Jen Psaki: The lessons Democrats can take from Trump's disastrous polling
This is an adapted excerpt from the April 28 episode of 'Inside with Jen Psaki.'
The story of what the opposition has done across these first 100 days of the Trump administration is every bit as important as what the Trump administration has done. While there has been disagreement among Democrats about how to approach this moment, that difference isn't even really an ideological one.
Yes, there are debates and disagreements on big issues on the margins, but Democrats agree that taking a wrecking ball to the economy with a half-cocked trade war is a bad idea. Democrats agree that letting the world's richest person and his band of interns rifle through the federal government and suggest firing people who answer the phones at Social Security offices, people who track extreme weather events and people who research cancer is a bad idea. Democrats agree that mistakenly shipping a legal resident to a notorious foreign prison is outrageous, and deporting U.S. citizens as young as 2 years old is appalling. Democrats agree that abusing your power to go after law firms, the media and universities is the stuff of tin-pot dictators.
So the values are all pretty aligned. There are, what I would consider, some healthy disagreements about how to respond to all of that, including what issues to focus on and what tactics should be used to stand up to the actions of the Trump administration.
There are the Democrats who appear to have chosen the age-old, strongly-worded-letter route, like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who sent one to the administration about its attacks on Harvard University with eight strongly worded questions. In contrast, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz decided to actually go to Harvard on Monday for a conversation about the future of the Democratic Party and what Democrats should do to push back on the Trump administration.
James Carville suggested that Democrats should essentially roll over and play dead and let the Trump administration implode. Others, such as Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have held rallies with tens of thousands of people across red states. Then there's Sen. Cory Booker, who spoke on the Senate floor for more than 25 hours to rail against what this administration is doing to the country. There's also Sen. Chris Van Hollen, who traveled to a foreign country to highlight the lack of due process for his constituent who was shipped there by mistake.
Look, I do think we all need a little humility in this moment because it's hard to know what's going to work, what the best strategy is or what's going to matter when it comes time for people to actually vote again. But what does feel pretty clear is that the traditional ways of opposing Donald Trump are not going to work.
So for Democratic leaders, it's worth trying all sorts of things right now. It's worth showing up in surprising places, doing surprising things and taking risks. Lead the protest, give the speech, take the trip — because the future of the party, and the future leadership of our country, is going to be determined by the people who do those things and not by the ones who play it safe.
Perhaps Democrats should listen to Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who told Democrats in New Hampshire on Sunday, 'It's time to fight, everywhere, all at once.' Maybe that should be the strategy, because right now Trump is losing ground everywhere and all at once.
That's according to an absolute avalanche of polling that has come out over the past few days, showing Trump losing support across the board. A new ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll put Trump's approval at just 39% — the lowest rating they've found in 80 years for a president at the 100-day mark.
After electing Trump to address inflation and reduce the cost of living, a full 62% of Americans disapprove of his handling of that issue, according to a poll from CBS News/YouGov. On immigration, an issue that propelled many voters to support him in November, Trump's biggest actions have exposed some of his biggest weaknesses. A poll from The Associated Press-NORC found that, by a nearly 20-point margin, more Americans oppose deporting students for protesting Israel's actions in Gaza than favor it. A poll from The New York Times/Sienna College found that most voters disapprove of Trump's handling of the Kilmar Abrego Garcia case, 52%, compared with just 31% who approved.
The overwhelming majority of people in that CBS News/YouGov poll made it crystal clear that they reject some of the most outrageous actions the Trump administration has already taken. When asked if it's OK to mistakenly deport some legal U.S. residents to foreign countries, 81% of Americans said it's not acceptable. When asked what the administration should do if the Supreme Court rules against it, 85% of Americans said the Trump administration should follow the ruling, according to the same poll.
From the economy to immigration to the rule of law, voters seem to think Trump is going too far. So he is vulnerable. He is weaker than he was when he was elected and weaker than when he took office. But his loss of support has not yet translated into Democratic gains.
In its poll, NBC News asked Americans the question: 'Who fights for voters like you?' The most popular answer (38%) was that neither party fought for people like them. So, yes, while it is true that most of these polls should be pretty jarring to the Trump team, they also show that Democrats have a lot of work ahead.
Now, we can't say for sure that voters will respond to — whether it's those fiery words from Pritzker, Van Hollen's trip to El Salvador, Booker's Senate floor speech, or Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders' red state rallies — but the data shows there's an opportunity for Democrats here, because the seemingly unstoppable Trump of a few months ago is no more.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘Come and get me': Gavin Newsom has entered the meme war
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) has found himself in the center of the internet's spotlight after squaring off with President Donald Trump on social media over the deployment of military troops to counter protesters in Los Angeles. While police deployed tear gas and shot at protesters in Los Angeles with rubber bullets on Monday, Newsom shared a screenshot on TikTok of a Washington Post headline reporting that California would sue Trump over the National Guard's presence, paired with a trending sound sampled from the movie 'Mean Girls. ' The video was captioned 'We will not stand while Donald Trump illegally federalizes the National Guard' and was liked more than 255,000 times.

Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. An attorney for Brehm did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Another lawsuit over the dismantling of the agency is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Acting NJ U.S. Attorney Alina Habba says Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted
A grand jury indicted U.S. Rep. LaMonica McIver on charges related to an incident at Delaney Hall in Newark last month, according to a social media post made by acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Alina Habba. McIver was at Delaney Hall with U.S. Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman and U.S. Rep. Rob Menendez to "inspect the treatment of ICE detainees at Delaney Hall." All three are Democrats. The congresswoman said in a statement the 'facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: a brazen attempt at political intimidation. 'This indictment is no more justified than the original charges, and is an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do,' McIver said. 'But it won't work — I will not be intimidated. The facts are on our side, I will be entering a plea of not guilty, I'm grateful for the support of my community, and I look forward to my day in court.' Habba said the federal grand jury 'returned a three-count indictment' against McIver for 'forcibly impeding and interfering with federal law enforcement officers.' 'It is my constitutional obligation as the chief federal law enforcement officer for New Jersey to ensure that our federal partners are protected when executing their duties,' she said. 'While people are free to express their views for or against particular policies, they must not do so in a manner that endangers law enforcement and the communities those officers serve.' The three counts have a maximum penalty of eight years for count one, an additional maximum penalty of eight years for count two and a maximum penalty of one year for count three. Earlier: NJ Rep. LaMonica McIver makes court appearance for assault charges in Newark ICE incident McIver said in a statement on May 19 she and her colleagues were "fulfilling our lawful oversight responsibilities, as members of Congress have done many times before, and our visit should have been peaceful and short." "Instead, ICE agents created an unnecessary and unsafe confrontation when they chose to arrest Mayor Baraka," she said. "The charges against me are purely political -- they mischaracterize and distort my actions, and are meant to criminalize and deter legislative oversight." Newark Mayor Ras Baraka had been arrested at Delaney Hall for trespassing but the charges have since been dropped. He is suing Habba for 'false arrest and malicious prosecution.' McIver's lawyer, Paul Fishman, served as U.S. Attorney in New Jersey during the Obama administration. He said in May the "decision to charge Congresswoman McIver is spectacularly inappropriate." "She went to Delaney Hall to do her job. As a member of Congress, she has the right and responsibility to see how ICE is treating detainees," Fishman said. "Rather than facilitating that inspection, ICE agents chose to escalate what should have been a peaceful situation into chaos. This prosecution is an attempt to shift the blame for ICE's behavior to Congresswoman McIver. In the courtroom, facts — not headlines — will matter." Katie Sobko covers the New Jersey Statehouse. Email: sobko@ This article originally appeared on NJ U.S. Attorney Alina Habba: Rep. LaMonica McIver indicted