logo
Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act

Supreme Court blocks North Dakota redistricting ruling that would gut key part of Voting Rights Act

Boston Globe24-07-2025
Three conservative justices, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas, would have rejected the appeal.
The court also has a separate redistricting case over a second majority Black congressional district in Louisiana. The justices heard arguments in March, but took the rare step of calling for a new round of arguments in their term that begins in October. They have yet to spell out what issues they want discussed.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
In the North Dakota case, the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, with reservations 60 miles apart, argued that the state's 2021 legislative map violated the act by diluting their voting strength and ability to elect their own candidates.
Advertisement
The case went to trial in 2023, and a federal judge later ordered the use of a map of the area, including the reservations that led to the election last year of three Native Americans, all Democrats, to the Republican-supermajority Legislature.
But in a 2-1 ruling issued in May, a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that only the Justice Department can bring such lawsuits under the law's Section 2.
Advertisement
The 8th Circuit also had ruled in an Arkansas case in 2023 that private individuals can't sue under the same provision.
More than 90 percent of Section 2 cases have been brought through private enforcement, UCLA law professor Richard Hasen wrote on the Election Law blog.
The 8th Circuit rulings conflict with decades of decisions by appellate courts that have affirmed the rights of private individuals to sue under Section 2.
The Supreme Court often will step in when appeals courts around the country come to different decisions on the same legal issue.
In a statement, Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians Chairman Jamie Azure said, 'We are relieved that Native voters in North Dakota retain the ability to protect ourselves from discrimination at the polls. Our fight for the rights of our citizens continues. The map enacted by the North Dakota legislature unlawfully dilutes the votes of Native voters, and it cannot be allowed to stand.'
North Dakota Secretary of State Michael Howe, a Republican, who is named in the lawsuit, said his office 'will continue to follow election laws set by the North Dakota legislature or as directed by any final decisions by the courts.'
The 8th Circuit covers seven states: Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota. In the wake of the Arkansas decision, Minnesota and other states moved to shore up voting rights with state-level protections.
Dura reported from Bismarck, North Dakota.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Deploys National Guard On D.C. To Stop Crime That Isn't Happening
Trump Deploys National Guard On D.C. To Stop Crime That Isn't Happening

Black America Web

time23 minutes ago

  • Black America Web

Trump Deploys National Guard On D.C. To Stop Crime That Isn't Happening

Source: Xinhua News Agency / Getty On Monday, after President Trump took the unprecedented step to deploy the National Guard in Washington, D.C., Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host turned U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, warned that this was 'just the beginning,' as she continued to push the lie that crime rates in the city are 'horrific.' 'President Trump has rightfully declared an emergency crisis of crime and deployed the National Guard, the ATF, the DEA, the FBI, so that criminals know now that we see them,' she said during an appearance on 'Fox News with host Sean Hannity,' The Hill reports. 'We are watching them and we are gonna make them accountable. But make no mistake, Sean, this is just beginning.' We care about your data. See our privacy policy. Trump announced earlier that the Justice Department would be taking control of D.C.'s police department and that some 800 National Guard troops would be deployed into the largely Black city with a Black mayor to help lower crime rates that are lower than years before. 'I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order, and public safety in Washington, D.C., and they're going to be allowed to do their job properly,' the president said during a press conference, The Hill reports. Probably doesn't matter to the Trump administration, but data shows that, 'violent crime is down 26 percent compared to 2024 in the nation's capital, and that homicides last year dropped by 32 percent compared to 2023,' The Hill reports. 'Today was, as the president called it, 'Liberation Day.' But we are now in the process of bringing to the attention of law-abiding citizens, not just in D.C., but throughout the country, that we're not gonna tolerate crime that is out of control in the nation's capital,' Pirro told host Sean Hannity. 'This is the shining city on the hill that our forefathers talked about,' she added. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, along with several other Democratic mayors, whose cities have been targeted by the Trump administration, call the president's drastic move to deploy the military on civilians 'unsettling and unprecedented.' But, she added, not surprising. Trump Deploys National Guard On D.C. To Stop Crime That Isn't Happening was originally published on

Indiana House Democrats join Texas House Democrats to stand against mid-decade redistricting
Indiana House Democrats join Texas House Democrats to stand against mid-decade redistricting

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Indiana House Democrats join Texas House Democrats to stand against mid-decade redistricting

Nine Indiana House Democrats joined Texas House Democrats in Chicago Wednesday to stand against mid-decade redistricting of congressional districts — which Texas Democrats are currently fighting against and Indiana Democrats could be fighting next. Indiana Black Legislative Caucus Chair State Rep. Earl Harris Jr., D-East Chicago, said he was elected to serve his constituents 'not to help a guy in Washington D.C.' The move to redistrict mid-decade will disenfranchise voters, particularly minority voters, Harris said. Indiana District 1, held by Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, could be considered for redistricting if Indiana Republicans choose to do so, Harris said. District 1 has a large population of minority voters, Harris said, whose voices would be stifled. 'Why are we disenfranchising voters — Black and brown voters — who chose the person we want to represent us? We need to stand here and fight, be here in this fight,' Harris said. Texas State Rep. Gene Wu said the state Democratic House Caucus left the state to stop 'a racist, unconstitutional and illegal gerrymandering effort in Texas.' Gerrymandering refers to politicians manipulating the boundaries of an electoral map in their party's favor. Texas Democratic lawmakers are in Illinois for a second week as Republicans are trying to reconvene the state legislature in a special session to vote on redrawing congressional maps in their party's favor. Redistricting occurs every 10 years following the release of census data. But the Trump administration has been pressuring states, most notably Texas, to redistrict ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. '(We're) stopping the D.C. swamp from dictating who we get to vote for. This is an effort to stifle Americans who have had enough because Republicans know that their agenda and what they have done is so unpopular … with all Americans,' Wu said. 'They need to cheat and rig the system so they can rig the system.' State Rep. Cherrish Pryor, D-Indianapolis, said she was proud to stand with her Texas colleagues to 'protect our democracy.' 'While Texas is on the front lines of this fight, Indiana may be next in line,' Pryor said. Last week, Vice President JD Vance met with Gov. Mike Braun and state Republican leaders to discuss redistricting in Indiana. After the meeting, Mrvan said during a news conference that the Trump administration 'brought the circus' of redistricting to Indiana and that he believed the decision to redistrict Indiana was 'a done deal.' 'JD Vance and Donald Trump brought the circus to Indianapolis,' Mrvan, D-Highland, said. 'They are afraid of checks and balances. They are afraid of the polling that they see, and they want to redistrict things.' State Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis, said Vance 'is engaged in Congressional-level shoplifting.' 'Never in my life did I think that the vice president of the United States would come to my state and ask our legislature to shoplift for Congressional districts — steal them off the shelf, run outside and wave them in front of the country,' DeLaney said. On Tuesday, Braun told the Indiana Capitol Chronicle that he hasn't decided if he'll call a special session on redistricting Indiana's congressional map, but that he and Republican legislative leaders are 'considering it seriously' as they watch what happens in Texas. 'It'll be interesting to see what Texas does because they don't have a supermajority, so … if that gets tripped up, it's gonna probably impact what happens elsewhere, because the rest of it doesn't add up to much,' he told the Capital Chronicle on Tuesday. 'I think mostly what happens here is going to depend on where Texas goes, because I think they've got five seats in play,' he said. Indiana was last redistricted in 2021, which left Congressional Republicans with seven seats and Democrats two seats. Pryor said Republicans want to redistrict early because they want to hold onto power despite policies like the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Pryor called a 'Big Beautiful Mess,' hurting Americans. 'This behavior that we're seeing today, we would not expect that from this country. We would expect that from a dictatorship, not the United States of America,' Pryor said. 'Their greatest fear is that Americans are waking up and realizing that the Republican Party might not be making them better off; it's making them bankrupt.' Indiana Democratic Party Chairwoman Karen Tallian said in a statement that mid-decade redistricting attempts 'prove the GOP knows it is losing support among voters.' 'This is a clear power grab by a Republican Party that knows it can't win the next election without changing the rules,' Tallian said. 'After 21 years of Republican rule in Indiana, utility bills and grocery prices are skyrocketing and our healthcare system is hanging by a thread — no wonder they'd rather cheat than face the voters fair and square.'

Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing
Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing

Black America Web

time4 hours ago

  • Black America Web

Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing

Source: Michael M. Santiago / Getty With a little over three months left until New York City elects a new mayor, two of its most prominent candidates in Zohran Mamdani and Andrew Cuomo are verbally clashing. This time, Cuomo is attacking the frontrunner over his platform message of adding affordability in housing for citizens, questioning why he's living in a rent-stabilized apartment in Astoria, Queens, while making a $140,000 salary. While appearing at the National Dominican Day Parade on Sunday (Aug. 10), Cuomo attacked Mamdani and said he would create a new law to highlight the Democratic candidate's alleged hypocrisy. 'I think rent stabilized units when they're vacant should only be rented to people who need affordable housing, not people like Zohran Mamdani, and I'm gonna call it Zohran's law, because it is an abuse of the system,' he said to reporters. Mamdani fired back on Monday (Aug. 11), saying: 'What Andrew Cuomo is proposing, be it the rent control he cited, the rent stabilization, he intends to speak about, is in many ways reflective of the fact that I live rent free in his head.' He added that he had a salary of $50,000 at the time he moved into his apartment. The state assemblyman did express that he was against needs testing and income limits for housing. Incidentally, Cuomo currently resides in an apartment on the east side of Manhattan for $8,000 a month. The exchange is the latest between Cuomo and Mamdani, with Cuomo opting to deliver barrages against the candidate who defeated him soundly in the Democratic primary months ago. Cuomo, who served as the former governor of New York until stepping down in 2021 over sexual harassment allegations, was blasted by Mamdani campaign spokeswoman Dora Pekec, who called his comments 'desperate' before adding: 'If Mr. Cuomo really cared for working people in New York City, he'd commit today to reimburse the taxpayers the $60 million we are spending on his personal legal defense — which could pay for thousands of affordable housing units instead of probing the gynecological records of women he harassed.' Currently, the first poll released by Siena about the mayoral race shows that Mamdani still holds a strong lead of 19 percentage points over Cuomo, also holding a good share of potential Democratic voters. Cuomo still has an edge, however, over Mamdani as well as Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and the incumbent Eric Adams among Black and Jewish voters. SEE ALSO Mamdani And Cuomo Spar Over Affordable Housing was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store