Artist's long career leads to place in Tate art book
Mr Gill was born in India but moved to Kenya following the death of his father.He took a job working at a garage in Kenya, where he won first prize at an exhibition with a painting called Sita in 1959."Someone [offered] me a thousand shillings for it," he said. "But I couldn't sell it. It was the beginning of everything."Mr Gill then came to the UK in 1963 and finally settled in Nottingham in 1972, where he studied diplomas in Art and Education, gained an MA in Fine Art and taught as a lecturer at what was then South Nottingham College for almost 30 years.Mr Gill added: "Whenever I am going through Nottingham, ex-students come up to me and say how I motivated them." "I showed them my own work in the college so that students could see what I was doing, not just what I was teaching."Beginning with landscape and realism, Mr Gill later turned toward abstraction, collage, and installation. One ever-present in his work is recycled material — polystyrene, cardboard, even scrap palettes. "Recycling is the right word," he said. "I use what I find. Nothing is wasted."
Mr Gill said his work frequently deals with cultural remembrance. He painted a portrait of Guru Nanak for his mother, shortly before she died. "She wouldn't have gotten abstraction," he said. "So I painted something she could really relate to."His wife, Inderjit Gill, said: "When he's painting, he doesn't think about anything else — even his tea."He's in a meditative state."Mrs Gill has played a key role in his career and handled communications, organised exhibitions and ensured Mr Gill was able to focus on creating art. "I like living in an art gallery," she smiles. "I say to him — let's put more work up."He was a prominent figure in Nottingham's Asian Artists Group during the 1980s and had his work exhibited widely, from Leicester Museum to the New Art Exchange. Now, his piece, Earth Shrine, will appear in Alina Khakoo's 'A Brief History of British South Asian Art', from Tate Publishing. The painting, composed of texture, nature forms, and metaphorical items is presented as a reflection of Gill's compound, intuitive style. "I don't plan my work completely," he said. "It comes together. Like life."Mr Gill said he was delighted to have his work acknowledged in the book. "All artists want to be acknowledged," he added. "This is gratifying. Surprising. An honour."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
This debut novel got a £500,000 advance — it was worth every penny
Remember the exuberance of 1997? Tony Blair came to power, sweeping away nearly two decades of Conservative rule. It was the year the nation lost its collective mind over the death of Diana. The Twin Towers had yet to fall and there was a freshness in the air, a sense that we could shrug off our past as a stuffy nation of colonial stiff upper lips. Britain was rebranding itself, embracing multiculturalism, and we needed the new voices and stories to match. Arundhati Roy's The God of Small Things could have been precision-tooled for those cultural conditions. In many ways it's a miracle it was ever published let alone became a global hit. Roy was an architect and a screenwriter living in Delhi and had never written a novel before. She was about as far off the British publishing world's radar as it is possible to be, but her tragicomic narrative about a dysfunctional south Indian family worked its magic on everyone who set eyes on it. The young Indian publisher Pankaj Mishra (now an essayist) sent it to the literary agent David Godwin who hotfooted it to Delhi within four days of receiving the manuscript to sign up Roy. He won her an advance of £500,000 — at the time, the biggest paid to a first-time novelist. The book was published simultaneously in 16 languages when Roy was 35. It won the 1997 Booker prize and went on to sell six million copies. Based on Roy's childhood, The God of Small Things centres on the twins Estha and Rahel growing up in a Syrian Christian community in Ayemenem, a small town in Kerala. Their rebellious mother, Ammu, has already disgraced the family by marrying a Hindu and then getting divorced. The twins' position in society and in their family is precarious and it's further threatened by their cousin Sophie Mol, who is half-English, sand-coloured and thus 'loved from the beginning'. • What we're reading this week — by the Times books team The book achieves that extraordinary feat that all great books do: it makes a highly specific situation — in this case, a particular, eccentric family in a town riven by race, gender, class and caste conflict — feel familiar to all readers around the world. It helps that we see it through the eyes of the children. Estha and Rahel don't understand why they should not love Velutha, the 'untouchable' who carves them tiny animals and shows them the unconditional affection that is missing from their family. They don't understand why he is marching with the Naxalite-Maoist rebels, or why that matters to their factory-owning uncle Chacko. Their dawning knowledge of Ayemenem's rigid social structures mirrors our own. They come to understand, as we do, the brutal punishment meted out to those who dare to challenge the rules about 'who should be loved. And how. And how much.' But none of this would come alive without Roy's playful use of language, her warmth and her humour. She said she worked for years on the book's complex structure but the language was natural to her and that's how it feels to the reader. OK, not everyone was a fan — the Sunday Times critic Peter Kemp raged against the 'typographical tweeness' of her capitalisations and elisions (the Orangedrink Lemondrink man, a pet Bar Nowl). But reading the book now is to be struck anew by the freshness and vibrancy of her voice. That the book is not now an established classic may be partly because Roy turned out to be — if I may borrow her capitalisation habit — a Very Disobedient Female. She faced obscenity charges in India over her depiction of inter-caste sex and she didn't want to write more warm and funny novels about children. She spent the next 20 years using her position to campaign against dam projects, nationalism, capitalism and the Indian government's policy on Kashmir. I admire her for that but it divided opinion in a way that her fiction never did. • Read more book reviews and interviews — and see what's top of the Sunday Times Bestsellers List Roy's wonderful memoir Mother Mary Comes to Me is due out next month and I hope it brings many more readers back to The God of Small Things. To quote the book, capitals and all: 'The Great Stories are the ones you have heard and want to hear again … in the Great Stories you know who lives, who dies, who finds love, who doesn't. And yet you want to know again.' The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy is published on Sep 4. To order a copy go to Free UK standard P&P on orders over £25. Special discount available for Times+ members
Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
India's PVR Inox loss more than halves as 'F1', other hits draw moviegoers
Aug 6 (Reuters) - India's PVR Inox ( opens new tab reported a sharply narrower quarterly loss on Wednesday as a strong box office slate, including Hollywood hit 'F1: The Movie', drew more audiences to theatres and boosted ticket and food sales. India's largest multiplex operator, formed through the merger of PVR and Inox, reported a consolidated loss of 540 million rupees ($6.2 million) in the April-June quarter, compared with a loss of 1.79 billion rupees a year earlier. Analysts, on an average, had expected a loss of 659.1 million rupees. Footfalls in cinema halls have been pressured by weak urban consumption, an uneven slate of film releases and growing competition from streaming platforms. To bring audiences back, PVR has been offering discounted weekday tickets and relaunching older movie hits. These measures, along with the strong box office performance of Bollywood and Hollywood films such as 'Sitaare Zameen Par' and 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' helped lift quarterly footfalls by 12% on-year. Average ticket prices rose 8% to 254 rupees, while per head spending on food and beverages increased 10% to a record 148 rupees. Executive Director Sanjeev Bijli told Reuters he expects spending in these segments to grow at a similar pace in the coming quarters. "I do see a visibility of great films all the way down to December, the end of third-quarter, and that's what's going to drive consumption for admissions, ticket prices, advertisement revenues and also F&B spends," Bijli said. He added that the company's new cinema halls will experiment with gaming centers, co-working spaces and cafeterias inside the premises to "enhance the stickiness of the consumer". Revenue from operations rose 23% to 14.69 billion rupees for the quarter, topping analysts' estimate of 14.24 billion rupees. The results come amid growing signs of recovery in urban consumption. Consumer goods firms such as Hindustan Unilever ( opens new tab and Britannia ( opens new tab are signalling improving urban demand after several quarters of sluggish growth.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Denmark to reportedly remove ‘ugly and pornographic' mermaid statue
A debate has erupted in Denmark over the fate of a mermaid statue that is to be removed from public view after being decried as 'ugly and pornographic' and 'a man's hot dream of what a woman should look like'. The Danish agency for palaces and culture is reportedly removing the 4x6 metre Den Store Havfrue (the Big Mermaid) from Dragør Fort, part of Copenhagen's former sea fortifications, because it does not align with the cultural heritage of the 1910 landmark. Politiken's art critic, Mathias Kryger, has branded the statue 'ugly and pornographic'. Sorine Gotfredsen, a priest and journalist, wrote in the newspaper Berlingske: 'Erecting a statue of a man's hot dream of what a woman should look like is unlikely to promote many women's acceptance of their own bodies.' She added: 'It's truly uplifting that many find the statue vulgar, unpoetic, and undesirable, because we're suffocating in overbearing bodies in public space.' The man behind the 14-tonne sculpture, Peter Bech, has said he does not understand the criticism, saying that the stone figure's breasts are simply 'of a proportional size' to its scale. Others have said the criticism reflects society's attitudes to women's bodies more generally – and not in a good way. For Aminata Corr Thrane, Berlingske's debate editor, the scrutiny of the mermaid's breasts was tantamount to body shaming. 'Do naked female breasts have to have a specific academic shape and size to be allowed to appear in public?' she wrote. Noting that the Big Mermaid was 'arguably a bit less naked' than her famed petite contemporary in bronze and granite, the Little Mermaid, Corr Thrane added: 'On the other hand, she has bigger breasts, and that's probably where the problem lies.' She added: 'Perhaps the two statues – the Big and the Little Mermaid – represent two sides of woman, and the eternal tug of war about what a real woman is. And perhaps even what a wrong woman is.' In 2006 the Big Mermaid was erected at Langelinie Pier in Copenhagen, near the Little Mermaid. But it was removed in 2018 after locals denounced it as 'the fake and vulgar mermaid'. It was subsequently moved to Dragør Fort, until the Danish agency for palaces and culture intervened in March, requesting its removal. Dragør municipality has since reportedly declined Bech's offer of donating it as a gift. Helle Barth, chair of Dragør muncipality's climate, urban and business committee, told Berlingske that although it was a nice offer, 'it's just hard to fit in. It takes up a lot of space.' Bech, who has said he made the statue in response to tourists' comments that the Little Mermaid – inspired by the Hans Christian Andersen fairytale – was too small, has said he is often told by people in Dragør that they love his sculpture. He is hoping to find a way to keep it in the town. The Danish agency for palaces and culture declined to comment.
