Ottawa County commissioners hold off on administrator decision
The board with U.S. Army Col. Michael Tremblay, speaking to him for about a 1.5 hours. But the board was not prepared to vote on whether or not to hire him, with commissioners saying they wanted time to consider next steps and additional candidates.
The the search will resume during the board's June 24 meeting.
The it wanted to pick a candidate this month, with the goal of the new administrator starting in late July or early August. It's unclear whether that timeline is still viable.
Tremblay told commissioners he thinks he would be a good fit for the job, but acknowledged their 'demanding job' with 'a lot of competing interests.'
'You're going to go back and make a decision, drive on. I appreciate the opportunity to be here. And if ultimately decide to go a different way or do something else, I totally get that, too,' he said. 'I will tell you this: I think I would do a great job for Ottawa County. I think I do a great job for the commissioners. I think I do a great job for the county.'
1 candidate remains as Ottawa County seeks new administrator
He was the only remaining finalist after four others pulled their names from consideration. Mark Eisenbarth, currently the Muskegon County administrator, withdrew Tuesday. Glen Salyer, currently a deputy county administrator in Florida, withdrew Monday.
'We lost four candidates and maybe one left … because of how we acted in our board meeting last week, but the others did not. There were legitimate reasons why people withdrew. And so among the board commissioners and throughout the community, nobody should be pointing fingers at anybody about where we are,' Board Chair John Teeples said.
The the board's June 4 meeting was contentious as commissioners disagreed about whether discussion of a number of administrator candidates should be in public or in closed session.
'Nobody has a right to take credit. Nobody has a right to point (fingers). This is just part of the process, I think, and circumstances the way they are. So I think from that standpoint, we could all just take a breath, right? Remember we're on a common cause to find the absolute best under the circumstances,' Teeples said Thursday.
Nearly all the board members are Republicans, but they are split into two factions. One is members backed by conservative political action committee Ottawa Impact. The other is Republicans unaffiliated with that group and includes .
'The last two times, we've lost a lot of candidates. And I think we, as a board, have a responsibility,' Teeples said. 'We are the face of the county and how we act gets out on social media, it's in the newspapers, it's in the national press. We need to be leaders that that that people can't go on YouTube and say, 'I don't want to go there.' We think, we all believe that Ottawa County is the plum colony of the state of Michigan. But people coming from the outside, they may not see that in us because of how we as a commission act.'
'I think our community needs to see us start to get along so that we can heal this county and have be less divisive,' he added.
Ottawa County has been since February 2024, when then- board Chair Joe Moss and Ottawa Impact , whom they had during their first meeting in January 2023. Jon Anderson, a candidate for sheriff last year, filled the role on an interim basis before in October 2024. Deputy Administrator temporarily stepped in before he reached a severance agreement with the board in December. Gary Rosema, a former Ottawa County sheriff, has been since January. He said all along he would not take the job long-term and hoped to be done in about six months.
The next county administrator will make between $200,000 and $260,000, according to a job description shared with commissioners in April.
—News 8's Byron Tollefson contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
28 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Taylor Swift Breaks Donald Trump's Record For Most Podcast Views In An Hour
We're sure there will be bad blood. Taylor Swift has broken a record previously held by President Donald Trump. On Wednesday, the Grammy winner appeared on the New Heights podcast hand-in-hand with her boyfriend and co-host Travis Kelce, as his older brother, Jason Kelce, interviewed Swift for a little over two hours. The Daily Beast reports that 1.3 million viewers tuned to watch the podcast episode on YouTube within the first hour that it was online. The outlet notes that reps for the 'Shake It Off' singer confirmed the number. The figure trumps the record previously held by Trump. His appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience in Oct. 2024 saw 800,000 people tune in within the first hour, according to CNN data analyst Harry Enten. CNN host Kate Bolduan also noted Wednesday the episode is 'already on track to become one of the most watched podcasts of all time.' Trump will likely be pretty peeved about Swift mopping him up. The president expressed hostility towards the 'Blank Space' singer after she publicly endorsed Kamala Harris in the build-up to the 2024 presidential election. Big Event Media / Getty Images 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT,' he wrote in all caps on his Truth Social platform at the time. A real post from Trump's Truth Social account: 'I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT' — philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) September 15, 2024 @Phil_Lewis_/X/@realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial / Via We suppose that at least 1.3 million people think otherwise.
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Playbook PM: The next round in the redistricting race
Presented by THE CATCH-UP ANYBODY HAVE A MAP?: Texas Democrats are set to return to the Lone Star State, ending their quorum break now that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has wrapped up the legislature's initial special session. But the Democrats are returning to a second special session, gaveled in by Abbott today, and once they do, Republicans' new maps — which aim to carve out five new GOP seats — are fated to pass. Abbott blasted the 'delinquent' Democrats in a statement, noting lawmakers will once again take up GOP-proposed congressional maps, along with a slew of other Republican priorities in the new special session. 'We will not back down from this fight. That's why I am calling them back today to finish the job. I will continue to use all necessary tools to ensure Texas delivers results for Texans,' Abbott wrote. It's the latest display of Abbott's zealousness in President Donald Trump's second presidency as he continues to notch political wins in the deep-red state. 'The third-term governor appears determined to win any battle — even if it means scorched-earth primary crusades or trying to boot duly elected legislators from office,' The Texas Tribune's Alejandro Serrano reports. Meanwhile, Texas Democrats spun the first session's end as a win. 'After we issued our conditions to return home yesterday, Texas Republicans have given in and ended their corrupt special session,' they wrote on X. Democrats' second condition hinged on California's push for voters in the state to approve new congressional maps — which Gov. Gavin Newsom hopes will provide a counterweight to the efforts in Texas. GOING TO CALIFORNIA: Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has reemerged in the Golden State, working behind the scenes to rally Republican support against California Democrats' gerrymandering ballot measure, POLITICO's Blake Jones scoops. 'McCarthy recently told his former home-state congressional delegation that he's aiming to raise $100 million' for an opposition campaign. California Democrats were briefed last night on the new proposed boundaries of the state's 52 congressional districts, with Paul Mitchell presenting lawmakers with slides of the map, per our California Playbook colleagues. More on Mitchell: Known statewide as a top data nerd, Mitchell has become the backbone of Newsom's planned mid-decade redraw and remains 'one of the rare few in the state with the skills to execute what is now a lost art — using technology to carve California's natural and human geography into electorally useful units — and those who know him say he is uniquely suited to weather the pressures that accompany it,' POLITICO's Will McCarthy writes. HOOSIER HOOPLA: White House officials are privately ramping up the pressure on Indiana Republicans to launch their own redistricting bid in the Hoosier State, POLITICO's Adam Wren and Andrew Howard scoop. White House Intergovernmental Affairs Director Alex Meyer in his personal capacity has reached out to 'several lawmakers' on the topic, while the White House has invited Indiana Republicans to meet in D.C: 'More than four dozen — including the state House speaker and Senate president — have agreed to attend and two have declined.' Forward America, a dark money group, appears to be behind an effort in the state urging voters to voice their support for redistricting to elected officials. A recent robocall 'received by a POLITICO reporter living in Indiana accuses Democratic Govs. Gavin Newsom of California and Kathy Hochul of New York of using redistricting with a goal of 'ending the Trump presidency' and urges listeners to call GOP state Rep. David Hall and tell him to back the effort. … 'We can stop these radicals by doing our own redistricting here in Indiana,' the call said.' Listen to the call Happy Friday afternoon from the Lone Star State. Thanks for reading Playbook PM. Drop me a line at birvine@ 7 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW 1. ALL EYES ON ALASKA: Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet face-to-face in just a few hours in Anchorage to discuss a possible ceasefire in Ukraine. Here's the latest: 2. DISTRICT DISARRAY: D.C. AG Brian Schwalb filed a lawsuit in federal court today challenging both Trump and AG Pam Bondi's separate orders this week attempting to federalize the city's police force, with further legal action expected as soon as this afternoon, POLITICO's Nicole Markus and Kyle Cheney report. In an emergency filing to block Bondi's order, the District AG argues that the administration is 'abusing its limited, temporary authority' under D.C.'s Home Rule Act and 'infringing on the District's right to self-governance.' The suit also alleges Trump does not have the authority to remove or replace the chief of police or 'determine how the District pursues purely local law enforcement.' More from Schwalb: 'This is the gravest threat to Home Rule D.C. has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it,' Schwalb wrote in a thread on X. 'In D.C.'s 52 years of Home Rule, no President has tried invoking this authority. Until this week.' The filing marks the most direct opposition from city officials — including Mayor Muriel Bowser — who had until now largely been skirting around standing up against the White House's takeover. Though Bowser ramped up her criticism following Bondi's order, the mayor previously said the 'surge of officers enhances our MPD forces on a temporary basis.' 3. DEEP IN THE HEART: The Texas Senate race is heating up again, with a buzzy new poll showing longtime Sen. John Cornyn closing the gap in the Republican primary against AG Ken Paxton, who has been leading early polling. A new Emerson College poll shows Cornyn and Paxton locked in a virtual dead heat. By the numbers: In a sample of 500 voters between Monday and Tuesday, Cornyn holds a slight edge in the numbers, with 30 percent of voters surveyed backing him while Paxton sits at 29 percent. The cold water dump: The leading number in the poll is the 37 percent of voters who remain undecided in the race. Redistricting returns: Texas voters are split on the proposal to redraw the state's congressional map ahead of midterms, according to the Emerson polling: 38 percent oppose the effort, with 36 percent supporting and 26 percent unsure. 4. LET'S GET DOWN TO BUSINESS: The White House has created an official 'scorecard' rating hundreds of companies and trade associations on their support and promotion of Republicans' sprawling tax and spending legislation that Trump recently signed into law, Axios' Mike Allen scoops. The scorecard ranks 533 companies' 'strong, moderate or low' support of the bill based on factors such as 'social media posts, press releases, video testimonials, ads, attendance at White House events, and other engagement.' Uber, DoorDash, United, Delta, AT&T, Cisco, Airlines for America and the Steel Manufacturers Association have all been deemed 'examples of good partners' on the list. 5. TAKING STOCK: New financial disclosures show that the president has some major financial stakes in both Apple and Nvidia, both companies that have 'recently benefited from special concessions Trump has made to tech companies,' WaPo's Eva Dou and Clara Ence Morse report. The president's latest investment filings show he 'owned between $615,000 and $1.3 million in Nvidia shares at the end of last year, and $650,000 to $1.35 million of Apple stock.' The reporting comes after the White House confirmed a controversial deal with Nvidia this week. Though the president's portfolio raises eyebrows around conflicts of interest, there's no direct evidence 'that he has made policy decisions based on his personal stock earnings.' Related read: 'Intel shares jump after reports US govt may buy stake,' by Semafor's Tom Chivers 6. IMMIGRATION FILES: Internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement documents show how ICE authorities, boosted by a $45 billion new budget, are considering 'opening or expanding 125 facilities this year,' potentially doubling the capacity of the country's immigrant detention system to hold more than 107,000 people, WaPo's Douglas MacMillan and colleagues scoop. 'The road map, last updated July 30, shows that ICE intends to expand immigrant detention to new parts of the country … relying increasingly on makeshift 'soft-sided' structures that can be built in a few weeks and taken down just as easily.' A familiar target: 'The government is also planning to dramatically expand its capacity for detaining parents and children in what could amount to the nation's largest family detention program in decades.' Authorities are focused on expanding facilities in (and beyond) existing ones in Texas, Georgia, California and Louisiana, with 'new facilities in Texas alone expected to double the state's capacity to almost 38,000 beds by year-end.' 7. SCHOOL DAZE: 'The Trump campaign promise that doesn't have the votes,' by POLITICO's Mackenzie Wilkes: '[C]losing the Education Department requires congressional approval. And despite being a target of conservative ire since its founding, shutting it down may be a tough sell for Republicans with poor school districts and states that depend on its legal guidance, civil rights enforcement and other support. That need for careful calculus has made it clear to the two top GOP education leaders on Capitol Hill that a more 'rational' and piecemeal deconstruction of the agency is necessary.' TALK OF THE TOWN Kristi Noem is living for free in a military home typically reserved for the U.S. Coast Guard's top admiral because of reported safety concerns, per WaPo. Adam Schiff is investigating the river-raising for JD Vance's birthday kayak trip in Ohio, per NBC's Frank Thorp. Arnold Schwarzenegger is prepping for the map battle in California, donning a colorful shirt that includes the phrase, 'TERMINATE GERRYMANDERING.' TRANSITIONS — Joetta Appiah is now deputy press secretary for Rep. Haley Stevens' (D-Mich.) Senate campaign. She previously was a public affairs associate at SKDK and is a Kamala Harris alum. … Peter Owens is now campaign manager for Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R-Iowa). He previously was campaign manager for Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds for the 2026 cycle before she decided not to seek reelection and is an NRCC and Don Bacon alum. … … Michael Linnington will be CEO of the United Service Organizations. He currently is a consultant and is a Wounded Warrior Project and U.S. Army alum. … Sen. Mark Kelly's (D-Ariz.) political team has added Mairead Cahill as national political director and Taylor Hawkins as national finance director. Cahill previously was battleground political director for the Harris campaign, and is a Biden campaign, DNC and Maine Democratic Party alum. Hawkins previously was the national finance director for Sen. Bob Casey's (D-Pa.) 2024 reelect. Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In his push for fairness in college admissions, Trump has been silent on legacy preferences
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump attempts to reshape college admissions, he's promising a new era of fairness, with an emphasis on merit and test scores and a blind eye toward diversity. Yet the Republican president's critics — and some allies — are questioning his silence on admissions policies that give applicants a boost because of their wealth or family ties. While he has pressed colleges to eliminate any possible consideration of a student's race, he has made no mention of legacy admissions, an edge given to the children of alumni, or similar preferences for the relatives of donors. Trump often rails against systems he describes as 'rigged,' but he has overlooked a glaring instance in higher education, said Richard Kahlenberg, a researcher at the Progressive Policy Institute think tank who has written about admissions. 'It's hard to think of a more flagrant way in which the system is rigged than legacy preferences,' Kahlenberg said. 'Rarely is a system of hereditary privilege so openly practiced without any sense of shame.' In recent weeks, Trump has taken several actions to scrub any vestiges of race from admissions decisions, suggesting that some schools are ignoring a 2023 Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action. His administration negotiated settlements with Brown and Columbia universities that included provisions to share admissions data. Last week, Trump issued a call for colleges nationwide to submit data to prove they do not consider race in admissions. Some are urging Trump to go further. Sen. Todd Young, R-Ind., applauded the settlement with Brown requiring the university to turn a blind eye toward race — even in application essays. But 'restoring meritocracy warrants more,' said Young, who cosponsored legislation in 2023 aiming to end legacy admissions. 'Federally accredited institutions should eliminate ALL preferences grounded in arbitrary circumstances of ancestry that students have no control over, such as legacy status,' Young said on social media. Many selective colleges consider family ties Sometimes called 'affirmative action for the rich,' the practice of legacy admissions remains widespread among elite colleges even as it faces mounting bipartisan opposition. Virginia's Republican governor signed a bill last year barring legacy admissions at public institutions, following similar measures in Colorado, California and elsewhere. Some Republicans in Congress have worked with Democrats on proposals to end it nationwide. Roughly 500 universities consider legacy status when evaluating applicants, including more than half of the nation's 100 most selective U.S. schools, according to 2023 disclosures to the federal government. A few have abandoned the policy, but it remains in place at all eight Ivy League schools. Stanford University said in July it will continue considering legacy status, even after a California law barred it at institutions that receive state financial aid. Stanford opted to withdraw from the state's student financial aid program rather than end the practice. The university said it will replace the funding with internal money — even as it begins layoffs to close a $140 million budget deficit. Stanford officials declined to comment. Last year, as part of a state transparency law, the school reported that about 14% of its new students were relatives of alumni or donors. A push for merit, but no mention of legacy admissions The executive action signed by Trump last week requires universities to turn over more information about students who apply to and are accepted to their campuses. Taxpayers 'deserve confidence in the fairness and integrity' of decisions, his memorandum said, adding that more information is needed to ensure colleges are heeding the Supreme Court's decision. A week earlier, the Justice Department issued a memo clarifying what it considers illegal discrimination in admissions. It takes issue not only with overt racial considerations but also 'proxies' for race, including 'geographic targeting' or personal essays asking about obstacles applicants have overcome. Similar language requiring 'merit-based' admissions policies was included in the government's resolutions with Brown and Columbia universities. None of the actions made any mention of legacy admissions. Trump's silence caught the attention of the nonprofit Lawyers for Civil Rights, which has an open complaint with the Education Department alleging that Harvard University's use of donor and alumni preferences amounts to illegal racial discrimination. The group's 2023 complaint says the practice overwhelmingly benefits white students. If the Trump administration wants to make admissions a meritocracy, it should start by ending legacy preferences, said Oren Sellstrom, litigation director for the group. 'These deeply unmeritocratic preferences simply reward students based on who their parents are. It's hard to imagine anything more unfair or contrary to basic merit principles,' he said. Few Americans support legacy or donor preferences Colleges defend the practice by saying it builds community and encourages families to become donors. Some backers say it increasingly helps nonwhite students as campuses become more diverse. Then-President Joe Biden, a Democrat, urged colleges to rethink legacy preferences in the wake of the Supreme Court decision, saying it expanded 'privilege instead of opportunity.' Some feared it would drive up white enrollment as affirmative action ended. Georgetown University reviewed the policy but kept it in place this year after concluding the pool of legacy applicants had a similar makeup to the wider admissions pool. An AP-NORC poll in 2023 found that most Americans have a dim view of legacy and donor preferences, with few saying either should play a strong role in decisions. Universities are required to tell the federal government whether they consider legacy status, but they don't have to divulge how far it tips the scale or how many legacy students they admit. Among the 20 most selective universities that say they employ the practice, none would tell The Associated Press what percentage of their incoming class has a family connection to alumni or donors. Trump's blitz to root out racial preferences has hinged on the argument that it undermines merit. New scrutiny is needed to ensure colleges are following the Supreme Court's order and 'recruiting and training capable future doctors, engineers, scientists' and other workers, he said in his executive action. That argument sends the message that minority students are 'intellectually suspect until proven otherwise,' said Justin Driver, a Yale law professor with a forthcoming book on affirmative action. He worries Trump's latest actions will intimidate colleges into limiting minority enrollment to avoid raising the suspicion of the government. 'I believe that the United States confronts a lot of problems today,' Driver said. 'Too many Black students on first-rate college campuses is not among them.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
