South African court tells Zambian ex-president's family to hand over body for burial at home
The Zambian government and the family of the late Edgar Lungu, Zambian president from 2015 to 2021, have been embroiled in a legal battle over his remains and burial.
Lungu died in June, aged 68, at a South African hospital following an undisclosed illness.
His family wanted him to be buried in South Africa and for the current President Hakainde Hichilema neither to attend his funeral nor be involved in its arrangements.
The family said it was Lungu's final wish that Hichilema should not get anywhere near his burial, but the Zambian government went to court to stop him from being buried in South Africa.
The court ruled on Friday that Zambia had the authority to hold a state funeral for its former leader.
The court noted that the Zambian courts have previously emphasized that a state funeral is a matter of public interest and protocol for a person of national significance.
'Such that even if a president has expressed a desire not to be given a state funeral, such a wish must be overridden by public interest,' said Judge President Aubrey Ledwaba.
Lungu's family applied for leave to appeal the ruling on Friday, but they will have to convince the same court that made the order that there are reasonable prospects for a different outcome.
Lungu and Hichilema were sworn political rivals. Their conflict led to Hichilema's imprisonment in 2017, when Lungu was president.
Last year, Lungu accused Hichilema's government of using police to harass him and restrict his movements. His family also said the government had initially prevented him from traveling to South Africa for treatment, a charge the government denied.
Zambia's Attorney General Mulilo Kabesha welcomed the ruling, telling reporters that he hoped it would bring the matter to a close even though the family still had a right to appeal.
'This is not winning. You don't win over a burial. It's just what makes good sense, that the former president of the Republic of Zambia should be buried in his own country, the country where he was president,' said Kabesha.
__
Jacob Zimba in Lusaka contributed to this report.
____
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Welsh Labour spends £4m planting trees in Uganda
The Labour-run Welsh Government has spent more than £4m on planting trees in Uganda. The Mbale Tree Planting Project, which aims to mitigate climate change and promote gender equality for female workers in the landlocked country, has been backed by the Welsh Government since 2013. Yet it is the latest in a series of taxpayer costs signed off by Welsh Labour politicians to come under scrutiny, as NHS patients in the country continue to face some of the longest waits for treatment in the UK. The Size of Wales programme, which sends the taxpayer cash to Uganda, has overseen the planting of trees for beekeeping in Africa as part of the Advancing Gender Equality for Climate Change Resilience and Adaptation project. As a result, a network of tree nurseries has been established which are capable of growing at least 3.2 million trees each year. Providing training and support to women-led nurseries had also 'empowered women to take on leadership roles and generate income,' an evaluation of the project reported. Celebrating the planting project's 25 millionth sapling earlier this year, Welsh Labour minister Jane Hutt said: 'The distribution of 25 million trees in eastern Uganda is not only helping to combat climate change, it's transforming lives, particularly for women and young people across Uganda.' Meanwhile, the indigenous Wampis people in the northern Peruvian Amazon have enjoyed solar-powered boats and charging points, also funded by the Welsh Government. Yet more than 5,800 miles away in Wales, the ambulance service has also faced severe pressure and the social care sector is struggling to cope with increased demand. Council tax bills have also soared by 7.2 per cent on average across the country. Welsh Tory leader Darren Millar said: 'People in Wales will be amazed that there is money to plant trees in Uganda, yet public toilets, libraries and other services are closing in their communities. Every pound spent on planting trees in Africa is a pound that is not being spent on public services here. ' The Welsh government isn't even responsible for international relations so Labour ministers should stop the overreach and focus on the things that they are responsible for such as our poorly performing schools and hospitals and getting to grips with the unacceptable waiting times in the Welsh NHS.' It is not the first Welsh Labour policy has faced criticism in recent months. Earlier this year the Government came under attack for spending almost £250,000 on a project to count moths. Tory colleague Janet Finch-Saunders added: 'It is time the Welsh Labour Government stopped this virtue-signalling and instead concentrated their spending priorities on the things that matter most to our tax-paying residents.' A Welsh Government spokesman said: 'Climate change affects all of us, and we are stepping up to play our part in the world. These trees protect communities from floods and droughts, while connecting Welsh and Ugandan schoolchildren culturally and through practical environmental education opportunities. 'Earlier this year, we passed a £26bn budget, investing an extra £1.6bn in public services, strengthening our NHS, supporting schools and helping communities across Wales thrive.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Somalia gripped by fears of militant Islamic uprising
As Fartun Hashi Warsame serves cardamom-spiced tea at her shop, she often overhears worried chatter about the al-Shabaab militants closing in on Mogadishu. If customers notice she is listening, they drop their voices. Speculating about whether al-Shabaab might reach Somalia's capital, or speaking about the government's failings, are dangerous topics, even if they are commonplace. In a city full of secret police, residents never know who might be listening. 'Everybody senses it: the war is raging outside Mogadishu and al-Shabaab keep getting closer,' Mrs Warsame says. 'If al-Shabaab keep taking territory, then it's obvious that the same fate will await Mogadishu. 'Surveillance is everywhere, but sometimes you can't hold back from the obvious. Everybody is aware of the situation and many are concerned.' Al-Shabaab has launched a sweeping offensive, capturing dozens of towns and villages in regions around the Somalian capital since February. The ambitious advance by one of al-Qaeda's most successful affiliates has overturned several years of recent gains made by an internationally recognised federal government, which increasingly finds itself isolated in Mogadishu. An African peace-keeping mission and a sharp escalation in US air strikes under Donald Trump have failed to stop the push. The militia, which is declared a terrorist organisation by the US and the UK, is meanwhile trying to shed its reputation for repression and murderous suicide bombings. Waging a patient 'hearts and minds' campaign in its quickly spreading territory, the group promises Islamic law, justice and order, rather than the corruption of the government. To many international observers, such echoes of of words and conditions in Afghanistan before the Taliban's 2021 victory are concerning. Donors, including the UK, who have poured billions into a faltering nation-building effort are disillusioned and weary. 'It's absolutely similar [to 2021 Afghanistan], and for good reason,' says Ashley Jackson of the Centre on Armed Groups, who has researched both the Taliban and al-Shabaab. 'Both governments are these creations of the global war on terrorism, and similar models of stabilisation were followed in both countries. And this created and sustained predatory, corrupt governments more consumed with self gain than legitimacy or service delivery.' The Taliban and al-Shabaab are 'very structurally, militarily and ideologically similar,' she says, though al-Shabaab allows girls to go to school. As al-Shabaab has this summer stormed across the Hiiraan, Lower Shabelle and Middle Shabelle regions, there has been heavy fighting only 25 miles or so from Mogadishu. Surprisingly, inside the increasingly isolated city, security is better than it has been for years. The indiscriminate al-Shabaab suicide bombings that used to kill hundreds at a time have largely stopped. Shrapnel marks and bullet holes have been plastered over. High-rise blocks, hotels and restaurants have sprung up. The government angrily rejects speculation that the city is threatened, worried it will scare off donors and international backers who live in fortified compounds near the airport. Ismail Osman, former deputy director of Somalia's national intelligence and security agency, said last week: 'Mogadishu is not falling. Mogadishu is standing. 'In fact, it is standing taller every year, supported by a population that is tired of war, energised by opportunity, and determined to never again allow terror or foreign indifference to define its future.' Yet the prospect is widely discussed, including by the businessmen who have poured money into the capital. 'I'm thinking about leaving,' says one businessman who declines to give his name. He returned from Canada to his homeland, but is now worried everything he has invested in shops and cafés will be lost if fighting reaches the city. 'I returned here a decade ago, but even though then the city was plagued by rampant bombings and assassinations, I didn't have as much fear as I do today. 'No one knows what will happen next, that's why everyone is fearful,' he says. 'Most people in Mogadishu know that many towns and districts have fallen and there is fighting taking place near Afgoye [20 miles from Mogadishu]. 'One of my friends told me to spend the summer with him in Nairobi to see how things go, but I have put too much into this city. I won't leave now, but I'll make my decision soon.' Al-Shabaab, meaning The Youth in Arabic, emerged as the radical wing of Somalia's now-defunct Union of Islamic Courts, which controlled Mogadishu in 2006, before being forced out by Ethiopian forces. The group vows to implement Islamic law and condemns democracy as a Western transplant. In 2012 the leadership swore allegiance to al-Qaeda. The group became notorious for attacks inside Somalia and in neighbouring Kenya, where in 2013, its gunmen stormed the Westgate shopping mall in Nairobi, killing at least 67 people. Several foreign jihadists are thought to have joined, including Samantha Lewthwaite, the British woman married to one of the 7/7 suicide bombers, and now known as the White Widow. Al-Shabaab's resurgence would have seemed unlikely only two years ago. From mid-2022 a clan-based militia called the Macawisley pushed the group out of much of central Somalia with the backing of the army. Yet those gains have been swept away after government successes later soured. Promises of development in the liberated areas went unfulfilled and the clan militia quickly started to prey on the population. Al-Shabaab appeared to have been biding its time and has been able to retake much of the territory easily, often facing little local resistance. Sympathisers with the group are not difficult to find, even with its blood-soaked record. 'Al-Shabaab are feared but the government is hated. It's tough,' explains Abdirahman Nur Hassan, a rickshaw driver in the capital. Army morale is low The group has tried to project a softer face and relaxed some of the strictures in its territory, allowing people to use the internet and scaling back judicial executions and amputations. Prisoners of war are now being freed, rather than killed. Last month the offensive took the strategic towns of Moqokori and Maxaas. Overall, the Somali army has struggled to mount a cohesive counter-offensive, though this week it said it had retaken Bariire, a town south-west of the capital The new 10-000 strong African Union peacekeeping mission (AUSSOM) of Ugandans, Ethiopians and Kenyans is distracted as it undergoes a transition and reportedly cannot pay its troops. One army deserter said: 'Our morale was gone and with each town that fell one after another, we knew it was a matter of time before we were overrun and killed.' The former soldier, who declined to be named, said: 'The army will seize a town, then Shabaab will seize it and then the army would be back, but then Shabaab takes over once again. It's been going on for years. 'Young soldiers are dying in large numbers and many don't want to keep dying for a lost cause because that's how many feel about the war with al-Shabaab.' Meanwhile, the federal government under Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is consumed by political infighting and appears to be calculating it will not be deserted by the international community. The president has particularly courted Turkey as a protector, granting Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO) exclusive rights to explore and produce offshore oil and gas. Next year's elections may be a more dangerous point for Mogadishu, says Ms Jackson, rather than an imminent al-Shabaab military offensive. The group is more likely to be patiently positioning itself to take advantage of any electoral violence, or disputes between the federal states, that would seriously weaken the central government. She said: 'I don't think Mogadishu is immediately in danger in military terms. 'The fact that the people are even worried about it shows how little faith they have in the Somali government.'
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump closer to new travel ban for two more countries
The State Department is rolling out a yearlong pilot program that will require certain travelers looking for US tourism or business visas to pay a significant bond, hoping to stop people from overstaying their welcome. It's a decision that could make the process unaffordable for aspiring visitors - and force them to rethink their plans altogether. The department outlined the new 'visa bond' initiative this week, which targets countries with high rates of visa overstays. The list will first apply to nationals of Malawi and Zambia applying for a tourist visa, but could be amended throughout the program to consider other countries. The pair of African countries were targeted first because they have a high rate of unauthorized overstays. According to State Department officials, the bond could reach as much as $15,000 per person, though officers will typically set the amount at $10,000 per adult and $5,000 per child. The amount will be determined during the visa interview. The department adds that the bond payment will be returned if the applicants comply with all of the terms set in the visa. The Daily Mail reached out to both embassies for a reaction to this move, and learned that they were not communicated with by either the White House or State Department on the changes. The Republic of Zambia Minister of Foreign Affairs Mulambo Haimbe told the Daily Mail, 'The Zambian government views this development with serious concern, given its potential economic implications on trade, investment, tourism and people-to-people exchanges. This includes the unnecessary financial strain on Zambian Nationals.' The Minister added, 'The decision is contrary to the spirit of the meeting held with His Excellency, Mr. Michael Gonzales, Ambassador of the United States of America to Zambia, at State House in Lusaka on July 9, 2025, which centered on exploring new pathways to deepen the enduring partnership between the two nations,' adding that they are now taking immediate steps to engage with the US government through diplomatic channels. The Malawi office of the Ambassador also responded to the Daily Mail, saying, 'The Embassy has not been officially informed about this trending news. As such, the Embassy has no comment at this point.' David Bier, director of immigration studies at the CATO Institute, told the Daily Mail the policy is 'incoherent' and amounts to an admission 'it will likely just ban people from coming, not just result in compliance.' 'There is no reason to impose such a draconian rule,' Bier added.
