Inheritance feuds to rise as warring relatives in line for more rights
Second spouses, divorced partners and stepchildren should be able to challenge binding wills for more money, a landmark report has said.
In England and Wales, a person's possessions are left to whomever they choose. However, if a potential heir can prove they were financially dependent on the deceased – even if they were cut out of the will – they can go to court to challenge it, under the Inheritance Act 1975.
And a new report by the Law Commission on Friday recommends these dependents are given even greater rights to estates.
The guidance states that where a person has a mutual will – where two people make a will that binds both of them when the first dies – potential heirs should be able to make a claim on the property included.
Currently, family homes subject to a mutual will are excluded from estates when challenges are considered. The changes have been put forward to the Government who will now consider whether to update the law.
If approved, lawyers said it could lead to larger settlements and more claims because it will increase the size of estates being considered.
More than 10,000 wills were challenged in 2023, up 43pc since 2019, according to figures from the Ministry of Justice.
Alison Parry, of law firm JMW, said that mutual wills can produce 'quite unfair results', especially where a survivor remarries.
She told The Telegraph: 'Say one of them dies in their late 40s, and the survivor goes on to have another marriage, potentially more children … Then those extra people in the survivor's life might have a very good claim under the inheritance act.
'They wouldn't be able to get that because the property is tied up in the mutual wills agreement.'
Tamasin Perkins, Partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, said: 'For too long, treating mutual wills as unavailable on a 1975 Act claim has created a loophole that has allowed some estates to side step those protections.
'We've seen first-hand how this can lead to unfair outcomes, often for children, stepchildren and financial dependants.'
Samara Dutton, partner at Collyer Bristow, said: 'Mutual wills remain relatively uncommon, so the practical impact of this reform will be limited in scope but significant in effect for those it touches.'
The Law Commission began looking into wills in 2016, before pausing the research in 2019 to focus on marriages, at the Government's request.
It published the results of two public consultations and draft legislation on Friday. The report found that current laws are not doing enough to protect the elderly and vulnerable from financial abuse, amid a rise in so-called 'predatory marriages'.
The commission also recommended that electronic wills be considered valid, that marriage should no longer invalidate a will, and that those aged over 16 should be given the right to make a will, rather than just those over 18.
It also said that more informal wills should be recognised by courts, and proposed changes to rules about when disabled or mentally incapacitated people can make decisions for themselves.
Amanda Collins, of law firm Moore Barlow, said: 'In practice, I've seen a sharp increase in probate disputes, particularly around the validity of a will.
'Disputes can lead to confusion, mistrust and lasting divisions between relatives. This trend points to the inadequacy of the current legal framework and the need for reform to protect families and give them the clarity and protections needed.'
Hayley Robinson, of law firm Stevens & Bolton, said: 'We would flag the risk of a large increase in potential litigation.
'More flexibility around testamentary affairs can only be a good thing, but where any recommendation includes giving the Court a jurisdiction to approve formally invalid wills in 'exceptional' circumstances, it must be assumed that litigation will follow around what 'exceptional' really means.'
The Ministry of Justice said it 'welcomed' the report and will give it 'detailed consideration.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Crystal Palace: Group including Jimmy Butler expected to make offer for stake in Premier League club
A consortium of sport and entertainment executives, which includes the NBA star Jimmy Butler, is expected to make an offer in excess of $200million to purchase Eagle Football's 43 per cent stake in Premier League soccer club Crystal Palace, sources briefed on the proposed deal have told The Athletic. Advertisement The group is led by former Morgan Stanley sports executive Bejan Esmaili and former Roc Nation attorney Wajid Mir, with the pair having previously agreed in January a period of exclusivity with John Textor — the largest shareholder in Eagle Football and one of Palace's four primary owners — which they allowed to lapse. The Dallas Mavericks head coach Jason Kidd had formed part of that consortium but instead chose to join the ownership group of fellow Premier League side Everton in April. Now Butler, a six-time NBA all-star who has been with the Golden State Warriors since February, has become part of the wider group. Eagle and Butler, via his representatives, have been approached for comment. Previously backed by two Saudi Arabian businessmen, Haider and Mansoor Syed, the original group opted to allow its 30-day period of exclusivity to end and instead sought alternative funding. The new consortium, sources added, is backed by an American group which has experience investing in soccer clubs. Should the group's expected offer be accepted, it would value Palace — which won the English FA Cup, the world's oldest soccer cup competition, for the first time in May — as a whole in excess of $465million (£343m). Other recent investments in Premier League clubs include Sir Jim Racliffe's purchase of a 28.9 per cent stake in Manchester United for $1.6bn in December 2023, the Todd Boehly-Clearlake Capital takeover of Chelsea for $3.02bn in May 2022 and the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund (PIF)-backed takeover of Newcastle United for £305m in October 2021. Sources also added that Woody Johnson, owner of the New York Jets, has also made an offer for Eagle's shares but has yet to meet Textor's valuation. The Athletic has approached Johnson for comment, via the Jets. Sportsbank, a sports investment group advised by the former Everton director and experienced football financier Keith Harris, was granted exclusivity to invest in Eagle in January, but that exclusivity also lapsed and it no longer has an active offer, although remains interested in investing should Eagle complete its initial public offering (IPO). Advertisement The expected offer from the new U.S. consortium comes amid concerns over Palace's eligibility to compete in next season's Europa League despite qualifying as FA Cup winners, due to Eagle's ownership of French side Lyon, where it holds a majority stake, putting them potentially at odds with UEFA's rules around multi-club ownership. Textor had hoped fellow Palace co-owners Josh Harris, who owns the NFL's Washington Commanders, and David Blitzer, the two American businessmen who together make up the other general partners alongside chairman Steve Parish, would purchase Eagle's shares but no deal has been agreed. They have the right of first offer to buy Eagle's stake in the south London soccer club and have been approached by Textor, but according to sources familiar with the situation, their proposal fell short of being accepted. Textor believes it would be the easiest way to remove doubt over Palace's Europa League participation. Textor, the fourth general partner at Palace as a representative of Eagle, is the chairman of the group but after more than a year shifting between being open to selling Eagle's stake and seeking to buy a majority, appears to have settled on selling, especially with Palace's place in Europe in question. UEFA's rules restrict teams from multi-club groups playing in the same competition. While there may still be ways around this, the deadline set by European football's governing body to address any multi-club ownership issues passed on March 1 — the day Palace beat Millwall in the fifth round of the FA Cup. Lyon qualified for the same competition through their league standing and due to finishing higher than Palace in their respective league, they have precedence to be admitted to the competition. All four of Palace's general partners met with UEFA in Nyon, Switzerland, last week to present their case that Textor does not have control or influence at Palace. There is some confidence that they would be able to convey a lack of decisive influence but the decision on whether to admit Palace to Europe remains in the balance before it is communicated to the club, which is expected later this month. The U.S. consortium is expected to now come back to the table. Should it make the offer and it be accepted by Eagle, as their previous offer was in December, then the deal will be subject to Premier League approval. It remains to be seen whether UEFA would be satisfied by a binding agreement for Eagle to sell its stake, or whether any deal can reach that stage before the committee makes its decision. Should the consortium be successful in buying out Eagle, it may subsequently look to carry out a full takeover of Palace in due course in order to have full decision-making power. In May last year, Textor told The Athletic that he was actively looking to sell Eagle's stake in Palace and he had hired investment banking firm Raine to find a suitable investor to purchase the group's share in the club. 'We've reached the point where we have a significant investment in a club we hold in the minority (in Palace),' he said. 'We're having extreme success in Brazil and early on in France, (and) to not have that same level of integration with our partner in the UK… it just becomes more and more clear that that level of collaboration we want and need works.' Advertisement Eagle Football 'is simply not a perfect fit for Crystal Palace,' he added. Textor originally purchased 40 per cent of Palace in 2021 for £87.5m (now $114m), helping to fund a successful transfer window and complete the redevelopment of the academy, before increasing that stake by around five per cent with an additional £30m. Further investment has come from capital calls. There have been failed attempts by Textor to purchase a controlling stake in the club, which is also owned by fellow general partners Parish, Harris and Blitzer, who each have 25 per cent of the voting rights. Over the past four years, Textor has struggled to make headway into purchasing a controlling stake and disagreed with Parish over the direction of the club, in particular with his multi-club model which includes controlling stakes in Lyon, Brazilian top-flight club Botafogo and Belgian club RWD Molenbeek, which he recently renamed Daring Brussels. Now, he appears to have accepted it is time to sell up at Palace. Additional reporting: Anthony Slater (Top photo of Crystal Palace players celebrating their FA Cup win in May:)


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Britain's Billionaire Exodus Shows Cost of Tax Raid
The UK government says ending special tax privileges for the wealthy will bring in billions. Ben Stupples explains why a growing wealth exodus is putting their decision to the test. (Source: Bloomberg)


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Britain Counts the Mounting Cost of Taxing Wealthy ‘Non-Doms'
As the pace of wealthy individuals leaving London quickens, the numbers are starting to stack up: Labour's flagship 'tax the rich' policy risks becoming a net drain on the UK economy. Barely a day passes by without a big investor or entrepreneur exiting after the government abolished a two-century-old tax break for non-domiciled residents — well-heeled residents hailing from overseas. Billionaire founder Guillaume Pousaz and Nassef Sawiris, Egypt's richest man, are among those fleeing to European and Middle Eastern financial centers with promises of a lighter tax load, as what began as a trickle of exits quickly turns into an exodus.