logo
Unearthed Mamdani college newspaper writings promote anti-Israel boycott, rail against 'white privilege'

Unearthed Mamdani college newspaper writings promote anti-Israel boycott, rail against 'white privilege'

Fox News09-07-2025
FIRST ON FOX: College newspaper articles written by New York City socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani shed light on the surging candidate's early views on a variety of topics, including his promotion of an anti-Israel boycott and concerns about "white privilege," a Fox News Digital review found.
Mamdani wrote 32 articles for the Bowdoin Orient during his four years studying at Maine's presitigous Bowdoin College from 2010 to 2014, including an article his senior year promoting an academic boycott of Israel.
"This academic and cultural boycott aims to bring under scrutiny the actions of the Israeli government and to put pressure on Israeli institutions to end the oppressive occupation and racist policies within both Israel and occupied Palestine," wrote Mamdani, who co-founded his college's Students for Justice in Palestine organization.
Students for Justice in Palestine has become one of the biggest drivers of anti-Israel protests on college campuses since the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre, with some going so far as to celebrate the attack.
Mamdani was taking issue in his article with Bowdoin College's president, Barry Mills, opposing the boycott.
"Lastly, Mills regrettably makes no mention of Palestinians or Palestine," Mamdani wrote. "The call for the boycott comes in response to more than 60 years of Israeli colonial occupation of Palestine. When Mills speaks of the 'free exchange of knowledge, ideas, and research, and open discourse' in academia, he does so while privileging partnerships with Israeli institutions over basic freedoms for Palestinians, including the rights to food, water, shelter and education, which many Palestinians are denied under Israeli rule."
In a 2013 op-ed, Mamdani responded to a White student who took issue with criticism of the school's editorial page being too White by accusing him of holding "white privilege."
"White males are privileged in their near-to-exclusive featuring as figures of authority in print, on television and around us in our daily realities," Mamdani wrote. "We, the consumers of these media, internalize this and so believe in the innate authority of a white male's argument and the need for its publication. So, white privilege is both a structural and an individual phenomenon, the former propelling the latter. Therefore, even when the individual is silent, the structures continue to exist and frame our society through their existence."
Mamdani said the "pervasive male whiteness" of the school's opinion pages "builds on the sadly still-present white male monopolization of both discourse and understanding."
Mamdani explained, "While whiteness is not homogenous, white privilege is. This privilege is clear in not having to face institutional racism in access to housing subsidies, college grants, financial institutions, or civil rights. It allows a white person to universalize his own experiences. It restricts society's ability to understand its flaws, and projects a false image of meritocracy upon a nation built on institutional racism."
In another post, titled "Bearded in Cairo," Mamdani discussed his time studying abroad in Egypt as the Muslim Brotherhood was violently toppling President Morsi's regime. He explained that before arriving he had grown a beard "mostly as a symbolic middle finger" to the stereotype that "pervades America" that brown individuals with beards are a "terrorist."
Mamdani discussed privilege again, saying that he had "arrived in a society where privilege was a different color."
"Gone was the image of the white Christian male that I had grown accustomed to, and in its place was a darker, more familiar picture – ­­­one that, for the first time, I fit: brown skin, black hair, and a Muslim name," Mamdani wrote. "With the right clothing, some took me for an Egyptian and most thought I was Syrian – either identity allowed me unrestricted access to exploring Cairo."
In a 2014 article titled "On the 50th anniversary of MLK's visit to campus, let's acknowledge what we still need to achieve," Mamdani lamented that his school, which doubled its diversity student population over the previous 13 years, was still behind where it should be. He wrote that the school had prematurely achieved a "satisfaction with the level of diversity."
"I have been forced to personally grapple with these inconsistencies during my time here," Mamdani wrote.
"I sit in class not knowing whether to correct everyone's mispronunciation of an Indian woman's name. I usually do, but today I'm tired. I'm tired of being one of a few non-white students in a classroom, if not the only one. I bring up race in discussions only to see the thought flicker in my peers eyes and on their tongues. They sigh without a sound. I've brought up race again. I've sidetracked the discussion. I've chosen to make an issue out of it."
In the same post, Mamdani, who was born in Uganda to Indian parents, outlined his struggles feeling uncomfortable being a non-white student.
"I grow a beard only to be called a terrorist," Mamdani wrote. "I pronounce the 'h' in my name only to hear muffled laughs. Clothing becomes exotic once it clads my body. Cotton shirts are called dashikis and sandals ethnic."
Mamdani continued, "While I am now comfortable in my own skin, I can remember wishing for whiteness my first year when I thought certain types of girls were impossible to talk to due to my skin being more kiwi than peach. Months later, I remember thinking that attraction might only be possible when a girl had 'a thing for brown guys.'"
Mamdani explained that he has found "solidarity" with some students on campus but that "still, too few people acknowledge that race is an issue on our campus, or that it has ever been one."
"But if people say they are color blind, do they even see me?" Mamdani wrote.
Fox News Digital reached out to Mamdani's campaign for comment.
Mamdani burst onto the national political scene last month when he won a surprising victory in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary despite facing criticism for his far-left policies, which included city-run grocery stores, defunding police, safe injection sites and raising the minimum wage to $30.
Mamdani's victory has sparked a civil war of sorts within the Democratic Party between those pushing to moderate since VP Kamala Harris's defeat in November and those embracing a progressive shift toward the mold of Rep. Alexandria-Cortez, D-N.Y., who endorsed Mamdani.
Mamdani, thanks to his primary victory, is the clear frontrunner in the general election in a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans by a roughly six-to-one margin.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

After D.C., Trump says he might use the National Guard to ‘take back' other cities. Can he actually do that?
After D.C., Trump says he might use the National Guard to ‘take back' other cities. Can he actually do that?

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

After D.C., Trump says he might use the National Guard to ‘take back' other cities. Can he actually do that?

When President Trump announced his plan Monday to send 800 National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., to crack down on what he described as 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor' in the nation's capital, he also issued a warning to other cities around the country. "We're going to take back our capital," Trump said. "And then we'll look at other cities also.' But can Trump actually send federal forces elsewhere? And what cities might he target? Here's everything you need to know about the president's warning. What did Trump say about sending the National Guard into other cities? During his news conference on Monday, Trump singled out Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore and Oakland, Calif. as 'other cities also that are bad, very bad.' 'They're so far gone,' he continued. 'We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C. and we're going to clean it up real quick, very quickly, as they say.' Beyond that, the president didn't elaborate on his plans. But he did issue what amounted to an ultimatum: 'self-clean up' or else. 'Other cities are hopefully watching this,' Trump said. 'Maybe they'll self-clean up, and maybe they'll self-do this.' But 'if they don't learn their lesson, if they haven't studied us properly,' he continued, 'then I'm going to look at New York in a little while. … And if we need to, we're going to do the same thing in Chicago, which is a disaster.' Later Monday, Trump issued an executive order directing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to coordinate with state governors and "authorize the orders of any additional members of the National Guard to active service, as he deems necessary and appropriate, to augment this mission." What does the law say about Trump's plans? Trump's actions in Washington, D.C., are legal. As you may remember from elementary school, D.C. isn't a state. It isn't part of any other state either. It doesn't have a constitution of its own. Instead, D.C. is what's known as a 'federal district,' and it's been mostly under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress since its founding in 1791. In 1973, Congress passed the Home Rule Act, which allowed D.C. residents to elect their own mayor and council members. But the law doesn't give D.C. complete autonomy. Even now Congress controls its budget. Congress also has the power to review and block local legislation. The president, meanwhile, still appoints D.C.'s judges — and he still leads its National Guard. He can also take control of the District's police force by invoking Section 740 of the Home Rule Act, which is precisely what he did Monday. But Trump doesn't have the same powers across the rest of the country. Under current law, governors are in charge of each state's National Guard and the police are largely controlled locally. Trump has already challenged some of these rules. Over the objections of state and local officials, he deployed nearly 5,000 National Guard members and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in June after a new round of ICE workplace raids sparked protests marred by sporadic violence. California Gov. Gavin Newsom swiftly sued the administration to end the mobilization, claiming that Trump was violating the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits the president from deploying the armed forces to participate in domestic law enforcement operations unless he declares that an insurrection is underway. A federal judge agreed with Newsom, but an appeals court blocked that ruling. Now Trump and Newsom are facing off in a three-day trial that began on Monday in San Francisco to determine whether Trump has the authority to do what he did in L.A. in other cities such as Chicago and New York. A verdict is expected Wednesday. What does Trump hope to accomplish by mentioning other cities? Whether the president sends federal forces into other cities remains to be seen; much depends on the outcome of the current trial in California (and any subsequent appeals). In the meantime, Trump was clear on Monday: He wants to pressure Democratic-run cities to change certain policies he disagrees with. One policy he mentioned was cashless bail, which eliminates the requirement for defendants to pay money to be released from jail before their trial. Supporters say the policy addresses disparities in the justice system, where those who can afford bail are released while those who cannot remain incarcerated; critics (like Trump) say that it puts the public at risk by releasing potentially dangerous individuals back into the community. Maybe other cities will 'get rid of the cashless bail thing and all of the things that caused the problem,' Trump said Monday. 'I mean, if you go back, this whole thing with cashless bail is a disaster. So many problems came that we never had before.' Have local officials pushed back? Yes. As Yahoo News reported Monday, 'the president's description of crime in Washington, D.C., is not reflected in official statistics, which show that the city had its lowest violent crime rate in over 30 years in 2024. The rates of homicide, sexual abuse, assault with a dangerous weapon and robbery all fell by at least 25% compared to 2023, according to statistics from the U.S. attorney's office for the district.' On Sunday, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, cited similar statistics to claim that Trump is prioritizing politics over policy. 'If the priority is to show force in an American city, we know he can do that here,' Bowser told MSNBC. 'But it won't be because there's a spike in crime.' Officials elsewhere have repeated that message. On Monday, the U.S. Conference of Mayors responded to Trump's actions and statements by touting a "nationwide success story" of plummeting crime rates. An FBI report released Aug. 5 found that between 2023 and 2024, violent crime nationwide dropped by 4.5%, with murder and non-negligent manslaughter falling by nearly 15%. "Ultimately, the best public safety outcomes are delivered by local police departments and local officials, who know the communities," Oklahoma City Mayor David Holt, president of the mayors' conference, said in a statement. "America's mayors never see takeovers by other levels of government as a tactic that has any track record of producing results."

DC Residents Are Saying The Same Thing About This Clip Of DEA Officers Patrolling The National Mall
DC Residents Are Saying The Same Thing About This Clip Of DEA Officers Patrolling The National Mall

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

DC Residents Are Saying The Same Thing About This Clip Of DEA Officers Patrolling The National Mall

On Monday, Donald Trump announced he would be taking over the Washington DC police department and deploying National Guard troops there. One day before that, on Sunday, DC news anchor Lorenzo Hall took this video of DEA police officers patrolling the National Mall: LorenzoHall/Twitter: @LorenzoHall Related: There were a bunch of *viral* responses to the clip. DC political analyst and journalist Tom Sherwood called it "Basically [a] meaningless stroll." Related: @johnmconnollyjr said, "I've lived in DC for 10 years. The only crime I've ever seen on the National Mall was when a mob ransacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021 at the direction of the man who lost the 2020 presidential election." And Aaron Fritschner the Deputy Chief of Staff for Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, pointed out, "The Metropolitan Police Department tracks and publishes the location of all crimes committed in the DC; the map grid section where this video was shot on the National Mall near the Lincoln Memorial has recorded zero (0) crimes so far in 2025: Related: The responses get pretty funny from there: One person said, "6 guys in full uniform on a stretch of the mall where the biggest threat is the mama ducks defending their ducklings from my dog." Another person joked, "You know what screams 'high crime area'? White women jogging." Related: And this person said, "This is cosplay. this is drag. this is banned from entering Florida public schools." Basically, everyone is like: "If you know DC you understand how tremendously goofy this is." Also in BuzzFeed: Also in BuzzFeed: Also in BuzzFeed:

Price Trumps 'Made In USA' Labels As Tariffs Affect Consumer Choice
Price Trumps 'Made In USA' Labels As Tariffs Affect Consumer Choice

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Price Trumps 'Made In USA' Labels As Tariffs Affect Consumer Choice

Key Takeaways A new survey showed that consumers are less likely to emphasize where a product is made. U.S. consumers are 18% less likely to prioritize buying American-made products than they were three years ago. Consumer loyalty to products made in other countries also declined. The survey showed that price-conscious consumers are more likely to look for value than focus on where the product is made.'Made in the U.S.A.' labels may appeal less to consumers as rising tariff costs are changing people's attitudes about where products are made. A new study by The Conference Board found consumers are now less likely to purchase a product based on where it's made, even if it's in the U.S. The June survey of 3,000 U.S. adults found that 50% said they were more likely to buy American-made products, down from 60% in a similar survey from 2022. It's not just American-made products, either. Consumer loyalty was lower for products made in every country included in the survey. The sentiment shift comes as President Donald Trump instituted a series of tariffs that he said would help boost American manufacturing, potentially enabling businesses to offer more products made domestically. However, price-conscious buyers are more focused on a product's price than where it's made, the report found. 'As price concerns intensify, many U.S. consumers appear to associate 'made in' labels with elevated prices due to generally higher domestic production costs as well as tariffs on foreign-made goods,' said Denise Dahlhoff, director of marketing and communications research at The Conference Board. 'Increasingly, consumers prioritize value and affordability over emotional affinity for certain countries, including their own.' Support for American-Made Products Drops for Older Buyers Support for American-made products dropped across almost every age group and demographic category, with those younger than 35 being the only group more likely to buy American-made products than they were three years ago. Notably, customers older than 55 were among the most likely to lose support for buying products with the 'Made in the U.S.A.' label, dropping 22 percentage points from three years ago. American-made products were most popular with middle-income consumers; those making between $50,000 and $125,000 a year were most likely to purchase domestically produced goods. Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store