‘I am on it': Health minister accelerates audit of vaccine injury program
'PHAC is currently accelerating its audit of Oxaro and Oxaro's management of the Vaccine Injury Support Program, and the Agency will provide recommendations on alternative delivery models for the program,' said Emilie Gauduchon-Campbell, a senior communications adviser responsible for issues management in the health minister's office.
Gauduchon-Campbell revealed those developments in an email this week following the broadcast and publication of a three-part investigation Global News investigation into VISP in July.
'All options are on the table as we make sure that taxpayer dollars are being spent appropriately, and that the money is being spent on supporting Canadians who have been injured,' she added.
Story continues below advertisement
Asked about the sped-up scrutiny at a news conference in Fredericton Tuesday, Health Minister Michel told reporters: 'I cannot add any comment more for now, but I am on it.'
The audit's previous deadline was not disclosed and the minister's spokeswoman declined to disclose the revised deadline.
'PHAC's audit of OXARO's work is part of normal practice and understood from the outset of any program as a condition of the contribution agreement. However, PHAC has accelerated its response based on its initial analysis of the program and the direction from Minister Michel to find a solution that resolved the identified problems,' Gauduchon-Campbell added in a second statement last night.
Neither the minister nor her staff would elaborate on what they mean by 'alternative delivery models.' Those could include the government taking back administration of the program itself or hiring a new private company to serve as administrator to handle vaccine injury claims.
The Liberal government in 2020 announced it would create VISP to provide financial support to anyone who is seriously and permanently injured as it embarked on the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, the largest such effort in the country's history.
The government decided to outsource its administration to an Ottawa consulting firm, Oxaro Inc., in 2021. But the Global News series revealed allegations and complaints by applicants and former workers about its flawed delivery over the past four years, despite $54 million in taxpayer dollars going to the program.
Story continues below advertisement
2:41
'Slap in the face': Calls for investigation into Vaccine Injury Support Program
In response to the revelations, four opposition Conservative MPs called for a Commons committee investigation into the VISP, and a pivotal non-profit health foundation also said the program needs an urgent overhaul.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The five-month Global News investigation that prompted the outcry revealed that:
Oxaro had received $50.6 million in taxpayer money; $33.7 million has been spent on administrative costs, while injured Canadians received $16.9 million. Updated Health Canada figures released last week show the company has now received $54.1 million and spent $36.3 million on administration costs, with just $18.1 million paid to injured Canadians
PHAC and Oxaro underestimated the number of injury claims VISP would get, initially predicting 40 per year and then up to 400 valid claims annually. More than 3,317 applications have been filed — of those, more than 1,738 people await decisions on their claims
Some injured applicants say they face a revolving door of unreachable VISP case managers and require online fundraising campaigns to survive
3:02
Federal Vaccine Injury Support Program leaving some injured people waiting for years
Some VISP applicants and former staff said Oxaro was unequipped to deliver fully on the program's mission to deliver 'timely and fair' support, and questions emerged about why the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) chose this company over others, while internal documents suggested poor planning from the start
Global News obtained internal government documents that suggested poor planning from the start as both PHAC and Oxaro underestimated the number of applications the program would get.
Story continues below advertisement
In an email to Global News Monday, a VISP spokesman identified only as 'William, Case Escalation Manager,' reiterated earlier comments and responses by the consulting company but confirmed Global News reporting on the wildly inaccurate claims forecasts.
'Applications to the program grew to more than 10 times the originally anticipated levels,' William said. 'The program processes, procedures and staffing were adapted to face this unexpected increase in volume.'
'VISP is a program that adapts to changing circumstances and continuously improves to meet its objectives,' William added.
The Oxaro spokesman said the company and PHAC have been collaborating closely to evaluate how the program 'can remain agile to handle the workload on hand while respecting budget requirements.'
Oxaro has also said that its monthly invoices sent to the government include documents and details, which in turn PHAC reviews and approves prior to all payments it gets.
Story continues below advertisement
When it bid for and won the VISP contract in 2021, Oxaro vowed it had the 'people, processes, and tools' to run the initiative with 'industry best practices.'
Global News also heard descriptions of a workplace that lacked the gravitas of a program meant to assist the seriously injured and chronically ill: drinking in the office, ping pong, slushies and Netflix streaming at desks.
2:48
Whistleblowers allege 'high school' workplace inside federal program
Some workers said the office distractions had improved in recent months and emphasized that they had done their best with the resources they were given.
One worker added that: 'I don't think anyone actually understood the severity or the relevance of the program that was being contracted to the firm.'
READ MORE OF OUR COVERAGE
PART 1: Canada set up a $50M vaccine injury program. Those harmed say it's failing them
Story continues below advertisement
PART 2: 'Nothing was ready': Inside Canada's Vaccine Injury Support Program
PART 3: VISP aimed to curb vaccine injury lawsuits. Now, people are suing in 3 provinces
READ OTHER RELATED STORIES:
Vaccine injury programs elsewhere also face challenges, criticism
Is VISP an independent administrator? Here's what some documents say
Tory MPs, health group call for investigation and overhaul of vaccine support program
Federal auditors target vaccine injury program amid surprise Oxaro office visit
'Breach of trust': Critics slam Ottawa's vaccine injury program 'failure'
Want to contact us about this investigation? Email: andrew.mcintosh@corusent.com or carolyn.jarvis@globalnews.com. You can also reach Andrew at (416) 550-4684.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
8 minutes ago
- Global News
Use of IUDs up after B.C. made birth control free
A new study shows more women opted for long-acting birth control methods after British Columbia began covering the cost, which researchers say is a strong reason for Ottawa's pharmacare plan to do the same. The study found prescriptions for all types of birth control jumped significantly after the province began covering contraceptives in April 2023, with a 49 per cent jump in prescriptions for intrauterine devices (IUDs) driving the increase. The paper published Monday in the BMJ examined the prescriptions of nearly 860,000 women in the 15 months after contraception coverage began and compared them to what would have been expected without coverage. Among prescriptions for women aged 15 to 49 between April 2023 and June 2024, 11,000 more women were prescribed IUDs, which are inserted into the uterus to prevent fertilization and considered 10 times more effective than pills or condoms. Story continues below advertisement 5:57 What Pharmacare expansion means for Canadians Reached in Vancouver, lead author Laura Schummers said IUDs can cost up to $450 out-of-pocket compared to approximately $25 for a month of pills, according to a government estimate. Though IUDs last at least three years, they cost more upfront. 'This tells us that costs alone are a huge barrier to the most effective methods of contraception across Canada,' said Schummers, an assistant professor of pharmaceutical sciences at the University of British Columbia. Schummers says these results clearly demonstrate the need for national pharmacare coverage, as affordable access is unequal across the country. Many other provinces will only cover contraception for those who are below a certain age or income. The federal government said just a fraction of Canadians are eligible for that low- or no-cost option. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The British Columbia government started covering 100 per cent of the cost of all IUDs, such as copper and hormonal, contraceptive implants and injections, vaginal rings, most birth control pills and emergency oral contraceptives on April 1, 2023. Story continues below advertisement The federal government announced in October 2024 that it intended to cover the cost of contraception and diabetes medications. That required the government to negotiate and sign deals with each province and territory. The federal government announced in October 2024 that it intended to cover the cost of contraception and diabetes medications. That required the government to negotiate and sign deals with each province and territory. But the Liberal leadership changed ahead of the spring election. Last week, federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel said the Mark Carney government would not commit to signing pharmacare funding deals beyond the three provinces and one territory that did so under Justin Trudeau. Those include P.E.I., B.C., Manitoba and Yukon. A spokesperson for the minister says the government will protect the four deals that have been signed. Schummers says those who cannot afford IUDs may either choose cheaper but less effective methods, or forgo contraceptives altogether. 0:32 Pharmacare bill covering diabetes, birth control medications passes Senate 'This is not a small fraction of people who are falling through the cracks,' she says. Story continues below advertisement The study says that 15 months after the policy was implemented, there were 1,981 more monthly prescriptions filled when compared to what they were expecting based on pre-policy trends. Schummers says the increase in IUD use was seen across all age groups, but most pronounced for people aged 20 to 29, many who had previously not been using any prescription contraception. Halifax pharmacist Kari Ellen Graham says she's seen customers prescribed birth control leave empty-handed because of the cost. She said one woman was in an abusive relationship but could not afford to pay out-of-pocket for birth control. The next summer, she saw the woman with a newborn in tow. 'We see this all the time in gender-based violence and it's a really sad thing when people don't have reproductive autonomy,' Graham said. There are deductibles and copayment options for contraception in Nova Scotia, but both require the patient to pay at the counter. 'It's been decades that we've been having these conversations around birth control here in Nova Scotia and we are exactly where we were decades ago,' she said. Dr. Amanda Black, past president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, said there's a financial incentive for the federal government to cover the cost of contraception. Story continues below advertisement A paper she authored in 2015 estimated the direct health-care cost of unintended pregnancies in Canada was at least $320 million per year, which she said is very likely higher in 2025. That figure accounted for the cost of abortions, ectopic pregnancies and births. She said UBC researchers in 2018 estimated that the provincial government breaks even within two years of funding birth control. 'After that the government is actually saving money,' said Black, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Ottawa. Black said it would be a step backwards for women's health in Canada if the federal government stops signing pharmacare agreements with the provinces, particularly as reproductive rights are being rolled back in other parts of the world. 'We want to be moving forward and continue to move forward and this is one of the biggest things that has happened for women's gender equity in decades.' – with file from Sarah Ritchie This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025. Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Advocates question fairness as federal government backs away from pharmacare program
OTTAWA – Health advocates say they're shocked to hear the federal government may not sign more pharmacare funding deals, which would leave coverage uneven across the country. The first phase of the Pharmacare Act, passed last fall by the Liberals and the NDP, calls for the federal government to fund the cost of contraceptives and diabetes medications for patients. The Trudeau government signed deals with B.C., P.E.I., Yukon and Manitoba to cover those costs for four years — but the new government is not committing to signing deals with the rest. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Mark Carney says the Liberal leader promised 'that we wouldn't cut or abolish any of the existing deals' during the spring election. Julie Veinot, the executive director of South Shore Sexual Health in Nova Scotia, says people in her province should have the same access to care as those in B.C. Dr. Amanda Black, past president of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada, says that if the government doesn't continue signing pharmacare deals, it would be a step backward for women's health. — With files from Hannah Alberga in Toronto This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 28, 2025.
Global News
4 hours ago
- Global News
Judge blocks Trump admin's efforts to defund Planned Parenthood
A federal judge on Monday ruled Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide must continue to be reimbursed for Medicaid funding as the nation's largest abortion provider fights President Donald Trump's administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation. The new order replaces a previous edict handed down by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston last week. Talwani initially granted a preliminary injunction specifically blocking the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood members that didn't provide abortion care or didn't meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year. 'Patients are likely to suffer adverse health consequences where care is disrupted or unavailable,' Talwani wrote in her Monday order. 'In particular, restricting Members' ability to provide healthcare services threatens an increase in unintended pregnancies and attendant complications because of reduced access to effective contraceptives, and an increase in undiagnosed and untreated STIs.' Story continues below advertisement A provision in Trump's tax bill instructed the federal government to end Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, even to those like Planned Parenthood that also offer medical services like contraception, pregnancy tests and STD testing. Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Although Planned Parenthood is not specifically named in the statute, which went into effect July 4, the organization's leaders say it was meant to affect their nearly 600 centers in 48 states. However, a major medical provider in Maine and likely others have also been hit. In her Monday order, Talwani said that the court was 'not enjoining the federal government from regulating abortion and is not directing the federal government to fund elective abortions or any healthcare service not otherwise eligible for Medicaid coverage.' Instead, Talwani said that her decision would block the federal government from excluding groups like Planned Parenthood from Medicaid reimbursements when they have demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success in their legal challenge. 1:34 Planned Parenthood drops federal funding over Trump administration rule In its lawsuit, Planned Parenthood had argued that they would be at risk of closing nearly 200 clinics in 24 states if they are cut off from Medicaid funds. They estimated this would result in more than 1 million patients losing care. Story continues below advertisement 'We're suing the Trump administration over this targeted attack on Planned Parenthood health centers and the patients who rely on them for care,' said Planned Parenthood's president and CEO Alexis McGill Johnson in a statement on Monday. 'This case is about making sure that patients who use Medicaid as their insurance to get birth control, cancer screenings, and STI testing and treatment can continue to do so at their local Planned Parenthood health center, and we will make that clear in court.' The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah. The federal department of health did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Previously, the department said it strongly disagreed with the judge's initial order that allowed some Planned Parenthood members to receive Medicaid funding. 'States should not be forced to fund organizations that have chosen political advocacy over patient care,' said the department's communication director, Andrew Nixon. Doing so, he said, 'undermines state flexibility' and 'concerns about accountability.' Medicaid is a government health care program that serves millions of low-income and disabled Americans. Nearly half of Planned Parenthood's patients rely on Medicaid.
