U.S. Sen. Mike Lee brings back proposal to sell public land in Utah, Idaho, other Western states
U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, (right) participates in a forum hosted by the Sutherland Institute at the University of Utah's Hinckley Institute of Politics on Oct. 14, 2024. (Katie McKellar/Utah News Dispatch)
U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, is bringing back a proposal that would allow the federal government to sell off several million acres of public land in Utah and other Western states, including Idaho.
Lee says it will open up 'underused' federal land for housing and help communities manage growth. Opponents, including a number of Democrats in Congress and environmental groups, say it's an attempt to pay for tax cuts and warn it will jeopardize access to public lands.
More than 100 environmental groups sign letter opposing return of public lands sale
Introduced Wednesday evening, Lee's amendment to congressional Republicans' budget bill, nicknamed the 'big, beautiful bill,' renews an effort initially spearheaded by U.S. Reps. Celeste Maloy, R-Utah, and Mark Amodei, R-Nevada, that sought to dispose of 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah and some 450,000 acres of federal land in Nevada.
But Lee's proposal is much broader — rather than earmark specific parcels of land for disposal like Maloy and Amodei's amendment, Lee wants to require the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Department of Agriculture to sell off a percentage of land managed by the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management.
Idaho is among the states included in Lee's proposal.
'How out of touch do you have to be to think our public lands should be sold off to pay for billionaire tax breaks?' Idaho Democratic Party Chairwoman Lauren Necochea said in an emailed statement on Thursday. 'This shameless scheme would force the sale of millions of acres, including land right here in Idaho. These are the places Idahoans hunt, fish, hike, and pass down to the next generation.'
Necochea slammed Idaho's U.S. Sens. Jim Risch and Mike Crapo, both Republicans, for voting on April 7 in opposition to the 'Public Lands in Public Hands Act' bill amendment. That amendment would have blocked the sale of public lands to help pay for the Republicans' budget reconciliation proposals. U.S. Rep. Russ Fulcher, R-Idaho, also voted against the amendment. The only member of Idaho's congressional delegation to vote in favor of of the amendment to protect public lands from sale was U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, also a Republican.
'Now the bill heads to the committee Risch sits on, and if his record tells us anything, he'll side with the billionaires again,' Necochea stated. 'Idahoans have made it clear: our public lands are not for sale. If Risch and Crapo keep siding with out-of-state developers and mega-donors, we'll make sure they have plenty of time to enjoy the lands they refused to protect.'
According to Lee's new amendment, the U.S. Forest Service and the BLM would be required to dispose of between 0.5% to 0.75% of land they manage, which amounts to about 2.2 million to 3.3 million acres. State and local governments would be allowed to nominate parcels of land, and would be granted priority to purchase.
Eleven states would be eligible — Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. Notably, Montana is exempt, and Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke was instrumental in sinking Maloy and Amodei's original proposal, stating that selling public lands is a line he would not cross.
Though the scope is much bigger, Lee's reasoning behind the proposal is the same as Maloy and Amodei's: identify parcels of federal land near high-growth areas, and sell them at market value to local governments to use for housing, water infrastructure, roads and other development.
The amendment prohibits the sale of land that's already designated, like national parks, national monuments, wilderness areas or national recreation areas. Land that has an existing right, like a mining claim, grazing permit, mineral lease or right of way is also off limits.
If it passes, the secretaries of the departments of Interior and Agriculture would have to prioritize nominating land that's next to already developed areas, has access to existing infrastructure or is 'suitable for residential housing.' The amendment also directs the secretaries to nominate land that's isolated and 'inefficient to manage,' and to reduce the checkerboard land pattern, the result of railroad grants in the 1800s that left small plots of private land scattered within swaths of federal land and vice-versa.
'We're opening underused federal land to expand housing, support local development and get Washington, D.C., out of the way for communities that are just trying to grow,' Lee said in a video address. 'We're talking about isolated parcels that are difficult to manage, that are better suited for housing and infrastructure. To our hunters, anglers and sportsmen, you will not lose access to the lands you love. Washington has proven time and again it can't manage this land. This bill puts it in better hands.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
But that reasoning didn't fly for a number of environmental groups, including the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, which called Lee's proposal an attempt 'to pay for tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy.'
'Senator Lee's never-ending attacks on public lands continue. His hostility stands in stark contrast with Americans' deep and abiding love of public lands. Senator Lee's plan puts Utah's redrock country in the crosshairs of unchecked development,' said Travis Hammill, Washington, D.C., director for the alliance. 'In Utah and the West, public lands are the envy of the country — but Senator Lee is willing to sacrifice the places where people recreate, where they hunt and fish, and where they make a living.'
Long-thwarted efforts to sell public lands see new life under Trump
The Center for Western Priorities, a public lands advocacy group, called Lee's amendment 'a shameless ploy to sell off pristine public lands for trophy homes and gated communities that will do nothing to address the affordable housing shortage in the West'; the National Wildlife Federation dubbed it a 'fire sale' that is 'orders of magnitude worse' than Maloy's proposal; The Wilderness Society said it was 'a betrayal of future generations and folks on both sides of the aisle' and warned that could spark political backlash.
Maloy's proposal identified parcels owned by the Bureau of Land Management to sell to Utah's Washington and Beaver counties, the Washington County Water Conservancy District and the city of St. George. The land would have been used for water infrastructure (like reservoirs and wells), an airport expansion in St. George, new and widened roads, recreation and housing.
The proposal was widely celebrated by the water district and local governments, who said it would help them make adjustments as the region continues to experience rapid growth. But nearby tribes, environmentalists and politicians from both sides of the aisle were skeptical.
The Greater Yellowstone Coalition on Thursday said in a press release that it is calling on Montana, Idaho, and Wyoming U.S. senators to stand up and speak out against Lee's proposal.
'Public lands belong to all Americans and are vitally important to the communities of Greater Yellowstone and other iconic western landscapes,' said Greater Yellowstone Coalition Executive Director Scott Christensen in the press release. 'Our national public lands are not a luxury, they're our legacy. These are outdoor spaces that connect us to each other, fuel the economies of western states, and provide clean drinking water to millions of Americans downstream. Once these lands are sold off, they're gone forever.'
Idaho Capital Sun editor-in-chief Christina Lords contributed to this story.
Utah News Dispatch, like the Idaho Capital Sun, is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Utah News Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor McKenzie Romero for questions: info@utahnewsdispatch.com.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Democrats seethe after Padilla forcibly removed from Noem press conference in LA
Democrats on Capitol Hill were furious Thursday after Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was forcibly removed and handcuffed after trying to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a press conference in Los Angeles. After Padilla identified himself by his name and title, he pushed toward the front of a conference room trying to ask a question. He was then grabbed by agents who pushed him backward, shoved him through a set of double doors, and forced him onto the ground and handcuffed him. Video of the confrontation emerged as the Senate was concluding work for the day, shocking members. More than a dozen immediately went to the floor to defend Padilla and speak out against what they argued was unjust and unnecessary. On the other side of the building, California Democrats alongside other members of the party descended the Capitol steps as a group to condemn what many called the 'manhandling' of their colleague. Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and other House Democrats also marched to Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) office in a show of outrage. 'He had every right as a member of the United States Senate to talk and be at an event that was open to the public and the press. Instead, he was manhandled by law enforcement, forced to the ground and handcuffed. This is an outrage,' Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said with dozens of Democrats gathered behind her. 'And I'll tell you what, you know, it had me thinking, is this what it felt like to be in Germany in 1933.' Many of the 17 Senate Democrats who spoke likened Padilla's removal to actions seen in dictatorial states and called for a bipartisan investigation. 'Make no mistake, the effort to manhandle our colleague, to push him out of the room for asking an inconvenient question, to handcuff him — it's an attempt to shut him up. It's an attempt to shut everyone up who has a dissenting view from this administration,' Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) said, pointing to the decision to deploy the military to quell the Los Angeles protests. 'They want to intimidate you,' he added. Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Padilla's seatmate, also characterized the response as an attempt to silence a lawmaker confronting questionable actions in their state. 'There he is, going to this press conference to advocate for those who are most vulnerable, to ask the questions that need to be answered, like 'What is the basis under the law or Constitution to over the objection of the governor to federalize the Guard to be used against our own people in California?'' he said. 'I understand why Secretary Noem doesn't want to answer these questions because she can't, but it is Alex Padilla's job to ask those questions and to demand those answers, and we are proud of him. We are proud of him. We are proud of his courage and his steadfastness.' Noem had organized the press conference to boast about U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Los Angeles, where officers have arrested hundreds of migrants, with some already swiftly deported. The large-scale raids sparked protests that were met with force by the administration. President Trump took the unusual step of bypassing Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in calling in the National Guard and deploying 700 Marines — an even more unusual scenario for a subset of the military trained for war. ICE's relationship with Congress was already under scrutiny after a scrum took place outside a New Jersey detention facility that lawmakers were attempting to visit. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka (D) was arrested, though charges were subsequently dropped. And interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba has brought charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.), alleging she assaulted an officer with her forearms during a chaotic scuffle. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) noted Thursday there are laws on the books protecting lawmakers. 'These thugs who manhandled the senator probably don't know it's a federal offense to attack a member of Congress, but that's not what it's about. It shouldn't be anybody in our country [who is] treated this way. So we speak out for Sen. Padilla. We're speaking out for everyone who has a right to speak,' she said. Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, referred to what happened as an assault. 'Sen. Padilla was not only stopped from expressing his opinion, he was assaulted. He was assaulted. Anybody that sees the video will see that he was aggressively assaulted and thrown on the ground for simply just wanting to express his opinion,' he said. Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), a fellow Southern Californian, said he wanted more than an investigation. 'We need answers. We don't need reports. We need answers from Sen. [John] Thune, from Speaker Johnson. We need answers to these questions because Donald Trump's administration is unhinged,' he told reporters. Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), who was visibly angry during his brief remarks, urged those protesting in California and elsewhere this weekend to 'be very peaceful' given what happened to Padilla and issued a vociferous defense of the senator's actions. 'I have never ever, other than Jan. 6, been so outraged at the conduct of an administration,' Schatz said. Others pointed the finger at Noem, calling for her ouster. 'Kristi Noem should resign in disgrace,' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) wrote on social platform X. While reactions from Senate Republicans were more muted, some made clear they were not fans of Padilla's actions and accused him of grandstanding. 'I think he should have been here in Washington voting,' Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) told reporters. 'He has a responsibility to his constituents to show up at work,' he continued. 'Not to go try to make a spectacle of himself.' Speaker Johnson said he thought Padilla should be censured. 'I think that that behavior at a minimum rises to the level of a censure,' Johnson told reporters. 'I think there needs to be a message sent by the body as a whole that that is not what we're going to do, that's not what we're going to act.' The lack of support from Republicans infuriated Democrats. 'I cannot believe that we don't have senators on both sides of the aisle calling this out as outrageous,' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said. 'I've come to this floor often to speak out, to be angry, to be a voice for my people. I have never come this close to having tears in my eyes as I speak to both sides of this aisle about this horrendous incident that occurred.' Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) said the lack of Republican criticism was troubling. 'I have studied trouble democracy, and this is how democracies unravel. What should scare you most is who wasn't at this press conference,' he said. 'To my knowledge, not a single Republican has criticized the manhandling of Sen. Padilla.' And as Johnson endorsed the censure, a group of Democrats heckled him. 'Mike, that's absurd,' Rep. Sam Liccardo (D-Calif), who represents the San Francisco Bay area, shouted. Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) added, 'Why don't you stand up for Congress?' Outside of Congress, Padilla and the administration traded different accounts of what had happened. 'I was there peacefully. At one point I had a question, and so I began to ask a question,' Padilla said. 'I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room. I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed.' But he also pointed to the broader treatment of migrants being swept up in LA immigration raids that have sparked widespread protests. 'I will say this: If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, I can only imagine what they're doing to farmworkers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country,' he said. The Department of Homeland Security later accused Padilla of failing to identify himself and 'lunging' toward Noem. While Padilla did push his way toward the front of the room, he clearly identifies himself. 'Senator Padilla chose disrespectful political theatre and interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem,' DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin wrote on X. 'Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands. @SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately. Secretary Noem met with Senator Padilla after and held a 15 minute meeting.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
UPI
3 days ago
- UPI
Trump administration advises 500,000 migrants to self-deport
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday began notifying more than 500,000 people that their temporary protected status is revoked and advising them to self-deport. File Photo by Anna Rose Layden/UPI | License Photo June 12 (UPI) -- People from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela on Thursday began receiving notices of termination of their temporary protected status. They were told to self-deport. The Department of Homeland Security used email to send the TPS termination notices to inform more than 500,000 affected people that the parole and work authorizations granted by the Biden administration have been revoked with immediate effect, CBS News reported. Those who have not obtained other lawful immigration approvals are encouraged to self-deport. The Supreme Court on May 30 upheld the Trump administration's cancellation of the TPS status for the affected people, which the Biden administration first used in 2022. The program granted protected status for those from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela while they awaited the outcome of their respective immigration proceedings. "This program was abused by the previous administration to admit hundreds of thousands of poorly vetted illegal aliens into the United States," DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said Thursday in a news release. "The Biden administration lied to America," McLaughlin said. "They allowed more than half a million poorly vetted aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela and their immediate family members to enter the United States through these disastrous parole programs." She said the Biden administration gave them "opportunities to compete for American jobs and undercut American workers" while forcing career civil servants to promote the programs even after fraud was identified. The Biden administration "then blamed Republicans in Congress for the chaos that ensued and the crime that followed," McLaughlin added. She said those affected can use the CBP Home Mobile App to obtain travel assistance and a $1,000 exit bonus upon arrival in their home countries. The self-deport notices started going out on the same day that the House of Representatives approved a measure ending the District of Columbia's Sanctuary Values Amendment Act, the Washington Post reported. The House voted 224-194 to require the nation's capital to comply with federal immigration laws, requests for information on individuals' respective immigration status and lawful detainer requests. Eleven Democrats voted with Republicans to approve the resolution.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Public lands ‘fire sale' plan fuels criticism from Nevada, environmental groups
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Public lands advocates, environmental groups and Nevada politicians issued strong reactions as details of a plan to sell off millions of acres emerged on Wednesday. Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee's plan could result in as much as 3 million acres at fair market value, with all the money going directly into the U.S. Treasury, where it will help pay for extensions to President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts. 'It is clear that this language was developed behind closed doors without input from critical Nevada stakeholders because it ignores provisions for affordable housing and eliminates funding Nevada relies on for our schools and water conservation projects,' Nevada Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto said Wednesday night. BLM auctions in the Las Vegas valley generate millions in revenue for parks and recreation through the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act (SNPLMA). Nevada public lands likely a target again when Senate takes up Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' 'If we truly want to support affordable housing and economic development in Nevada, everyone needs to be at the table. Shoving lands sales in a reconciliation bill in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires is not the way forward, and I'll continue to fight against this misguided proposal,' she said. Lee's plan would sell off up to 3.3 million acres, according to the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter. The majority of U.S. public lands are in the West, and 80% of Nevada is federally owned. The Bureau of Land Management controls 47 million acres (63% of the state) and the Forest Service owns 5.7 million acres. Those two agencies are ordered to sell land in Lee's proposal. At the end of the 69-page document detailing the plan, a single paragraph earmarks $500 million for 'water conveyance enhancement' to restore or increase the capacity or use of existing conveyance facilities constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation. The magnitude of the federal ownership of land in the West becomes clear in the plan's goal of selling 0.5% to 0.75% of land under the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of Agriculture, which is over the Forest Service. The equates to 2.2 million to 3.3 million acres. 'Our organization has always upheld that this type of land sale could never fix the affordable housing crisis,' Olivia Tanager, executive director of the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter, said Wednesday. 'No one who needs affordable housing can afford to live in the outskirts of town with no access to public transportation, jobs, schools, or grocery stores.' East Las Vegas valley site revealed in affordable housing plan The Sierra Club is putting on five town hall meetings in Las Vegas to help explain Lee's proposal. The first is tonight — Thursday, June 12, from 5:30-6:30 p.m. at Enterprise Library. A June 18 meeting at the Summerlin Library is from 5:30-6:30 p.m. Click here for more on the Sierra Club's schedule. More than 100 groups opposed including public land sales in the 'one big, beautiful bill' making its way through the U.S. Senate. 'Public lands are part of our national heritage, and people around the country have stood up and said 'no' to the MAGA public land fire sale,' Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said earlier in the week. 'America needs these beautiful places for wildlife, people, clean air and clean water. Sen. Mike Lee is trying to ram public land sell-offs down Westerners' throats, and we won't stand for it.' The reconciliation bill was passed by the U.S. House on May 22, but without Nevada Republican Rep. Mark Amodei's amendment to sell public lands. That provision was stripped out as Republican leaders moved to be sure they had the votes to pass the bill. Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, former U.S. Interior secretary during Trump's first term, would have voted against the bill if it included the public land sales. Lee's bill exempts Montana public lands from the sale, but that might not be enough to swing his vote if the bill gets back to the House. 'This was my San Juan Hill; I do not support the widespread sale or transfer of public lands,' Zinke told the New York Times last month. 'Once the land is sold, we will never get it back.' Cortez Masto and others have criticized Amodei's tactic in using a late-night session for his amendment, escaping immediate public scrutiny. They have also criticized Lee, who didn't release his plan until Cortez Masto pressed Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Wednesday. 'Yet again, decision makers in Washington D.C. are making deals behind closed doors and excluding the public on how to manage our public lands,' Russell Kuhlman, executive director of the Nevada Wildlife Federation,' said. 'We already have processes in place to deal with the sale of public lands to address housing in the west which includes public participation. Circumventing nearly 50 years of tradition and trust in order to sell land to the highest bidder is not a precedent our decision makers should be making. I urge the Senate to listen to the hunters, anglers, hikers, and other public land users that make up the majority of westerners who want this proposal removed from the reconciliation bill.' Kristee Watson, executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, echoed that statement. 'This is what happens when you open the door to backroom land deals,' Watson said. 'Mark Amodei lit the match, and now extremists in the Senate are fueling the fire, pushing a reckless sell-off of our public lands without public input or regard for the consequences. These lands are not 'disposable' — they fuel Nevada's $8.1 billion outdoor economy, support thousands of jobs, and provide the open spaces that make our state special.' Watson said the move isn't about the housing crisis. 'It's about greed. Politicians in DC are once again trying to sell out Nevadans and put our public lands on the auction block to fund handouts for their billionaire buddies. We urge the Senate to reject this dangerous amendment and stand with Nevadans, not with out-of-state developers and wealthy interests,' she said. 'Senator Mike Lee should be ashamed of himself for using the housing affordability crisis as an excuse to sell public lands off to private developers,' Jennifer Rokala, executive director of the Center for Western Priorities, said. 'Time and time again, Westerners have made it crystal clear that they want to keep public lands in public hands. Clearly Senator Lee isn't listening.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
