
Texas poised to ban social media for minors in a bold move that could rewrite online childhood
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Human impact vs. constitutional rights
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Platforms say they're already changing
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In what could become the most far-reaching law of its kind in the United States, Texas is close to banning all residents under 18 from joining social media platforms. Supporters call it a bold step to protect kids' mental health. Critics warn it's a dangerous overreach and possibly unconstitutional.If passed by the state Senate in the coming days, Texas House Bill 18 would make it illegal for minors to hold or create social media accounts. Platforms like TikTok Instagram , and Snapchat would be required to verify users' ages, delete minors' accounts if requested by parents within 10 days, and face fines or lawsuits for noncompliance. The bill has already cleared the Texas House with bipartisan support and is likely headed to Governor Greg Abbott's desk.'Safety and online privacy for Texas children remain a priority,' said Andrew Mahaleris, a spokesperson for Gov. Abbott, adding the governor will 'thoughtfully review' the legislation.To understand the emotional core of this story, look no further than parents like Angela Martinez, a mother in San Antonio, whose 13-year-old daughter secretly joined a platform last year. 'She was scrolling past midnight, getting bombarded with weight-loss videos,' Martinez said. 'She began skipping meals. I felt helpless.'That sense of helplessness is fueling momentum behind legislation in at least 27 states this year. Florida already passed a law barring under-14s from using social media and requiring parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds. A federal judge let that law stand in March, but lawsuits are ongoing.Opposition is growing louder, too — especially from digital rights groups like the ACLU. 'These bills cut off an entire universe of information and conversation from young people,' said Vera Eidelman of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy and Technology Project. 'It's a First Amendment issue.'Tech giants are also mobilizing. Apple CEO Tim Cook personally called Gov. Abbott to object, warning that such laws could compromise user privacy by forcing invasive ID verification. Trade group NetChoice, which represents Meta, Google, and X, calls the bill a 'censorship regime masquerading as an online safety law.' They've vowed to sue if the bill is enacted.Experts say the brain's not ready, but neither is the lawPsychologists say something needs to change. 'These are things that don't fit with the adolescent brain like endless scroll and 'like counts,'' said Dr. Mitch Prinstein of the American Psychological Association. But he added: 'An age ban? That's like delaying the age of driving but not having any driver's ed. It just delays the risk, doesn't solve it.'Indeed, the APA has urged Congress to act, but with more tailored reforms, such as stronger design standards and digital literacy education rather than blanket bans.Meta and TikTok say they've implemented features to protect teens, like screen time limits, nighttime nudges, and restricted messaging. But a recent test by The Washington Post found teens still exposed to body image content and dangerous trends on Instagram, despite these tools.Legal analysts believe Texas's law, if passed, will face an immediate constitutional challenge. Similar laws in Arkansas, Ohio, and California were blocked by federal courts on free speech grounds.Yet for families on the front lines of America's mental health crisis, the fight isn't legal but deeply personal.'We're not trying to raise kids in a bubble,' Martinez said. 'We just want them to have a chance to grow up without being addicted to a screen.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
27 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump administration revoked more than 6,000 student visas, State Department says
The US State Department has revoked more than 6,000 student visas for overstaying or breaking the law, including a small number for alleged support of terrorism, a State Department official said Monday. The cancellations are part of the Trump administration's stricter approach to student visas, which includes tighter social media checks and expanded screening, as reported by Fox Digital. Diplomats have been instructed to watch for applicants seen as hostile to the US or involved in political activism. Reasons for visa revocations About 4,000 visas were cancelled due to criminal offenses, mainly assault, while some involved DUI or burglary. Between 200 and 300 visas were revoked under rules targeting individuals 'engaging in terrorist activities' or having links to terrorist organizations. The official did not name any specific groups. President Trump has criticized several top US universities, claiming they support antisemitism after student protests in favor of Palestinian rights amid the Gaza conflict. In disputes with Harvard, Trump has frozen funding for investigations and threatened to remove the university's tax-exempt status. Several European countries have increased research grants to attract talent in response. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said hundreds or possibly thousands of visas have been revoked because recipients were involved in activities conflicting with US foreign policy. Trump administration officials have stated that visa and green card holders could face deportation for supporting Palestinians or criticizing Israel, describing these actions as threats to US foreign policy and labeling the individuals as pro-Hamas.A student from Turkey at Tufts University was detained for over six weeks in Louisiana after co-authoring an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to the Gaza war. She was released on bail after a federal judge critics say the visa revocations represent an attack on free speech protected under the First Amendment. (With inputs from Reuters)


Indian Express
15 hours ago
- Indian Express
Texas Democrats end walkout as Republicans try to pass redrawn map
Texas Democrats returned to the state on Monday after a two-week walkout that had delayed a Republican-led effort to redraw congressional map. Their return gives Republicans the numbers needed to move forward with the plan, which has the backing of US President Donald Trump, The New York Times reported. The standoff began on 3 August, when dozens of Democratic state representatives boarded a plane to Chicago in order to deny the Texas House the quorum needed to conduct business. At least 100 members of the 150-seat chamber must be present. In recent days, numbers had hovered just below that threshold. Governor Greg Abbott, along with Attorney General Ken Paxton, had gone to court to try to force the lawmakers back. State House Speaker Dustin Burrows also issued arrest warrants and threatened fines of $500 a day under House rules, while Senator John Cornyn sought help from the FBI. Despite those measures, most Democrats only decided to return after the first special legislative session expired on Friday. Representative Gene Wu, a Democrat from Houston, said their action was meant to lay the groundwork for a legal challenge. 'Our return allows us to build the legal record necessary to defeat this map in court,' he told The New York Times. (Refresh for more updates)


Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
Ohio's Senate Contest Heats Up: Brown vs. Trump-Endorsed Husted
Ohio's 2026 Senate showdown between Democrat Sherrod Brown and Republican Jon Husted is emerging as one of the nation's most pivotal races. Brown is emphasizing the running on a pro-worker, populist agenda, while Husted relies on Trump's leanings on GOP strength. With Senate control at stake, the contest drew nationwide focus. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Brown's Second Chance Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Husted's Position of Strength Stakes Beyond Ohio FAQs: Ohio is once again set to take center stage and become the focal point of U.S. politics as Democrat Sherrod Brown and Republican Jon Husted prepare for one of the most closely watched races of the 2026 midterm election. With the Senate majority at stake, the outcome could help determine the direction of national policy for years ahead. Sherrod Brown , a progressive presence in the Senate for decades, is hoping voters will grant him another opportunity after his narrow loss to Bernie Moreno in 2024. Recognized for his gravelly voice and pro-worker message, Brown has built his career in long championed unions, health care access, and fair pay. This campaign, he cites, is about unfinished business.'Ohio families deserve a senator who will fight for them, not corporate interests,' Brown declared at his campaign kickoff, highlighting his record of defending working-class communities. His candidacy has already energized Democrats, especially labor groups who see him as a reliable a recent interview, Brown revealed that he had not originally intended to jump back into politics until he and his wife, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Connie Schultz, watched the Senate pass President Trump's broader tax breaks and spending cuts bill. 'We just couldn't stay on the sideline,' Brown said. 'And I know I can fight back. Nobody in the Senate is speaking out for Ohio workers, nobody. And that's my job to do. It's what I've done my whole life, and it's what I'm going to continue to do.'At 72, Brown is considered as one of the Democrats' strongest contenders leading into next year's midterms. Alongside figures like former North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper represents the party's attempt to recruit high-profile candidates in races that could flip control of the chamber. Jon Husted , 57, stepped into the Senate seat after being appointed when J.D. Vance vacated it to be vice president. A veteran Republican with years of experience as Ohio's lieutenant governor and secretary of state, Husted enters the contest with clear advantages: strong name recognition, party infrastructure, and the backing of Donald has positioned himself as a steadfast conservative, pressing for stricter border policies , lower taxes, and regulatory rollbacks. His campaign rapidly sought to frame Brown as out of step with the state. 'Brown will be starting in the biggest hole of his political career,' Husted's spokesperson Tyson Shepard said, accusing him of catering to 'radical coastal elites' instead of Ohio however, countered sharply: 'My career has been about workers. His career has been about special interests.' He also highlighted lingering questions about Husted's past ties to an energy company implicated in a $60 million bribery scandal that rattled Ohio politics . Husted has never charged, but Democrats see the issue as a political Senate remains narrowly divided, and Ohio's race could tip the balance of power in Washington. Analysts anticipate massive sums to pour into the race from national donors, outside groups, and political parties, ensuring Ohio will be blanketed with advertising throughout once viewed as a political battleground, has leaned increasingly Republican in recent cycles. Still, Brown's history of navigating tough statewide contests offers Democrats hope that his populist message can resonate. At the same time, Husted's incumbency and deep ties to the state's GOP infrastructure give him significant strength.A1. Sherrod Brown is a Democratic politician and former U.S. Senator from Ohio.A2. Jon Husted is a Republican Senator from Ohio, backed by President Donald Trump.