
‘I really hate him for what he did': Wife at the centre of Singapore's shocking rape ring case speaks out
SINGAPORE, June 8 — After years of silence, the survivor of a deeply disturbing rape case in Singapore involving her husband and six other men shared her story with The Straits Times in the hope of helping others.
Annie (not her real name) used to break down reading her husband's letters from prison. Now, she barely glances at them.
'I don't love him anymore,' she said quietly. 'I've let go and moved on.'
Her husband, known only as 'J' in court reports, is at the heart of one of Singapore's most disturbing sex crime cases: a calculated and brutal scheme where four men drugged their wives and allowed others to rape them. Annie was the first known victim — and the woman at the centre of it all.
J, who recruited the most accomplices, drugged Annie and facilitated her rape by five men, one of whom attacked her on their wedding anniversary.
She told her story to The Straits Times twice — first in 2024 and again in May 2025 on camera. The pain was raw.
'I really hate him for making me go through this,' she said through tears.
'But I tell myself I have to go on.'
Annie met J in 2008 at a karaoke bar. She was in her 20s, drawn in by his humour and charm. Within months, she was pregnant and reluctantly married him.
'I told him, 'I don't feel secure with you,'' she recalled. He promised he had changed.
But shortly after their first child was born, Annie discovered he had been checking into hotels regularly. At first, he lied, then claimed a woman was 'just giving massages.'
She forgave him, wanting to keep the family intact.
'I didn't want my child to grow up in a broken home,' said Annie, who had been raised by a single mother.
But the cycle repeated. Even during her second pregnancy, she caught J lying about his whereabouts.
Eventually, Annie herself had a brief affair — something J would later use to justify his actions.
Unbeknownst to her, J had already been planning her violation, exchanging fantasies with a man she had contacted briefly online.
'He even gave him details about me — where I studied, what drinks I liked,' she said.
'Everything was so nicely plotted. I thought it was my fault.'
There were signs. J installed a camera in their bedroom, supposedly to watch their children — but later shared access online, where strangers watched them have sex. Another time, he called someone to listen in as they were intimate.
Annie was furious. Her mother-in-law slapped J and told him: 'This is your wife, not some prostitute.'
Annie suggested counselling, but gave up when only group therapy was available.
'I just felt hopeful,' she said. 'I wanted a happy family.'
He remained outwardly devoted to their children and successful in his job, so she kept forgiving him.
Everything unravelled on New Year's Day in 2020. Annie came home from a party and found sexually explicit messages on J's phone, including photos of herself — blindfolded and unconscious.
'I felt very blank. I couldn't believe he had done this to me,' she said.
She confronted him, but he refused to explain. Her family urged her to go to the police. At first, she didn't — afraid of what it might mean for her children.
Later, she confronted one of the men mentioned in the chat, referred to as 'K', and he admitted to raping her. Her sister filmed the exchange.
That was when Annie finally filed a police report.
'I was afraid my children would become victims too if he wasn't arrested.'
J and K were arrested on January 2, 2020. As police investigations progressed, Annie discovered the true extent of the betrayal.
J had orchestrated multiple rapes, drugging her with Dormicum pills bought illegally. He photographed her unconscious body and shared the images with his accomplices.
'I couldn't imagine someone I loved doing this to me,' she said.
'The only 'lucky' thing was that I wasn't awake for the assaults.'
Looking back, she recalled waking up groggy and disoriented, her underwear missing, and wondering why she was taking so many pills.
'He said it was medicine I asked for,' she said.
She also recognised some of her assailants — one had flirted with her online; another had joined her and J for drinks, making her feel uneasy.
Annie's case helped expose the harrowing crimes committed by her husband and six other men, all of whom have since been convicted.
Now in her 40s, she's focused on rebuilding her life and raising her children. She speaks out not for sympathy, but to ensure others know such abuse can happen — even within a marriage.
'I want women to know this kind of thing really happens,' she said.
'And they're not alone.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Straits Times
3 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Drugged, raped for 8 years - Singaporean's ordeal in hands of depraved ex-hubby
KUALA LUMPUR: The woman victimised in Singapore's "wife-rape" ring has recently recounted her life's darkest chapter to The Straits Times. Annie (not her real name) was the first victim in a shocking trial that led to the conviction of seven men in the city-state, including her former husband. Four of the men had plotted an elaborate and sadistic scheme, which involved drugging their own wives and allowing others to rape them. Between 2010 and 2018, she endured a horrific ordeal: she was drugged and blindfolded by her then-husband, who invited various men to rape her while she was unconscious. Now, her ex-husband and five other men involved in the "wife-rape ring" had been given lengthy prison sentences of between 13 and 22 years. Three of them were also given 20 strokes of the rotan. To protect the victims' identities, a gag order had been issued by the court. The names of the seven men were anonymised in public records, a standard practice when sex offenders were close family members of their victims. During the trial, they were identified only as "J", "K", "L", "M", "N", "O" and "P", and the victims were Annie, the wives of "K" and "L", as well as the ex-wife of "M". Most of the accomplices were enlisted by Annie's former husband, known in media reports as "J". He frequently drugged Annie and arranged for five men to rape her, with one assault even occurring on their wedding anniversary. Besides Annie, the man known as L also drugged his own wife and invited P to rape her, though that attempt was not successful when she regained consciousness. P was handed a three-year jail sentence in 2022. In the exclusive interview, Annie said; "I really feel hatred. I really hate him for making me go through this, but there is nothing I can do about it. I just tell myself that I have to go on." Annie's nightmare began in 2008. She was in her 20s and she met J at a karaoke pub. He was jovial, humorous and had charmed her with sweet talk. Within months, she became pregnant and, despite her reservations, she married him. "I told him, 'I don't feel secure with you. I have this thought that after marriage, you will have a lot of other women'," she recalled. He, however, reassured her: "You are 'The One' for me. I have had enough fun, I will be a good husband and father to our children." For years, Annie felt something was not right about J. He'd suggested installing a CCTV camera in their bedroom on the pretext of monitoring their children. Police investigations later found that he had shared the camera's password online, allowing others to watch them in the bedroom at intimate moments. Another time, while they were in bed, she caught him calling someone to listen in on their intimate moments. Annie's life shattered on New Year's Day in 2020 when she found her husband asleep while watching a video on his phone. A gut feeling led her to check his online chat history, and she was shocked to find explicit photos of him with a blindfolded woman, and horrifyingly, with herself also blindfolded and unconscious. "I actually felt very blank. I could not imagine that he had done something like that to me." Annie then forced her ex-husband to take her to the man whom he shared her explicit pictures with K. She asked if he and K had raped her when she was unconscious, and after initial denials, he admitted it. Fearing her children might become J's next victims, Annie filed a police report on Jan 2, 2020. "I also thought what he did to me was really cruel. Really very cruel," she said as quoted. The next day, she went to the police station. The following day, J and K were arrested. As investigations progressed, Annie learnt that she had been violated by multiple men and not just K. J had not only invited them into the couple's bedroom and watched as they raped her, but also snapped photos and later relived the assaults with them. Annie had no recollection of the assaults, but the pieces began falling into place afterwards. She remembered J giving her pills for minor ailments, like a sore throat or cough. "When I asked, 'How come I need to take so much medicine?', he would say, 'These are what you requested, and they are all good for you'," Annie recalled, noting she'd sometimes wake up groggy or without underwear. It was later revealed J had been sedating her with dormicum pills, a prescription drug he bought from a peddler and even tested on himself. "After I found out that he used this as a way to sedate me, I felt a very deep sense of betrayal," she said. "I could not imagine somebody that I love so much doing this to me." To cope with the emotional turmoil, she began drinking heavily. She also worked two jobs to keep her family afloat, all while shielding her children from the truth. It took over a year before she could tell them what happened. When they finally heard, they burst into tears and hugged her. Her eldest child said of their father, "He can stay inside prison forever. I don't care." Annie said; "I hated myself for being so blinded by love, by him and I also hated myself for being so forgiving. "I felt very dirty. I felt very used. I just felt that there was no meaning for me to exist, actually. Why do I still exist?" But each time those thoughts surfaced, she clung to one reason. "I have to bring my children up. I cannot just leave them like that. It is not their fault," she said. In the interview, Annie revealed that she attended the first few hearings in her ex-husband's trial, but stopped after that. She testified against O, who was the only perpetrator to claim trial. O was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 13 years' jail and 12 strokes of the rotan. J and the other four men had pleaded guilty, but Annie did not attend her ex-husband's sentencing. He received the heaviest penalty of 29 years' jail and 24 strokes of the rotan. "I felt sad for him that he has to serve (a long sentence), but I also felt glad that all the accused are receiving the punishment they should be receiving," she said. While Annie, whose divorce was finalised in April this year, no longer speaks to her former in-laws, however, she permitted her children to visit them as she valued family ties. She had sold her marital home and moved into a smaller flat. Besides financial reasons, she also wanted to avoid her former neighbors' questions about J's whereabouts.

Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
DAP demands AG justify ‘no further action' ruling in Teoh Beng Hock case, backs judicial review
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — DAP today called on Attorney General Tan Sri Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar to explain in detail his decision to classify Teoh Beng Hock's death as requiring no further action (NFA). In a joint statement issued by DAP national chairman Gobind Singh Deo and secretary-general Loke Siew Fook, the party said the Attorney General must justify why he believes there is insufficient evidence to prosecute anyone for Teoh's death. 'The Attorney General and no one else has the discretion to prosecute under the Constitution. He must explain why he is unable to do so in this case particularly in light of the decisions of the Court of Appeal and civil proceedings in the High Court,' the statement said, as published on the DAP's official Facebook page. On May 21, the Attorney General classified the case as NFA after receiving investigation papers from the police, and on May 30, issued a letter to the family's lawyers stating that there was not enough evidence to support criminal prosecution. The party said it had consistently pushed for accountability since Teoh's death in 2009 and had formed a legal team that initiated an inquest to determine the cause of death. The inquest found bruises on Teoh's neck, but on January 5, 2011, the coroner returned an open verdict. DAP then challenged the finding in the High Court, which upheld the coroner's decision, prompting an appeal to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal overturned the earlier findings, concluding that Teoh's death was caused by 'an unlawful act or acts of persons unknown, inclusive of MACC officers who were involved in the arrest and investigation of the deceased.' DAP also supported the family in a civil suit that led to a government admission of liability for negligence and a RM600,000 compensation award with RM60,000 in costs. The party argued that both the Court of Appeal and civil court decisions provided grounds for renewed police investigations to identify those responsible. DAP said it supports the family's intention to challenge the NFA decision through a judicial review. 'We support this action and also call upon the Attorney General to review his decision and push ahead with charges against those responsible for Teoh Beng Hock's death without further delay,' the party said.

Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Fine, see you in court': Fahmi Reza calls out authorities over travel ban confusion, says no one taking responsibility; vows legal action
KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — Graphic artist and activist Fahmi Reza has criticised the government over his recent overseas travel ban, saying no authorities have taken responsibility for the incident. In a strongly worded statement posted on Facebook, Fahmi said despite government claims that there was 'no official travel restriction' against him, he was still barred from leaving the country due to what authorities described as a 'confusion during an immigration check'. 'I don't see any government body owning up to the mistake that resulted in the restriction of my freedom of movement,' he said. 'You keep saying there is 'no official ban'. But in reality, I was still blocked and denied my right to travel,' he added. Fahmi questioned the government's accountability, saying he had lost time and money because of the incident, yet no agency had taken the blame. He also pointed out the double standards in how regular citizens are swiftly prosecuted for offences, whereas authorities often escape responsibility. 'This time, it's the people's turn to drag those in power to court,' Fahmi said. He insisted that no government or authority is above the law and that citizens should not be afraid to challenge injustice. 'You always tell me to 'use the right channel', don't you? Fine, see you in court,' he said. The travel issue came to light after Fahmi was reportedly prevented from boarding an international flight yesterday. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had earlier denied the existence of a blacklist order against Fahmi, saying there was no directive from the government to restrict his movement. Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Razarudin Husain similarly stated that police did not issue any instruction to bar Fahmi from leaving the country and attributed the matter to possible confusion at the immigration checkpoint.