logo
'We saw Labour winter fuel U-turn on social media', SNP minister says

'We saw Labour winter fuel U-turn on social media', SNP minister says

The Nationala day ago

Speaking to the BBC on Tuesday morning, Shirley-Anne Somerville said the lack of communication from the Labour administration in London was 'no way for the governments to work together'.
It came after Chancellor Reeves confirmed on Monday that the Winter Fuel Payment, which she cut back soon after taking power, would be largely reinstated, with payments of £200-£300 to every pensioner household with an annual income below £35,000.
READ MORE: SNP urge Rachel Reeves to abandon disability cuts after winter fuel U-turn
Asked about the U-turn, Somerville said it was a 'mistake to try and take money away from pensioners in the first place'.
She went on: 'The U-turn is welcome, but I think it points to a rather shambolic way to make policy, which does have implications on the Scottish Government because we're in a system where we are inextricably linked to spending decisions, policy decisions from Westminster.
'It's very difficult to try and run a devolved social security system when you're actually finding out some of the details on social media before you can actually find out the details from the Government.
'Now, that's no way for the governments to work together, and I'm deeply disappointed – welcoming the U-turn – but deeply disappointed in the way that the UK Government have handled this once again with the Scottish Government.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves (Image: Jordan Pettitt/PA Wire) Since the U-turn from Reeves, Labour have been pushing for the SNP to 'triple' the Winter Fuel Payment in Scotland, which is set at a baseline of £100.
However, Somerville said that people on pension credit in Scotland would already get payments similar to south of the Border. She said that people who are not on pension credit would get £100, people on pension credit and under 80 would get £203, and people on pension credit and over 80 would get £305.
Asked if the SNP might up the payments due to the extra funding which is set to come from Labour's U-turn, Somerville said: 'We are still waiting for the confirmation of whether there's any funding implications from the Chancellor's announcement yesterday, with no details of how that scheme will work.'
'We have no idea what the implications will be,' she added.
Somerville further said she hoped the Chancellor would use her Spending Review on Wednesday to also reverse £5bn cuts to disability benefits and to end the two-child cap on benefits.
READ MORE: What does the Winter Fuel Payment U-turn mean for Scottish pensioners?
'I hope that the Labour Chancellor will do that,' she said. 'That's the right thing to do. She has the opportunity again tomorrow, and I hope she doesn't turn her back on it once again.'
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray, also appearing on BBC Scotland on Tuesday, said the UK Government would 'never' consult devolved governments on devolved policy.
Asked if cutting the Winter Fuel Payment after taking power had been a 'mistake', Murray said: 'No, it was the right thing to do at the time.'
He insisted that the U-turn is only possible because the UK's economy is improving – an assertion which has been questioned by experts.
Pushed on why the Labour Government had not informed the SNP administration of its policy plans or their implications, Murray dodged the question.
Scottish Secretary Ian MurrayAsked again, he said: 'How much extra the Scottish Government are going to get? Well, of course it would be Barnett Consequentials on that, which will be calculated in the usual way at the usual time when the policy is finalised.'
Murray was then pushed again on whether 'Social Justice Secretary Shirley Anne Somerville is correct when she says that they're trying to to develop policy here, but they never know what's happening at a London level'.
The Scottish Secretary said: 'Well, hold on a second, we never consult the Scottish Government on policy that is devolved.
'And if we did consult the Scottish Government on policy that was devolved to be screaming blue murder at the fact that we're encroaching on the devolution settlement.
READ MORE: 'Resign if you disagree so much', Labour tell civil servants raising Israel concerns
'This is a devolved payment. There's lots of social security that is devolved in Scotland … the Scottish Government had through the Budget last year received … a £50bn settlement, the largest in devolution's history.
'It's up to the Scottish government under devolution to decide how they spend that. We've got one in six Scots on the NHS waiting lists, so they're not spending on the NHS.
'We've got an increasing educational attainment gaps, so they're not spending it on education.
'So Scottish voters were very right to ask where the money is being spent and why is it not being spent on their priorities.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership
Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership

The National

time30 minutes ago

  • The National

Top SNP figures in secret meeting to discuss John Swinney's leadership

Attendees said that the First Minister has two weeks in which to come up with a new strategy on independence or face a 'bloodbath' at the SNP conference, The Herald reported. A source told that paper: 'It feels like Groundhog Day. The last time John was in charge he dropped independence, surrounded himself only by people who agreed with him, and pushed out the likes of Margo [McDonald] and anyone who challenged his devolutionist strategy. 'For those with short memories, that ended in a bruising defeat. If he stays, we will be heading for a repeat. What is left of the membership will not tolerate it.' READ MORE: Controversial Loch Lomond Flamingo Land plans recalled by Scottish ministers It comes after SNP insiders made a similar argument to The National, warning that it felt like the party was being headed up by a small, private leadership group and 'heading back into the same old internal splits'. The Herald reported that the Monday meeting was ostensibly about forcing the party to move forward on independence, but there was a unanimous view that the First Minister 'has no intention of putting independence anywhere near the party's narrative whatsoever". Previously, the SNP's former policy chief Toni Giugliano told The National that independence had never been so far off the party's agenda as currently under Swinney. One source told The Herald: 'If there is nothing in the next couple of weeks from the leadership, then conference will be a bloodbath.' Though they doubted that any MSP or MP would challenge Swinney directly, they said it did not matter if the only competition came from an activist, as any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous". Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote. (Image: PA) Last year, Swinney faced a leadership challenge from party activist Graeme McCormick, who claimed to have secured the necessary nominations. However, McCormick was later talked out of the challenge after a 'lengthy and fruitful conversation' with Swinney. An SNP insider predicted similar challenges, saying: 'NEC members better start looking for new hobbies unless the leadership announces a change of direction soon — because at this rate we are heading for a mass clear-out.' They went on: 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description – it is essential – and he has failed on probation. 'The Presbyterian schoolmaster might fly in Perthshire – but in the rest of Scotland it just does not land. Stabilising the party only works for a short time. There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.' Last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election saw the SNP lose to Labour by 602 votes. READ MORE: 'Absurdity' of UK position on Israel while still supplying arms called out by SNP MP The party had been favourites, with Swinney calling it a two-horse race between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Yesterday, the constituency's new MSP, Davy Russell, took his oath at Holyrood and, in a speech on the steps of the garden lobby, said his win could be a 'springboard' to Labour winning power next year. The seat had been held by Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie until her death earlier this year at the age of 57. At a press conference on Friday, Swinney insisted there had been progress for his party when the result was measured against their dire performance at last year's general election. One MSP told The Herald on Sunday that that was not enough. They said it was time for Swinney to make changes to his top team. 'I think a proper ministerial reshuffle is required, and an exercise undertaken to seek new policies. For example, I would call in the former MPs who have experience but have had time to refresh their perspective. 'I can sense that many – for the first time – are now nervous, and rightfully so. 'On independence – again, it can never be enough to simply run a competent devolved government without a vision of what could be.' The First Minister is expected to conduct a limited reshuffle of his ministerial team in the coming days. Swinney's previous time in charge saw the party's vote share and number of seats fall. He resigned in 2004, paving the way for the return of Alex Salmond. Asked by the BBC on Sunday if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said: 'Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me. 'I was not seeking high office – I had held high office for a long time in my life – and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.' Professor Sir John Curtice said the close battle for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did not mean Anas Sarwar was a shoo-in for Bute House. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed The election expert told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'The recent message from opinion polls is the SNP is running at just over 30%, Labour is around 20%, so it seems a reasonable expectation that such a result would not mean Anas Sarwar is Scotland's next first minister.' An SNP spokesperson said: 'Since John Swinney became leader last year he has brought the SNP back together and the party is back to doing what it does best – standing up for the people of Scotland. 'In the run-up to next year's Scottish Parliament election, the SNP will continue to deliver for people across the country, while setting out a clear and hopeful vision for their future as an independent country. 'With the latest polling putting support for independence at 54%, the SNP will continue to focus on demonstrating how having the full powers of an independent country is key to addressing the everyday concerns of people across Scotland and creating a more prosperous society for us all.'

Heathrow says record demand shows ‘honest conversation' is needed on expansion
Heathrow says record demand shows ‘honest conversation' is needed on expansion

The Independent

time38 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Heathrow says record demand shows ‘honest conversation' is needed on expansion

Heathrow airport has called for 'an honest conversation' about expansion after another record month for passenger numbers. More than 7.2 million passengers travelled through its four terminals last month. This was up 0.4% from a year ago and represents its busiest May on record. A Heathrow spokesperson said: 'As these record numbers become the norm, it's time to start an honest conversation about the challenges this presents for an already space-constrained yet highly efficient hub. 'Heathrow continues to deliver excellent service, but to sustain this performance and meet future demand, expanding capacity will be essential.' The airport has previously said it will submit detailed plans for building a third runway to the Government in the summer. Chancellor Rachel Reeves used a speech on growth in January to give her support to the project, which has been repeatedly delayed over several decades because of environmental concerns.

Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence
Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence

Lords' objections to Data Bill over copyright threatens its existence – minister Sir Chris Bryant said the continued parliamentary ping-pong, where a bill bounces back and forth between the Lords and the Commons could "imperil" the Bill Protesters in central London in May called on the Government to ditch plans to allow AI tech firms to steal their work without payment or permission (Image: PA Wire/PA Images ) The continued refusal by the House of Lords to pass the Data Bill threatens its existence altogether, a minister has said, as the Commons passed an amendment to head off a challenge from peers. Sir Chris Bryant said the continued parliamentary ping-pong, where a bill bounces back and forth between the Lords and the Commons could "imperil" the Bill. ‌ The critical stand-off arose as artists and musicians including Sir Elton John and Sir Paul McCartney, raised concerns over AI companies using copyrighted work without permission. ‌ Baroness Kidron, who directed the second Bridget Jones film, had put forward an amendment aiming to ensure copyright holders could see when their work had been used, which was overwhelmingly passed by the Lords for the second time last week. However this has not won Government backing. In a concession to win around the Lords, the Government has instead said it will give a parliamentary statement six months after the passage of the Bill, where it will update MPs and peers on an economic impact assessment, and a report on the use of copyright works in the development of AI. A parliamentary working group will also be established. Article continues below Technology minister Sir Chris said the amendments showed the Government had "unequivocally heard concerns". However Conservative chairwoman of the Culture, Media and Sport select committee Dame Caroline Dinenage said MPs had been "gaslit". MPs voted in favour of the Government's amendment, which replace the changes put forward by Lady Kidron, by 304 votes to 189, majority 115. ‌ These will now go back to the Lords for peers to approve. During the last session in the Lords, where Lady Kidron had successfully forward her amendment, she told peers it she would not hold up the Bill further if the Commons chose to disagree with it. MPs heard the Bill will help establish digital verification services, a new national underground asset register which could speed up roadworks, and allow better healthcare and policing. ‌ It would also renew UK and EU data protection laws. The current agreement with Brussels will run out in December. Speaking at the start of the Bill, Sir Chris said: "Double insistence would kill the Bill, where ever the Bill has started. I take people at their word when they say that they don't want to kill the Bill." ‌ Sir Chris added: "Its provisions have the support of all parties in both Houses. "Which is why I urge this House to accept our amendments in lieu. "And I urge their Lordships not to insist on their amendment, but to agree with us. ‌ "It is worth pointing out, that if their Lordships do persist, they are not just delaying and imperilling a Bill which all parties agree is an important and necessary piece of legislation. "They are also imperilling something else of much greater significance and importance economically; our data adequacy with the European Union." He said he was "mystified" by Liberal Democrat and Conservative opposition to the Bill. ‌ "These amendments show our commitment to ensuring considered and effective solutions as I have just outlined, and demonstrate that we have unequivocally heard concerns about timing and accountability." Conservative shadow technology minister Dr Ben Spencer said the creative industries and peers "were not buying" the Government's approach. He said: "They're not buying it because the Government has lost the confidence of their stakeholders that it will bring forward legislation to enact effective and proportionate transparency requirements for AI models in the use of their creative content." ‌ Dame Caroline said Sir Chris and the Government were not engaging with the central issue. She said: "By being cloth-eared to the legitimate concerns of the world-leading creative industries for month after month after month; they have been virtually dragged kicking and screaming to this position now, where they bring forward a couple of tiny amendments. "By gaslighting members of all parties at both ends of this building who have attempted to draw attention to this. ‌ "By somehow pitting our world-leading creative industries against AI, almost somehow presenting them as luddites, that they are somehow allergic to innovation and technology when actually these are some of the most groundbreaking and innovative sectors out there; they are using AI every single day to produce world-breaking pieces of creative content." Responding, Sir Chris said: "I would just say to her (Dame Caroline) that she clearly has forgotten that the previous government actually introduced plans which would have brought forward a text and data mining exemption for commercial exploitation of copyrighted materials without any additional protections for creative industries at all. "That seems to have slipped her mind. Article continues below "We have moved a considerable deal since this Bill started. "We have moved and we have listened to what their lordships and, more importantly, what the creative industries have to say in this."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store