London Bankers Scour Market for IPO Reboot After Shein Stalls
(Bloomberg) -- London bankers and investors are pinning their hopes on a handful of candidates to get initial public offering activity off the ground after the much-anticipated listing of Shein hit a pause.
A New Central Park Amenity, Tailored to Its East Harlem Neighbors
As Trump Reshapes Housing Policy, Renters Face Rollback of Rights
Is Trump's Plan to Reopen the Notorious Alcatraz Prison Realistic?
What's Behind the Rise in Serious Injuries on New York City's Streets?
NYC Warns of 17% Drop in Foreign Tourists Due to Trump Policies
A blockbuster IPO by Shein, planned for this year and at one point eyeing a valuation of as much as £50 billion ($67 billion), was often touted as the catalyst that London needed to reignite IPO activity.
Instead, the Chinese-founded fashion retailer got caught up in the US tariff war. Progress on the deal has slowed to a crawl as Shein assesses the impact of the trade restrictions on its business, Bloomberg News has reported.
UK equity capital markets have endured a torrid stretch, with a dearth of IPOs in recent years exacerbated by a number of high-profile listings moving overseas. Fundraising from London IPOs fell below $1 billion in 2024 — only the second time since the financial crisis that volume dipped so low, data compiled by Bloomberg show.
'At the start of the year, there was real optimism for a cyclical rebound in IPOs,' said Mike Jacobs, a partner specializing in capital markets at law firm Herbert Smith Freehills. 'But macro and market volatility — particularly sectors exposed to tariffs — has reasserted itself with a vengeance.'
Still, a list of deals penciled in for the coming quarters may offer a measure of spark that the market has been waiting for. And while the chilling effects of the ongoing tariff war continue to weigh on IPOs in Europe and the US, bankers say a number of firms are looking to go public as soon as calm returns.
'Most IPO timetables have now shifted,' said Brian Hanratty, head of ECM at British investment bank Peel Hunt Ltd. 'There are three to five notable London IPOs lined up for the coming quarters.'
One company that is considering braving the volatility is iFOREX Financial Trading Holdings Ltd. The trading platform with $50 million in revenues announced plans for a potential listing on the London Stock Exchange on Friday.
Other companies that are considering a London listing this year include payments firm Ebury, backed by Banco Santander SA, as well as private equity-owned consumer credit provider NewDay and Greece's Metlen Energy & Metals SA, Bloomberg has reported.
Uzbek gold miner Navoi Mining & Metallurgical Co. has also been stepping up preparations for an eventual stock market debut, while Hong Kong-based EcoCeres Inc. has been considering London as a potential venue for a listing next year, people familiar have said.
To be sure, private equity owners could consider alternatives to offload holdings. For instance, NewDay's owners CVC Capital Partners Plc and Cinven have been fielding interest from potential buyers for the whole or part of the business, Bloomberg reported last month.
Investors are also still nursing heavy losses from the last wave of UK listings, underscored by Deliveroo Plc announcing a buyout by DoorDash Inc. this week for less than half the £7.6 billion valuation the London-based food delivery platform reached in its IPO about four years ago.
'The poor 2021 IPO vintage is undoubtedly still fresh in investors minds,' said Jamie Constable, market strategist at London-based Singer Capital Markets. However, 'we do not see this as driving an investors' 'buying strike.' Investors are keen for new blood.'
To encourage more offerings, UK authorities are implementing the biggest revamp to listing rules in decades, with measures to relax voting rules and share structures already in place. They're also exploring ways to unlock investment from retirement savings, for example by consolidating government pension funds.
Even so, more can be done to facilitate access to capital, including bolstering retail investment as well as government support for emerging companies, according to Caroline Escott, senior investment manager at pension fund Railpen, which oversees more than £34 billion in savings.
Scrapping stamp-duty on shares and supporting the London Stock Exchange's junior bourse for early-stage companies, AIM, are also key to revitalize the market, said Jason Paltrowitz, a director at trading platform OTC Markets.
'London therefore needs to double down on supporting AIM to build the venture-stage companies of tomorrow, rather than focusing on attracting perceived 'headliners' to its markets,' he said.
US Border Towns Are Being Ravaged by Canada's Furious Boycott
How the Lizard King Built a Reptile Empire Selling $50,000 Geckos
Maybe AI Slop Is Killing the Internet, After All
With the New York Liberty, Clara Wu Tsai Aims for the First $1 Billion Women's Sports Franchise
Pre-Tariff Car Buying Frenzy Leaves Americans With a Big Debt Problem
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The number of unsold homes in the U.S. hits a record high — is that good news for buyers?
There's nearly $700 billion in unsold homes sitting on the market nationwide, according to Redfin. That's a 20.3% jump from a year ago and, at $698 billion, likely adds up to the highest dollar amount ever, the Seattle-based online brokerage said, citing an analysis of the value of listings on from 2012 through April of this year. And $330 billion of the unsold properties — 2 out of every 5 — are considered 'stale inventory' because they've been on the market for at least 60 days. At 44%, that number is up from 42.1% a year earlier, and the highest for April since the COVID-19 lockdown in 2020. So what's behind the big numbers? Here's what Redfin says: More sellers than buyers. Just two years ago, buyers outnumbered sellers but another recent Redfin analysis estimated there are nearly 500,000 more now, 1.9 million compared to 1.5 million. That 33.7% difference is up from 6.5% more sellers than buyers a year ago. Taking longer to sell. It took 40 days for a typical home to go under contract in April, compared to 35 days a year ago. During the pandemic buying boom, when mortgage rates were still at record lows, it took an average of just 24 days to seal the deal. Demand down. Polls show buyers are hesitating to make big purchases, due to the economic uncertainty surrounding President Donald Trump's policies, including ever-changing tariffs. Monthly mortgage payments have also reached record highs. Prices up. In April, the median U.S. sale price for a home was up year over year. But the total value of the current inventory climbed much more, 20.3%, indicating the increase in the number of listings 'is a bigger factor.' Denver real estate agent Matt Purdy said on the Redfin site that he spotted the trend earlier this year, at the beginning of the critical spring housing market that's supposed to be the busiest time for sales. 'A huge pop of listings hit the market at the start of spring, and there weren't enough buyers to go around,' Purdy said 'House hunters are only buying if they absolutely have to, and even serious buyers are backing out of contracts more than they used to.' But he suggested there's a silver lining in the shifting market: 'Buyers have a window to get a deal; there's still a surplus of inventory on the market, with sellers facing reality and willing to negotiate prices down.' Redfin's head of economic research, Chen Zhao, also said buyers may benefit. 'Not only are there more homes for sale than there have been in five years, but the value of those homes is higher than it has ever been,' Zhao said. 'We expect rising inventory, weakened demand, and the prevalence of stale supply to push home prices down 1% by the end of this year, which should improve affordability for buyers because incomes are still going up.'
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI startups revolutionize coding industry, leading to sky-high valuations
By Anna Tong and Krystal Hu SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -Two years after the launch of ChatGPT, return on investment in generative AI has been elusive, but one area stands out: software development. So-called code generation or 'code-gen' startups are commanding sky-high valuations as corporate boardrooms look to use AI to aid, and sometimes to replace, expensive human software engineers. Cursor, a code generation startup based in San Francisco that can suggest and complete lines of code and write whole sections of code autonomously, raised $900 million at a $10 billion valuation in May from a who's who list of tech investors, including Thrive Capital, Andreessen Horowitz and Accel. Windsurf, a Mountain View-based startup behind the popular AI coding tool Codeium, attracted the attention of ChatGPT maker OpenAI, which is now in talks to acquire the company for $3 billion, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Its tool is known for translating plain English commands into code, sometimes called 'vibe coding,' which allows people with no knowledge of computer languages to write software. OpenAI and Windsurf declined to comment on the acquisition. 'AI has automated all the repetitive, tedious work,' said Scott Wu, CEO of code gen startup Cognition. 'The software engineer's role has already changed dramatically. It's not about memorizing esoteric syntax anymore.' Founders of code-gen startups and their investors believe they are in a land grab situation, with a shrinking window to gain a critical mass of users and establish their AI coding tool as the industry standard. But because most are built on AI foundation models developed elsewhere, such as OpenAI, Anthropic, or DeepSeek, their costs per query are also growing, and none are yet profitable. They're also at risk of being disrupted by Google, Microsoft and OpenAI, which all announced new code-gen products in May, and Anthropic is also working on one as well, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The rapid growth of these startups is coming despite competing on big tech's home turf. Microsoft's GitHub Copilot, launched in 2021 and considered code-gen's dominant player, grew to over $500 million in revenue last year, according to a source familiar with the matter. Microsoft declined to comment on GitHub Copilot's revenue. On Microsoft's earnings call in April, the company said the product has over 15 million users. LEARN TO CODE? As AI revolutionizes the industry, many jobs - particularly entry-level coding positions that are more basic and involve repetition - may be eliminated. Signalfire, a VC firm that tracks tech hiring, found that new hires with less than a year of experience fell 24% in 2024, a drop it attributes to tasks once assigned to entry-level software engineers are now being fulfilled in part with AI. Google's CEO also said in April that 'well over 30%' of Google's code is now AI-generated, and Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said last year the company had saved 'the equivalent of 4,500 developer-years' by using AI. Google and Amazon declined to comment. In May, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said at a conference that approximately 20 to 30% of their code is now AI-generated. The same month, the company announced layoffs of 6,000 workers globally, with over 40% of those being software developers in Microsoft's home state, Washington. 'We're focused on creating AI that empowers developers to be more productive, creative, and save time,' a Microsoft spokesperson said. 'This means some roles will change with the revolution of AI, but human intelligence remains at the center of the software development life cycle.' MOUNTING LOSSES Some 'vibe-coding' platforms already boast substantial annualized revenues. Cursor, with just 60 employees, went from zero to $100 million in recurring revenue by January 2025, less than two years since its launch. Windsurf, founded in 2021, launched its code generation product in November 2024 and is already bringing in $50 million in annualized revenue, according to a source familiar with the company. But both startups operate with negative gross margins, meaning they spend more than they make, according to four investor sources familiar with their operations. 'The prices people are paying for coding assistants are going to get more expensive,' Quinn Slack, CEO at coding startup Sourcegraph, told Reuters. Both Cursor and Windsurf are led by recent MIT graduates in their twenties, and exemplify the gold rush era of the AI startup scene. 'I haven't seen people working this hard since the first Internet boom,' said Martin Casado, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, an investor in Anysphere, the company behind Cursor. What's less clear is whether the dozen or so code-gen companies will be able to hang on to their customers as big tech moves in. 'In many cases, it's less about who's got the best technology -- it's about who is going to make the best use of that technology, and who's going to be able to sell their products better than others,' said Scott Raney, managing director at Redpoint Ventures, whose firm invested in Sourcegraph and Poolside, a software development startup that's building its own AI foundation model. CUSTOM AI MODELS Most of the AI coding startups currently rely on the Claude AI model from Anthropic, which crossed $3 billion in annualized revenue in May in part due to fees paid by code-gen companies. But some startups are attempting to build their own models. In May, Windsurf announced its first in-house AI models that are optimized for software engineering in a bid to control the user experience. Cursor has also hired a team of researchers to pre-train its own large frontier-level models, which could enable the company to not have to pay foundation model companies so much money, according to two sources familiar with the matter. Startups looking to train their own AI coding models face an uphill battle as it could easily cost millions to buy or rent the computing capacity needed to train a large language model. Replit earlier dropped plans to train its own model. Poolside, which has raised more than $600 million to make a coding-specific model, has announced a partnership with Amazon Web Services and is testing with customers, but hasn't made any product generally available yet. Another code gen startup Magic Dev, which raised nearly $500 million since 2023, told investors a frontier-level coding model was coming in summer 2024 but hasn't yet launched a product. Poolside declined to comment. Magic Dev did not respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Advisors Say $1,000 ‘Trump Accounts' Won't Benefit Families Who Need Help Most
Are your clients planning on having children? Tell them to hurry it up. Inside the Trump administration's key $4 trillion tax bill is a proposed idea to open accounts for each new baby born in the US until 2028. The so-called 'Trump Accounts' are seeded with $1,000 that gets invested in equities and locked up until the child's 18th birthday. Parents can also contribute up to $5,000 annually. Previously called MAGA accounts, the funds are designed to help parents prepare for their children's financial futures. But, what do advisors think about the proposed accounts? 'They are stupid,' said Catherine Valega, an advisor with Green Bee Advisory, adding that the wealthy have plenty of options to save, while the less affluent won't be able to afford additional contributions. READ ALSO: Bitcoin Rules for Now, but the Crypto Landscape Is Vast and RIA Headcount, AUM Shattered Records in 2024 The idea of funding accounts for newly born children is nothing new. In fact, before the current administration, the accounts were called 'Baby Bonds' and have been floated by politicians on both sides of the aisle. Well-known financial advisor Ric Edelman has been a prominent supporter of the idea, and even started a trust product with annuities for babies in 1999. But today, most advisors said the proposed Trump accounts will largely benefit upper-class families who can afford to contribute annually. 'The real advantage will go to families with enough disposable income to consistently fund the account,' said Edzai Chimedza, a CFP and advisor at Tobias Financial, adding that it's an attractive tool for upper-middle-class and affluent families, who are more likely to be able to contribute after covering essentials, like retirement savings and emergency funds. The accounts aren't the only savings options out there, either. Who can forget those 529 plans that have grown significantly more flexible over the years and are a great option to save for college, Valega asked. A guardian Roth IRA can also help children jump-start their retirement savings, while helping them get up to speed with the stock market. Baby Got Tax. For families that can pitch funds into the accounts, it makes sense to stop and think about a client's intentions, said Sarah Avila, an advisor with VLP Financial Advisors. 'If you are eligible to open the account for your baby, it is worth it to get the free $1,000 from the government,' she said. But clients should be aware that earnings on qualified withdrawals will be taxed at long-term capital gains rates. 'If the idea is to save for college, contributing to a 529 plan is more advantageous, from a tax perspective, because the money is tax free,' she said. This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive financial advisor news, market insights, and practice management essentials, subscribe to our free Advisor Upside newsletter.
