logo
Left in limbo: How federal workers still on the job are coping with chaos

Left in limbo: How federal workers still on the job are coping with chaos

Yahoo02-05-2025

More than 100 days into Donald Trump's presidency, many federal workers have decided to do something that was unthinkable on inauguration day: quit their jobs.
As the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency cuts budgets and headcounts across the government, a workforce used to job security is now beset by low morale and deep uncertainty. Among those who've been fired or quit are tens of thousands of highly trained experts and specialists, draining the agencies of their knowledge base.
Deeper cuts are likely to come.
Weeks away from hurricane season, the Federal Emergency Management Agency is set to lose roughly 1,000 workers – 20% of its full-time staff – who took a buyout offer. About 25% of Internal Revenue Service workers, roughly 22,000 people, are planning to take buyouts. The Environmental Protection Agency this week made another offer to all employees – open through May 5 – to quit now and be paid through the end of September.
Those left behind now face a highly uncertain future in which a job that once seemed secure could disappear in a flash, leaving them wondering if it makes any sense to stay.
Many of the more than a dozen workers who spoke to CNN describe a culture of fear that now permeates.
Just last week, some agencies moved to end flexible work schedules. Some workers' lives are being uprooted by mandatory reassignments and relocations. Many feel they are being pitted against each other because rules around seniority and status mean some staffers could still be displaced from their jobs by coworkers.
Some federal workers said normal activities – such as stepping away from their computers to collaborate in-person with other workers, or attending after-hours retirement parties – are being more closely scrutinized.
Shannon Walsh, a federal worker with the Environmental Protection Agency in Chicago, says that an email employees recently received informing them that their PIV card swipe data is being tracked felt threatening – causing paranoia and uncertainly over how their time is being truly monitored and for what reason.
'Confused. And afraid. It honestly makes me feel both those things but also angry because I feel that that is the point,' said Walsh, a member of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 704. 'It makes me feel like we are being smoked out.'
Ellie Hagen, also an EPA employee in Chicago and a member of the local union, described a 'very intense culture of fear' at work.
Hagen said an office 'retirement' party to celebrate those who were terminated was canceled recently by management. Even though the party was to take place outside of work hours, there was worry it would appear they were being unproductive.
'People are afraid to do things that were once routine,' she said.
Still, many federal workers who spoke to CNN remain resolute and insist they aren't leaving until they are given no choice.
Almost all federal workers in February were offered deferred resignation: quit now and be paid through the end of September. Since then, Trump-appointed agency heads have begun reducing their ranks through multiple efforts, including some that have offered their own buy-outs.
Those efforts have met legal challenges and political backlash from Democrats who are highlighting the implications of those cuts ahead of next year's midterm elections.
One employee at the US Department of Agriculture who spoke to CNN said they recently decided to take the second deferred resignation offer in April after being terminated and then reinstated earlier this year, undermining their sense of job security.
'If I do this, I'm going out on my own terms. I'm choosing it,' the worker said, noting that they'll be paid through September 30 under the program's terms.
When the first buyout was offered earlier this year, the employee didn't give it any thought. They wanted to continue working for USDA, and their boss told them they didn't have anything to worry about. Two days later, they were terminated, along with tens of thousands of other probationary federal workers.
Even those who are staying face continued uncertainty as layoffs are implemented.
The IRS issued a memo last week telling its approximately 90,000 employees that it was withdrawing from an agreement that allowed employees to work a flexible schedule.
As part of a 2022 labor agreement, the IRS allowed employees to work some nine-hour days, so they could take a full typical workday off after they logged enough hours. The deal also allowed employees to pick their start time, giving them additional flexibility over their time.
Those deals were nixed by the IRS as part of the Trump administration's broader efforts to end collective bargaining for federal workers. It also came amid a Trump administration push to shrink the size of the workforce by offering time-limited buyouts in exchange for quitting.
'A lot of people are upset that this was not announced before the option to resign,' a Utah-based IRS employee told CNN. 'Things are sure different around the office these days.'
At the Veterans Health Administration, a draft document from late March reviewed by CNN detailing its 'reductions in force' effort laid out 'a process where one employee may 'bump' another employee out of their position.'
It goes on to explain that employees would be organized based on factors including their tenure and status – such as whether they meet veterans' preference status that helps military veterans get hired.
The document says: 'If you 'bump' another employee, you would retain employment. You may be eligible for grade and/or pay retention. If another employee is ranked higher, you may be 'bumped' out of your role and released from employment.'
Max Stier, CEO of the Partnership for Public Service, said on a call with reporters Friday that displacing other federal employees is typically part of federal reduction-in-force efforts, though he noted that no prior administration has conducted a reduction like this.
'If somebody's been RIF'ed, they may have the opportunity of moving into another position where they have seniority that is specifically similar to the job that they had before,' Stier said. 'They can, in effect, take that job from the incumbent that's there and push that person out. That is part of the RIF procedure.'
The Office of Personnel Management regulations for RIFs include details about so-called bumping and retreating rights, which should apply to any agency conducting a reduction in force, said Jenny Mattingley, vice president for government affairs at the Partnership. However, it can take many months for agencies to properly categorize all the federal employees subject to the layoffs.
It's 'pretty complicated,' she added, noting that an employee's appointment category (such as career staffer or probationary worker), length of service and performance are taken into account, in addition to veteran status.
National Treasury Employees Union National President Doreen Greenwald criticized the Trump administration's 'aggressive mismanagement' of the federal workforce.
'The exodus of talent and nonpartisan dedication to public service makes it harder for our federal agencies to accomplish the important missions assigned to them by Congress. And for those who stay on the job, this administration continues to unnerve them with unnecessary changes to their schedules, petty disruptions to their working lives, deep cuts to their operating budgets and threats to their careers,' Greenwald said in a statement.
At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health, roughly two dozen top officials placed on administration leave during the mass April 1 layoffs were given the option to be reassigned to the historically understaffed Indian Health Services.
Those officials – ranging from longtime lab researchers to regulatory and policy experts – received an email with five IHS sites, including Albuquerque, New Mexico, Billings, Montana, and Juneau, Alaska, asking them to rank their preferences.
They were given one day to decide.
At NIH, at least four institute directors, overseeing infectious diseases, minority health and disparities, pediatric disease and nursing research, were placed on administrative leave and given the IHS option.
'Things are broken and confused here,' said a remaining NIH employee. Nearly a month after the mass layoffs, 'we're still learning who is here and who is gone.'
The reassignments to Indian Health Service also angered tribal communities that are in dire need of physicians and nurses at understaffed, remote clinics – not longtime officials and researchers shunted away from their bureaucratic roles.
It was a 'slap in the face,' said Liz Carr, a member of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians who served as a senior IHS advisor during the Biden administration. 'They are painting our communities as a relegation, a hellscape, a place of punishment for these people that want to provide services to HHS in other capacities.'
She added: 'Our people deserve the best of the best, and so sending people to places they don't want to be is not going to create adequate or beneficial health care.'
Most of the officials did not respond to the email and are still in limbo, according to three people familiar with the reorganization efforts. One CDC official responded with their preferences and has received no further communications since then, two of those people said.
'Administrative leave is a pretty big deal. It's closely monitored, but there's so much going on right now [that] I don't even know if there's enough people in HR to be processing putting people on administrative leave,' one former official said.
Overall, Department of Health and Human Services officials' reorganization aimed to slash 20,000 jobs, consolidate programs, and shutter others. Several of the cuts, like a canceled program to study women's health, brought controversy and HHS promises to reverse course.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. insisted soon after the mass layoffs that these things would happen with swift DOGE cuts. 'The part of that, DOGE – we talked about this from the beginning – is we're going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstalled because we'll make mistakes,' he told reporters on April 3.
But the uncertainty has left remaining health agency employees 'waiting for the next shoe to drop,' said one longtime health official who departed before the mass layoffs. 'People are confused, frustrated, saddened, and worried about the future of public health. Is this just the first step?'
Those workers say the cuts are leading to backlogs and fewer government employees handling the same amount of work.
One medical professional at the Department of Veterans Affairs now has to care for more patients – and ones with higher needs – because their colleague retired recently and a request to replace the person was denied.
'There's no way I can spend as much time on care as my colleague was,' they told CNN. 'So, the patients are suffering.'
Feeling spread very thin, the professional worries that they won't be able to keep up the pace without burning out. They went into the medical field to help people but are upset that they can't provide the type of care their patients need.
Despite all this, they are committed to sticking it out.
'I'm not leaving because I love working with veterans,' they said. 'It feels like a sacred mission, not just a job.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump broke the politics of Medicaid
How Trump broke the politics of Medicaid

Politico

time12 minutes ago

  • Politico

How Trump broke the politics of Medicaid

Republicans used to cheer the possibility of Medicaid cuts. Now, as the GOP advances President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' that would reduce Medicaid spending, they're rebranding it as making the program stronger. The shift reflects the striking new politics of Medicaid — and how dramatically the GOP's coalition has changed under Trump. Now Democrats are hoping Medicaid could be the issue that exposes the cracks in the Trump coalition. They have seized on a nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimate that the bill would cause 7.8 million people to lose access to the low-income health insurance program. At stake is whether Democrats can start to win back working-class voters who have shifted toward the GOP over the past decade. Medicaid provides health insurance for nearly 80 million people but was long the electoral forgotten sibling of Social Security and Medicare. It's clear in the ads: TV ads for House and Senate races last election cycle were 26 times as likely to mention Medicare, the health care program for seniors, as Medicaid, according to a POLITICO analysis of transcripts from AdImpact, which tracks political advertising. But that's already changing. 'I saw elections 16 years ago where people ran on cutting Medicaid, and there were folks who were on Medicaid who were in the crowd cheering them on,' said Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a potential Democratic candidate for president in 2028. 'That's not the case of where we are today.' The Medicaid provisions in the GOP's budget bill have prompted new debate even among Republicans. To Beshear and others, that provides an opening. Democrats, he said, should stand in front of hospitals and 'talk about how important Medicaid is,' he said, while emphasizing 'the impact on specific communities.' Congressional Democrats have seized on the issue, with moderates and progressives alike speaking in defense of the program. The party's House campaign arm is prioritizing Medicaid in swing-district messaging. And TV ads mentioning Medicaid have already run in more Republican-held districts this year than they did all of last cycle. Republicans are cautious, with an ideologically diverse group of senators wary of cuts and poised to exert significant influence over the bill. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who warned that cutting the program would be 'both morally wrong and politically suicidal,' said last week that Trump had promised him no cuts to benefits. GOP lawmakers have largely rallied around Trump's bill by arguing the House legislation protects Medicaid by only removing people who do not deserve it in the first place. That careful messaging is a stark difference from a decade ago, when congressional Republicans explicitly prioritized cutting Medicaid and governors blocked its expansion. One reason for the turnaround: A series of red states expanded Medicaid by ballot initiative between 2017 and 2020 — largely with backing of Democratic-aligned groups — and GOP voters defied their state and local political leaders in large numbers to support the program. Nationwide, enrollment for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program rose from just shy of 70 million in 2014 to nearly 79 million at the end of 2024. And at the same time more people were entering the program, including Republican voters in red states, an electoral realignment was shifting working-class voters toward Trump. 'Medicaid has a broader and broader appeal the more people that are on it, and the more people who know someone who's on it. That's incredibly powerful politically,' said Kelly Hall, executive director of the Fairness Project, which backed state Medicaid referendums. The makeup of Medicaid users was changing — and so were its politics. For a long time, the program has been relatively absent from federal races. Even in the 2018 midterms, when defending the Affordable Care Act was central to Democrats' midterm messaging, only 30 TV ads across all congressional elections mentioned Medicaid, while nearly 500 mentioned Medicare, POLITICO's analysis found. But Medicaid expansion was a major issue in many gubernatorial and state legislative races in the 2010s. The success of ballot measures proved the program had a strong constituency, even in red states. And Trump's popularity with working-class voters also reshaped the GOP's coalition. Compared to Republican candidates before him, Trump's 2024 gains were strongest in counties with high Medicaid enrollment, a POLITICO analysis found. In the 2024 election, 49 percent of Medicaid recipients voted for Trump compared to 47 percent for Kamala Harris, according to Morning Consult polling. That means cuts to Medicaid or reductions in eligibility could now pose a political risk for Republicans. People who could lose benefits would not just be Democratic voters in blue states, but Republicans in red states and swing districts who supported Trump last year. Drew Kent, a GOP strategist whose firm recently polled Pennsylvania's voters, found a slight majority, including 30 percent of Republicans, disapproved of work requirements for Medicaid. 'These results are definitely a bit surprising to me,' Kent said. 'It clearly shows the challenges and importance, particularly in a political swing state like Pennsylvania, of getting the policy, messaging, and communications right on an issue of this magnitude.' Republicans are aware of the potential political liability: The GOP's argument about the bill, which could still face changes in the Senate, is that the changes to the program do not amount to cuts for voters. 'The President wants to preserve and protect Medicaid for the Americans who this program was intended for,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing last month. 'We want to see able-bodied Americans at least working 20 hours per week, whether that's part-time or full-time, whether that's even looking for work or volunteering for 20 hours a week, if they are receiving Medicaid.' A memo from the National Republican Campaign Committee last month advised the party to go on offense, saying the bill protects Medicaid by 'removing illegal immigrants and eliminating fraud.' Among its provisions, the bill would penalize states such as California that use state dollars to extend Medicaid benefits to undocumented immigrants. According to CBO estimates, of the nearly 11 million people who would lose Medicaid or other health insurance due to the bill, about 1.4 million are immigrants. GOP strategist Josh Novotney argued that approach is in line with what Trump's working-class base wants. 'Most blue-collar Trump supporters I have met or spoken with in large groups do not want their hard-earned taxes going to other people, whether that is student debt forgiveness or Medicaid abuse,' he said. 'That is not at odds with his supporters.' A Kaiser Family Foundation poll released Friday found a plurality of Republicans, 42 percent, believed the Trump administration's policies would strengthen Medicaid, with only 22 percent believing the program would be weakened. But Republican Medicaid enrollees were more split, with 35 believing Trump would strengthen the program and 34 percent saying he would weaken it. That is where Democrats see an opening. A nonprofit affiliated with Democrats' House campaign arm is already targeting swing-district Republicans with digital ads accusing members of cutting Medicaid to pay for tax breaks for the rich. And a flurry of other liberal groups have purchased TV or digital ads and planned billboards and other activist campaigns. 'To the extent that this is becoming a bigger political issue, it's simply because their efforts to destroy Medicaid are fundamentally more dangerous and more real than ever before,' said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), whose PAC is helping fund a group that opposes Medicaid cuts. As the bill currently stands, the Medicaid work requirements would not go into effect until the end of 2026. That means Democrats largely won't be able to point during their midterm campaigns to people who have already lost access to Medicaid. Instead, they may rely on voter trust on an issue that has historically worked for them. While polls have found voters consistently prefer the GOP more on issues such as the economy and immigration — which helped propel Trump's win last year — health care has remained a rare bright spot for Democrats. 'If there is a debate or chaos or uncertainty about Medicaid cuts, then I think Democrats stand to benefit from that because of the brand advantage on health care,' said Democratic pollster Zac McCrary. 'One of the few places where we have maintained an edge.'

LA Escalate as National Guard Inflames Unrest
LA Escalate as National Guard Inflames Unrest

Bloomberg

time13 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

LA Escalate as National Guard Inflames Unrest

Tensions flared in Los Angeles on the third day of anti-deportation protests, as demonstrators clashed with law enforcement. The arrival of National Guard troops deployed by US President Donald Trump over the weekend inflamed residents angered by the sweeping deportation policies of the administration, local officials said. Demonstrations also took place in San Francisco. (This video includes graphic violence and may contain profanities. Source: AP) (Source: Bloomberg)

Forget Dogecoin. If You Want a Low-Cost, High-Upside Cryptocurrency, Buy XRP Instead
Forget Dogecoin. If You Want a Low-Cost, High-Upside Cryptocurrency, Buy XRP Instead

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Forget Dogecoin. If You Want a Low-Cost, High-Upside Cryptocurrency, Buy XRP Instead

Dogecoin is down 40% for the year, while XRP has been one of the top-performing major cryptocurrencies of 2025. XRP has proven utility, while Dogecoin is still just a speculative meme coin. XRP has higher upside potential than Dogecoin, which has never traded higher than $0.74. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Now that Elon Musk is finally leaving the Trump administration, it's time to forget about Dogecoin (CRYPTO: DOGE). While there was hope earlier in the year that the billionaire tech titan might be able to help push up the price of this meme coin, that simply hasn't happened. For the year, Dogecoin is down a whopping 40%. But all hope is not lost. There are plenty of other options if you are looking for a low-cost, high-upside cryptocurrency. My favorite pick right now is XRP (CRYPTO: XRP), which is up a modest 6% for the year. Here's why you should consider it for your portfolio. Dogecoin has always been -- and always will be -- a meme coin. Moreover, it was created as an internet joke, so it was never meant to be serious. The only way Dogecoin can increase in value is through hype, buzz, and speculation. Musk's brief tenure in the White House is proof of that. Even though he had no direct role in any of the White House's crypto policies, the mere fact that he created a government-adjacent group called DOGE -- the same as the ticker symbol for Dogecoin -- created quite a bit of hype and speculation that something big might be coming for Dogecoin. But nothing ever did. In contrast, XRP has real utility. In other words, you can actually use it for something of value. XRP is primarily used as a bridge currency. As such, it can be used to facilitate cross-border transactions, as well as to convert one fiat currency (such as the U.S. dollar) into another fiat currency. All of this runs on the XRP blockchain, and is supported by Ripple Labs, a San Francisco-based tech company that has been around since 2012. XRP's blockchain technology has already been embraced by large financial institutions as a way to move money around the world in a way that is cheaper and faster than with traditional financial tools. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has even suggested that the XRP payment network might eventually become even bigger than SWIFT, as it is adopted by more and more global institutions. During the previous crypto bull market rally, Dogecoin soared in value seemingly overnight. It was the first-ever meme coin, and investors piled into it, hoping to become crypto millionaires. But that was four years ago. In May 2021, Elon Musk appeared on NBC's Saturday Night Live at exactly the moment when many people thought Dogecoin was headed to the moon. Dogecoin never made it to the moon. In fact, it couldn't even reach escape velocity. Dogecoin reached an all-time high of $0.74, and never recovered. Today, it's trading for $0.20. Never once in its history has it ever broken the $1 mark. In contrast, XRP has already shown its tremendous upside potential. Yes, it was flatlining around the $0.50 mark for much of 2024, but it then suddenly went parabolic after the U.S. presidential election. At one point, it was up as much as 600% after the election. Granted, XRP has cooled off considerably since then. It's now trading for just $2, and is down nearly 35% from its 52-week high earlier in the year. But it's still one of the only top cryptocurrencies up for the year. Analysts and investors remain bullish on XRP's long-term prospects. It could easily double in value, to regain its all-time high of $3.84. Some even think XRP might soar in value to $10 or higher. I get the allure of Dogecoin -- it's cheap and it's fun. But investing in Dogecoin just doesn't make sense, especially when it's down 40% for the year. At a time of maximum global macroeconomic uncertainty, the last thing smart investors want to be holding is a dog-themed meme coin with a funny name. A better option would be XRP, which is still relatively cheap -- just $2, less than a cup of coffee these days! And, at times, XRP trades much like a meme coin. Just a hint or whisper of something big coming for XRP is often enough to send it higher. But at least XRP has some utility to it, and has much higher upside than Dogecoin over the long haul. If you are choosing between XRP and Dogecoin, this one's a no-brainer. Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Dominic Basulto has positions in XRP. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Forget Dogecoin. If You Want a Low-Cost, High-Upside Cryptocurrency, Buy XRP Instead was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store