be a coup for Democrats if they could court the influence of the world's richest man once more.' It would not, obviously, be a coup for democracy, which is supposed to be rule by the people and not by money. And yet a longstanding bipartisan commitment to plutocracy means the US has never been in danger of true democracy. Instead, billions upon billions of dollars are spent to sustain an electoral charade and ensure that capital remains concentrated in the hands of the few – while Americans continue to literally die of poverty. Now it remains to be seen whether the Trump-Musk breakup will drive Democrats into Musk's arms. But either way, the country's plutocratic values remain rock solid – and that is nothing less than a 'disgusting abomination'. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.

Trump warns Musk of ‘serious consequences' if he funds Democrats
Trump warns Musk of ‘serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

Trump warns Musk of ‘serious consequences' if he funds Democrats

United States President Donald Trump has warned billionaire former ally Elon Musk against funding Democratic candidates in the country's 2026 midterm elections as the pair's volcanic break-up continued to play out on the world stage. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' Trump told US network NBC News in an interview published Saturday, without spelling out what the repercussions might be for the tech mogul, whose businesses benefit from lucrative US federal contracts. Trump aides, various Republicans, and key wealthy donors to the GOP have urged the two to temper the bitter feud and make peace, fearing irreparable political and economic fallout. But, asked whether he thought his relationship with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, 'I would assume so, yeah'. The interview featured Trump's most extensive comments yet on the spectacular bust-up that saw Musk criticising his signature tax and spending bill as an 'abomination', tensions escalating after he went on to highlight one-time links between the president and the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. By Saturday morning, Musk had deleted his 'big bomb' allegation that Trump featured in unreleased government files on former associates of Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public,' he said in Thursday's post on X. The Trump administration has acknowledged it is reviewing tens of thousands of documents, videos, and investigative material that his 'MAGA' movement says will unmask public figures complicit in Epstein's crimes. Trump was named in a trove of deposition and statements linked to Epstein that were unsealed by a New York judge in early 2024. The president has not been accused of any wrongdoing, but he had a long and well-publicised friendship with Epstein. Trump has denied spending time on Little Saint James, the private redoubt in the US Virgin Islands where prosecutors alleged Epstein trafficked underage girls for sex. Just last week, Trump had given Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Vice President JD Vance said Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Trump, though he also tried to downplay his attacks as the frustrations of an 'emotional guy'. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' he said in the interview with comedian Theo Von, released Friday. Trump also told NBC that it was the Department of Justice, rather than he, that had decided to return Salvadoran immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia to the US, where he faces charges of transporting undocumented migrants inside the country. Trump added that he had not spoken to El Salvador President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return.

What's behind the Trump-Musk break-up?
What's behind the Trump-Musk break-up?

Al Jazeera

timea day ago

  • Al Jazeera

What's behind the Trump-Musk break-up?

The big break-up: The president of the United States, Donald Trump, has parted ways with the richest man in the world, billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk. Once their friendship reaped rewards for both: Musk donated around hundreds of millions of dollars to Trump's re-election campaign and the president created a role for Musk in his government. But political, or fiscal, differences soured the relationship, and what was once a mutually beneficial alliance deteriorated into an exchange of insults on social media. So, did Elon Musk's position undermine US democracy? And do Donald Trump's friendships and interests influence US policy? Presenter: Elizabeth Puranam Guests: Niall Stanage – Political analyst and White House columnist for The Hill newspaper Dan Ives – Technology analyst and managing director of Wedbush Securities Faiz Siddiqui – Author of, Hubris Maximus: The Shattering of Elon Musk

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store