Row over Edinburgh Council bid to spend £1.7m on 2027 Tour De France
Edinburgh Councillors need to "take back control" from officials, one has claimed, amid a row over calls to spend of £1.7 million of council reserves on the Tour de France.
In a report published before Thursday's full council meeting, officers had asked councillors to sign off on £1.7 for the Tour de France, saying council political group leaders had agreed to it.
However, at the full council meeting, several group leaders spoke out to say that they had not approved the spend, and that the last they'd heard of Tour de France planning was in October.
One councillor said the move was 'unacceptable', while another admitted they did not yet know how the spend would benefit the city.
The decision on approving the £1.7m Tour de France spend - and £2m in other reserve use for other issues - has now been pushed back to a committee meeting next week.
Conservative group leader, councillor Iain Whyte, said: 'We were given some information. We were not given all the information.
'We agreed that officers should keep working on it, but I would have expected that to come to committee.'
SNP group leader, Councillor Simita Kumar, expressed the same sentiment.
The report for councillors said that they intended for the £1.7m spend to be replenished from income from the city's upcoming visitor levy.
Former Liberal Democrat leader Kevin Lang shared the confusion of the other group leaders.
But, he also clarified that, in October, officers had explained that the use of visitor levy money to backfill the £1.7m was intended to be extra income brought in by the event.
It was announced in March that Edinburgh would host the start of the 2027 running of the men's Tour de France race.
It will be the first time that the race visits the city, and with the women's race set to start somewhere else in the UK, the first time that both the men's and women's races started in the same country besides France.
SNP councillor Kate Campbell said: 'There is very little explanation really of why we're making those allocations.
'Group leaders I've spoken to do not have recollection of making a decision on this.
'We've had no reports to councillors, no notes to committee, about the value we're getting from £1.7m for the Tour de France.
'It's a huge amount of money. We really don't know what the benefit to the city is.'
Conservative councillor Phil Doggart said: 'Much as I have respect for my convener, and much as I respect the other conveners, can I just say that group leaders are not a decision making body.
'At the very least, this should have come to F&R last week. We could have discussed it.
'This is unacceptable. We are the council. So let's take back control of the council from the officers. We make decisions.'
Councillors agreed with a motion put forward by the city's Labour administration, which saw the matter pushed back to the next meeting of the city's Finance and Resources Committee.
That meeting is set to take place on Tuesday, 24 June, and can be viewed here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
44 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Ministers warned not to 'close the door' on hydrogen for heating amid heat pumps 'disastrous rush'
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... UK government ministers have been urged not to 'close the door' on harnessing hydrogen to heat homes before the outcome is known of a landmark pilot of the technology in Fife. The appeal comes as SNP ministers are poised to finally table their long-delayed and watered-down heat in building proposals that could allow for hydrogen for heating to be used as an alternative to heat pumps and heat networks as part of efforts to reach net zero. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Hydrogen Power Unit John Swinney has flirted with the idea of hydrogen being used for heating in contrast to the Scottish Government's initial heat in buildings strategy, drawn up by former minister Patrick Harvie, which stated that hydrogen-ready boilers would be classed as 'direct emissions heating systems' and not consistent with net zero aims. Campaign groups and experts including the independent Climate Change Committee have warned that utilising hydrogen for heating would likely be a distraction from efforts to scale up the roll-out of heat pumps and networks as the primary method to decarbonise how buildings are heated. Green hydrogen, the blend of the fuel that does not rely on fossil fuels, requires large amounts of energy to produce. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government's heat in buildings bill, which is expected to be published once MSPs return from summer recess, would need the green light from the UK government, if hydrogen was to play a role in heating. The UK government is poised to launch a fresh consultation on whether hydrogen could be used for heating homes before making a judgment on the use of the technology. A separate UK government consultation document on opening up hydrogen regulations for industrial and power uses, states that 'the potential role of hydrogen in heating (homes) will be covered in a separate forthcoming consultation'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But a trade union leader has called for the UK government judgment to be delayed until a pilot in Fife is concluded, to give a better understanding of the potential the technology could have on heating homes. SGN is running the pilot for around 300 homes in Fife which will use green hydrogen for heat and will begin operating later this year until 2027. The H100 project in Fife will use hydrogen boilers for around 300 homes (Pic: SGN) The GMB union has warned that without allowing the pilot to conclude before deciding whether to exclude the technology for heating, UK ministers are putting an industry and jobs at risk. The union believes harnessing hydrogen for heating could potentially ease the impact of the move to replace fossil fuel boilers with heat pumps and networks on the gas industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Louise Gilmour, GMB Scotland secretary, has claimed the risk of prematurely running down gas supply networks could be catastrophic for jobs and household bills and insisted the move is avoidable. She said that a 'verdict' on the technology should not be delivered 'before hearing the case and ministers, like all of us, do not yet know the potential of hydrogen'. GMB Scotland secretary Louise Gilmour. Picture: Andrew Cawley Ms Gilmour added: 'The trial in Fife could possibly help shape an energy strategy for generations to come but we will never know if ministers rush to reject hydrogen heating in homes. 'It makes no sense to effectively close the door on that potential before understanding its scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It would be a needless and possibly disastrous rush to judgement chilling any hope of private investment and risking jobs and a practical, effective energy transition.' In February, the First Minister branded the H100 pilot in Fife as a 'shining example' of how technology could help deliver net zero and told The Scotsman that using hydrogen for heating was 'a really exciting opportunity'. Ms Gilmour added: 'We have yet to be told just exactly how much the electrification of homes will cost householders and the National Grid and there is likely a good reason for that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'The impact on the many industries and jobs underpinning our country's reliance on gas, which will continue for decades, is another great unknown. 'The impact of the UK's ill-judged rush to abandon oil and gas production is being seen every day as jobs, skills and contracts are lost to the UK while being exported around the world. 'We need a measured, effective and, above all, realistic energy strategy. 'To rush to net zero without a plan and whatever the cost is absolute folly because the cost in terms of jobs and the communities relying on them is unimaginable while the risk to our planet remains unchanged.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A spokesperson for the UK's government's Depertment of Energy Security and Net Zero said: "We have been engaging with stakeholders on this issue. We are continuing that engagement and will publish the consultation in due course."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Conservative leader wins Canada by-election, regaining parliament seat
Canada's Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has won a closely-watched by-election in the province of Alberta, giving him a chance to return to parliament after suffering a shock defeat in April's federal election. Poilievre finished with 80.4% share of the vote after Monday's election in the riding of Battle River-Crowfoot, in the deeply Conservative western province. 'Thank you very much to the great people of Battle River-Crowfoot,' Poilievre told supporters as he celebrated the victory with his family in the city of Camrose. 'If I stand before you here today, it is by the grace of God and the good generosity of so many people… Getting to know the people in this region has been the privilege of my life.' Poiliever, the leader of the opposition, lost the seat he had held for more than 20 years in April's national election. He now replaces Damien Kurek, who volunteered to resign his seat in order to give Poilievre a chance return to parliament. Without a seat in the House of Commons, Poilievre has been unable to fully serve his role as opposition leader. Instead of sparring with prime minister Mark Carney during question period, Poilievre has been relegated to holding media scrums on the outskirts of parliament, diminishing his national visibility. Monday's victory, with relatively high turnout for a by-election, is likely to re-energize supporters. But Poilievre won one of the country's most Conservative-friendly seats by a narrower margin than Kurek did in April. Diminished support for the federal leader could influence members when they vote to review his tenure as the top Tory in January. The race, which had a national feel for a rural, sparsely populated riding, was also the target of the Longest Ballot Committee, a group calling for electoral reform. The movement coaxed 203 candidates to add their names to the roster, forcing Elections Canada to use write-in ballots for the first time during a federal election and to hire more staff to count ballots on election night. 'Make your vote count so that I can go to Ottawa and fight for you. Fight for your right to buy any truck or car you want. To keep your firearms, fight for farmers, oil and gas workers, and a stronger military. Fight for an immigration system that is under control and puts Canadians first,' Poilievre said in a video posted to social media on Monday, which included directions on how to correctly spell his surname. 'But before I can do any of that, I need you to get out and vote today.'
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
JK Rowling divides gender critics - but is it permanent?
Ms Rowling has been a vocal critic of the constitutional divide for more than a decade, voting No in the 2014 referendum and donation £1 million to the Better Together campaign. Equally though, she has always maintained friendships with people on both sides of the debate. Ms Rowling and the transgender exclusionary movement share a common dislike for the former first minister, given that she spearheaded the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill that set fire to the debate. It is surprising, then, that Ms Rowling's review of Ms Sturgeon's memoir caused such a schism in the movement. Ms Rowling took particular issue with the former first minister's argument that the independence debate was not "unpleasant and divisive". She wrote in her review that No voters were "being threatened with violence and to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason". It immediately caused a divide. Pro-independence blogger Wings Over Scotland stated it had "ripped open an old wound between a bunch of gender-critical people who were getting along just fine". And getting along just fine they were. Arguably, the gender critical movement was at an all-time harmonious high. When the Supreme Court ruling linked the terms "woman" and "man" to biological sex in the Equality Act 2010, the triumph from campaigners was inescapable. And the employment tribunal between Sandie Peggie and NHS Fife reinvigorated the gender critical community with 10 days of non-stop news of their cause. After Ms Rowling's review, social media was awash with conflicting views: those urging pro-independence voters not to conflate the constitutional issue with the campaign for women's rights. Read more: But others felt that it was only right to call out the Harry Potter author. High profile figures joined in to contradict her version of events. Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry said she felt Ms Rowling's take may have exaggerated the bad behaviour during the referendum. The author's review omits "any reference to bad behaviour by Better Together supporters which also occurred," according to the former SNP MP. The KC said she experienced a "determined attempt" to "traduce" her professional reputation after she set up Lawyers for Yes. The author referenced the concerns, writing on X: "Did pro-union people behave badly, as well as nationalists? Yes, without a doubt. In any binary contest you will look around and find a lot of people standing in your camp you don't have a single thing in common with except on a single yes/no question. "There's a reason, though, that far more nationalists than unionists look back fondly on the run up to the referendum time. "Pro-independence politicians were happy to impugn remainers' motives in very ugly ways, and plenty elected MPs and MSPs contributed enthusiastically to online toxicity." Both Scottish independence and the gender debate have become two of the most divisive debates in the country's history. Ms Rowling's self-published review has reignited questions about how movements with shared values can fracture when broader identities and loyalties clash. Much like the debate around self-ID, the constitutional question continues to stir deep emotion and division. The Scottish independence movement has never overcome that division. The challenge now for the gender critical side, is whether it can overcome the deep differences for the benefit of its greater cause - and only time will tell.
