
Japan's new AI laws promote R&D, safeguarding the public
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
The Japanese parliament's upper house has passed a bill to promote research and development (R&D) in artificial intelligence (AI). The law aims to keep Japan at the forefront of the technology, considers the wider impact of AI on society and the economy, and gives the government new powers to investigate firms in the AI industry.
The bill passed the House of Councillors this week with backing from the governing coalition and most major opposition parties, signaling broad support for the move. It had already passed the House of Representatives with similar support in April, guaranteeing its passage into official law.
One of its provisions is the formation of a 'strategic headquarters' that includes the prime minister and the entire Cabinet to create a basic plan to advance AI R&D along with its potential applications.
Local media reports have focused more on how the government will deal with risks associated with widespread AI use rather than the R&D aspects. This reflects the growing awareness of AI in the mainstream, as more members of the general public have personal experience with generative AI tools.
One concern is that AI may 'facilitate crimes, leak personal information, and violate copyrights.' False or incorrect information generated by AI tools could also have negative impacts. Under the new law, the government may disclose the names of companies it considers 'malicious' if an AI-related crime is committed.
If a reported incident is serious enough, the government can launch official investigations into companies or groups involved. Based on its findings from these potential investigations, it may instruct or advise business operators related to the matter, release information to the public, and take 'other necessary actions.'
AI has been on the Japanese government's radar for some time. A decade ago, it was grouped in a list of four emerging technologies deserving attention as one of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's economic 'arrows.' Together with the Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, and Big Data, AI formed a key part of Abe's 'Abenomics' national revitalization plans.
Back then, any mention of AI was immediately connected to robotics and the concept of humanoid robots working in the service industry. That's still prominent in Japan, though nowadays, the focus is more on generative AI and its downstream issues, such as the veracity of the information it provides and potential harms to end-users and creators.
In 2025, technological and geopolitical concerns have shifted and the revival Abenomics promised hasn't quite materialized. But its legacy lives on in current policies, and Japan has always seen awareness of technological developments as part of its national prestige. Even if this doesn't necessarily involve Japan remaining at the bleeding edge of actual development, the government is always keen to stay informed of any new implications.
Several large corporations in Japan have begun integrating generative AI into their office workflows, consumer applications, and industrial processes. These include Panasonic (NASDAQ: PCRFF), Japan Airlines (NASDAQ: JPNRF), Asahi Breweries, Sumitomo Chemical (NASDAQ: SOMMF), Suntory (NASDAQ: STBFF), Seven-Eleven, and Asahi Steel. Large financial institutions like MUFG Bank (NASDAQ: MUFG), SMBC Group, and Mizuho (NASDAQ: MZHOF) have also claimed to have begun using generative AI in office and financial processes.
Internationally, significant AI advancements are seen as opaque or difficult to understand, and there's a growing suspicion that companies and governments will keep their true capabilities secret, potentially to use against adversary countries and even members of the public.
As a result, there's a growing desire for more transparency in the industry and disclosure of what data is being used, and how. Data security and protection of private information have been gaining attention for several years now, but this is now joined with an appetite for data veracity. Information systems of the future will need built-in protections for these, not just legislation if data-driven economies and societies are to retain public trust.
In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI.
Watch: Demonstrating the potential of blockchain's fusion with AI title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Chinese researchers charged with smuggling dangerous biological pathogen into US
A pair of Chinese researchers have been charged for allegedly smuggling a biological pathogen into the US to study at the University of Michigan. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.


Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
SNP's 'outdated dogma' over armed forces spending is threat to national security
The SNP has been accused of putting 'outdated dogma' above the interests of national security in a dramatic escalation of a war of words over defence spending. Holyrood ministers have refused to back down from the party's policy against funding companies involved in munitions manufacturing. In a letter to the First Minister, Labour MP Graeme Downie, accused him of 'willing to place outdated SNP dogma regarding the UK armed forces and defence sectors above the security of our country' Downie, whose constituency is home to a number of UK defence contractors, said: 'If it is the policy of your government that public money should not be spent on ammunition and military equipment to defend our country, can I ask if you believe our armed forces should have equipment at all and, if so, how would you otherwise suggest this is funded? The row came after Sir Keir Starmer pledged to increase defence spending and make the UK battle ready, supporting more than 25,000 jobs in the sector in Scotland. But it emerged the Scottish Government was refusing financial support to a welding site in Glasgow because the project involved an 'attack submarine'. Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs Mairi Gougeon told the BBC Sunday Show that public money should not be spent on ammunition or military equipment. She was defending the Scottish Government's failure to support the creation of thousands of jobs by Rolls-Royce, adding that the SNP had a 'long-standing' policy against giving money to munitions companies. A major row ensued with Rolls-Royce disputing that it is a 'munitions' company, while John Healey, the Labour UK Government defence secretary, said he could 'hardly believe' a Scottish nationalist government would stand in the way of skills development in Scotland. Yesterday Scottish Labour deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, told the MSPs at Holyrood: 'The Scottish Government's position is frankly incoherent and their policy on state funded aid for defence is all over the place and applied selectively.' She pointed out that the Government-owned shipyard Ferguson Marine is carrying out subcontractor work for the Royal Navy's Type 26 frigate programme - arguing 'there are munitions on the frigate'. Dame Jackie asked: 'What does the Government believe the Army, the Navy and the air force should defend the country with? 'Pea shooters, bows and arrows, a telling off?' SNP business minister Richard Lochhead who was in the firing line said the SNP administration 'values the role of the defence sector' north of the Border and had allocated £45million of support to defence companies through enterprise agencies. He said governments must take into account 'ethical considerations' when funding the sector. Meanwhile, Mr Downie also raised serious concerns in his letter to the FM that Scottish ministers were routinely failing to acknowledge the importance of Scotland's defence industry and its workforce. He said: 'I am sure that these recent manoeuvres by your Ministers to undermine their work will be deeply felt and is something, I hope, you would wish to distance yourself from. 'A failure to do so would, sadly, lead me to the conclusion that you are and the opportunity to provide a pathway to highly skilled jobs across Scotland, particularly for young people from working class communities in constituencies such as mine.' 'I hope you will see the inconsistency and ludicrous nature of the position adopted by the Cabinet Secretary over the weekend. Last year we revealed how SNP Ministers had failed to meet Babcock for three years. One of the UK's largest engineering firms it works on the Royal Navy's Dreadnought Class nuclear submarines and runs a Naval yard at Rosyth, Fife. Both John Swinney and Kate Forbes neglected to attend the steel-cutting ceremony for the new HMS Formidable frigate - despite it representing a significant milestone in the construction of Type 31 frigates. Ministers were also absent from the steel-cutting ceremony for HMS Birmingham at BAE Systems' Govan yard in April 2023, part of the £4.2billion Type 26 frigate programme. The row over Rolls-Royce, which is ready to support an enormous submarine welding centre in Glasgow, came after it was revealed a £2.5million grant from Scottish Enterprise was withheld due to a party ban on 'munitions' funding. Steve Carlier, president of submarines at Rolls-Royce, warned the FM the project 'cannot continue' without the public funding. A Scottish Government spokesman repeated its long-standing policy position is that it does not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions. He added: 'We recognise the importance of the aerospace, defence and shipbuilding sectors for Scotland's economy, and are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing and innovation. Ministers continue to engage with industries across the country, including the defence sector, as part of this work. 'We have received the letter and will respond in due course.'


Powys County Times
36 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
RAF chief set to be new head of armed forces
The head of the RAF is set to be appointed as the new chief of the British armed forces, according to reports. Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton is thought to be in line to be the next Chief of Defence Staff. The position is currently held by Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, who has been in the role since 2021. According to his biography on the Government website, Sir Richard joined the RAF in 1989 as a university cadet, and served as deputy chief of the defence staff from 2019 to 2022. The appointment comes as the Government has pledged to increase defence spending in the UK to 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. The Ministry of Defence said: 'This is speculation. The appointment process is ongoing and any announcement will be made in the usual way.'