logo
Auction house pledges to no longer include Nazi items in future militaria sales

Auction house pledges to no longer include Nazi items in future militaria sales

Independent12-02-2025

An auction house has said it will no longer include Nazi and SS artefacts in future auctions after holding a sale featuring such items.
Several artefacts from the Third Reich went under the hammer in the militaria auction at McTear's in Glasgow on Wednesday.
They included a 1939 Iron Cross medal and a 1933 badge featuring the swastika, which together sold for a hammer price of £300, and Nazi bunting, also emblazoned with the swastika, which sold for £50.
A Third Reich Luftwaffe dress dagger sold for £220 while items linked to high profile Nazi Hermann Goering were also included in the sale.
McTear's said it fully understands the 'sensitivity' around the sale of such items and will no longer include them in future sales, adding that it will receive no income in fees from the Third Reich related artefacts sold on Wednesday.
While it is not illegal to sell Nazi memorabilia in the UK, sales of such items have been controversial.
In 2019, Bloomfield Auctions in Belfast cancelled a sale of such artefacts after an outcry from Jewish leaders.
A spokesperson for McTear's auctioneers said: 'As the only auctioneer in Scotland to run dedicated sales of historic militaria, McTear's has frequently auctioned important artefacts from both World Wars, some of which have been purchased by museums both in the UK and overseas.
'On occasion, our auctions, like many others across the world, have included a small number of items relating to Nazi Germany, which have always been handled with sensitivity.
'It is important to note that these historical artefacts provide a tangible link to an important – albeit extremely dark – era in our history that should never be forgotten.
'That said, we fully understand the sensitivity surrounding the sale of these particular historical items and have now taken the decision to cease the inclusion of Nazi and SS artefacts in future auctions.
'With regard to the items sold in today's Militaria sale, McTear's will receive no income in fees.'
Other artefacts in Wednesday's sale included two silver plates thought to be from Goering's personal train dining wagon, which sold for £500 each and an item described as a 'Third Reich North Africa propaganda one pound note' which sold for £10.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump and Elon Musk: How did we get to 'KILL BILL' fallout
Donald Trump and Elon Musk: How did we get to 'KILL BILL' fallout

The Herald Scotland

time2 days ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Donald Trump and Elon Musk: How did we get to 'KILL BILL' fallout

Musk's prominence has been highly controversial with Americans, with only 38% of Economist/YouGov's May 30-June 2 poll respondents saying they would like Musk to have an influence in the administration going forward. How did we get here? Take a look back and the dramatic rise and fall of their partnership: Skid marks: President Trump's fast start has hit some speedbumps Elon Musk endorsed Trump following 2024 assassination attempt Musk, the CEO of Tesla, bought Twitter in 2022 and reinstated Trump to the platform after he was banned following the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riots. Musk became a growing ally to Trump over the next couple of years. Then, on July 13, 2024, Trump was shot in an attempted assassination at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, and Musk officially endorsed him for president shortly after. Musk gave more than $250 million to groups backing Trump in election Federal Election Commission records show Musk gave $238.5 million to his America PAC, which backed Trump's campaign. His contributions included $1 million daily payments to lucky voters in swing states who signed an online petition in support of the Constitution. The move raised legal questions, drew criticism from former Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, and prompted former Republican officials to press former Attorney General Merrick Garland for an investigation. Elon Musk was slated to lead DOGE with Vivek Ramaswamy During the campaign, Trump said he would establish a government efficiency commission headed by Musk if he won the election. Musk joined Trump at an October rally, jumping around on stage in a highly memeable moment. Shortly after winning the election, Trump announced Musk and former Republican presidential contender Vivek Ramaswamy would lead the new "Department of Government Efficiency", also known as "DOGE" with the mandate to slash federal government spending, waste and regulations. But Ramaswamy ultimately decided to run for governor of Ohio in 2026. Musk attended Trump's Inauguration with other billionaires Musk was at Trump's inauguration in Washington, D.C., and joined by fellow billionaires Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg. Musk delivered a speech at one of the inauguration events, during which he attracted controversy by giving a one-armed salute that some said appeared to resemble a Nazi-style gesture. "It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured," Musk said before making the gesture. DOGE comes for federal workforce, spending Musk's DOGE took a machete to federal spending, though he didn't cut nearly as much as he set out to. By some calculations, the workforce reduction efforts totaled in more than 100,000 layoffs, though the Trump administration is facing ongoing legal challenges to the swift cuts. Man of many hats at Cabinet meeting farewell At an April 30 Cabinet meeting, Musk appeared to bid farewell while joking about wearing lots of hats. Musk said at the meeting it was "an honor to work with your incredible Cabinet," and thanked the group. He had said at the time that DOGE was running more independently on its own and that he would spend less time in Washington as his companies needed him. (Tesla's earnings were down 71% in the first quarter of 2025.) On his way out, he participated in a seemingly friendly press conference with Trump in the Oval Office on May 30. But by his last day as a government employee, Musk had also appeared to diverge with Trump on a major piece of legislation going through Congress. Musk calls Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' a 'disgusting abomination' in post Just days after the White House sendoff, Musk appears to have embarked on a "kill bill" campaign on his X account. Trump's tax and domestic policy bill he has dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill," is under consideration in the U.S. Senate. But some Republicans have major concerns about the bill, like the deficit and health care and now, Musk. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk said in a June 3 post on X. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. "It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Contributing: Joey Garrison, Riley Beggin, Bart Jansen; USA TODAY. Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @

Pro-Israel lobby lauds Glasgow Film Theatre after BDS vote
Pro-Israel lobby lauds Glasgow Film Theatre after BDS vote

The Herald Scotland

time30-05-2025

  • The Herald Scotland

Pro-Israel lobby lauds Glasgow Film Theatre after BDS vote

Caroline Turner, director of UK Lawyers for Israel told The Herald: 'We are pleased that the Trustees of GFT have decided to reject these endorsements. These campaigns were part of a central Palestinian boycotting organisation whose aim is the destruction of the Jewish State. 'The film theatre had upset many of its regular Jewish film goers by its boycott of Coca Cola products earlier this year, and the anti-Israel statements made by some of its staff.' The BDS movement calls for a boycott of all Israeli goods. The BDS movement was set up by 170 Palestinian civil groups in 2005 as a form of non-violent "pressure" on Israel and has gained worldwide support, often being compared to the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. The collective has called on Israel to 'end its colonisation and occupation' of Arab lands, recognise the 'fundamental rights' of Arab-Palestien citizens of Israel, and 'respect and protect' the rights of Palestinian refugees. Adherents of the movement advocate for a full economic and cultural boycott of Israeli goods and companies, and protest against international companies with close ties to the Israeli state. Three members of the GFT's trustee board resigned in protest over the cinema's decision. A joint statement reads: 'We cannot in good conscience continue to serve on the board of the GFT. In addition to our concerns related to governance and decision-making processes, we are also deeply concerned about the attitude the GFT has shown toward our unionised workers.' In February, Unite Hospitality union members, which make up 85% of front-of-house and cleaning staff at the cinema, announced they would refuse to serve Coca-Cola products due to the company's ties to Israel. This led to the removal of the brand from the GFT bar. Coca Cola was among the products to be banned at the GFT (Image: PA).The theatre was hit with a legal threat after UK Lawyers for Israel wrote a letter to charity regulator OSCR alleging the boycott breached the cinema's 'charitable objects'. The complaint was ultimately dismissed. In a statement published on Thursday evening, the charity said: 'As an independent charity, trustees are legally required to act in the best interests of the charity, and in line with its charitable objects which are, for Glasgow Film, principally to educate the public about film. 'To meet this obligation, we believe that all decisions, including those relating to ethical purchasing and programming, should be taken independently, and on a case-by-case basis, informed by robust internal policies and processes.' The cinema's board also said that a full review of their 'ethical policies and practices' would be carried out, including the sale of products in their bar, and that the work of Palestinian artists would continue to be platformed. UKLFI's Turner added: 'It is good news that the GFT is now considering ethical and inclusive programming and purchasing. We hope that their inclusive programming will also include Israeli films.' The GFT board voted against endorsing the BDS movement. (Image: Newsquest) However, angry patrons hit out as news of the decision spread online Thursday night. Ruth Gilbert, national campaigns chair for Living Rent, posted to X: 'This is pathetic and embarrassing. Against the will of your unionised staff, your customers, and members of your board, you can't even commit to the bare minimum of solidarity with the Palestinian people? Many will vote with their feet if you don't reconsider.' Similarly, Emma Diamond remarked: 'So disappointed to read this, as a long term member & supporter I really hoped for better. 'It's not enough to pledge to platform Palestinian voices, what voices will there be left to 'platform' if this genocide continues.' Andy Ashe added: 'Apart from the obvious ethical consequences, I think you have vastly underestimated your customers' commitment to Palestine.' Read more: Coca-Cola to be removed from Glasgow Film Theatre bar after staff boycott Glasgow Film Theatre could ban Disney films as staff push for Israel boycott Glasgow Film Theatre reported to charity regulator over Coca-Cola boycott In response to the decision, campaign group Art Workers for Palestine Scotland said: 'We ask audiences, film-workers and partners, to email the Chief Executive of GFT Allison Gardner to make your voice heard and demand a reversal to this decision which undermines GFT's very reason for existence as an independent cinema. "GFT directly benefits in numerous ways from the optics of screening radical anti-colonial films. We refuse to let them disguise their lack of ethics with a progressive veneer. GFT is publicly funded and we, the public, are here to assert that film is political. We will not back down.'

Mining giant puts new spin on China resource push
Mining giant puts new spin on China resource push

Reuters

time29-05-2025

  • Reuters

Mining giant puts new spin on China resource push

HONG KONG, May 27 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Zijin Mining's ( opens new tab, plan to take advantage of the surging gold price may not glitter as much as it hopes. The $67 billion company, which also digs up copper, zinc and lithium, wants to spin off, opens new tab its overseas gold mines into a separate listing on Hong Kong's stock exchange. That could boost its valuation and its global ambition. But new targets may be harder to find. Zijin has gained over 700% since 2015, making it one of the best-performing blue chips in Hong Kong. During that time it also spent $7 billion snapping up assets around the globe, more than its domestic rivals, per Dealogic. Shareholder value was not the only – or possibly even chief – driver. The People's Republic is resource-hungry, and Zijin's overseas spending spree helps Beijing's strategy to secure self-reliance in critical minerals. That's why the mining sector has been unaffected by regulators' tight oversight that has curtailed most other industries' outbound M&A. As a result, Zijin's gold and copper production now accounts for 24% and 65% of China's total, per its latest annual report. The company's strategic value to the country looks even higher with the price of both metals recently shooting to record highs. Arguably, though, keeping them under the same roof has weighed down valuation. Zijin's Hong Kong-listed shares trade at 10 times 2025 earnings, compared with the average 16 times multiple of several gold-mining global peers, calculates Jefferies. Carving out its yellow metal assets might narrow that gap. Yet Chinese miners' global push is getting more rocky. First, Zijin has tended to focus on riskier-looking assets, mainly in developing countries. In 2020, for example, it bought control of the Buriticá project in Colombia from Newmont (NEM.N), opens new tab. It's now the company's third-biggest gold mine by production, but the company reckons thieves in 2023 stole 3.2 tonnes worth $200 million – 38% of the location's annual output. Second, multinational rivals are less willing to sell as Chinese demands drive up prices of critical metals. Many will also want to avoid provoking President Donald Trump, whose administration is stepping up to counterbalance, opens new tab China's influence in resources-rich countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo, where Zijin is also heavily invested. All big mining companies have to learn how to navigate geopolitical risks. For Zijin, those lessons are getting trickier.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store