‘Confession pages' an online challenge for Auckland schools Tāmaki College and Tangaroa College
Tangaroa College principal Chris Bean said he found out about the 'Tangaroa Confessions' page during the school holidays from parents.
'As soon as we found out, we made the community aware. We also shared our concern with our Year 13 student body, and we were as proactive as we could be to put a stop to it.
'We wanted to nip it in the bud while we could so it didn't spread to the to the lower levels.'
Confession pages have been popping up on Facebook and Instagram for about a decade. Overseas, they started on university campuses but quickly filtered down to high school students.
In Aotearoa, people commenting on Facebook say confession pages are happening at other secondary schools and intermediates.
Bean said he believed it was the first time it had happened at the school, and it was 'just a handful' of Year 13 students.
Even though the confessions pages had involved older students who would not be included in the government's proposed social media ban, it would still be a good move, he added.
'I think it would be a positive initiative. It just take away that unnecessary distraction for our young ones. It would also allow them not to feel they could communicate in such negative ways and still be hidden from who they are when they make those comments.'
Last year's phone ban had helped, he added, but it was only enforced within the school grounds.
Tamaki College tuamaki Soana Pamaka would not speak to RNZ about the Tamaki Confessions page but in a letter posted on the school's Facebook page, she said some 'very hurtful' comments about students had been posted by others.
Both schools were working with Netsafe, which helps persuade platforms and content producers to remove harmful content. The Tamaki Confessions page had popped up again several times since then.
In a statement Netsafe chief executive Brent Carey said he could not comment on the two cases due to a 'confidential complaint process' but Netsafe was 'committed to ensuring a safe online environment for everyone'.
Ministry of Education hautū (leader) for operations and integration Sean Teddy said cyberbullying not only caused emotional harm, it was also a serious offence.
'Schools/kura take reports of cyberbullying involving their students very seriously. Cyberbullying remains one of the most significant online safety issues facing young people today. It can cause serious harm and emotional distress, and under New Zealand's Harmful Digital Communications Act, it is illegal to post or send digital communications that deliberately cause serious emotional harm to others.
'In this case we are aware that the schools are working with Netsafe and we have offered our support, if required.
'We also recognise the vital role of parents and caregivers in promoting safe and responsible use of digital platforms. Families are encouraged to have open conversations with their children about their online experiences, set clear expectations and foster a culture of trust and dialogue, creating an environment where young people feel empowered to speak up is key to tackling cyberbullying.'
Police said they were aware of the 'wider situation' at both schools, but had not received any formal reports.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Man took sleeping pills before crash
A Dunedin father and road-safety advocate has admitted crashing his car on the motorway, wiping out 200m of the wire barrier. Mark David Cummings, 49, appeared in the Dunedin District Court last week and pleaded guilty to threatening to kill, posting harmful digital communication, possessing cannabis, two charges of assaulting police, two charges of resisting police, two charges of speaking threateningly and refusing to undergo a compulsory impairment test. In 2019, the defendant's 15-year-old daughter Jayde Amy Cummings was killed instantly when the driver of the ute she was in failed to stop at the intersection of Church Rd West and Huntly Rd, in Outram. The incident resulted in a prolonged road safety campaign by Cummings and he was vindicated by a coroner's report last year. The police summary revealed that on March 22, Cummings was driving his Ford Ranger south on Dunedin's Southern Motorway. He drifted into the metal wire centre barrier and witnesses said he made no attempt to brake. About 200m of the centre barrier was wiped out, and his vehicle became entangled in the wire. While being transported to Dunedin Central Police Station, Cummings was falling asleep. He admitted to officers he had taken 10 sleeping pills and used cannabis before driving. About 8pm Cummings was taken back to his home but 30 minutes later he showed up at his mother's house, acting aggressively, and police were called again. When they arrived, the defendant yelled at them before a struggle ensued between him and two constables. Once police restrained him, he was found to be holding a lighter and a small bag with 0.78g of cannabis. Cummings told one officer that he would remember him, he was going to "get it" and he would "make him pay". Police assisted the defendant to regain his balance before he put his feet on to the couch and jumped back in an attempt to "body slam" the constable into the wall. Back at the police station Cummings continued to be belligerent and attempted to rip two pairs of underwear. Yesterday, the defendant also admitted that on February 9 he posted a threatening message on his Facebook profile which ended with "I will see u soon c...". The next month, he turned up at the victim's place of work, smacked the corner of his desk and said "10 grand on the corner of this desk by 4 o'clock today, or else I am going to break your kneecaps and whatever else I have to. The boys will be here as well". Cummings was remanded on bail and scheduled to appear for sentencing in October. In December 2021, Cummings was sentenced to nine months' intensive supervision after he used a wooden baton to smash a hole in a lawyer's office and damaged the Dunedin City Council building. The outburst was a response to reading a media article that the teen driver who caused his daughter's death had been discharged by the Youth Court. At the time, Judge Evangelos Thomas told Cummings: "Nobody can hold your grief or your rage against you ". , Court reporter
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Five revealing moments from Erin Patterson's cross-examination
The prosecution has stepped up its questioning of Erin Patterson - the Victorian woman accused of killing three people and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal laced with poisonous mushrooms. After days of giving evidence in her own defence, Patterson has now faced cross-examination from prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC, who has challenged her on everything from deleted photos and cancer claims to the exact wording of her emoji use in private messages. Australia Correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin explains some of the biggest moments from the cross-examination so far. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 1. 'You knew they were death cap mushrooms' Nanette Rogers began by suggesting Patterson knew she had cooked with death cap mushrooms and deliberately got rid of the evidence. 'You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?' 'No, I didn't know that,' Patterson replied. The prosecution then accused her of deliberately disposing of the food dehydrator to cover her tracks. 'You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms?' 'No, I didn't,' Patterson said again. ADVERTISEMENT (Source: 1News) 2. Photos allegedly show mushrooms being weighed Rogers showed the jury a series of images from Patterson's phone showing sliced mushrooms on a dehydrator tray, balanced on kitchen scales in her home. Expert evidence has previously suggested the mushrooms pictured were consistent with Amanita phalloides - the deadly species known as death caps. 'I suggest you were weighing these mushrooms so you could calculate the weight required for... a fatal dose,' Rogers said. 'I disagree,' Patterson replied. She also denied claims that she foraged those mushrooms after seeing a post online about local sightings on the iNaturalist website. ADVERTISEMENT 3. Internet searches raise questions about cancer claim The prosecution questioned Patterson over her claim to her lunch guests that she had cancer - a lie she now says was a cover for planned weight-loss surgery. Court documents showed images and search results related to ovarian and brain cancer stored on Patterson's devices. 'I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie,' Rogers said. 'That's theoretically true, but it's not what I did,' Patterson replied. She said she'd worried about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but denied conducting searches in 2023 to support a fabricated illness. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 4. Emoji use and 'eyerolls' spark courtroom debate The court was also shown Facebook messages Patterson sent to friends, in which she referenced her in-laws and used eye-roll and neutral-face emojis when talking about their religious advice. Rogers argued the tone was mocking. Patterson disagreed. 'There's a better eyeroll emoji than these,' Patterson said. 'I can't see anything about eyes rolling in there. I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated.' 5. Prosecution questions Patterson's use of the word 'panicked' and 'foraging' Patterson had previously told the court she panicked in the days after the fatal lunch, which led her to lie and destroy evidence. But Rogers challenged this, suggesting Patterson was not reacting emotionally, but acting to avoid detection. ADVERTISEMENT 'Can you please alert me to the answer that I gave where I said I panicked when I learnt that everyone was unwell?' Patterson asked during one exchange. Rogers paused before continuing: 'Certainly.' In a continued moment of back-and-forth, Rogers questioned Patterson on her use of other language - specifically whether she understood what 'mushrooming' meant. Patterson replied: 'I think it could mean a couple of things… foraging, but also other uses of mushrooms that are not eating.' When asked what she would call picking mushrooms for food, she said: 'Pick and eat.' She maintained she never used the word 'mushrooming' and would have said 'foraged' if that's what she meant. Patterson denies the charges and the trial continues next week. ADVERTISEMENT Aziz Al Sa'afin looks at the key questions in the trial Aziz Al Sa'afin answers your most asked questions about the mushroom trial (Source: 1News) Who is Erin Patterson and what is this trial about? Erin Patterson is a 50-year-old woman from Leongatha, Victoria, who is accused of murdering her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. She is also charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, a local pastor who survived the same meal. All four guests became seriously ill after eating a beef wellington lunch prepared at Patterson's home in July 2023. What is she accused of doing? Prosecutors allege that Patterson used death cap mushrooms - one of the most poisonous fungi in the world - in the meal she served her guests. The Crown claims she knowingly poisoned them. The Defence says it was a tragic accident and Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges. What are death cap mushrooms? ADVERTISEMENT Death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) are deadly fungi that can be easily mistaken for edible varieties. Even a small amount can cause liver failure or death. They are not typically sold in stores and are often found in the wild. Cooking them does not neutralise their toxicity. What has Erin Patterson said in court? She has told the jury that she did not mean to harm anyone and believes the poisoning was a tragic accident. She admitted to lying in a police interview about foraging mushrooms and using a food dehydrator, which she later dumped. She said she panicked and was scared she'd be blamed. Why does she say she lied to police? Patterson has admitted to lying about key details during her initial police interview. She said she was overwhelmed and frightened, particularly after learning two of her guests had died. She told the court: 'It was a stupid kneejerk reaction… I was scared, but I shouldn't have done it.' What does the prosecution say? The prosecution has accused Patterson of deliberately cooking with death cap mushrooms and trying to cover her tracks. They've pointed to deleted photos, dumped kitchen equipment, and online searches they allege were used to create a convincing cover story, including a lie about having cancer. ADVERTISEMENT What has she said about the cancer claim? Patterson admitted lying to her lunch guests about having cancer. She told the court she said it to cover up a planned weight-loss surgery and described feeling ashamed of her body. The prosecution says she researched cancer online to make her story more believable. Patterson denies that. Why has this trial received so much attention? The unusual and shocking nature of the case - involving a homemade meal, rare poisonous mushrooms, and a family tragedy - has made headlines around the world. The fact that Patterson is giving evidence in her own defence is also highly unusual in a murder trial. True-crime podcasters and filmmakers have descended on the town of Morwell to cover this trial only adding to the hype. What does the jury have to decide? The jury must decide whether Erin Patterson is guilty of murder or attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt. This means they must be sure of her guilt based on the evidence presented in order to return a guilty verdict. In a Victorian criminal trial, the jury's verdict must be unanimous - all 12 jurors must agree. They will be pushed until they can reach a unanimous verdict of guilty or not guilty. In the rare instance they can't, the judge may declare a hung jury, which could lead to a retrial. What if Erin Patterson is found guilty? ADVERTISEMENT If found guilty of murder, Patterson faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The judge would determine her sentence at a later date. What happens if Erin Patterson is found not guilty? If Patterson is found not guilty, she will be acquitted of the charges and released from custody. An acquittal means the jury was not satisfied of her guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the legal threshold for conviction was not met. What happens next? The trial is ongoing and has now lasted for six weeks. Cross-examination is underway, and Patterson is expected to remain on the stand into next week. Closing arguments will follow, then final instructions from the judge before the jury deliberates. The trial could stretch into late June.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
AI use intensifying scams: Netsafe
Artificial intelligence (AI) is enabling fraudsters to devise ever-slicker romance scams, Netsafe says. The online safety agency recently presented updated resources as part of its Get Set Up for Safety programme, aimed at protecting older people from an upswing in sophisticated digital cons. Business development manager Sarah Bramhall said scammers might spend weeks or months building online relationships before seeking money. "Scammers most often use the techniques or the emotions of trust, fear and hope, usually in a combination. "So they will tap into human emotions." Exploiting lonely or companionship-seeking victims, scammers try to stop them sharing information with friends or family. "They will try to keep them isolated so that they don't tell anyone, because obviously otherwise friends and family will pick up on something happening." At some point the scammer will begin requesting money, sometimes large amounts or gradually increasing amounts. These requests could be couched in ways that played on people's natural desire to be kind or helpful. "Usually it presents itself in something like a medical requirement, they need to travel, they have got family that are sick. "Those sorts of things that really play on emotions." Kind-hearted people who felt they had developed a bond would feel like they wanted to help that person out. "Most of the time, people really don't recognise that they are being scammed in those scenarios. "It is really quite hard for even support workers and family to get them to come to that realisation because they suffer heartbreak, essentially." Generative AI tools were enabling scammers to polish their English, generate fake images or create believable back-stories. Poor grammar or language used to be a red flag that it was a scam message. "That is getting harder to pick up on now," she said. While there were many ways AI was opening up useful and beneficial possibilities, it was important to be mindful of some of the drawbacks of AI, in particular large language models such as ChatGPT, which could create "hallucinations" that could seem plausible but were falsehoods. "I just say 'sometimes AI can lie'." Netsafe has refreshed its portfolio of resources that can help organisations and individuals navigate the online digital realm safely. The material tackles challenges such as spotting scams, safer online dating, privacy settings, securing accounts and verifying requests for personal information. Get Set Up for Safety offers a wide range of resources, including checklists, fact sheets, videos and interactive activities. • To find out more, visit
