NECSA backs Eskom's Duynefontein nuclear power station for energy security
Image: Mike Hutchings/Reuters
Banele Ginidza
The South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa) has voiced robust support for Eskom's plans to initiate the construction of a new nuclear power station in Duynefontein, situated adjacent to the Koeberg facility.
This initiative signifies a critical move towards enhancing South Africa's energy security and is set to adhere to the highest standards of safety, environmental protection, and regulatory compliance, as previously demonstrated by Eskom at the Koeberg nuclear power plant.
Necsa is keen on expanding its role in nuclear fuel manufacturing and, in April, signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC).
In this context, the organisation on Monday welcomed the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment (DFFE), Dion George's announcement that Eskom has received environmental authorisation to proceed with the construction of the 4 000 megawatt (MW) power station in Duynefontein, following a successful appeal against an earlier decision issued in 2017.
This announcement unlocks the pathway for Eskom to secure several essential statutory authorisations.
These include a Nuclear Installation Licence from the National Nuclear Regulator (NNR), approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (Nersa), and a water use licence from the Department of Water and Sanitation, alongside various other approvals from the Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources.
"This approval marks an important milestone for the nuclear industry and South Africa's journey towards implementing a balanced energy mix that enables socio-economic development and is climate friendly," said Necsa CEO, Loyiso Tyabashe.
"The Minister's decision shows rigour of the process that was followed to choose an appropriate site for nuclear new build and reflects confidence in nuclear technology as a safe, clean, and reliable energy solution."
Tyabashe said nuclear power remained a crucial component of South Africa's baseload energy mix, and part of the government's strategy to reduce greenhouse emission.
"Necsa supports initiatives that reinforce the use of nuclear technology and its applications for power and beyond power for peaceful means and development," Tyabashe said.
"Necsa continues to work with the Department of Electricity and Energy as well as Eskom as a partner and commits to contribute its technical expertise to maximise the benefits of nuclear energy."
In addition to expanding its role in nuclear fuel manufacturing and intergrating small modular reactors (SMRs) into South Africa's energy plans, Necsa is also pursuing a R60 billion nuclear build programme.
Environmentalists and civil society advocates are objecting to the decision to uphold Eskom's 2017 environmental authorisation, particularly due to reliance on outdated Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) studies, which raised alarms about the risks posed by high seismic activity and dense human populations in the area.
In reaction to this announcement, Koeberg Action Alliance (KAA) spokesperson Peter Becker described the decision as a surprise, adding that civil society will be meeting to discuss the options.
Becker said as the EIA process was started in 2007, and so much has changed since then, including population density, and the cost of alternatives, thus it was not rational to ignore these changes in the environment of the proposed plant and to base such a crucial decision on thoroughly outdated studies.
"It is of note that the EIA consultants found that Duynefontein (Koeberg) was not the best site for a new plant, due to seismic risks and population density in the area," Becker said.
"It appears the DFFE has been pressured to override the consultants' view due to economic factors. It is of course far cheaper to build a new plant where there is already existing infrastructure."
BUSINESS REPORT
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Brian Molefe's legal troubles deepen as AIG sues for R4. 4m over defence costs
Insurance company AIG South Africa is gunning for former Eskom chief executive Brian Molefe in a multimillion-rand lawsuit. Image: Simphiwe Mbokazi / Independent Newspapers uMkhonto weSizwe Party MP and former Eskom chief executive Brian Molefe is facing more legal woes after an insurance company slapped the erstwhile Transnet boss with a R4.4 million lawsuit. AIG South Africa signed a written management liability insurance policy with Eskom in April 2017. In terms of the policy, AIG agreed to provide liability cover to the power utility's directors, officers, and employees, including those in its subsidiaries. Each insured person was insured independently and separately for their respective interests, according to the policy. Molefe, in his capacity as chief executive of Eskom, qualified as an insured person under the policy and was eligible, subject to its terms and conditions, to indemnification during his time at the state-owned entity. The policy made provision that AIG will advance cover for liability insurance, being the obligation to pay to or on behalf of an insured person any loss incurred by the insured person. In Molefe's case, AIG agreed to pay for his defence costs on condition that if it was found by a court that he had gained a profit or an advantage to which he was not legally entitled or that there was a commission of a dishonesty or deliberate fraudulent act, then he would have to repay the costs that had been disbursed or that would be disbursed to him or on his behalf. The insurance company disbursed the sum of approximately R4,398,849 (about R4.4m) for his defence costs. However, various judgments were delivered against Molefe by the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) and the Constitutional Court, which determined that his conduct was unlawful. The matter relates to Molefe unsuccessfully applying for leave to appeal to both the SCA and the apex court, an earlier Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, judgment finding that his reinstatement as Eskom chief executive was at variance with the principle of legality and reviewing and setting aside the board's decision to accept his early retirement proposal in November 2016. The high court also reviewed and set aside the decision by then Public Enterprises minister Lynne Brown to appoint and reinstate Molefe to the position of Eskom chief executive and declared that any payment or sum of money received by Molefe under any purported pension agreement between him and Eskom is invalid and ordered him to repay such amounts within 10 days. AIG informed Molefe of its intention to institute legal proceedings and claim the provision of his defence costs, and that he accepted the benefits conferred on him by the policy and agreed to be bound by its terms. The company told Molefe in October 2017 that it would advance defence costs to him on a without prejudice basis, and, on the basis that should it eventuate in due course that he was not entitled to an indemnity under the policy, he would refund such costs in full and on demand. Molefe maintained that he did not agree to the provisions of the policy and is not bound by it, as well as that he did not agree to repay the defence costs He also insisted that an arbitration clause in the policy compelled AIG to refer disputes on the recovery of the defence costs to arbitration and raised a special plea in the pending action by the company that its case be dismissed or stayed pending resolution of the arbitration. On August 1, Judge Allyson Crutchfield ordered that the disputes in respect of the claim instituted by AIG shall not be referred to arbitration. The judge found that Molefe's stance that he is not bound by the policy while simultaneously relying upon and claiming the enforcement of the arbitration clause in respect of AIG's claims was untenable and not sustainable in law.
TimesLIVE
3 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Egypt signs $1bn deal with China's Sailun Group to build tire factory
Egypt has signed an agreement with China's Sailun Group to build an automotive tire factory in the Suez Canal Economic Zone, with total investments of $1bn (R17.53bn), a cabinet statement said on Wednesday. The project's first phase will be completed in 2026 Reuters
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Grid recovery brings hope for load shedding-free summer
Thabo Makwakwa | Published 4 hours ago South Africa's state of power grid shows real momentum after years of disruption, with unplanned outages shrinking, reliability rising, and a clear path toward a stable summer. During a media briefing in Pretoria on Wednesday, Minister of Electricity and Energy Dr Kgosientsho Ramokgopa framed the August briefing as evidence that disciplined maintenance, unit returns, and strategic upgrades finally translate into tangible, near-term resilience for households and businesses. The briefing, which draws on the Department of Electricity and Energy's August 2025 State of Electricity briefing, outlined a landscape in which unplanned outages are trending down and the grid shows signs of strengthened resilience ahead of the coming summer. Ramokgopa opened by acknowledging the progress while tempering expectations. 'What we're seeing is a recovery trajectory delivering real results - lower unplanned losses, higher reliability metrics, and a clearer path to secure generation capacity for the 2025/26 summer,' the minister said. 'We are not claiming victory, but we are confident that the combination of disciplined maintenance, returning units to service, and strategic upgrades will continue to strengthen the grid's resilience.' Key numbers presented in the briefing portray a sector moving away from the worst days of load shedding toward a more stable operating envelope. There has been no load shedding since 15 May 2025, with only 26 hours recorded between 1 April and 31 July 2025. Between 1 April and 7 August 2025, the Unplanned Capacity Loss Factor (UCLF) fell to 28.35%, a week-on-week improvement of about 0.23%. The ministry cautioned that the system remains sensitive to external pressures and the realities of operating a large, aging fleet - still, the data point to meaningful gains. Ramokgopa stated that the year-to-date Energy Availability Factor (EAF) stood at 60.14% by 8 August 2025 , up roughly 4.4 percentage points from April 2025. The weekly EAF oscillated between 62% and 70%, with a month-to-date average of 65.38%, signalling growing fleet stability and reliability. On the fuel side, he stated that the Open Cycle Gas Turbine (OCGT) performance showed a notable uptick in activity. The OCGT load factor reached 5.99% for the week, up from 0.31% the prior week. He stated that from 1 April to 7 August 2025 (the winter period), Eskom spent about R5.842 billion on fuel for its OCGT plants, generating 988.56 GWh. 'The year-to-date OCGT load factor stood at 9.35%, a slight week-on-week decrease but still higher than the 4.82% recorded during the same period last year.' The briefing highlighted a broad set of initiatives under the Operational Reliability and Sustainability Plan, designed to push long-term reliability and safety. These efforts include reducing the number of trips, improving outage planning and execution, and accelerating the implementation of strategic projects. The plan also emphasised a strengthened people-plant-process mindset, with root-cause analysis, trip reduction directives, and expanded partnerships with original equipment manufacturers and other utilities to improve availability of spares, technology, and maintenance capability. Beyond maintenance, the minister emphasised capacity additions and returns from units brought back from long-term outages. Since late 2023, several key units have returned online or been upgraded, contributing to approximately 2,500 MW of added capacity. Ramokgopa added that notable milestones include Koeberg Unit 1 returning to service, Kusile units coming back online, and Medupi Unit 4 synchronising in July 2025, all of which aim to reinforce security of supply as the grid moves through a transition period. The minister said that the improvements are about short-term numbers and longer-term stability. 'The focus on Koeberg, Medupi, Kusile, Tutuka, and other critical stations is about more than today's metrics. It's about maintaining a stable, predictable power system that supports households, industry, and the broader economy,' Ramokgopa said. [email protected] IOL Politics
