Gov. Polis uses state grants to lean on local governments that buck housing policies
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed an executive order Friday that pushes local governments to comply with certain state housing laws as a condition of receiving state grant funding.
The order directs several state agencies to identify funding opportunities that can be prioritized for local governments and projects that align with state housing priorities. It highlights seven state laws passed in the last two years that aim to increase housing options across the state.
Polis said the goal of the executive order is to ensure those who receive discretionary grant funding from the state are prioritizing state efforts to increase housing stock, affordability and sustainability. He estimated over $100 million dollars in state funding will be subject to the order.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'Today we're taking action to make sure that the limited state funding opportunities are prioritized for local governments that are following state housing laws and land use laws and doing their part so hardworking Coloradans to afford to live, work and thrive across our state of Colorado,' Polis said at a press conference in his office at the Colorado Capitol, where he signed the executive order Friday.
While many local governments have supported housing policies approved by the Colorado Legislature in recent years, others opposed the policies and indicated concerns about compliance. Polis said he wants local governments to be able to go through DOLA to help them achieve compliance with new state housing laws.
'We want to make sure everybody is working in good faith and has a plan to implement these laws,' Polis said. 'Some counties have just thought about it and worked on it more than others, and we want to make sure that everybody thinks about it and works on it and gets it done because housing is a statewide issue.'
Laws covered by the executive order include 2024 measures to prohibit residential occupancy limits, require higher-density housing near transit stops, prohibit local minimum parking requirements, legalize the construction of accessory dwelling units, and encourage more sustainable affordable housing, as well as 2025 polices that set regional building codes for factory-built homes and allow some multifamily buildings to have just one staircase.
Housing availability and affordability has been a growing crisis in Colorado that state legislators worked to improve since 2023. A 2023 housing executive order Polis signed said the state is short tens of thousands of housing units, and his new order says the same concerns continue to escalate.
Some of the laws included in the order are not yet implemented, so the provisions of the executive order will apply after the measures take effect.
The executive order requires state agencies including the Colorado Department of Transportation, the Colorado Energy Office, the Department of Local Affairs, and the Office of Economic Development and International Trade to submit a list within 30 days of potential competitive grants and other discretionary funding sources that could be subject to the requirements of the order.
The order will be updated once the governor's office compiles a list of grants and funding to be included, and it will apply to funding awarded after Oct. 6.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colorado lawmakers proposing bill to pause wolf reintroduction at special session
Multiple attempts to pause Colorado's controversial wolf reintroduction program have failed. But that hasn't persuaded a bipartisan coalition of state lawmakers from attempting another bill to pause more paws on the ground during the special session called by Gov. Jared Polis to address the state's budget woes. The bill to be introduced at the Aug. 21 special session of the Colorado legislature calls for pausing the planned release of more wolves late this year or early next year to help the state grapple with a budget shortfall of nearly $1 billion, according to a news release. The special session was called in part to address the passage by Congress of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" and its health insurance impacts to the state, according to the news release. Here are highlights of the proposed bill: Reduce by $264,268 appropriations for state fiscal year 2025-26 from the general fund to Colorado Parks and Wildlife for the reintroduction of gray wolves and allocate money in the same amount to the general fund to be used for the health insurance affordability cash fund. Eliminate fiscal year 2025-26 general fund revenue for Colorado Parks and Wildlife to acquire or reintroduce wolves. That money may be used to assist livestock owners in preventing and resolving conflicts between wolves and livestock and to pay fair compensation to owners of livestock for any losses of livestock caused by wolves. The state general fund allocated $2.1 million for the wolf recovery program that will be used for the purposes mentioned. Bill sponsors stated in a news release Aug. 19 the bill would allow for a "reasonable pause in wolf reintroduction while the state continues to put in place supports for landowners and handles budget challenges." The bill's main sponsors include Sen. Dylan Roberts (D-Frisco), Sen. Marc Catlin (R-Montrose), Rep. Meghan Lukens (D-Steamboat Springs) and Rep. Matthew Martinez (D-Monte Vista). "Now is not the time to be spending precious taxpayer dollars on new wolves; let's focus on lowering costs for Coloradans and balancing our budget.' Roberts said in the news release. Roberts and Catlin, whose districts are in the heart of where two prior wolf releases and the majority of wolf depredations of livestock have taken place, have been consistent critics of Colorado Parks and Wildlife's implementation of the wolf recovery plan. That plan was established after voters narrowly approved reintroducing wolves to Colorado in 2020. Roberts, chairman of the Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee, confronted Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis about budget overruns of its wolf recovery plan at a Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee hearing held June 30. The Aug. 19 news release cited the plan's nearly $3.5 million cost the past fiscal year when voters were told the wolf recovery program would cost about $800,000 per year in future years depending on the final plan. The news release cited part of that budget overrun was due to significant costs for wolf-livestock conflict management and depredation reimbursement costs to livestock owners required by the plan. Part of the state's wolf-livestock conflict management costs have been offset by the Rocky Mountain Wolf Project's Born to be Wild specialty license plate that has generated nearly $1 million since its inception in January of 2024. The sale of those license plates has paid for the state's $500,000 range rider program to deter wolves from conflicts with livestock. Colorado Parks and Wildlife in 2024 awarded wolf depredation claims of $603,327.60, which is more than $253,000 over what the state budgeted through its general fund as well as revenue from several Colorado Parks and Wildlife funds, excluding sales revenue of hunting and fishing licenses. The state wildlife agency previously told the Coloradoan the difference will be covered by its funding sources. Claims of similar amounts could be incurred by the state, as there have been 19 confirmed wolf depredations of livestock as of Aug. 19, 2025, compared to 29 depredations in 2024. Here are previous attempts to pause wolf reintroductions that have failed The Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission voted 10-1 to deny a petition by ranching and county groups to pause wolf releases in January. Gov. Polis vetoed Senate Bill 23-256 in May of 2023 that would have postponed the state's initial wolf releases, which occurred in December of 2023. A group called Smart Wolf Policy is collecting signatures to get Ballot Initiative 13, which calls for repealing what voters approved in 2020 by putting an end to the reintroduction effort by Dec. 31, 2026, on the November 2026 ballot. This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Here is the latest effort to pause Colorado's wolf reintroduction Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
With more self-driving cars on the road, states put more rules in place
In an aerial view, Tesla cars sit parked in a lot at the Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif. (). Self-driving vehicle technology continues to advance, prompting a wave of liability and safety regulations from state lawmakers. This year, lawmakers in Arizona, Louisiana, Montana, Nevada and the District of Columbia enacted legislation to regulate driverless vehicles, according to a database from the National Conference of State Legislatures. While much of the legislation aims to update existing law to include new definitions for autonomous vehicles, other measures put rules in place regarding insurance, permitting, licensing and road testing. In total, lawmakers in 25 states introduced 67 bills related to autonomous vehicles, according to the database. California, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania currently have bills under consideration. Alaska, Delaware and Washington have bills that will be carried over into the next legislative session. Governors vetoed two measures this year. Colorado Democratic Gov. Jared Polis shot down a measure that would have required a driver to be present in any commercial vehicle being operated by an automated driving system. Virginia Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a measure that would have put rules in place for 'high-risk artificial intelligence systems,' but would have excluded 'autonomous vehicle technology' from that category. As of now, there are no vehicles that have achieved full autonomy, according to the Society of Automotive Engineers' criteria. But several car companies have introduced automated driving features, allowing drivers to take their hands off the wheel. Tesla is rolling out its Full Self-Driving feature, a system under which a vehicle can drive itself almost anywhere with minimal intervention from the driver. Tesla Autopilot, which the company made available to the public in late 2024, also helps with basic vehicle maneuvering. And Waymo, the country's first autonomous ride-hailing service, is currently operating in Atlanta; Austin, Texas; Los Angeles; Phoenix and San Francisco. The robo-taxi company plans to expand to Miami and Washington, D.C., next. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, vehicle safety is the main benefit of driverless cars. With higher levels of automation, there is less room for human error or driver distractions. The new technology also could improve safety for bicyclists and pedestrians, according to the agency. But driverless cars have been involved in hundreds of accidents over the past few years. Between 2021 and 2024, there were 696 accidents reported that involved a Waymo vehicle, according to an analysis by California-based law firm DiMarco | Araujo | Montevideo. And last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration began investigating Tesla's Full Self-Driving system after multiple reports of crashes that occurred in low-visibility conditions. Stateline is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@ Solve the daily Crossword
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Low credit scores blast Coloradans' home insurance rates
Coloradans with low credit scores can expect to fork over $2,000 more annually on average for home insurance compared to high-credit policyholders, a new analysis finds. Why it matters: Credit scores aren't necessarily indicative of somebody's ability to pay their bills — and tying them to insurance prices can disadvantage low-income and minority homeowners, among others. The big picture: U.S. homeowners with low credit are charged $1,996 more annually compared to otherwise identical homeowners with high credit, per a new report from the Consumer Federation of America and the Climate and Community Institute. Zoom in: The report shows the "credit penalties" — the difference between annual premiums for otherwise identical low-credit and high-credit policyholders — sits at $2,034 for Colorado. Context: The report is based on over 600,000 nationwide "test quotes" representing "what a typical, hypothetical homeowner would be charged for homeowners' insurance."
