
'New form of censorship and harassment': Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad defends Facebook posts
The Harayana commission alleged that the remarks of the HoD odfPolitical Science department in Ashoka University 'disparaged women officers in the Indian Armed Forces and promoted communal disharmony'.
The Commission issued the notice to Mahmudabad on Monday after taking suo motu cognisance of his social media posts following Operation Sindoor on May 7. The remarks have been annexed in the show-cause notice. Mahmudabad has been summoned summoned to appear before the Commission on Wednesday.
Ali Khan Mahmudabad is a historian, political scientist, and columnist.
Ali Khan Mahmudabad holds a PhD and MPhil from the University of Cambridge, and an undergraduate degree in History and Political Science from Amherst College.
He has also studied Arabic at the University of Damascus.
In his remarks, Mahmudabad had described the media briefing on Operation Sindoor by woman officers — Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh — as 'optics' and 'just hypocrisy'. The Commission has interpreted his remarks as 'an attempt to vilify national military actions'.
In his post on Facebook, Mahmudabad also condemned 'mob lynching' and 'arbitrary bulldozing'. He further decried war as 'brutal' and said the poor suffer while 'politicians and defence companies' benefit from it.
Ashoka University has distanced themselves from this remark by Professor Mahmudabad.
Renu Bhatia, chairperson of the commission, told ThePrint that the panel took suo motu cognisance of Ali Khan Mahmudabad's remarks under Sections 10(1)(f) and 10(1)(a) of the Haryana State Commission for Women Act, 2012.
The notice highlights six concerns: disparaging women in uniform like Colonel Sofiya Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh; misusing terms such as 'genocide' and 'dehumanisation'; vilifying military actions against cross-border terrorism; risking communal unrest; violating women's dignity under the Constitution and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita; and breaching the University Grants Commission's ethical guidelines for faculty.
The Haryana State Commission for Women (Women's Commission) issued summons to me on 12 May 2025 in relation to certain posts made by me on social media. My lawyers have submitted my detailed reply to these summons and have represented me in front of the Commission today, 14 May 2025.
The screenshots attached to the notice make it clear that my remarks have been completely misunderstood and that the Commission has no jurisdiction whatsoever in the matter. The Women's Commission is a body that serves an important function, however, the summons issued to me fail to highlight how my post is contrary to the rights of or laws for women.
Contrary to the allegations, my post appreciated the fact that the armed forces chose Colonel Sofia Qureshi and Wing Commander Vyomika Singh for the press conference to highlight the fact that the dream of the founders of our Republic, of an India which is united in its diversity, is still very much alive. I even applauded members of the right wing who supported Colonel Qureshi and invited them to have the same attitude for common Indian Muslims who face demonisation and persecution on a daily basis. If anything, my entire comments were about safeguarding the lives of both citizens and soldiers. Furthermore there is nothing remotely misogynistic about my comments that could be construed as anti-women.
I have used my academic training and public voice to advocate for peace due to the high cost of war. At the same time I have analysed and commented on the manner in which "care has been taken by the Indian armed forces to not target military or civilian installations or infrastructure so that there is no unnecessary escalation." This reflects a clear appreciation of the Indian military's measured and proportional approach and indeed I have condemned the use of terrorists by the Pakistani military to destabilise the region. In fact in my analysis I have shown that this puts "the onus on the Pakistani military to make sure it cannot hide any longer behind terrorists and non-state actors." I further added that the Pak military has used these tactics "to destabilise the region for far too long." Animated by a profound moral commitment to minimising the human cost of armed conflict, my statements solely express concern over the thetorical excesses and reckless warmongering exhibited by certain sections of the civilian public.
My academic record as well as my public writings and policy work which, at times have involved collaboration with senior bureaucrats, military officers, politicians and others from the Government of India, both active and retired, attest to the fact that I have also made it a priority to uphold the principles of our Constitution, safeguard the morality enshrined therein and protect the unity and integrity of India. All my public writings have always tried to uphold the principles of justice, liberty, fraternity and equality and have always sought to promote peace and communal harmony.
Simply put, I have exercised my fundamental right to freedom of thought and speech in order to promote peace and harmony and to applaud the Indian armed forces for their resolute action, while criticising those who preach hatred and seek to destabilise India. I am surprised that the Women's Commission, while overreaching its jurisdiction, has misread and misunderstood my posts to such an extent that they have inverted their meaning. This is a new form of censorship and harassment, which invents issues where there are none. I have faith in the process of law and know that my fundamental, constitutional, and statutory rights will be protected. I reserve my right to take legal action against all those who are using this Notice of summons to make defamatory claims about me.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Let 21-yr olds to contest assembly poll: Revanth
Hyderabad: Chief minister A Revanth Reddy on Wednesday pushed for reducing the minimum age to contest assembly elections from 25 to 21 years. He argued that younger leaders must be given space in lawmaking to drive India's future. Paying floral tributes to Rajiv Gandhi on his 81st birth anniversary at the late PM's statue opposite the secretariat, the CM said the move would carry forward Rajiv's vision of empowering youth. "It was Rajiv who gave voting right to every Indian above 18. Today, inspired by the same spirit, we want to give every 21-year-old the opportunity to shape lawmaking in legislative assemblies," Revanth said. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad "Young IAS and IPS officers are successfully steering district administration and law and order responsibilities. If they can thrive at 21, why not as MLAs?" he said. He said the minimum age for contesting Lok Sabha elections could remain at 25 for now, the assembly threshold must be lowered to 21 so that 'young guns' can take charge at the state level. Revanth went a step further, tying the proposal to Congress' national ambitions. "Telangana Assembly will pass a resolution urging the Centre to amend the Constitution once Rahul Gandhi becomes prime minister. To realise this dream, Rahul should be made PM," he declared, calling on youth to rally behind Congress. He recalled how Rajiv had ensured 33% reservation for women in local bodies, laying the foundation for future legislation on women's reservation in state assemblies and Parliament. Revanth claimed that despite BJP's reluctance, it was Rajiv's vision that sowed the seeds of women's political empowerment. He also praised Rajiv's partnership with technocrat Sam Pitroda, which spurred the information technology revolution. "In Hyderabad, the foundation for Hi-Tec City was laid during Nedurumalli Janardhan Reddy's tenure as chief minister of undivided Andhra Pradesh. Today, Hyderabad stands as a hub for IT, data centres, and global capability centres, with Telugu technocrats holding crucial positions in Silicon Valley," he said. Drawing a parallel between Rajiv's vision and Congress govt's current agenda, Revanth said his govt was working to make Hyderabad compete with the world's best cities through projects like Future City and Musi river rejuvenation. He highlighted recent measures, including resolving long-pending SC categorisation and implementing 42% reservation, as proof of his govt's commitment to inclusive growth. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


India.com
44 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump's Peace Claims Examined: How Many Conflicts Did He Really Influence?
New Delhi: U.S. President Donald Trump has positioned himself as a mediator in multiple international conflicts, including the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. Since the beginning of his second term, he has expressed interest in peace talks and emphasised diplomatic interventions and negotiations. On August 18, Trump stated at the White House, 'I have ended six wars. All of these agreements were made without even mentioning the words 'ceasefire'.' The following day, he revised the count to seven conflicts. The Trump administration has highlighted these interventions to bolster arguments for awarding him a Nobel Peace Prize. They released a list of conflicts he reportedly helped de-escalate. Some agreements were short-lived, while the durability of others remains uncertain. Trump repeatedly referred to these events as 'ceasefires' on his Truth Social platform. Israel And Iran A 12-day conflict began on June 13, following Israeli strikes on Iranian sites. Trump confirmed that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu informed him prior to the attacks. U.S. forces also targeted Iranian nuclear sites, actions that reportedly helped reduce tensions. On June 23, Trump posted on Truth Social, 'Officially, Iran will begin a ceasefire. Israel will follow 12 hours later. Within 24 hours, the 12-day war ends.' Following the ceasefire, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed a 'decisive victory' without mentioning the truce. Meanwhile, Israel cautioned that renewed strikes could occur if new threats emerged. Pakistan And India Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 attack on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam. In May, four days of fighting concluded with Trump announcing that both nations agreed to a 'full and immediate ceasefire', attributing the resolution to a 'long night of U.S.-mediated discussions'. Pakistan publicly expressed gratitude, even recommending Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. India, however, downplayed U.S. involvement. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri clarified that negotiations occurred through established military channels. Prime Minister Narendra Modi reinforced in Parliament that no external leader intervened in Operation Sindoor. Despite Trump's repeated claims of mediating between India and Pakistan, India consistently rejected third-party involvement. Rwanda And Congo The longstanding conflict between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo escalated earlier this year when the M23 rebel group seized mineral-rich territories. In June, both nations signed a peace agreement in Washington aimed at ending decades of hostilities. Trump stated that the agreement would strengthen trade between the United States and both countries. The accord also referenced a ceasefire between Rwanda and Congo in August 2024. Nevertheless, accusations of ceasefire violations emerged, and M23 rebels threatened to withdraw from talks. Thailand And Cambodia On July 26, Trump posted on Truth Social that he would contact Thailand's acting prime minister to request a ceasefire. Days later, Thailand and Cambodia agreed to an 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' following a brief conflict lasting less than a week. Trump warned that failure to halt the fighting could impact ongoing U.S. tariff negotiations. Both countries rely heavily on exports to the United States. A deal was signed on August 7 to reduce border tensions. Armenia And Azerbaijan Trump's involvement in facilitating a peace agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan on August 8 prompted some leaders to suggest he deserved a Nobel Peace Prize. Signing a deal at the White House helped both sides move toward peace. Tensions had escalated after Azerbaijan took control of Armenian territory in 2023. The agreement marked a step toward resolving the nearly 40-year-long Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Egypt And Ethiopia Trump did not resolve tensions between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile Dam. The completion of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam has long concerned Egypt regarding water allocation. On June 29, Egypt's foreign minister reported stalled negotiations with Ethiopia. Trump expressed hope for a swift resolution, but Ethiopian officials warned that tensions could worsen. No formal agreement has been reached. Serbia And Kosovo On June 27, Trump claimed he had prevented hostilities between Serbia and Kosovo, asserting that both countries were on the verge of war. However, neither country was actively fighting, meaning no war was actually halted. The two nations had previously signed an economic agreement in 2020 during Trump's first term, but it did not involve active conflict.


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
High court agrees to hear PIL against Kothagudem corp formation
Hyderabad: A division bench of Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice GM Mohiuddin of the Telangana high court on Wednesday brushed aside objections raised by the court registry and agreed to hear a public interest litigation challenging the formation of the Kothagudem Municipal Corporation. The petition, filed by advocate and social worker J Shivaram Prasad of Paloncha, contests the Telangana Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2025 and a subsequent govt order (GO No. 103, dated May 28, 2025) through which Kothagudem and Paloncha municipalities, along with seven gram panchayats of Sujathanagar mandal, were merged to create the new corporation. Petitioner's counsel Chikkudu Prabhakar argued that the merger is unconstitutional, illegal, and arbitrary as it includes Scheduled Areas, where the 74th constitutional amendment relating to municipalities does not apply. He contended that the move violates the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, the Panchayat (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996, and several Supreme Court rulings safeguarding tribal rights. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad The counsel further alleged that no consultations were held with gram sabhas nor were public objections invited before the merger, in violation of the principles of natural justice. He maintained that incorporating predominantly tribal and rural areas into the municipal corporation would deprive local villagers of their constitutional and livelihood rights. The PIL seeks to quash the amendment and the GO, restrain the govt from proceeding with ward delimitation and elections to the new corporation, and suspend all consequential steps until the matter is adjudicated. The bench directed the case to be listed for detailed hearing shortly. Land regularisation plea In a separate matter, the high court on Tuesday heard the state govt's plea to vacate an earlier stay order that has stalled the regularisation of certain agricultural land transactions. The govt submitted that under the Telangana Bhu Bharati Act- 2025, small and marginal farmers who purchased agricultural land through unregistered sale agreements prior to June 2, 2014, and have been in possession for more than 12 years, are eligible for ownership rights. It pointed out that applications for regularisation had earlier been accepted between Oct 12 and Nov 10, 2020, under the old Act, but an interim order of the high court had halted further processing. Appearing for the state, advocate general A Sudarshan Reddy argued that the interim order, passed in 2020, should now be lifted to enable the govt to process these pending applications under the new law. The counsel for the petitioner opposing such regularisation sought time to file a reply. The bench, comprising Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice GM Mohiuddin, posted the case to Aug 26 for further hearing. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.