Public lands ‘fire sale' plan fuels criticism from Nevada, environmental groups
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Public lands advocates, environmental groups and Nevada politicians issued strong reactions as details of a plan to sell off millions of acres emerged on Wednesday.
Utah Republican Sen. Mike Lee's plan could result in as much as 3 million acres at fair market value, with all the money going directly into the U.S. Treasury, where it will help pay for extensions to President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts.
'It is clear that this language was developed behind closed doors without input from critical Nevada stakeholders because it ignores provisions for affordable housing and eliminates funding Nevada relies on for our schools and water conservation projects,' Nevada Democratic Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto said Wednesday night. BLM auctions in the Las Vegas valley generate millions in revenue for parks and recreation through the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act (SNPLMA).
Nevada public lands likely a target again when Senate takes up Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill'
'If we truly want to support affordable housing and economic development in Nevada, everyone needs to be at the table. Shoving lands sales in a reconciliation bill in order to pay for tax cuts for billionaires is not the way forward, and I'll continue to fight against this misguided proposal,' she said.
Lee's plan would sell off up to 3.3 million acres, according to the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter. The majority of U.S. public lands are in the West, and 80% of Nevada is federally owned. The Bureau of Land Management controls 47 million acres (63% of the state) and the Forest Service owns 5.7 million acres. Those two agencies are ordered to sell land in Lee's proposal.
At the end of the 69-page document detailing the plan, a single paragraph earmarks $500 million for 'water conveyance enhancement' to restore or increase the capacity or use of existing conveyance facilities constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation.
The magnitude of the federal ownership of land in the West becomes clear in the plan's goal of selling 0.5% to 0.75% of land under the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of Agriculture, which is over the Forest Service. The equates to 2.2 million to 3.3 million acres.
'Our organization has always upheld that this type of land sale could never fix the affordable housing crisis,' Olivia Tanager, executive director of the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter, said Wednesday. 'No one who needs affordable housing can afford to live in the outskirts of town with no access to public transportation, jobs, schools, or grocery stores.'
East Las Vegas valley site revealed in affordable housing plan
The Sierra Club is putting on five town hall meetings in Las Vegas to help explain Lee's proposal. The first is tonight — Thursday, June 12, from 5:30-6:30 p.m. at Enterprise Library. A June 18 meeting at the Summerlin Library is from 5:30-6:30 p.m. Click here for more on the Sierra Club's schedule.
More than 100 groups opposed including public land sales in the 'one big, beautiful bill' making its way through the U.S. Senate.
'Public lands are part of our national heritage, and people around the country have stood up and said 'no' to the MAGA public land fire sale,' Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said earlier in the week. 'America needs these beautiful places for wildlife, people, clean air and clean water. Sen. Mike Lee is trying to ram public land sell-offs down Westerners' throats, and we won't stand for it.'
The reconciliation bill was passed by the U.S. House on May 22, but without Nevada Republican Rep. Mark Amodei's amendment to sell public lands. That provision was stripped out as Republican leaders moved to be sure they had the votes to pass the bill. Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, former U.S. Interior secretary during Trump's first term, would have voted against the bill if it included the public land sales.
Lee's bill exempts Montana public lands from the sale, but that might not be enough to swing his vote if the bill gets back to the House. 'This was my San Juan Hill; I do not support the widespread sale or transfer of public lands,' Zinke told the New York Times last month. 'Once the land is sold, we will never get it back.'
Cortez Masto and others have criticized Amodei's tactic in using a late-night session for his amendment, escaping immediate public scrutiny. They have also criticized Lee, who didn't release his plan until Cortez Masto pressed Interior Secretary Doug Burgum on Wednesday.
'Yet again, decision makers in Washington D.C. are making deals behind closed doors and excluding the public on how to manage our public lands,' Russell Kuhlman, executive director of the Nevada Wildlife Federation,' said. 'We already have processes in place to deal with the sale of public lands to address housing in the west which includes public participation. Circumventing nearly 50 years of tradition and trust in order to sell land to the highest bidder is not a precedent our decision makers should be making. I urge the Senate to listen to the hunters, anglers, hikers, and other public land users that make up the majority of westerners who want this proposal removed from the reconciliation bill.'
Kristee Watson, executive director of the Nevada Conservation League, echoed that statement.
'This is what happens when you open the door to backroom land deals,' Watson said. 'Mark Amodei lit the match, and now extremists in the Senate are fueling the fire, pushing a reckless sell-off of our public lands without public input or regard for the consequences. These lands are not 'disposable' — they fuel Nevada's $8.1 billion outdoor economy, support thousands of jobs, and provide the open spaces that make our state special.'
Watson said the move isn't about the housing crisis. 'It's about greed. Politicians in DC are once again trying to sell out Nevadans and put our public lands on the auction block to fund handouts for their billionaire buddies. We urge the Senate to reject this dangerous amendment and stand with Nevadans, not with out-of-state developers and wealthy interests,' she said.
'Senator Mike Lee should be ashamed of himself for using the housing affordability crisis as an excuse to sell public lands off to private developers,' Jennifer Rokala, executive director of the Center for Western Priorities, said. 'Time and time again, Westerners have made it crystal clear that they want to keep public lands in public hands. Clearly Senator Lee isn't listening.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene: Sen. Alex Padilla should be charged
(NewsNation) — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene said Thursday that Sen. Alex Padilla should be charged and prosecuted after the California Democrat was forcibly removed and handcuffed during a Homeland Security news conference in Los Angeles. 'He should be charged. He should be prosecuted,' Greene, a Georgia Republican, told 'The Hill on NewsNation,' adding that Padilla 'came in very aggressively' and 'actually fought police.' Video footage shows multiple agents restraining Padilla and forcing him from the room during Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference. Additional video shows agents pushing Padilla to the floor to handcuff him. Geraldo Rivera: Sen. Padilla's removal a 'bad look' 'I'm Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary,' Padilla is heard saying as he's pushed out of the room. As he's forced through double doors, he can be heard saying, 'Hands off!' A Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman said Secret Service agents thought Padilla was an attacker and 'acted appropriately.' Noem later said she spoke with Padilla for 15 minutes after the incident and told him no one realized who he was when he 'created a scene.' However, the video clearly shows Padilla identifying himself as a senator. Greene criticized Padilla for not wearing his congressional identification pin and said he 'resisted arrest' and 'aggressively refused to leave.' Padilla forcibly removed from Noem press conference, handcuffed 'You never saw any Republican member of Congress or senator going out aggressively towards the Biden administration secretaries and Cabinet officials,' Greene said. 'You never saw us fighting police officers and resisting an arrest.' In his own press conference following the incident, Padilla said he was there peacefully to ask a question. 'I was not arrested and I was not detained,' Padilla said. 'If this is how this administration responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they are doing to farmers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout the country.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla forced to ground, handcuffed by federal agents
— SenAlexPadilla (@SenAlexPadilla) Live Events LATEST INCIDENT PARTISAN RESPONSE (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla was shoved, forced to the ground and handcuffed by security after attempting to ask a question at a press conference on Thursday held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about immigration raids "I am Senator Alex Padilla. I have questions for the secretary," Padilla said during the press conference in Los Angeles, where Noem was discussing protests in the city over President Donald Trump 's immigration crackdown."Hands off," Padilla, 52, said to security agents before he was ushered out of the room.A video shared by Padilla showed what happened next: Three agents pushed him to the ground and handcuffed his hands behind his back. Reuters was not immediately able to confirm the authenticity of the represents California, where Los Angeles has seen days of protests against Trump's crackdown on migrants. The White House responded by sending National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into the city, saying they would help secure federal buildings and defend Immigration and Customs Enforcement Department of Homeland Security in a statement on X accused Padilla of engaging in "disrespectful political theater"."@SecretService thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately," the department said, adding that Noem later met with said in a statement he was released shortly after."If this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farmers, to cooks, to day-laborers throughout the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country," Padilla Deputy Director Dan Bongino defended agents' actions on social media."The senator in question was not wearing a security pin and physically resisted law enforcement when confronted," Bongino said, referring to the lapel pins senators typically wear in the Capitol. "Our FBI personnel acted completely appropriately while assisting Secret Service."During Trump's first week in office, his administration warned it would investigate officials who sought to resist his hardline immigration agenda. It has acted on those Mayor Ras Baraka was arrested and charged with trespassing on May 9 while visiting a privately run immigration center. Prosecutors later dropped those charges but charged Democratic U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver with assaulting and resisting officers who were trying to arrest have denied prosecutors also criminally charged a Wisconsin judge for attempting to help a man in her court evade immigration earlier this week said he would support the arrest of California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, who has accused the administration of violating the law by sending troops into the city."This is a sad and frightening state of affairs," McIver said on Thursday. "This administration will stop at nothing to keep elected officials from doing our jobs and demanding accountability for our constituents. We're seeing it in real time: They don't want oversight, they want total control."The Padilla dust-up triggered immediate, angry responses from Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said the video of the press conference "reeks of totalitarianism."Democratic Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey called Padilla's treatment "a pattern and a practice. This is not an isolated incident," referencing the Newark incident."I have been here for more than 32 years," said Democratic Senator Patty Murray of Washington state. "I cannot believe that we don't have senators on both sides of the aisle calling this out as outrageous."Many Republicans found fault with Padilla's actions."He should have been here in Washington voting. He has a responsibility to his constituents to show up at work, not to go try to make a spectacle of himself," Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the chamber's No. 2 Republican, told Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, a maverick in her party who in the past has said that Trump's threats of political retaliation make people "afraid," criticized Padilla's treatment."Senator Padilla is a big, tall guy, and to see how he was handled out of that room is wrong and sick," she told reporters at the Capitol.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The scariest thing about Trump? Nothing he does can shock us any more
For a president famed for his shock value, the dog days of June have actually been some of the least shocking of his tenure. The break-up of Donald Trump and Elon Musk must have been on everyone's bingo card. Surely no one was surprised when their divorce exploded on social media, and we feasted on a pass-the-popcorn moment writ large in Trump-scale signage. A trope of the Trump years is that a Hollywood scriptwriter would be laughed out of town for authoring such a madcap screenplay. America is in its final season, goes the joke, and the showrunners have completely jumped the shark. On this occasion, however, they would have been sent back to the writing room, and told to try harder. The personal insults. The threats of cancelled government contracts. Even Musk's taunt about the Jeffrey Epstein files felt cliched. I would not even have been surprised if either Trump or Musk had sought to monetise their row by launching a crypto coin in the shape of a broken heart. That is a measure of how, in the 10 years since Trump descended that golden escalator, the abnormal has been normalised. The chaos in Los Angeles was also entirely foreseeable. A crackdown on protesters in a Democratic-run city in a Democratic-run state was always going to be an obvious Trump play. Better still, the faux flashpoint came when agents from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) tried to arrest and expel unauthorised immigrants. For Trump, the staging for this American passion play could hardly have been more perfect. And what a dramatis personae and props. An African-American Democratic mayor, Karen Bass. A liberal Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, with a surname that lends itself to the playground slur 'Newscum' which Trump rejoices in using. A Democratic US senator, Alex Padilla, being bundled out of a press conference and then handcuffed after trying to ask Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem a question. Protesters waving the national flag of Mexico. And a big beautiful battalion of federalised National Guard, under the president's command and control, with 700 US Marines standing by on the fringes of the city. 'Lights! Camera! Action!' A Hollywood summer blockbuster executive produced by the country's most powerful executive. Nor should we overlook how the Democratic Party, and the Biden administration in particular, was crucial in the plot development. 'Democrats have gotten the border issue so wrong, for so long, that it amounts to political malpractice,' wrote W ashington Post columnist David Ignatius, a frequent Trump critic. Loading The Musk meltdown and Los Angeles showdown are, of course, linked. Trump, whose personal approval ratings have slumped sharply, needed a distraction after the breakdown of his billionaire bromance, and Musk's complaints that the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit. So Trump became the first US president since 1965 to federalise the National Guard without the agreement of a state governor. Back then, in one of the most climactic showdowns of the civil rights era, president Lyndon Johnson did so to protect black protesters marching between Montgomery and Selma, who had been bludgeoned by Alabama state troopers on 'Bloody Sunday'. Johnson's opponent was George Wallace, the white supremacist governor of Alabama, a 'Dixie' demagogue often viewed as a populist forerunner of Trump. Wallace would have applauded the president's announcement this week restoring the names of seven army bases which honoured Confederate leaders.
