logo
Willie Wilson: Violent crime may be down, but do residents feel safe in all neighborhoods?

Willie Wilson: Violent crime may be down, but do residents feel safe in all neighborhoods?

Chicago Tribune2 days ago
Mayor Brandon Johnson and his administration are touting reductions in homicides and other violent crime in Chicago as proof that his safety plan is working. However, in some neighborhoods, residents do not believe that crime is down.
Two-thirds of Chicago residents are concerned about public safety in the area where they live, a 2024 Harris Poll found. The data in distressed neighborhoods is bucking the midyear national trend of reductions in violent crime across the country. Austin, the neighborhood Johnson calls home, leads the city with 29 homicides so far this year. In 2024, Austin finished the year with 47 homicides.
In too many neighborhoods, people feel unsafe. The following neighborhoods lead the city in homicides and shooting victims: Austin, Englewood, Garfield Park, South Shore, North Lawndale and Auburn Gresham. These neighborhoods are predominantely African American.
I am appalled that more than 75% of the victims of gun violence are young Black men and boys. African Americans account for 28% of the city's population. The Black community does not feel a 30% drop in homicides and nonfatal shootings — because their neighborhoods remain places with high violence. Aretha Franklin, the singer, had it right: You have to give the people 'something they can feel.'
The city of Chicago data notes that 18% of the fatal and nonfatal victims of gun violence are Latino and 2.4% are white. Thirty-nine percent of the Chicago population is white. Why is there so much violence in Black communities and very little in predominately white areas?
In white communities, there is economic stability. A dollar circulates six hours in an African American community, compared with 17 days in a white community, 19 days in a Jewish community and 28 days in an Asian community. Building wealth in the Black community will lead to economic stability and likely lower crime rates. The mayor's policies supporting red light and speed cameras, parking tickets and high taxes could be causing economic hardship and anger. Economic instability coupled with high poverty, unemployment and poor-performing schools are a recipe for disaster.
How can Johnson celebrate reductions in violence when his community is in crisis? Over 50% of the people being shot in Chicago are young, from children to adults who up to 29 years old. Our young people represent the future.
Some of the teen gatherings downtown have led to violence and property damage. I believe the City Council rightly passed an ordinance to address this issue. Unfortunately, the mayor vetoed the legislation. Johnson should get out of the way and allow Chicago police Superintendent Larry Snelling to do his job. The superintendent is respected by his peers and the community. I believe if he were allowed to do his job without political interference, more cases would be solved and communities made safer.
I understand what it is like to be a victim of violent crime. I lost my 20-year-old son, Omar, to gun violence. It is a pain that stays with surviving family members. That pain is made worse when the perpetrators are not brought to justice. While crime numbers are trending down, if people are victimized and no one is held accountable, that amplifies gun violence in high-crime areas and sends a signal to criminals that community safety is not a priority.
Block Club Chicago and The Trace recently reported that the city's homicide clearance rate is still declining, even with fewer homicides to solve. In 2024, police made arrests in 16% of fatal shootings within a year of the incident, down from 23% in 2022. Eighty percent of Chicago's fatal shooting victims were Black, and their cases had a significantly lower clearance rate. Thus, families do not have closure, and no one has been held accountable for shooting their loved one.
The following are suggestions to curb violence in African American neighborhoods:
Residents living on the South and West sides should not be living in fear. They deserve full-service grocery stores, banks and manufacturing facilities with well-paying jobs.
The highest concentration of people returning from prisons across Illinois reside on the West and South sides. Elected leaders must provide investments in job training, vocational education and other wraparound services for individuals returning from prisons.
The data is not always the best predictor of safe neighborhoods. The people living in those communities know when they are safe — they can feel it.
I write this commentary to make those comfortable celebrating violence reduction statistics uncomfortable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cincinnati officials discuss city crime and widespread response to video of violent fight
Cincinnati officials discuss city crime and widespread response to video of violent fight

San Francisco Chronicle​

time15 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Cincinnati officials discuss city crime and widespread response to video of violent fight

Days after a brawl that injured six people in Cincinnati, the mayor and other city leaders said Friday they would beef up law enforcement patrols but criticized how the much-shared video of the fight had portrayed the city in what they see as an unfair and cynical light. 'Let me be clear, there is no place for violent crime in Cincinnati, whether it's a fight or gun violence,' Mayor Aftab Pureval said. 'We will pursue those responsible and we will hold them accountable no matter who they are.' Video of the fight quickly went viral, and conservatives leaders and influencers seized on the brawl to point out what they see as lawless urban areas in America. Those voices included Vice President JD Vance, Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and the vice president's half brother, Cory Bowman, who is running to be mayor of Cincinnati. A video of the fight shows a crowd milling about before several people start throwing punches. One man falls to the ground and is repeatedly punched and kicked by bystanders. Another woman is punched in the face and falls to the ground, lying motionless before another woman helps her. She can be seeing bleeding from the mouth. The mayor acknowledged on Friday the perception remained that the city was dangerous, but he pointed out that data showed the violent crime was declining in the city. Pureval also said 'there's a concerning increase in burglaries and breaking and entering, and shootings in some specific areas' without providing the data. 'Currently too many Cincinnatians don't feel safe,' he said. 'All of us, especially me, are clear-eyed and working urgently to fix that.' Pureval said he was working with Republican Gov. Mike DeWine to deploy state highway patrol to work highways into the city, which should free up more police officers. He also said police units like SWAT and the Civil Disturbance Response Team will expand their reach in the city. Cincinnati Police Chief Teresa Theetge said five men and one woman 'were subjected to unimaginable physical violence' in the brawl. She didn't identify them. She also said six people have been charged with assault and rioting for playing a role in the brawl, three of whom are in custody. 'This remains an open investigation, and I want to assure you, we will not stop until justice is finally served,' she told reporters, adding that they plan to release footage of the brawl, including body camera footage next week. But several speakers, including a pastor and a council member, talked about how the fight had been racialized and several blamed conservative Republicans for fueling that narrative. 'We would not be here and this will not be national news if this was a group of Black people that jumped on other Black people,' Pastor Damon Lynch, III told reporters. 'Obviously it's national news because it's been racialized.' Lynch said critics were focused on the Black participants but haven't mentioned a white man who, he says, could be seen in a video of the brawl slapping a Black man during the fight. 'Nobody's asking why didn't he just walk away?" Lynch said. Council Member Scotty Johnson also criticized the media for playing the brawl on a loop all week. 'What role do you play in quoting misdirected national leaders talking about a city that is on the right track, but they are doing everything they can to try take us off that track,' Johnson said. Toward the end of the press conference, a reporter asked Pureval how he would deal with the racial tensions in the city that have been exacerbated by this brawl. 'It's overt racial tensions that have been claimed by irresponsible leaders, who have unfortunately cynically tried to take advantage of this awful fight and try and divide us,' he said, noting that Cincinnati 'has a long history of being, on the on the very front foot of racial justice' including as a stop on the Underground Railroad.

Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case
Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

Supreme Court raises the stakes in a Louisiana redistricting case

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday expanded the scope of a Louisiana congressional redistricting dispute that has been pending for months by ordering new briefing on a legal question that could further weaken the landmark Voting Rights Act. The court issued an order asking the lawyers to address whether, in seeking to comply with the 1965 law that protects minority voting rights, Louisiana violated the Constitution's 14th and 15th Amendments enacted after the Civil War to ensure Black people were treated equally under the law. If the court rules that the state did violate the Constitution, it would mean states cannot cite the need to comply with the Voting Rights Act if they use race as a consideration during the map-drawing process, as they currently can. Rick Hasen, an election law expert at the UCLA School of Law. wrote on his Election Law Blog that the order "appears to put the constitutionality of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act into question." That provision bars voting practices or rules that discriminate against minority groups. The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority is often receptive to arguments that the Constitution is 'colorblind,' meaning no consideration of race can ever be lawful even if it is aimed at remedying past discrimination. In 2013, the court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in a case from Alabama and further weakened it in a 2021 case from Arizona. The justices heard arguments in the Louisiana case on more technical, less contentious questions in March and was originally expected to issue a ruling by the end of June. Even then, the constitutional issue loomed large. The new order did not indicate whether the court will hear another round of arguments before it issues a ruling in the case. The Louisiana map in question, which is currently in effect, includes two majority Black districts for the first time in years. The complicated case arose from litigation over an earlier map drawn by the state legislature after the 2020 census that included just one Black majority district out of the state's six districts. About a third of the state's population is Black. Civil rights groups, including the Legal Defense Fund, won a legal challenge, arguing that the Voting Rights Act required two majority Black districts. But after the new map was drawn, a group of self-identified 'non-African American' voters led by Phillip Callais and 11 other plaintiffs filed another lawsuit, saying the latest map violated the 14th Amendment. As recently as 2023, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the Voting Rights Act in a congressional redistricting case arising from Alabama. But conservatives raised questions about whether key elements of the law should ultimately be struck down.

Democrats Against a Higher Minimum Wage
Democrats Against a Higher Minimum Wage

Wall Street Journal

time3 hours ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Democrats Against a Higher Minimum Wage

File this under the category of progressives mugged by reality: On Monday the District of Columbia's City Council voted to slow a rising minimum wage for tipped workers, which has ravaged restaurants. To adapt an old adage for a young Washington clientele, there's no such thing as a free brunch. Tipped workers, including restaurant servers, are often paid at a special lower hourly wage, but then they earn much higher take-home pay. D.C. voters passed a ballot initiative in 2022 to raise the tipped minimum wage (then $5.35) to match the city's ordinary wage floor (now $17.95) by 2027. At this point, the tipped wage mandate has already nearly doubled to $10.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store