CBRM council told new library should be built on site of existing facility
After more than 15 years of debate over various locations, a new study says Cape Breton Regional Municipality should build a new central library on the site of the existing facility in downtown Sydney.
The Cape Breton-Victoria Regional Library board hired Dartmouth-based consulting firm Fathom Studios last year to assess five properties in or near downtown Sydney. The current location on Falmouth Street came in first.
Deputy Mayor Eldon MacDonald said he hoped Falmouth Street would be given "strong consideration."
"That would be my preference," he said.
MacDonald, a former library board chair whose district includes downtown Sydney, said the major difficulty will be finding a temporary location to house the library while the 65-year-old building is demolished and a new one is built.
But he said that would be a good problem to have, if it results in a modern library.
In addition to the existing James McConnell Memorial Library site, the board's study included the old courthouse on Wentworth Park, which several councillors rejected last year as unsuitable.
A $35,000 study found the building could be repurposed to house a library, but MacDonald said it was 60 years old and raised too many questions.
The library board study also looked at the empty Bargain Shop storefront on Charlotte Street, the empty and decrepit building that used to house the Cape Breton Post on Dorchester, and an empty lot at the corner of Prince and George streets.
Study looked at costs, nearby amenities, view
The study found the current library site scored 84 per cent of the total possible marks for criteria such as expected construction costs, environmental concerns, proximity to bus routes, daycare and other amenities, and view of the waterfront.
The empty buildings and the empty lot tied in second place with a score of 62 per cent, while the courthouse ranked last at 47 per cent.
The study, which was included in CBRM's committee of the whole agenda for Tuesday, was not discussed because the consultant was unable to be in Sydney due to the weather.
Mayor Cecil Clarke said the study will come before a future meeting, where council will have to decide where it lies on the priority list for funding.
If council does go ahead with a new library, they'll have to decide between funding the capital construction or leasing from a builder, he said.
Clarke said while the existing library location is an obvious choice for a new facility, there's no guarantee that'll be the final location.
"I've learned one thing when it comes to this topic of the library [and that] is you don't assume anything, but that is the recommendation and I will leave that for council," he said.
In 2018, a local developer agreed to build a new library on Sydney's downtown waterfront, where the Royal Cape Breton Yacht Club used to be, but in 2021, council refused to extend the deal, saying the $32-million price tag was too steep.
MacDonald said the existing library location is a good one because one of the Nova Scotia Community College's new buildings in downtown Sydney is across the street and it has been designed to connect by pedway to the library's current site.
NSCC and the YMCA a block away both have daycare facilities, as well, he said.
MacDonald said once a location is finalized by council, it will have to seek funding, come up with a design and have the new facility built.
He said he hopes a new library could be open to the public in about four years.
Clark said old estimates put the cost of a new library at $30 million, which is probably higher now with inflation.
CBRM has set aside $1.5 million toward a new library, but other levels of government would have to provide some financing, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Northland Power Achieves First Power on Hai Long Offshore Wind Project
Hai Long offshore substation in the Taiwan Strait. TORONTO, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Northland Power Inc. (TSX: NPI) today announced first power from its Hai Long Offshore Wind Project in Taiwan, marking successful energization of the project and connection to Taipower's grid. This achievement comes ahead of the second half of 2025, underscoring the project's strong construction momentum. The milestone also includes the commissioning of both onshore and offshore substations, further demonstrating the project's progress toward full commercial operations, anticipated in 2027. 'Achieving first power is a significant milestone for Northland and reflects the dedication of our team and partners,' said Christine Healy, President and CEO of Northland Power. 'We extend our deepest appreciation to our joint teams, partners, and contractors for their extraordinary efforts.' ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Since the commencement of construction, Hai Long has made substantial progress, including the production of jacket foundations and pin piles, installation of the Hai Long 2 and 3 offshore substations, installation of all 219 pin piles, assembly of Taiwan's first locally manufactured 14 MW wind turbine nacelle and the installation of 14 out of 73 turbines. With a planned capacity of 1 GW, Hai Long will play a vital role in supporting Taiwan's renewable energy target of 15 GW of offshore wind between 2026 and 2035. Once operational, Hai Long will be among the largest offshore wind farms in the Asia-Pacific region, providing clean electricity to over one million Taiwanese homes. 'This milestone is a testament to the teamwork, technical excellence, and shared commitment from all involved,' said Toby Edmonds, Executive Vice President, Offshore Wind. 'First power represents real progress, not just for Hai Long, but for Taiwan's broader offshore wind ambitions. We're excited to keep building on this momentum.' ABOUT NORTHLAND POWER Northland Power is a Canada-based global power producer dedicated to accelerating the global energy transition. Founded in 1987, with almost four decades of experience, Northland has a long history of developing, owning and operating a diversified mix of energy infrastructure assets including offshore and onshore wind, solar, battery energy storage, and natural gas. Northland also supplies energy through a regulated utility. Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, with global offices in seven countries, Northland owns or has an economic interest in 3.5 GW of gross operating generating capacity, 2.2 GW under construction and an inventory of early to mid-stage development opportunities encompassing approximately 10 GW of potential capacity. Publicly traded since 1997, Northland's Common Shares, Series 1 and Series 2 Preferred Shares trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbols NPI, and respectively. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This news release contains statements that constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws ('forward-looking statements') that are provided for the purpose of presenting information about management's current expectations and plans. Readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. Northland's actual results could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements may or may not transpire or occur. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or include words such as 'anticipates', 'expects,' 'believes,' or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as 'may,' 'will,' 'should,' 'would' and 'could.' These statements may include, without limitation, statements regarding Northland's expectations for the completion of construction and anticipated timing thereof, the anticipated sequence of construction operations, the timing for and attainment of commercial operations, the expected generating capacity of the project, and the future operations of the project, all of which may differ from the expectations stated herein. These statements are based upon certain material factors or assumptions that were applied in developing the forward-looking statements, including the design specifications of development of the project, the current construction schedule of the project, the provisions of contracts to which Northland or a subsidiary is a party, as well as other factors, estimates, and assumptions that are believed to be appropriate in the circumstances. Although these forward-looking statements are based upon management's current reasonable expectations and assumptions, they are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties. Some of the factors include, but are not limited to, those described in the 'Risks Factors' section of Northland's Management's Discussion and Analysis and Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2024, which can be found at under Northland's profile and on Northland's website at Northland has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from current expectations, however, there may be other factors that cause actual results to differ materially from such expectations. Northland's actual results could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements and, accordingly, no assurances can be given that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, and Northland cautions you not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this release are, unless otherwise indicated, stated as of the date hereof and are based on assumptions that were considered reasonable as of the date hereof. Other than as specifically required by law, Northland undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future events or results, or otherwise. For further information, please contact: Adam Beaumont, SVP, Capital Markets 416-962-6262 investorrelations@ Victor Gravili, Head of Global Brand & Integrated Communications 647-288-1105 communications@ A photo accompanying this announcement is available at
Canada Standard
an hour ago
- Canada Standard
Update: Ottawa City Council Backs Rural West Battery Project on 20-3 Vote
A proposed 250-megawatt battery storage installation in Ottawa's rural west won a resounding vote of confidence Wednesday as Ottawa City Council approved a municipal support resolution (MSR) for the project on a 20-3 vote. Just six days earlier, the city's Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee (ARAC) had unanimously rejected the Marchurst Battery Energy Storage System (BESS). But after that vote, The Energy Mix reported exclusively that project supporters expected a closer margin at council-with the possibility that at least two ARAC members would change their votes. In the end, that's exactly what happened, with only ward councillor Clarke Kelly (West Carleton-March), ARAC Chair David Brown (Rideau-Jock), and councillor Wilson Lo (Barrhaven East) voting against, CTV reports. "Energy is the new gold," said councillor Cathy Curry (Kanata North), who moved the motion in favour of the MSR. Curry cited the city's light rail expansion, acquisition of electric buses, and moves to electrify its own vehicle fleet as factors driving up local demand for electricity. The motion stressed that an MSR is "not a planning approval, and if approved would not commit Council to any future land use decisions with respect to the facility," CTV writes. In a statement, Gatineau, Quebec-based Evolugen, the subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Management that proposed the project, called the MSR approval "a significant milestone for the project" and acknowledged the "thoughtful engagement and consideration demonstrated by council and staff throughout this process." View our latest digests Evolugen already had a contract from Ontario's Independent Electricity System Operator to build the project on a 4.5-hectare site, about 30 kilometres west of downtown Ottawa, conditional on an MSR from the city. After the vote, the company pledged to "continue working closely with city staff, local residents, the public at large, and other stakeholders to ensure transparency and collaboration as the project moves forward." On Wednesday, Kelly said the voices of Ottawa's rural residents were being ignored, CTV writes. "The community most impacted by this installation has reached out in overwhelming numbers to demonstrate they remain uncomfortable with what is being proposed and where it is being proposed," he said. "If West Carleton was its own municipality, this project would not get an MSR for this location." But at least two ARAC members with large numbers of rural constituents changed their votes at council, after initially opposing the municipal support resolution in committee. At the 10-hour ARAC meeting last Thursday, councillors heard 68 public delegations before denying official backing for the project, CBC reported. But while the ARAC vote "was unanimous at face value," some committee members were "very conflicted", a committee observer told The Mix , with one councillor comparing the introduction of battery storage to the arrival of the motor car in a horse and buggy community. "I believe that BESS is a good technology, and this, on its merits, may actually be a good project," said Councillor Matthew Luloff (Orleans East-Cumberland), according to a segment of an unofficial meeting transcript viewed by The Energy Mix . While Luloff said his committee vote was meant to respect Kelly's wishes, as a vehemently opponent of the project in his ward, "I reserve the right to make my own decision at Council, where this matter will come forward again for further discussion." Luloff added: "I will be taking the lessons I learned here today at that vote. Let this also be a lesson on consultation, it is not a box to be checked but a fundamental part of decision-making. Community education is incredibly important, and we must continue to do better... in how we inform." After the ARAC vote, Angela Keller-Herzog, executive director of Community Action for Environmental Sustainability (CAFES), said the community adjacent to the Marchurst site "needs to come together" in order to negotiate with Evolugen for local benefits from the project. But at the moment, "avowed opponents... distrust information offered up by the project proponent company," she wrote in an email. "The anti-BESS group is talking about 'raising pitchforks' and the local Facebook group ejects anyone who has positive things to say about the project." [Disclosure: CAFES is a partner of the Green Resilience Project , a joint community listening effort hosted by Energy Mix Productions and the Basic Income Canada Network.] The Energy Mix could not verify the content of the private West Carleton BESS Facebook group. Courtney Argue, a leading project opponent who lives about 400 metres from the site, said "it really depends" how visitors are treated when they join the group. "People get deleted if they are being disruptive or we have a suspicion that they have ties to Evolugen or their potential or confirmed partners," she told The Mix in an email. "You try your best. Sometimes you get it right and sometimes you get it wrong." As for the comment about pitchforks, "we hold our pitchforks in our hearts when it comes to protecting our land, wildlife, and way of life," Argue wrote. "Rural folk are not violent folk. We handle things together. We show up in the masses at town halls, we help neighbours. In this fight, we cannot leave any stone unturned." While the group is meeting neighbours who support sustainable energy solutions-Argue said she'd "love to add solar to our farm to help sustain our operations"-she maintained that most of the people she's heard from oppose the BESS project. Keller-Herzog said the local community newspaper, West Carleton Online, which has covered the issue extensively over the last two years, recently estimated that "the community was pretty evenly split but that the anti-BESS voices consistently tried to present a picture as everybody against." In spite of the furor and the "significant coverage" it has received, "there is probably a majority of busy working families that are not tuned in to the local news and have no engagement on the issue," she said. "The real problem? Our community lacks a calm and credible space to talk things through," Keller-Herzog wrote in a mid-May opinion piece for West Carleton Online. "Many thoughtful West Carleton residents, who might offer balance or ask good questions, have simply gone silent, understandably reluctant to wade into a conversation that has become conflictive and dominated by a few loud voices." Prior to Wednesday's vote, she said Evolugen "now appears hesitant to engage further, perhaps understandably, given how strident the misinformation has become." Yet there are "other BESS conversations that affirm of course residents and businesses in Ottawa want the lights to stay on, want the grid to be stable, want power to be affordable, want the jobs, investment, taxes paid and local community benefits from a safe, non-polluting energy infrastructure solution." In an email Tuesday morning, Evolugen's Canadian head of development, Geoff Wright, told The Mix the company is "eager to move to the next phase of the development approvals process and submit our application for a fair and robust technical evaluation by city and provincial staff. We believe that review by independent, qualified experts will provide the comfort that residents are looking for, while taking into account the benefits that this infrastructure provides for the city, region and province. Source: The Energy Mix
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Premier Danielle Smith faces raucous, angry town hall on Alberta's coal policy
Premier Danielle Smith and three of her ministers got an earful on Wednesday night from southern Alberta locals at a rowdy, hours-long town hall to discuss the province's coal policy. About 500 people, dressed in cowboy hats, belt buckles, and jeans, packed a community hall in Fort Macleod, Alta., for an event marked by heckling, competing applause and placards. 'If we are not prepared to look and find middle-ground solutions to allow for industries to proceed while reducing our environmental footprint, you're going to find that different industries become the next on the hit list,' Smith said through a chorus of protesting voices and verbal jabs. 'Banning industries is just not something we are going to do.' The premier and her ministers of energy, environment and agriculture took questions and were shouted down on several occasions by attendees as they defended changes to the province's coal policy. Story continues below advertisement Many in the crowd held small placards reading 'lie' and 'false,' raising them each time they disagreed with a statement. There was a notable group that came in support of the province's coal policy, frequently applauding the ministers and shooting back at other crowd members. Many attendees carried notebooks and pens, keenly taking notes throughout. 2:27 Alberta Energy Regulator approves Grassy Mountain coal exploration The town hall came weeks after the Alberta Energy Regulator, or AER, granted an Australia-based coal company permission to start a controversial coal exploration on the eastern slopes of the Rocky Mountains. Northback Holding Corp.'s project at Grassy Mountain was initially rejected in 2021 when a panel ruled that the likely environmental effects on fish and water quality outweighed the potential economic benefits. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Late last year, the project was exempted from the Alberta government's decision to ban open-pit coal mines because Northback's application was considered an 'advanced' proposal. Story continues below advertisement The issue has been polarizing in southern Alberta, where the debate has primarily revolved around the economic implications of development against environmental effects. A non-binding referendum in Crowsnest Pass saw 70 per cent of voters saying they'd support the nearby coal project. Despite frequent pushback over the two-and-a-half-hour event, Smith rarely chose to get into back-and-forth discussions with attendees. She defended the province's approach to coal developments, pitching responsible development that prioritizes environmental standards. Smith also frequently cited a lawsuit by five coal companies that say they're owed $15 billion by the province in lost revenues and sunk costs. She argued again on Wednesday that she had taxpayers in mind when the province lifted its moratorium on coal mining and development on the eastern slopes. 'If we do nothing, then we are told we'll likely lose those cases and have to pay ($15 billion).' Story continues below advertisement An energetic Brian Jean, the province's energy minister, frequently challenged the boisterous crowd and at times trotted offstage to hand his business card to those asking questions. 'I live in the oilsands. You can't tell me what I'm concerned about and what I'm not concerned about. I'm very concerned about our Earth and our planet,' he said. Several questions returned to a new study by Alberta government scientists, yet to be peer reviewed, which recently said old coal mines on the eastern slopes are poisoning fish and any further coal mining there would result in 'population collapse' of fish species in a nearby lake. Asked about the report, Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said the province is looking into the issue and is waiting for it to be confirmed by the peer-review process. She said further studies to be released later this year are being conducted. 'We want to understand what is happening there so that we can prevent that from happening in the future.' The premier also jousted with protesters while speaking to reporters before the town hall. When a group gathered behind her and started yelling, she turned around and asked them to let her finish the interview. 'I'm looking for a little bit of courtesy,' she said. The event was scheduled to last two hours, but Smith asked to take questions for an extra 30 minutes after the clock had run out.
