logo
2026 Toyota bZ First Look: Is a Little Better Good Enough?

2026 Toyota bZ First Look: Is a Little Better Good Enough?

Motor Trend13-05-2025

Late to the game and short on redeeming qualities, the Toyota bZ4X has been a tough sell in the U.S. next to better options from Tesla, Hyundai, Kia, and pretty much every other company that builds a compact electric SUV. The revised 2026 Toyota bZ aims to fix that through subtle improvements to nearly all aspects of the vehicle, from range and charging to interior features and exterior design.
Toyota is also taking this opportunity to drop the '4X' in the old model's name. Calling the new car bZ probably won't shed the outgoing car's baggage, but it signals that Toyota has thankfully abandoned plans to brand every EV with an alphanumeric that starts with bZ (an abbreviation of 'Beyond Zero'). The company's next EV, the 2026 Toyota C-HR+, instead dredges up a different jumble of letters that has (some) historical precedence and maybe even a sliver of name recognition.
Going Further Quicker or the Same Distance Slower
The big news is that the bZ's maximum range rating jumps 25 percent to 314 miles over the bZ4X's best of 252 miles. Notably, that extra reach is squeezed out through small tweaks rather than packing a bunch of additional energy into the battery. The larger of the bZ's two packs is only marginally larger at 74.7 kWh of energy capacity compared to 71.4 kWh in today's front-drive models and 72.8 kWh in all-wheel drive trims.
New permanent-magnet motors make more efficient use of that energy thanks to silicon carbide semiconductors while also delivering improved performance. Most front-drive bZs make 221 horsepower, a 20-hp gain, while all-wheel-drive models surge from 214 to 338 hp. With all that giddy-up on board, we expect the quickest models to drop more than a second from the 0-60-mph dash, stopping the clock right around 4.5 seconds.
We're a bit shocked that Toyota Motor North America has also chosen to introduce a new base model. As far as we know, no one ever asked for a slower bZ4X with a smaller battery, and yet the front-wheel-drive 2026 Toyota bZ XLE generates just 168 hp and uses a 57.7-kWh battery. Curiously, Toyota says the XLE will earn an EPA range of 236 miles, somehow—almost inexplicably—matching the range of the front-drive 2025 bZ4X Limited with that 71.4-kWh battery.
How is that possible? If we had to wager a guess at what's going on with the new range ratings, we'd bet there are bigger changes to the numbers Toyota isn't sharing. While most of the auto industry advertises usable battery capacity, Toyota lists total capacity. It seems likely that the 2026 bZ leaves less energy in reserve than the old bZ4X, allowing significantly more energy to be used for driving the car down the road.
The model lineup, range estimates, and power ratings for the 2026 Toyota bZ are as follows:
Prepare for Better Charging
More than range, the bZ4X's greatest shortcoming has been its lousy DC fast-charging. Unfortunately, the 2026 bZ's peak DC charging speed doesn't increase beyond the current car's ho-hum 150 kW. Toyota is still promising faster public charging, though, thanks to a new battery preconditioning feature. When activated, it uses coolant to either warm or cool the battery to an ideal temperature for charging. Drivers can turn on preconditioning manually or set it so that the car automatically prepares the battery whenever a DC fast-charging station is set as destination. There's also a new route planner integrated into the navigation system to help drivers plan their charging stops on long road trips.
Toyota can even tout the 2026 bZ as an early adopter of the Tesla-designed NACS port, which will allow owners to plug into the majority of Tesla Superchargers without an adapter. Plug & Charge capability means the car can initiate charging and handle payment without needing the driver to fuss with a phone app or swipe a credit card. The bZ can also refuel faster at home thanks to an upgrade from 7-kW to 11-kW AC charging.
Design Tweaks Inside and Out
A new fascia with thinner running lights strengthens the familial relationship with the Toyota Camry and Prius, but it's the available body-colored-matched cladding that gives the bZ a real glow up. When painted to blend in with the rest of the car, the chunky plastic trim disappears into the rest of the body work. Unfortunately, the high-contrast black finish is still standard on some models, which calls attention to the front fenders that look like they've been installed backwards.
Interior revisions include a new dashboard with a larger 14.0-inch touchscreen across the lineup. Compared to the outgoing bZ4X's 12.3-inch screen, though, the new screen won't feel significantly larger because the current car's capacitive climate controls have been relocated into the display, where they take up the lower third of the screen. A revised center console provides space for two wireless phone chargers and moves the gear selector back toward the armrest. Toyota also says the cabin will be more refined than it already is thanks to improved sound insulation and tweaked suspension. The bZ's steering wheel sprouts a pair of paddles for adjusting regenerative braking and there's a 1,500-watt AC outlet for powering household electronics. Limited trims gain an eight-way power passenger seat, driver memory function, and a digital rearview mirror.
Is a Little Better Good Enough?
The 2026 Toyota bZ will reach U.S. dealers in the second half of 2025. With longer range, faster charging, more power, a more attractive face, and a more refined interior, there's little doubt that it will be a better EV than the bZ4X that came before it. But the competition isn't standing still. The question that remains is whether Toyota has done enough to push the bZ ahead relative to the alternatives. We'll wait to drive it and run it through our test regimen before we take a stance on that.
This story was originally published in March 2025 with global market details, but has since been updated to reflect U.S.-specific battery sizes, range estimates, photos, and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry
China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China's Rare Earths Weapon Could Kill Europe's Auto Industry

China earlier this year introduced restrictions on its exports of rare earths. The move marked a new stage in the US- China trade spat, when the two sides no longer tried to out-tariff each other but took to more concrete steps. The problem is, the restrictions don't just apply to U.S. companies. And they may well deliver the fatal blow to Europe's struggling auto industry. China controls 90% of the world's rare earths processing capacity. It is the indisputable, if not exactly celebrated in the West, master of the rare earths industry. And now, it is using this position to make a point to trade partners that have gone above and beyond to restrict Chinese exports to their own countries and regions—essentially the same thing that Washington does when it uses the dominance of the dollar to sanction governments it doesn't see eye to eye with. Rare earths are used in a perhaps surprisingly wide variety of products. More specifically, it's rare-earth magnets that are troubling carmakers on both sides of the ocean. 'Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components, including automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, seat belts, speakers, lights, motors, power steering, and cameras,' the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry body, wrote in a letter addressed to the Trump administration in early May. The letter, cited by Reuters in a recent report on the rare earths restrictions, is one of what looks like a cry for help that is only going to get louder. It was signed by auto industry leaders including Toyota, Volkswagen, and General Motors, which thanked the administration for trying to resolve the issue. If they didn't, the carmakers said, it would be only a matter of time before car factories started shutting same is happening in Europe, and it's worse—because with Trump, U.S. carmakers no longer have to worry about EVs. With the current European parliament and the Commission, local carmakers do have to worry about EVs, a lot. Because EVs feature greater amounts of those rare earths than internal combustion engine cars. And European carmakers have been mandated with the production and sale of certain minimum numbers of these EVs over the next three years. 'I informed my Chinese counterpart about the alarming situation in the EU car industry — the rare earth and permanent magnets are essential for industrial production… this is extremely disruptive for industry,' the European Union's trade commissioner, Maros Sefcovic, said this week, as quoted by the Financial Times. He added that the 'Carmakers are warning of huge production difficulties in a short period of time.' The clock, in other words, is ticking and China does not really seem in a hurry to stop it. The restrictions that Beijing implemented in mid-April are not literal—or direct. They are in the form of a new licensing regime for anyone who wants to buy rare earth magnets from Chinese producers. To do that, the prospective buyer needs to apply for a license, provide a substantial amount of information, and wait. As a Bosch spokesperson described it, the application process was 'complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information.' Because of this complexity, only a few car parts suppliers have been granted such licenses, making the car companies' freak-out only a matter of time, really. But this is coming at a really bad time for European carmakers, despite the substantial rise in EV sales. They are still to turn in a solid profit on their electric cars and they are supposed to be making ever more of these—which means a lot more rare earths. Things are not that swell in the United States, either, after President Donald Trump accused the Chinese of violating a deal the two earlier agreed, on the temporary relaxation of trade warfare, including tariffs and other trade restrictions—only to be slapped back with the accusation that he did that first, by restricting semiconductor exports. Things are not looking good for the car industry right now but there is, as always, a silver lining. It consists in the fact that the world is entirely dependent on a single source of rare earths and this is not a sustainable or secure state of affairs. There has been a lot of talk in both Europe and the United States about building their own supply chains in such critical materials but action has not really been forthcoming. Even if it was, building a supply chain from scratch takes many years—just ask China. Yet the rare earths drama may boost Europe's resolve to actually start working on that supply chain, however long it takes to build it. Import dependence can be fatal. By Irina Slav for More Top Reads From this article on

CCTV Script 06/06/25
CCTV Script 06/06/25

CNBC

timean hour ago

  • CNBC

CCTV Script 06/06/25

The war of words between Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which seemed to escalate almost hourly, has already cost real money in the capital markets. Overnight, Musk's personal net worth reportedly fell by approximately $34 billion. By aligning the timing of their social media exchanges with Tesla's stock movements, a clear pattern emerges: as the feud grew more intense, with language becoming increasingly blunt and emotional, Tesla's share price continued to slide. Many analysts believe that Tesla's stock is likely to remain volatile. To assess its future trajectory, we can start with the trigger of this conflict: a recently passed House spending bill. One provision would eliminate tax credits for electric vehicles—directly impacting Tesla. JPMorgan analysts estimate that the new legislation could cut Tesla's annual profits by around $1.2 billion. However, some market observers note that both Musk and others in the industry had long anticipated that the Trump administration would eventually scrap EV subsidies. This expectation has been priced in—it was only a matter of timing. But of even greater consequence is the second layer of impact: the broader regulatory posture of the White House toward Musk, particularly in the autonomous driving space. Timing is critical. Next week, Tesla is expected to debut its long-awaited Robotaxi service in Austin, Texas. Progress in self-driving technology has been a key reason many investors remain bullish on Tesla. But the breakdown in Musk's relationship with Trump could undermine those expectations. "there's a view that the battle here going on between musk and Trump, that this is going to continue to sort of, you know, increase, and with that, ultimately does is that autonomous and the regulatory vision does Trump now, now not start to play nice in the sandbox with musk.""Elon Musk, as brilliant as he can be, can also be mercurial and impetuous. CUT TO from a trading perspective, I think the stock could easily trade down into the 250s 260s until you get some support." Beyond the personal feud, the spotlight is also shifting to the broader relationship between Silicon Valley—the U.S. tech hub—and Washington, D.C.—the political center. As Musk and Trump move from allies to adversaries, their split is drawing attention to the evolving dynamic between big tech and federal power. Analysts told CNBC that during Trump's first term, major tech firms often found themselves in the administration's crosshairs. Companies like Meta, Google, and to some extent Apple were all named in antitrust inquiries. Now, the rift between Musk and Trump may open new doors for tech leaders who have had tense relations with Musk. For instance, Jeff Bezos—who also leads a space company—has in recent months made efforts to court Trump more closely, reportedly taking cues from Musk's political playbook. This shift may also present an opportunity for Sam Altman, CEO of AI startup OpenAI. "If you're a startup that's trying to make big names or big headlines with investments for the US, that's probably a good place to be." Still, some analysts caution that this overnight drama may not deserve too much attention. A defining feature of the Trump-era policymaking process has always been its volatility—things can shift dramatically within just a few hours. What ultimately matters is returning to the fundamentals and taking a long-term view of where the industry—and the economy—are heading.

Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government
Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government

Ark Invest's Cathie Wood has weighed in on the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Wood said the feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the US government. Trump said Saturday he had no desire to fix his relationship with the Tesla CEO. The public feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has shown investors just how much control the US government has over Musk's companies, Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood says. "I think the way this is evolving is Elon, Tesla, and investors are beginning to understand more and more just how much the government has control here," Wood said in a video posted to the company's YouTube channel on Friday. Many of Musk's companies have key links to the government and have received billions of dollars in federal loans, contracts, tax credits, and subsidies over the years. "Elon is involved in companies that are depending on the government," Wood said, pointing to Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink as examples. SpaceX's COO, Gwynne Shotwell, said last year that the company has $22 billion worth of federal contracts. Neuralink, Musk's brain chip company, is subject to FDA regulation, and a less friendly regulatory environment could impact Tesla's robotaxi rollout plans. Tesla stock fell more than 14% on Thursday after Musk and Trump became locked in a series of increasingly bitter clashes. The feud appeared to begin, at least publicly, on Tuesday, after Musk criticized Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." He called it a "disgusting abomination" and said it would increase the national budget deficit. Tensions rose fast between the once-close allies on Thursday. Trump threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and Musk said SpaceX would immediately begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft — which returned stranded NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore from the International Space Station in March. Musk later retracted that threat, which Wood said was a sign he was "beginning to walk this back." Wood said the rift with Trump could, in part, be Musk's attempt to further decouple himself from the Trump administration. Musk announced in April that he would be stepping back from his government work. "One of the hypotheses out there is that what has happened was partly — not entirely — orchestrated," Wood said. "Clearly, there has been some brand damage to Tesla, which he readily admits, and I think he's trying to disengage from the government and being associated with one party or the other." Moving forward, Wood said neither Trump nor Musk needed to get "bogged down" with a fight and that she believed both would eventually heed that reasoning. She also appeared to be confident that Musk could make the situation work for him. She said Musk "works really well under pressure" and that "he creates a lot of that chaos and pressure himself." Trump, however, signaled Saturday that he had no desire to fix his relationship with the SpaceX CEO anytime soon. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Trump told NBC News. "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," he added. Vice President JD Vance struck a somewhat friendlier tone when asked about the possibility of reconciliation during a Thursday interview with podcaster Theo Von. Vance said that while he thought it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president," he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store