Budget 2025 Must Deliver Consumer Confidence
Retail NZs latest quarterly Retail Radar survey, covering January-March 2025, found that 57% of retailers did not meet sales targets for the quarter and had mixed expectations for quarter two sales.
Retailers will be looking for next week's Budget announcements to boost consumer confidence and spending, Retail NZ says.
Strong signals on economic recovery are on Retail NZ's wish list for the Budget announcements.
The Electronic Card Transactions data for April 2025, released today by Stats NZ, shows a tiny increase in sales compared with April 2024, it is not enough to improve the outlook for retail, Retail NZ Advocacy Manager Ann-Marie Johnson says.
The 0.8% lift reflects the Easter public holidays, which fell fully within April this year, and also within the April school holiday period. Easter spanned March and April in 2024.
The figures also show that the value of the average transaction has not changed since April last year, with consumers spending $55 per transaction.
'There's still a long way to go before we see any light at the end of the tunnel. Retail NZ members are anticipating slow sales and uncertainty through this winter. Although there may be some relief from lower interest rates putting more money in consumers' pockets, low consumer confidence will continue to rein in spending. We are hoping the upcoming Budget will help restore confidence to the marketplace.'
Retail NZ's latest quarterly Retail Radar survey, covering January-March 2025, found that 57% of retailers did not meet sales targets for the quarter and had mixed expectations for quarter two sales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Tail-wagging jibe may have Labour worried
Analysis by Craig McCulloch The most telling line out of the Green Party's AGM held over the weekend was not its claim to be leading the opposition, nor its ambitions on leading the next government. Such lofty goals are to be expected as all parties try to motivate members at their annual conferences. More interesting was an observation from co-leader Marama Davidson, dropped almost as an afterthought near the end of Sunday's media conference. "Setting the agenda isn't just about numbers," she said. "We've got a government right now whose tail is being wagged by two smaller parties." The subtext is clear: if Act New Zealand and New Zealand First can have a disproportionate influence — as David Seymour likes to put it — then why not the Greens, alongside perhaps, Te Pāti Māori? That framing is politically dangerous for Labour. National will seize on it, warning of a Labour government beholden to its minor partners. Remember previous attempts to tie Labour to the Greens' wealth tax. Those attacks might be undermined somewhat by its own coalition tensions, but they will be aided by Labour's current policy paucity. If Labour's manifesto remains light on detail for too long, the Greens could end up setting the agenda and the terms of debate by default. That is where the Greens' claim of opposition dominance has some merit. They have pumped out a suite of detailed policies on tax, climate and industrial strategy this term, while Labour has deliberately kept its powder dry. Co-leader Chloe Swarbrick pointed to this year's Budget day, claiming ministers spent most of their time talking about the Green Budget. But that also proves the problem for Labour: Chris Hipkins and finance spokeswoman Barbara Edmonds spent weeks after the Budget being questioned about the Greens' plan, to their obvious frustration. Labour will look to correct that imbalance as the election gets closer. But in the meantime, it risks losing support to the Greens' big talk. Monday's Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll suggests that has not happened yet. The poll records Labour on 33.6% — the most popular party in Parliament — with the Greens just under 10%, more than 20% behind. That severely undercuts the Greens' self-styled role as the main force on the centre-left. However, look deeper and the polling shows voters are lukewarm on all party leaders. Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins are level-pegging as preferred prime minister, but on numbers that would have been considered dire in previous cycles. In that environment, a smaller party talking up its ability to call the shots could help mobilise its supporters — or it could alienate swing voters wary of instability. Both would be a concern for Labour, although again, a similar tension will play out on the centre-right as well. Ms Swarbrick's push for the Greens to reach beyond its comfort zone — to miners, mill workers, even farmers — recognises the need to expand its base. The question is whether those voters can realistically be convinced to back a party long associated with a different set of priorities and values. For now, the Greens remain what they have been for years: a minor party with a loyal base and a clear agenda. Their claims on leading the opposition are more marketing than reality. Still, in a race this tight, marketing might make the difference. • Craig McCulloch is RNZ's acting political editor.
Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
Christopher Luxon Shrugs Off Polls Showing Tight Electoral Race
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has shrugged off two polls showing a tight electoral race, promising to stay the course with the coalition's plan to fix the economy. The Taxpayers' Union-Curia poll on Monday showed Labour overtaking National as the most popular party and no clear path to power for either side. TVNZ's 1News-Verian poll was more forgiving to the coalition parties, returning them to government. But it also saw Luxon sink to just 20 percent as preferred prime minister, a two-year low. On his way into a morning caucus meeting on Tuesday, Luxon told reporters the polls would not be a topic of conversation in the meeting, nor should they be. "No, no, not at all," he said. "I'm not focused on polls or talking about myself. What I'm focused on is New Zealanders and making sure we've got the right long term economic plan in place." Luxon said his MPs continued to be provided internal polling through "a regular process" and discussed them "from time to time" in line with "normal practice". Asked whether he was meeting his own high standards, Luxon said the government was dealing with a challenging international environment. "We've inherited a really difficult recession," he said. "It's a very difficult time, but we are very, very clear minded and very, very focused on fixing the economy." Luxon said global confidence had been knocked by the United States' tariff regime but New Zealand had to "power through that". The faltering economy and cost-of-living crisis featured in both polls as key concerns for voters. Recently, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce has advocated a cut to the corporate tax rate, while the Taxpayers' Union is calling for an emergency mid-year Budget. Luxon previously dismissed such calls, and on Tuesday, he maintained the coalition's current focus on manufacturing and construction was the right approach. "We are doing everything we can. If you think about $6 billion worth of infrastructure projects starting before Christmas, that is a lot of jobs, it's a lot of tradies." He also pointed to relief on the horizon with the Reserve Bank expected to deliver further interest rate cuts this year. What's the alternative? Speaking on Tuesday morning, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the polls demonstrated New Zealanders were losing faith in National's ability to deliver on its promises. He accepted, however, that Labour had more work to do, given neither poll had returned the party to the Beehive. Asked whether the party's support was helped or hindered by Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said the government "would desperately love more things to attack". "We'll put further policy out there, but my focus right at the moment is holding the government accountable for their promises." Any comprehensive fiscal plan would have to wait till after next year's Budget, he said, but Labour's tax policy would be released this year. Hipkins said a final decision on tax had yet to be resolved but: "consensus is emerging." He repeatedly refused to give any details, including whether the proposal would be revenue neutral or possible parameters. "I've always said that I don't think the family home should be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced." National's campaign chairperson Chris Bishop said it was very easy for Labour to insist life should better when they had no policy solutions to offer themselves. "Life's easy when you're able to throw rocks from the side. Actually, we're the ones... in the arena, making the tough decisions across planning, across education, across infrastructure, across red tape, across fiscal policy to get this economy back on track." Bishop said the poll numbers reflected a "tough winter" but stressed that the election was not until next year: "People want the economy to be fixed. And I get that. But there is no silver bullet." He said any talk of replacing Luxon as leader was "just silly". Luxon: Palestine question is "not a race" Luxon declined to say whether the caucus would discuss the question of Palestinian statehood on Tuesday, but acknowledged there would be "nuances and differences" within the team. Foreign Minister Winston Peters on Monday confirmed Cabinet would come to a formal decision in September over whether to recognise a state of Palestine at an upcoming United Nations summit. All three opposition parties have castigated the government for failing to make a decision, pointing out that New Zealand is now out-of-step with its like-minded partners: Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and France. But Luxon said the complex question needed careful consideration. "It's not a race," Luxon said. "It deserves a serious weighing up of our position, and that's exactly what we're going to do." Luxon declined to say whether he would be comfortable with either coalition partner opting to "agree-to-disagree" on the decision. "I'm not going to get into hypotheticals... It's all very easy to jump to a bumper-sticker outcome or decision and not think through the consequences." Pressed on what conditions could be attached, Luxon said he would not presuppose a position but made clear Hamas would have to release hostages and disarm: "There is absolutely no role in any future Palestinian state for a terrorist organization like Hamas."
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Shane Te Pou: We can't spend Government ghost money
There is nothing new here. All the money was already planned for in the Budget. That means no new jobs or economic growth are being delivered that weren't already in the Budget. A Budget after which unemployment rose by 24,000 by June 2025. This isn't a stimulus to the economy because there is no extra investment beyond that already being planned – meaning no extra GDP. It's a Clayton's announcement. Critics urge a genuine, long-term infrastructure strategy, emphasising collaboration and addressing urgent economic and social needs. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Given the fact that 16,000 fewer people are working in construction than this time last year, you would think this would be the ideal time to boost investment. ANZ reported this week that, 'it appears residential builders are giving up on a recovery any time soon'. You would think that now would be an excellent opportunity to build new state housing. Alas, no such announcements were made. As the famous quote goes, ministers are finding that 'winning is easy, governing is hard'. The initial decisions made to cut investment in areas such as ferries, housing and Dunedin Hospital have sapped confidence in the economy. The impact of tax cuts promised at the last election has long since gone. The likelihood of further interest rate cuts is diminishing as inflation creeps towards 3% and above. It's time for a different approach. Our economy, our productivity and our public realm don't benefit when the Government changes long-term infrastructure planning like this. It doesn't help when ministers use infrastructure announcements as a means of political advertising. Chris Bishop claimed he wanted a 'cross-party consensus' on infrastructure, but critics question whether he's truly engaging with a broad range of voices beyond his own. Photo / Sylvie Whinray That's made even harder when the announcements don't mean anything. We need a long-term approach to tackling this problem – one that will work across Parliaments. An approach that doesn't put one form in infrastructure – roads – ahead of everything else. In December last year, Bishop said he genuinely wanted to build a 'cross-party consensus' on how we build infrastructure in New Zealand. That's great in theory, but when your idea of a consensus is everyone agreeing with you, that's not going anywhere. Building a true consensus would involve working with much wider groups. When was the last time Bishop sat down with trade unions to discuss infrastructure? When did he last sit down with child poverty advocates to talk about our housing that puts kids in hospital? New Zealand's economy is struggling. The US President has just slapped 15% tariffs on our exports – and it's our second-biggest export market. We are losing a generation of people who are voting with their feet because they can't see a future here in Aotearoa. Nurses are on strike. Yet our Government is concerned with changing the name on the front of a passport. It's dangerously out of touch with the real needs of New Zealanders. Infrastructure development and renewal can play a key role in restarting the economy. You simply can't re-wrap last year's Christmas presents and present them as new this year. When we invest in New Zealand, we invest in ourselves and we reap the dividends. The Government is pretending to invest right now, dressing up old investments as new. There is a ghost plan for the economy. It's time for a real one.
