Ottawa County commissioners hold off on administrator decision
OLIVE TOWNSHIP, Mich. (WOOD) — With all but one finalist having dropped out of the running to be the next Ottawa County administrator, the Board of Commissioners did not make a decision on hiring Thursday.
The board with U.S. Army Col. Michael Tremblay, speaking to him for about a 1.5 hours. But the board was not prepared to vote on whether or not to hire him, with commissioners saying they wanted time to consider next steps and additional candidates.
The the search will resume during the board's June 24 meeting.
The it wanted to pick a candidate this month, with the goal of the new administrator starting in late July or early August. It's unclear whether that timeline is still viable.
Tremblay told commissioners he thinks he would be a good fit for the job, but acknowledged their 'demanding job' with 'a lot of competing interests.'
'You're going to go back and make a decision, drive on. I appreciate the opportunity to be here. And if ultimately decide to go a different way or do something else, I totally get that, too,' he said. 'I will tell you this: I think I would do a great job for Ottawa County. I think I do a great job for the commissioners. I think I do a great job for the county.'
1 candidate remains as Ottawa County seeks new administrator
He was the only remaining finalist after four others pulled their names from consideration. Mark Eisenbarth, currently the Muskegon County administrator, withdrew Tuesday. Glen Salyer, currently a deputy county administrator in Florida, withdrew Monday.
'We lost four candidates and maybe one left … because of how we acted in our board meeting last week, but the others did not. There were legitimate reasons why people withdrew. And so among the board commissioners and throughout the community, nobody should be pointing fingers at anybody about where we are,' Board Chair John Teeples said.
The the board's June 4 meeting was contentious as commissioners disagreed about whether discussion of a number of administrator candidates should be in public or in closed session.
'Nobody has a right to take credit. Nobody has a right to point (fingers). This is just part of the process, I think, and circumstances the way they are. So I think from that standpoint, we could all just take a breath, right? Remember we're on a common cause to find the absolute best under the circumstances,' Teeples said Thursday.
Nearly all the board members are Republicans, but they are split into two factions. One is members backed by conservative political action committee Ottawa Impact. The other is Republicans unaffiliated with that group and includes .
'The last two times, we've lost a lot of candidates. And I think we, as a board, have a responsibility,' Teeples said. 'We are the face of the county and how we act gets out on social media, it's in the newspapers, it's in the national press. We need to be leaders that that that people can't go on YouTube and say, 'I don't want to go there.' We think, we all believe that Ottawa County is the plum colony of the state of Michigan. But people coming from the outside, they may not see that in us because of how we as a commission act.'
'I think our community needs to see us start to get along so that we can heal this county and have be less divisive,' he added.
Ottawa County has been since February 2024, when then- board Chair Joe Moss and Ottawa Impact , whom they had during their first meeting in January 2023. Jon Anderson, a candidate for sheriff last year, filled the role on an interim basis before in October 2024. Deputy Administrator temporarily stepped in before he reached a severance agreement with the board in December. Gary Rosema, a former Ottawa County sheriff, has been since January. He said all along he would not take the job long-term and hoped to be done in about six months.
The next county administrator will make between $200,000 and $260,000, according to a job description shared with commissioners in April.
—News 8's Byron Tollefson contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Flag Day salutes to mark Army's 250th birthday in Newport Beach, Dana Point
Even as anti-Trump protesters across the nation participate in 'No Kings Day' demonstrations Saturday, including several such gatherings in Orange County to counter the military parade the president has called for in Washington, D.C., a couple of traditional local Flag Day ceremonies are planned. The occasion will be marked in Newport Beach on Saturday, with a community Flag Day event hosted by Sara Weber, a member of the City Council, to celebrate the 250th birthday of the U.S. Army. The event, which starts at 11:30 a.m. and runs until noon, will feature 250 U.S. flags that were installed Thursday on the Newport Beach Civic Center lawn. Newport Beach resident Keira Wilkes will sing the national anthem, the presentation of colors will be led by Commander Brian Fleming of American Legion Newport Harbor Post 291 and the flag-folding ceremony will be overseen by Orange County Boy Scouts. Assemblywoman Diane Dixon (R-Newport Beach) will address those gathered for the event. Following her remarks, Weber will introduce veteran Angelo Pasciuti. Parking is available adjacent to the Newport Beach Civic Center, 100 Civic Center Drive, in the parking structure. Farther south along the coastline, Baby Beach in Dana Point will be the venue for O.C. Supervisor Katrina Foley's annual Flag Day festivities, also on Saturday and also featuring 250 American flags. This ceremony is to honor of all military personnel, firefighters, police officers, medical personnel, and other first responders, according to organizers. Hours are 2 to 4 p.m. The ceremony will be led by Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 9934. Baby Beach is located at 34451 Ensenada Place. 'No Kings Day' demonstrations are also planned to take place along the coast, from Seal Beach to Dana Point, according to organizers, including one in Newport Beach. — Daily Pilot Staff
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
The Manosphere Is at War With Itself Over Israel's Strike on Iran
From the outside, the manosphere often appears monolithic: a band of hyper-online masculinity influencers united in their war against feminism, political correctness, and what they see as the softening of Western civilization. Whether it's red-pillers, tradCons, incels, nationalists, or so-called alpha gurus, their message is usually loud, synchronized, and singular. But beneath the surface, the ecosystem is messy and fragmented. These men can't even agree on what a 'true alpha' is, other than to claim, for self-serving and brand-conscious reasons, that Donald Trump and Elon Musk are the ideal masculine archetypes. Now, a geopolitical crisis has cracked the whole thing wide open. For months, speculation swirled that Israel would launch a preventive strike on Iran. Inside the manosphere, this prospect was a source of simmering tension. Some influencers warned of a coming World War 3. Others tried to keep their feeds focused on fitness, feminism, and Western decline. But when Israel launched a large-scale airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities late Thursday night, June 12, the fallout across the online masculinity space was immediate and brutal. The strike has exposed a bitter ideological rift. On one side are those rallying behind Israel, defending what they see as the values of Western civilization and Judeo-Christian supremacy. On the other flank are anti-interventionists, neo-traditionalists, and Muslim influencers who either support Iran or reject the idea of U.S. involvement in yet another Middle East conflict. What's unfolding is an identity crisis for a movement built on certainty and dominance. Ben Shapiro, co-founder of The Daily Wire, is leading the charge on the pro-Israel front. A longtime vocal supporter of Israel, Shapiro went live on YouTube shortly after the strike, streaming for over an hour to explain 'Why Israel was 100% right to do it.' His post on X and Daily Wire's live feed have been viewed by hundreds of thousands of users. Shapiro, who is Jewish, has since flooded his feed with support for Israel and shared any coverage that reinforces the idea that Trump and other global powers are backing the attack. To his 7.8 million followers, the message is clear: Israel isn't alone. But while Shapiro affirms Israel's role in defending the West, most of the manosphere's power players are sounding the alarm, and they are not on his side. Tucker Carlson, with 16.3 million followers on X, used his newsletter to blast the Trump administration's response, particularly that of Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Rubio said the U.S. was not involved in the attack, a claim Carlson flatly rejects. 'The U.S. says it was 'not involved.' That's not true,' Carlson wrote on June 13. 'This could be the final newsletter before an all-out war.' He warned that Iran's threat to retaliate will escalate and that American citizens may be the ones paying the price. Charlie Kirk echoed the warning. With 5 million followers, Kirk warned that Iran could strike American military bases more easily than Israeli targets and argued that involvement in this conflict would be catastrophic. 'Dragging America into this war might be irrational and suicidal,' he wrote, comparing the situation to Ukraine. 'In any drawn-out war with Iran, America loses—even if we win.' Andrew Tate, the controversial influencer and recent Muslim convert, took a more ironic route. He reposted a thread skewering the language used to defend Israeli military actions. The post satirically lists 'rules' for discussing Israeli wars, including: 'Rule 1: Israel is never the aggressor' and 'Rule 14: The U.S. government has never lied about anything, ever.' Here's the thread he reposted. Myron Gaines, a fellow Muslim and co-host of Fresh & Fit, was more direct. 'I hope Trump doesn't make the same mistake Bush did and tarnish his legacy with more foreign wars in the Middle East that do NOTHING for the United States,' he wrote. Just hours before the strike, Matt Walsh, another Daily Wire personality, warned his 5 million followers that Iran poses no credible threat to the U.S. 'We do not need to get involved in yet another war in the Middle East for reasons that have nothing to do with defending our own nation,' he declared to his 3.7 million followers on X. The fallout is even more complex because many of these figures are stalwart Trump supporters. Now, they find themselves in opposition to Trump's foreign policy, or at least to the narratives being pushed by those closest to him. It's a splintering that no one in the movement seems to know how to manage. The divide is between entire ideological tribes that make up the masculinity ecosystem. The Christian nationalists find themselves at odds with pro-Muslim influencers. The Western traditionalists now clash with isolationist libertarians. The common ground that once united them—feminism bad, Trump good—is no longer enough. More fringe figures, like Nick Fuentes, are also weighing in, using the moment to amplify their openly anti-Israel stance. This rift matters. If Israel's strike escalates into a wider conflict, or if U.S. troops are drawn in, the fracture in the manosphere may become permanent. Influencers who have built empires on the illusion of ideological clarity are being forced to confront contradictions they'd rather ignore. Christian nationalists are struggling to square support for Israel with growing resentment among their base. Muslim influencers can no longer co-sign Western dominance while denouncing Western intervention. And libertarians are finding themselves surrounded by warhawks in their own movement. This is a test of what the manosphere really stands for when the stakes are higher than culture wars. What began as a fight about masculinity is now a battle over war, empire, and whose lives are worth defending. The grift is straining. The alliances are buckling. And no matter who wins this war, the brand may never be the same.
Axios
21 minutes ago
- Axios
The intra-GOP fight over Israel's strikes on Iran
Some Hill Republicans view the past 24 hours as a battle lost for MAGA's isolationist camp. Why it matters: GOP Hill leaders united in support of Israel's targeted attack on Iran — in spite of MAGA media's monthslong warnings against such strikes. Major MAGA figures from Tucker Carlson to Charlie Kirk to Jack Posobiec tried for months to rally the Trump base against the U.S. backing direct attacks on Iran. Non-interventionism is a core pillar of the "America First" movement — arguably as important to the MAGA base as immigration and trade. But elected Republicans' public support of Israel's action indicates the more traditional national security hawks still have some ground to stand on, for now. What they're saying: "Two months ago I gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to "make a deal." They should have done it," Trump posted on Truth Social on Friday. Israeli officials told Axios that despite the administration's official distancing from the strikes, the U.S. had given Israel the green light. "The United States Senate stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression," Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said in a statement. "Israel decided it needed to take action to defend itself. They were clearly within their right to do so," Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said. What we're hearing: Top GOP congressional staffers told Axios the limits of the MAGA isolationists' influence — particularly with lawmakers — is clear. One chief of staff described the online personalities as "in a bubble," arguing they have almost no real influence on Capitol Hill. Another said they felt that when it comes to Israel, most Republicans are not all that in line with voices like Carlson. One aide argued that Trump is not all that different than in his first term, when he took out Qasem Soleiman i or ordered strikes on Syria in response to a chemical weapons attack — despite new voices in his inner circle. Standing with allies is foreign policy 101, said another, calling it "remarkable" how some in the administration's isolationist wing pretends otherwise. What to watch: Some Republicans are taking it a step further than approval of Israeli actions, encouraging more direct U.S. involvement while not yet advocating for troops on the ground. "Again, I applaud President Trump for urging Iran back to the negotiating table," Sen Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) posted on X on Friday. "However, if Iran refuses this offer, I strongly believe it is in America's national security interest to go all-in to help Israel finish the job." "President Donald J. Trump does not bluff. If the Iranians attack Americans— there will be hell to pay," Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), a close Trump ally, posted. Between the lines: The MAGAverse's influence could have been diluted by its own division over the issue of Israel and Iran. Some in MAGA, led by older voters and evangelicals, want to continue Washington's historic Israel bearhug even while avoiding other foreign entanglements. Others don't have such an Israel-sized carveout in their non-interventionist instincts. A slice of MAGA promoting antisemitism is openly hostile to the country. The bottom line: Those divisions were on full display Friday. "How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant "DEATH TO AMERICA" and who openly plotted to assassinate President @realDonaldTrump never have an opportunity to have a nuke?" right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer posted on X. "They should be Israel first. But we have to be America first," Steve Bannon said on his "War Room" podcast Friday. "The bottom line is, we cannot be inexorably dragged into a war on the Eurasian land mass or in the Middle East or in Eastern Europe."
