Guido Fawkes editor to settle Dale Vince libel case over pro-Hamas allegations
The lawsuit was initiated following two articles published in March 2024, which Mr Vince claimed had libelled him by falsely alleging he supports Hamas.
The articles followed a Times Radio interview given by the Labour donor in October 2023.
During the radio interview, which occurred two days after the Hamas attacks on Israel on October 7, Mr Vince stated that "one man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist" as part of a broader discussion about the issue.
Mr Vince's legal team said that Guido Fawkes had published two articles and a 16-second extract from the interview, which included the quote, but that his comment had been "fatally distorted".
Following a judge's ruling on preliminary issues in the libel case, Guido Fawkes announced that Mr Staines would pay Mr Vince £9,995 in damages to settle the claim, without issuing an apology.
Mr Staines would also cover Mr Vince's legal costs, estimated to be around £100,000.
Mr Staines must also remove the allegations from his website and social media within seven days, and cannot repeat the claims.
It comes after Associated Newspapers Ltd, the publisher of the Daily Mail, settled a similar libel claim brought by Mr Vince earlier in the week.
In a statement, Mr Staines said: 'My decision to settle is a purely commercial one, similar to the decision that Associated Newspapers and GB News made.
'Following the adverse ruling on meaning the Guido Fawkes Organisation simply does not have the resources to risk a ruinous High Court legal battle of this kind involving appeals against a wealthy claimant.'
He continued: 'I am strongly of the opinion that this type of action, which the claimant has publicly characterised in partisan political terms, should be prohibited under the proposed cross-party supported legislation to block Slapps (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation).
'We will make no apology for closely scrutinising wealthy party political donors who do business in Government-regulated industries.'
Mr Justice Pepperall decided several early issues in the case on Wednesday, including the 'natural and ordinary' meaning of the articles and whether they were statements of fact or opinion.
Discussing the first Guido Fawkes article, the judge rejected Mr Vince's claim that it 'alleged his support for the 7 October atrocity', but 'declined to make a finding of some broader support for Hamas'.
In a statement, Mr Vince claimed he was 'seriously defamed' by the articles and that he believed his case 'is the first successfully pursued against Paul Staines and his Guido Fawkes operation'.
He added that he was 'happy to have burst his (Mr Staines') bubble' and added that Mr Staines must be 'diligent and accurate with what he publishes'.
Mr Vince is also taking legal action against Richard Tice, the deputy leader of the Reform UK party, and Lord Shaun Bailey, in separate libel cases in relation to the same accusations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Belfast Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
‘A lot of Gaza is like a car park now': Belfast journalist horrified by war in the Middle East
ITV News correspondent who visited besieged strip months after Hamas rampage sees no end in sight The normally positive-sounding Belfast journalist John Irvine struggles to maintain any semblance of optimism when it comes to Gaza. 'It's depressing. There doesn't seem to be a bottom to it,' says the 62-year-old senior ITV News correspondent, who shocked the world with his reports of emaciated, starving Palestinian children and adults being shot as they queued for food.
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour has condemned London to be Europe's capital for Rolex and Range Rover theft
Britain is facing an epidemic of shoplifting. Retailers are collectively facing just under three thefts per minute, almost double what it was 10 years ago. Over half a million such offences were reported last year. The rise of this larceny has partly been blamed on the downgrading in 2014 of the seriousness of 'low value' theft of items worth less than £200. The Government has announced that this policy is being reversed, but it looks set to make an equally serious mistake which will likely see London becoming Europe's capital of high-value thefts. It is not as if this problem is not already with us. While Range Rovers are no longer the most stolen car (Toyota Hilux pickup trucks now top that uncoveted league), they have been so prone to being pilfered that insurance rates soared. In London, annual quotes of over £20,000 became the norm as a result. The same phenomenon is true for insuring watches and jewellery. When I took a look myself, I found fine art premiums in general are 0.3pc of value or less – those for valuables that are worn will often be 10 times higher, at 3pc or more.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
1,200 ex-cons returned to prison amid reoffending increase
And a leading victim support charity has called on the Scottish Government to reform the "confusing" process. In 2021, the Parole Board of Scotland recommended that the Scottish Government revoke the release licences of 241 people. That number also dipped in 2022, slipping to 226, before an increase of 19.5% in 2023 (270 people). Last year, 285 people were sent back to prison, while 152 have been remanded during the first six months of 2025. That is a total of 1,174 people. The number of inmates in Scottish prisons averaged 7,860 in 2023/24, up 6% from the previous year. (Image: Colin Mearns) Meanwhile, 1,009 prisoners had been issued with release declarations or recommendations by the parole board between 2021 and 2025. The figures reveal that 248 prisoners were paroled in 248, followed by 191 in 2022. The number rose by 18.8% to 227 in 2023, before rising again to 240 last year. And in the first six months of 2025, 103 prisoners were paroled. According to the parole board, the 1,174 recommendations made by the board include people who had been released from prison on a 'parole' licence, as well as those who were released automatically 'upon reaching their earliest date of liberation'. However, Scottish Government ministers are permitted to revoke licenses without asking the board for a recommendation, which means the total number of reoffenders could be greater. While the terms of parole differ for each inmate, all continue a standard set of conditions, which include acting in 'good behavior', agreeing to visits and remaining in contact with one's parole officer, and not committing any offence. Kate Wallace, Chief Executive of Victim Support Scotland, told The Herald that the parole system could be 'vastly improved'. She said: 'While we acknowledge that parole decisions are purely based on risk, we fully support any changes to the system to make it more victim-centred, transparent and trauma-informed. "Victims often tell us they feel confused by the parole process and that they are not routinely informed when the perpetrator in their case breaches licence conditions. This presents them with a multitude of challenges, including their ability to plan for their own safety. People deserve to feel safe in their own homes and communities. Victim Support Scotland has called for a rethink of the current parole system. Wallace added: "We look forward to the Scottish Government's upcoming consultation on parole which will give people impacted by crime a voice in strengthening this important process. "In the meantime, Victim Support Scotland stands ready to support victims of crime at any stage of their journey, including helping them to navigate the parole system. The Parole Board's Annual Report for 2023/24, explains how applications for release are assessed, noting: 'The Board only grants release in cases where the level and nature of risk are deemed to be manageable. This decision is informed by oral or written evidence in the form of witness evidence or, usually, reports contained in dossiers.' However, in June, the Scottish Prison Service (SPS) revealed that more than 150 violent offenders had been released in February and March 2025, in a bid to combat overcrowding in the prison estate. 312 inmates who had served 40% of their sentence were released over the two months, 152 of which had been imprisoned for violent crimes of a non-sexual nature. Prisoners who have committed domestic abuse or sexual offences are not included in the early release provision. At the time, the SPS said the number of incarcerated people in Scotland's prisons had reached a critical level. "While these releases have provided some respite,' a spokesperson said, 'our staff continue to manage an extremely high and complex population, with eight prisons now at red risk status, and the number of people in custody set to rise even further. "This has an increasingly destabilising effect on our establishments, with staff unable to do the critical work of building relationships and supporting rehabilitation, and prisoners frustrated by the impact on their daily lives and the opportunities available to them." Read more: 'A pressure cooker': More than 8,000 violent prison assaults recorded 'More psychologists in Scottish prisons could prevent overcrowding' 'No plan': Swinney accused over response to spiralling taxpayer cost of prisons Reacting to the release of the figures, a Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Decisions on individual cases are a matter for the independent Parole Board for Scotland. Their decisions, including those around recall, are based on a clear risk assessment of any individuals being managed safely in the community. 'The parole system could work better for everyone – hearing a wide range of views is essential to developing a more person-centred, trauma-informed system. 'That is why [we] have already committed to a public consultation on reform of the parole system. It will be informed by direct engagement with victims, justice partners, and those with lived experience, driving a parole system that is fair, transparent, and trusted.'
