Ramaphosa defends transformation, says it's a necessity not a favour
CAPE TOWN - President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended transformation, saying it's a necessity and not a favour.
He said the country must dispel the false notion that a choice must be made between growth and transformation.
Writing in his weekly newsletter, the president said economic growth without transformation entrenches exclusion, and transformation without growth is unsustainable.
He, on Monday, again moved to dispel the view that Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BBBEE) is a cost to the economy.
The president recently challenged political parties in Parliament over their views on Black Economic Empowerment (BEE), stating that it's being viewed incorrectly in relation to economic growth.
Ramaphosa said this opinion needs to be challenged, adding that BEE is an investment in the economy.
For this reason, Ramaphosa said the government is strengthening initiatives like the Black Industrialists Programme and noted the establishment of the Transformation Fund to support a new wave of emerging businesses that can create job opportunities.
'Our Constitution reflects the promise we made to one another and to future generations to redress the injustices of our past and realise the full potential of our country. For this reason, we reaffirm that Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment is not just a policy choice but a constitutional imperative,' wrote Ramaphosa.
Appearing to take a swipe at his coalition partner, the Democratic Alliance (DA), Ramaphosa said he can't understand why those who continue to benefit from the legacy of exclusion decry BEE to the extent of challenging it in the courts.
Ramaphosa said that there was a critical need for black-owned businesses to access funding on affordable terms, and private banks should review their lending practices.
ALSO READ:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
4 hours ago
- The South African
'Look at Cape Town!': Helen Zille grilled over Joburg mayor bid
South Africans have mixed views over former Democratic Alliance (DA) leader Helen Zille's potential bid to become Joburg's next mayor next year. While the outspoken political leader – dubbed 'Godzille,' – won the World Mayor of the Year in 2008 for governing the city of Cape Town, many believe the two cities are worlds apart in comparison. Dada Morero is the current mayor of Johannesburg, the latest in a long list of short-lived stints by various candidates. One of them is the DA's Mpho Phalatse. Last week, Helen Zille confirmed that she was contemplating the monumental task of running for mayor of Johannesburg. The 74-year-old told the media: 'I have been approached to put my hat in the ring for mayor. I am still considering it and consulting my family.' 'GodZille' – who has been critical of the state of Joburg and its local government – revealed that she would have to make the move alone, as her family is settled in Cape Town. Helen Zille will have until 15 June to make her formal application. On social media, South Africans have been on the fence about Helen Zille possibly being Joburg's next mayor. Some, like author Khaya Dlanga, have urged the country to give her a chance to 'turn things around'. He posted: 'Let me tell you now, if she does, she will win. And not by accident. Like it or not, she has a proven record of turning a city around. Just look at Cape Town. 'You can debate her politics all you want, but she gets things done. Joburg, as it stands, is crying out for that kind of leadership. They want working traffic lights, clean streets, functioning municipalities, not endless excuses. Right now, everyone is complaining about what the ANC has done to the city. Zille offers a real, visible alternative.' However, others argued with Khaya that the DA had failed to govern Johannesburg and even Tshwane, whose mayor, Cilliers Brink, was ousted last year. X user @KobeMalebo posted: 'The DA has actually run all the key metros in Gauteng before and botched it!'. @luphumlongcayis replied: 'The DA or Zille is not some governance miracle. Just look at the City of Tshwane. Under DA leadership, the city fell into chaos: coalition collapse, unpaid workers, budget paralysis, and service delivery failure, especially in black communities and black working-class areas'. Some even pointed to Cape Town's vast divide between the rich and poor, and how the DA under Helen Zille failed to adequately address it. @papizwane2 shared: 'It's so easy to service wealthy people/areas. The true judge of service delivery is what you do for POOR people. So with that being said, how are Khayelitsha, Gugulethu, and the Cape Flats doing? Have their living standards turned around and doing better?' Another, @NkoTengimfene replied: 'The Cape Town you speak of is not the Cape Metro of the poor and working class' And @NolwAzi_Tusini added: 'What metrics are you using to judge Zille's 'success' in Cape Town when that city is so blatantly anti-poor? While many are backing Helen Zille to'save' Mzansi's financial hub, it's clear many South Africans – who reside in both Joburg and Cape Town – believe that the latter is not the benchmark for success. The public complaints around the DA-governed city and tourist hotspot are centred around the following issues… The widening gap between the wealthy and the poor. Poor service delivery in disadvantaged communities. Influx of illegal immigrants. Prevalence of crime and gang violence in townships. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
5 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Consultants bungling municipal audits despite receiving over R1 billion: COGTA committee chair
JOHANNESBURG - Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs committee chairperson, Dr Zweli Mkhize, says consultants are bungling municipal audits despite being paid over R1 billion to ensure the books balance. Mkhize has also noted what he calls a deepening crisis in the local government sector, saying there's a lack of accountability and leadership. He made the remarks while addressing a governance cluster briefing in Parliament on Monday.. Mkhize says the latest audit outcomes show how the financial and governance crisis in the country's municipalities is deepening. He says this has profound consequences for service delivery and public trust. Mkhize says the audits also show that 59% of financial statements submitted for auditing contained material misstatements despite being prepared by private sector consultants. 'This, despite municipalities having spent over R1.4 billion on consultants to prepare these very statements. It is unacceptable that such exorbitant spending yields so little value.' Mkhize says what is even more 'troubling' is that many of these municipalities across the country already have permanent staff tasked with performing this work and have called for the wastage to end.
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
SA must seize opportunity of tectonic global shifts to remodel its economy
The GNU must use the global governance crisis and its chairing of the G20 as a catalyst for the country to reorient its incorporation into global production structures, remodel its economy, ignite social renewal and secure national self-reliance. Despite its success in restoring diplomatic and economic interaction between South Africa and the US, President Cyril Ramaphosa's recent encounter with his American counterpart, President Donald Trump, also inadvertently cast an unflattering spotlight on South Africa's problem of pervasive crime and governance failures. The globally televised Oval Office drama, broadcast in prime time, highlighted domestic troubles that successive post-apartheid governments have failed to tackle effectively. It was a huge wake-up call for the year-old government of national unity (GNU) and an inflection point for the country's democracy. South Africa is at a crossroads. It is caught in the middle of major geopolitical shifts and a global governance crisis, which has been amplified by the ascendancy of the Trump administration in the US, colliding with its internal governance failures. These governance failures are typified by a slew of social and economic problems that have hampered the country's progress. These include a stagnant economy, high unemployment, poor public education and health systems, dysfunctional municipalities and state-owned enterprises, decaying infrastructure, endemic corruption, appalling public finances, widespread illegal immigration, an unwieldy and underperforming public service and rampant crime. Decisions required This moment of global turmoil and domestic crisis calls on the country's political leaders to make decisions about its future. It requires the GNU to make tough policy choices that will extricate the country from its social and economic stasis and launch it on a path towards national renewal and success. South African leaders will do well to draw on historical lessons in terms of how the country can confront global adversity and propel a new growth trajectory. Take, for example, how the country responded to the destruction caused by the onset of World War 2. The war galvanised many countries, including South Africa, to accelerate manufacturing, starting with munitions, arms and other critical supplies. In the aftermath of the war, South Africa built its industrial capabilities and raised its agricultural productivity. The foremost public policy consideration for the government at the time was post-war reconstruction. The Van Eck Commission, as well as the Social and Economic Planning Council, were set up with briefs to produce policy insights that would shape post-war development. Their recommendations led to, among other matters, an increase in farm support, the creation of marketing boards for agricultural products and the expansion of manufacturing activities. The war acted as an anchor to ignite economic recovery, and import tariffs played a key role in nurturing the development of an infant industry. Medical supplies for military use were also produced locally. Structural change was manifest on several fronts in the post-war years, especially between 1945 and 1970. During this period, there was a strong emphasis on capitalising on the conditions created by the war to stimulate local production and build the country's manufacturing capabilities. This sparked a rapid increase in national economic output and the growth rate, which averaged 5%. Second, manufacturing eclipsed primary production as the main driver of growth. Third, there was a marked shift in demographic concentration from rural to urban areas. The growth of metropolitan areas stimulated demand for infrastructure, housing and other amenities. Various state-owned enterprises created in the 1920s through to the 1950s contributed to the development of a manufacturing path. Eskom was formed in 1923 to produce cheap electricity for the railways and drive industrialisation. Iscor was set up as a monopoly to maximise the processing of domestic ore and achieve vertical integration in steel production. The Industrial Development Corporation (IDC) was established in 1940 to offer cheap finance to spur industrialisation. The IDC was instrumental in the founding of Sasol in 1950, which was created to produce synthetic fuels, mainly from coal. Moreover, South Africa, under the Union Government, and later under the apartheid government, deployed industrial policy systematically. This combined tariff protection, import-substitution industrialisation and the creation of industrial champions anchored in cheap energy and steel to stimulate downstream production. Industrial financing was funnelled to benefit not only the manufacturing sector, but also agriculture. These policy actions were central to powering South Africa's industrialisation and to catapulting the country towards national self-reliance. This industrial transformation would not have been possible without visionary leadership, firm political will and effective governance. The state played a pivotal role in propelling South Africa's industrial development and securing the economic advancement of poor Afrikaners. Hendrik van der Bijl, a brilliant engineer and technocrat who served as Director-General of War Supplies in the government of General Jan Smuts, was the driving force behind the creation of Eskom, Iscor and the IDC. Other influential public servants and scientists of this era included Frans du Toit and Etienne Rousseau, respectively founding chairman and managing director of Sasol, as well as Hendrik van Eck, head of the IDC. Opportunities in 2025 The rapidly changing geopolitical landscape, coupled with a crisis of multilateralism, provides South Africa with the opportunity to change course. In the same way as their predecessors used a crisis moment to remodel the post-war economy, South African leaders must take advantage of the tectonic global shifts to implement long-delayed structural reforms and fundamentally alter the structure and growth path of the South African economy. This means, among others matters, growing the economy and removing constraints to doing business, supporting the development of new sectors including innovation-driven industries, accelerating the inclusion of small and medium enterprises in the mainstream of the economy, reorienting trade and foreign policies, reforming state-owned enterprises, revitalising socioeconomic infrastructure, curbing illegal immigration, clamping down on crime, overhauling the public service and rooting out corruption. Thanks to poor governance, South Africa missed out on opportunities to turn around the country's chronically underperforming economy and ensure that it fulfils its considerable potential, overhaul the flawed foundations of the country's social and economic structure and seriously tackle the underbelly of inequality, poverty and social exclusion. This was the case, for example, at the height of the global commodity boom in the early 2000s, in the aftermath of the 2008/9 global financial crisis, and in the wake of the Covid-19 global pandemic. The crisis of global governance, which coincides with significant geopolitical changes and South Africa's chairing of the G20, provides another opportunity. The GNU must use the intersection of these developments as a catalyst for the country to reorient its incorporation into global production structures, remodel its economy, ignite social renewal and secure national self-reliance. The South African government today, unlike the erstwhile Union Government, is not reeling from the ravages of a global military war. But it faces conditions akin to war. It, therefore, must respond with the same degree of urgency and purposeful state action to what has become a dire national emergency. However, it cannot do that in the absence of inspired and effective leadership, as well as strong state institutions. Without a meritocratic, competent, professional and ethical public service, South African policymakers will fail to implement far-reaching structural reform of the country's political economy. DM
