
UN bids to salvage global development summit after US boycott
MADRID/LONDON, June 27 (Reuters) - Scores of world leaders will be sweltering in the summer sun of southern Spain next week at a once-a-decade United Nations development financing summit aimed at curbing global poverty, disease and the worst-case threats of climate change.
Despite the scorching temperatures, though, a major chill looms over the event - the decision early this month by the United States, traditionally the world's largest aid giver and key finance provider, not to show up, opens new tab.
UN countries want to close a $4 trillion-a-year funding gap they now estimate prevents the developing world achieving the organisation's Sustainable Development Goals that range from cutting infant death rates to minimising global warming.
Critics say the promises at the heart of the conference - called the "Seville Commitment" - are nowhere near bold enough.
The measures, agreed by consensus after a year of tough negotiations, include tripling multilateral lending capacity, debt relief, a push to boost tax-to-GDP ratios to at least 15%, and shifting special IMF money to countries that need it most.
The run-up, however, has been marred by the U.S. decision to withdraw over what it said was the crossing of a number of its red lines, opens new tab, including the push to triple development bank lending, change tax rules and the use of the term "gender" in summit wording.
The European Union only joined the summit with reservations, particularly over how debt is discussed within the UN.
Speaking to reporters this week, U.N. Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed described Washington's boycott as "regrettable", especially after its "catastrophic" recent aid cuts that she said had cost lives and livelihoods.
Speaking alongside officials from summit host Spain and Zambia, which has helped organise it, she said the final outcome document, opens new tab agreed reflected both "ambition and realism" and that the U.N. would try to re-engage the U.S. afterwards.
Remy Rioux, chief executive officer of the French Development Agency, said Washington's withdrawal had not been a total surprise given Donald Trump's views. The hope is that agreements next week will allow bolder action at the UN climate talks in Brazil in November.
"We will push for the new framework... (and) its operationalisation from Seville to Belem," he added, referring to the Brazilian city that will host COP30.
Other measures to be announced include multilateral lenders automatically giving vulnerable countries the option to insert repayment break clauses into their loans in case of hurricane, drought or flood.
Another buzz phrase will be a "Global SDR playbook" - a plan where the wealthiest countries rechannel the IMF's reserve-like Special Draw Rights they hold to the multilateral banks, who then leverage them as capital in order to lend more.
Campaigners warn that it will fall far short of what is needed, especially as more than 130 countries now face critically high debt levels and many spend more on repayments than on health or education.
Aid and support from rich countries, who themselves have rising debts, is dropping too.
In March, the U.S. slashed more than 80% of programmes at its USAID agency following federal budget cuts spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk. Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden have all made cuts in recent years too.
The OECD projects a 9–17% drop in net official development assistance (ODA) in 2025, following a 9% decline in 2024.
It looks set to hit the poorest countries hardest: bilateral ODA to least developed countries and sub-Saharan Africa may fall by 13-25% and 16-28% respectively, the OECD estimates, and health funding could drop by up to 60% from its 2022 peak.
So what would be a good outcome in Seville, especially given the U.S. pull-out?
"We should make sure we are not backtracking at this point," said Orville Grey at the International Institute for Sustainable Development, referring to funding commitments. "We should at least remain stable."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
5 Greek government officials resign over EU farming subsidy fraud allegations
Five high-ranking Greek government officials, including a minister and three deputy ministers, resigned Friday following allegations of involvement in corruption over the mismanagement of European Union farming subsidies. The case stems from the alleged mismanagement of EU subsidies for agriculture between 2019 and 2022 by a government agency, known by its Greek acronym OPEKEPE, tasked with handling the funds. According to the European Public Prosecutor's Office, a 'significant number of individuals' received subsidies through the agency based on false declarations, including claims of owning or leasing pastures that were in fact public land. The suspects continued submitting false declarations of livestock until 2024, maintaining subsidy payment entitlement, it added. The prosecutor's office sent a hefty case file to Greece's parliament earlier this week including allegations of the possible involvement of government ministers in an organized fraud scheme. Members of parliament enjoy immunity from prosecution in Greece that can only be lifted by parliamentary vote. In a resignation letter to the prime minister Friday, Migration and Asylum Minister Makis Voridis maintained his innocence, saying he was stepping down in order to concentrate on clearing his name. Voridis served as agriculture minister from mid-2019 to early 2021. Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis accepted his resignation, as well as those of the deputy ministers of foreign affairs, agriculture and food, and digital governance, and of the general secretary of agriculture and food. Replacements for all five will be named 'in the coming days,' government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis said in a statement. The European Commission announced earlier this month it would reduce the amount of farm subsidies for Greece by 5%, for a total of 392 million euros.


The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
M&S boss criticises post-Brexit food labelling as ‘bureaucratic madness'
The chief executive of Marks and Spencer has criticised an aspect of the final phase of the Windsor Framework coming into effect as 'bureaucratic madness'. Stuart Machin described 'yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for retailers', as he revealed that more than 1,000 M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not for EU' sticker affixed from next week. These labels have been phased in since 2023 when the post-Brexit trading deal was agreed. The Windsor Framework was negotiated by the UK and EU to address issues which had arisen in the operation of the Northern Ireland Protocol which effectively keeps Northern Ireland within the EU for trade. However, rules were needed to ensure goods for the UK did not enter the EU single market in the Republic of Ireland. Earlier this month the UK Government indicated it would hope for a smoother flow of trade when its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) deal with the EU is finalised. Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal. He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration. 'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X. 'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'. 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world. 'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
M&S boss criticises ‘mad' Not for EU food labels
The boss of Marks & Spencer has criticised the 'bureaucratic madness' of having to stick 'Not for EU' labels on food destined for Northern Ireland amid a lack of progress on Sir Keir Starmer's EU reset deal. Stuart Machin, the chief executive of M&S, said the Government's new reset deal with the EU 'cannot come soon enough', as officials continue to thrash out the details of the agreement. New requirements under the earlier Windsor Framework, which was drawn up by Rishi Sunak's government to oversee the flow of imports between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, are set to come into force within days. From next week, supermarkets will be required to label all milk, butter, meat, fish and vegetables destined for Northern Ireland with 'Not for EU' stickers. More than 1,000 M&S products must have 'Not For EU' labels, and another 400 products need to go through additional checks to be sold in Northern Irish branches. Mr Machin wrote on X: 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world.' He added: 'The Government's SPS [sanitary and phytosanitary] deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!' Labour last month said it had agreed a new sweeping deal with the EU, which included a new agreement on SPS standards to reduce the number of checks that must be carried out on food imports and exports between the EU and UK. However, the Government has since said details of the deal are still being negotiated, with some concerns that progress has started to stall. The SPS agreement has been the subject of much political controversy, with critics claiming it threatens to force the UK to abide by EU rules on food production, which are widely seen as anti-innovation in agricultural products. Last month, leaders from both Reform and the Conservative Party criticised the new EU deal, with Kemi Badenoch vowing to reverse the agreement if her party won the next election. Reform has argued that Labour MPs will lose their seats at the next election because of the deal.