logo
Axe the tax? Should Ohio eliminate the individual income tax?

Axe the tax? Should Ohio eliminate the individual income tax?

Yahoo05-04-2025

Apr. 5—LIMA — It is a phrase that almost everyone has heard: the only two constants in life are death and taxes. However, while paying a tax for goods is nothing new, as events like the Boston Tea Party show, taxation on individual income has a somewhat shorter history going back to the ratification of the 16th Amendment on Feb. 3, 1913 and a prior 10-year period in the 1860s when a tax on income helped pay for expenses related to the Civil War.
While Americans have grown accustomed to income taxes, particularly at the federal level, states like Florida, Texas, Tennessee and others, now including Mississippi, do not collect individual income taxes at the state level. In a statement, Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves promoted this move as a means not only for residents to keep more of what they earn but also as a way to attract new residents and new investment.
"Mississippi has the potential to be a magnet for opportunity, for investment, for talent — and for families looking to build a better life," he said in the statement.
When it comes to Ohio, the Tax Foundation, a research firm that analyzes tax policy nationwide, rated Ohio 35th in the nation for state tax competitiveness, giving the state a lower rating for its corporate gross receipts tax and higher local tax levels.
Could eliminating the state individual income tax benefit Ohio?
Some say it is time for a change
One person who has broached this idea is Republican gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, who has made it a talking point in his campaign.
"We will eliminate the income tax in Ohio & it turns out most people in our state vehemently agree," he said in an April 1 post on X.
It's your money, not the government's. We will eliminate the income tax in Ohio & it turns out most people in our state vehemently agree. pic.twitter.com/fYe9DkJ4tH
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) April 2, 2025
Legislators in the Ohio General Assembly have also tried to make this a reality, with Reps. Adam Mathews, R-Lebanon, and Brian Lampton, R-Beavercreek, introducing House Bill 386 in January 2024, which aimed to eliminate both the individual income tax and the 0.26-percent Commercial Activity Tax. That bill only got as far as the House Ways and Means Committee during the 2023-2024 session.
A new bill, House Bill 30, also sponsored by Mathews and Lampton, would, over two years, reduce the state's progressive tax rates of 2.75 percent and 3.5 percent to a flat tax of 2.75 percent for all earners of more than $27,350. This bill, introduced on Feb. 3, has also been referred to the House Ways and Means Committee for review.
Bluffton University economics professor Jonathan Andreas sees the idea of fairness as a potentially compelling argument when it comes to a flat tax.
"Most Americans like a progressive income tax because most of us are like, 'Hey, I'm not rich, and it's harder for me to pay, say, 20 percent of my income than it would for Bill Gates to pay 30 percent of his income,'" he said. "But there's a pretty significant group, higher earners especially, that feel like a flat tax would be the most fair because they don't feel like they get a fair shake if they are paying a higher percentage than middle class people, and so there is a fairness argument."
But at what cost? Is it feasible?
When it comes to that original axiom of the inevitability of death and taxes, Ohio Northern University College of Business Administration Dean John Navin would refute that claim, at least when it comes to individual income taxes.
"The question is, can you get rid of it? The answer is, absolutely," he said. "You can get rid of any tax you have, but you have to decide: do you want to replace the revenue or can you afford to have a budget that is smaller?"
According to the Ohio Legislative Budget Office, the state's combined state and local tax revenue in fiscal year 2021 totaled $62.85 billion, with 26 percent, or just over $16.34 billion, coming through individual income taxes. Only sales tax revenue (40 percent) and property tax revenue (29 percent) were higher sources of tax revenue for the state.
If the state's portion of that $16.34 billion in tax revenue were to be eliminated, the state would have to find that revenue using other means, Navin said.
"Either we could raise the sales tax and the use tax, and that's certainly an option, or you could raise corporate income tax," he said. "While it's an option, it's not one that's appealing if your goal is to increase businesses in the state of Ohio."
Navin also looked at the situations of some of the no-income-tax states like Florida and Texas, situations that may not apply as well to Ohio.
"In the case of Florida, it's pretty obvious how Florida gets its money with tourism taxes," he said. "Sales tax and use tax in Florida are huge. Texas is oil and gas [production] tax, so they don't have to have a state income tax. Alaska has the same natural resource tax with oil, for the most part."
Are things really that bad? Could the problem lie elsewhere?
When asked about the potential for the elimination of individual income tax in Ohio, House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, began his answer by noting there are already people in the state who pay no income tax. Along with individuals making less than $27,350 and pay no income tax, for small business owners who file "single" or "married filing jointly" returns, the state will not charge income tax on the first $250,000 of business income.
"So when you think about small businesses in downtown Lima and what they generate as a sole proprietor or as an LLC, most of those folks are paying zero income tax now," he said. "So that's not a flat tax. It's even better."
Huffman also noted that for those promoting a flat tax alternative, issues like the business income deduction will have to be considered, since such a move could inadvertently increase taxes for some rather than reduce them.
"Two things are going to happen if you either lower the income tax to 2.75 percent or eliminate the tax," he said. "Especially if you eliminate the tax, either there are going to be services that you don't provide or some other taxes or going to go up, or a combination of the two."
When asked about the state's current tax policy, Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine said that the state has already taken strong measures to reduce the tax burden on residents, reducing the number of tax brackets from as many as eight down to just two today.
"It's the lowest it's been in 50 years in the state of Ohio, so we're very competitive with other states," he said. "And I've never seen a company that looks at Ohio and comes in and says to me, 'Well, Gov. DeWine, we'd love to come to your state, but your income tax is too high.' It's just not an issue anymore."
The more pressing issue, he said, centers around property taxes, which have risen rapidly as property values have risen with equal speed.
"When you have a reappraisement for your house that you've been living in for 30 or 40 years and you've paid it off but now you're 70 years old and seeing the real estate tax go up and you're on a fixed income, that's pretty tough," DeWine said. "So I think that's where the real focus is."
Huffman also pointed to another factor that could be overlooked: local income taxes and levies.
"Ohio is the most expensive local government state in the United States," he said. "We have over 6,000 local taxing districts between school districts, cities, villages, townships, counties, the local sewer levy, the fire levy, whatever those things are. Ohio is the 13th highest-taxed state when you consider all taxes, state and local, but when you consider just states, we're in the 30s. So the state tax burden is already pretty competitive."
Huffman pointed to efforts in the statehouse to alleviate this burden, but he noted that this is a decision that the voters have to make in their own localities.
"One of the things we're doing in this budget that's about to come out is that school districts — many of them, not all of them, but many of them — have more money than they can spend," he said. "So we're going to say in this budget that if you have extra money, you need to reduce the real estate taxes of the people who pay the following year, so we're getting immediate relief."
Featured Local Savings

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online
"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

"How Much Ketamine Are You On?': Jon Stewart Spotted A Huge Issue With This "Crazy" Theory Trump Shared Online

Daily Show host Jon Stewart on Monday dismissed Elon Musk's attempt to cut government spending for President Donald Trump as an 'epic fail.' But what really caught his eye was Musk's spacey demeanor during an Oval Office ceremony held last week to mark the billionaire's departure from the job. 'There might've been an explanation for that behavior,' Stewart said, and cited a New York Times report that Musk had been using a blend of drugs including ketamine, ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and Adderall. That same report said Musk was experiencing bladder issues, which he told friends were caused by the ketamine. 'He told people that?' Stewart asked in disbelief. 'This dude is a one-man anti-drug campaign.' Stewart then offered up an ad for the mock campaign. Related: A Republican's Response To A "Tax The Rich" Chant At His Town Hall Is Going Viral 'These are your pants,' he said. 'These are your pants on drugs.' As he spoke, an image of Musk was altered to show a wet patch forming around his groin. Elon Musk has denied the New York Times's report, saying he is "NOT taking drugs!" @elonmusk/X / Via Twitter: @elonmusk Related: "I Am So Torn With What You Are Doing" — 11 Posts From MAGA Business Owners Who Are So Close To Getting It Later in the segment, Stewart turned to Trump's latest conspiracy theory: the president shared a post on his Truth Social platform claiming that Joe Biden was executed in 2020 and replaced by clones. Stewart said it was another example of Trump 'pulling some new crazy thing out of his ass to distract us.' But Stewart pointed to a big flaw in that conspiracy theory with a question for the president. 'You're saying that the Joe Biden who doesn't even know where he is is actually an incredibly advanced cloned robot?' he asked. 'How much ketamine are you on?' Much like the image of Musk earlier, the one of Trump shifted to show a wet patch appearing around the groin. 'A lot,' Stewart concluded. See more in his Monday night monologue: This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: People Can't Believe This "Disgusting" Donald Trump Jr. Post About Joe Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Is Real Also in In the News: One Body Language Expert Spotted Something Very Telling When Donald Trump "Held His Own Hand" At His Recent Press Conference Also in In the News: Republicans Are Calling Tim Walz "Tampon Tim," And The Backlash From Women Is Too Good Not To Share

Marjorie Taylor Greene's Big Beautiful Bill Tweet
Marjorie Taylor Greene's Big Beautiful Bill Tweet

Buzz Feed

time24 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Marjorie Taylor Greene's Big Beautiful Bill Tweet

Yesterday, Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene basically admitted that she didn't read President Donald Trump's championed "One Big, Beautiful Bill" before voting "yes" on it. In a tweet, she wrote, "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of the OBBB that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years... I would have voted NO if I had known." Obviously, any representative voting on a bill without knowing the full extent of its contents is concerning, regardless of party lines. But the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" — which passed through Congress last month with a 215 to 214 vote — is especially concerning as it includes: Perhaps unsurprisingly, the internet was not impressed with Greene's honesty. Here's what they're saying:

Top DeSantis aide named next Florida education commissioner

time25 minutes ago

Top DeSantis aide named next Florida education commissioner

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- The Florida Board of Education has tapped a top aide of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to be the state's next education commissioner, a choice meant to influence K-12 and higher education policy in the state while bolstering a conservative legacy that could long outlast the governor's time in office. The board voted unanimously Wednesday to appoint Anastasios Kamoutsas, a deputy chief of staff to the governor. The job opened up after Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, a former Republican state lawmaker, was named interim president of the University of West Florida. Kamoutsas' appointment is contingent on Diaz being named the permanent president of UWF. 'Student safety and achievement will be my top priorities," Kamoutsas said. "Parents will continue to be empowered. And teachers, you have my word that I stand in support of you.' Kamoutsas previously served as general counsel and chief staff at the state's Education Department, before moving to the governor's office. 'Stasi Kamoutsas has delivered on important issues like parental rights, school choice, and fighting back against radical ideologies in education,' DeSantis said in a statement. 'I am confident that he will continue to serve our state well as the next Commissioner of Education.' Kamoutsas is expected to help carry out DeSantis' conservative education agenda, from banning public funds for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, to restricting how schools teach about race and history, and dramatically expanding the state's school voucher system, which provides billions in public funds for scholarships to private and religious schools. Among those who lauded Kamoutsas at Wednesday's meeting was former Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran, who has overseen what critics describe as the 'hostile takeover' of New College of Florida. He's among the slate of Republican former state lawmakers who are now helming state colleges and universities. 'Every single major decision, I don't care if it was elimination of DEI, critical race theory, opening schools, demasking students, changing higher education, Stasi has been in that room, every single time,' Corcoran said. 'And not just as a participant. He's been in the room as a leader.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store