Welfare state is being treated not as a shared good, but as a burden
Supporters are told to welcome these as signs of pragmatism, but they reveal only a fake-it-till-you-make-it government clinging to the same austerity logic that's gutted public services for more than a decade. There's no strategy of principled adaptation, just damage control masquerading as radical policy-overhaul.
READ MORE: Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming PIP
Like cynical venture capitalists who asset-strip football clubs, this government treats the welfare state not as a shared good but as a historical burden. Public support systems are remodelled with fewer seats, less atmosphere, and none of the legacy. Cuts are proposed, resisted, and delayed, but always within the logic of managed decline. First they tried to demolish the Kop end stand, now they promise only future fans will be excluded.
Proclaiming progress, the luscious playing surface is narrowed and replaced with astroturf. Starmer and his front bench echo the language of 'toughness' while attacking the right to protest and doubling down on hostile-environment policies. Protesters are kettled, marches are banned, and dissent is criminalised by degrees. All this while far-right groups openly organise to infiltrate and co-opt Reform UK, talking of 'seizing control' and reshaping elections by 2030.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour MP not 'proud' of Keir Starmer's first year in charge
These are not fringe figures. They're part of a co-ordinated ecosystem of antisemitism, Islamophobia, authoritarianism and conspiracism – emboldened by silence and triangulation. Instead of calling it out, however, Labour's leadership seems content to play the same game: pinned in the six-yard box, offering managerial discipline while the far right runs rings around them and takes audacious pot-shots. Picture ex-Scotland manager Craig Levein's infamous 6-4-0 formation against the Czech Republic, but fielding only newly drafted players who might be loyal, but have no experience in big games.
Those of us pushed to the margins – disabled people, migrants, Muslims, and working-class communities – know what happens when the centre tries to outflank the right. Rights are lost and protections evaporate. We vanish from the headlines, except when someone from a marginalised group sells their soul for a front-bench post to prop up the attack on their own team. More of us end up in poverty, detention, or despair.
READ MORE: Home Office staff concerned over 'absurd ban on Palestine Action'
Meanwhile, Number 10 parades like champions of Europe, running victory laps over a non-league economy. The fans are left with crumbling public services – akin to Manchester United fans getting drenched beneath Old Trafford's increasingly dilapidated roof. And though our elected manager and board point to victories of old, it's clear they're preparing to flog the stadium that is the UK to the highest bidder, while calling it progress.
There's still time to fight this decline, but only if leaders stop hiding behind spreadsheets and rediscover the courage to name what we're up against: a political slide toward exclusion, authoritarianism, and resentment – selling the strongest players in the name of a squad rebuild.
The public knows the difference between real change and stage-managed retreat. Delivering anything less than what's needed means not just losing the match, but the risk of relegation and surrendering the values on which the club's success was genuinely built.
Ron Lumiere
via email
FOLLOWING Laura Webster's Saturday article on thenational.scot about Labour founding the welfare state, which has become a standard response by Labour hacks to every scenario: the Labour welfare state is a myth. The welfare state was agreed, with minor differences, by the wartime coalition. Bismarck had a welfare state in the 1870s and he was no socialist either; he wanted a race of supermen.
The Brits had to acknowledge that the German soldier was fitter, taller and better educated, like the Channel Islands' children after German occupation.
READ MORE: We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series
England did not achieve public education till the 1870s, due to opposition by the controlling Church of England. The Church of Scotland had no wish to control public education in Scotland, which has been free since the reformation. Incidentally, Catholic education legislation was introduced at the turn of the last century by a Liberal government, not because they were sympathetic to Catholicism, but because the wanted to create divisions in Scotland. Incidentally, there are no 'Prodistent' schools in Scotland, merely non-denominational schools where Catholic and other-denomination pupils and teachers are more common than most people realise.
It was a Liberal minister in World War One, Winston Churchill, who introduced free milk, because of the poorer state of the British working class compared to German wartime recruits. The architect of the welfare state was the Liberal Lord Beveridge.
Lords Wilson and Callaghan introduced further austerity and pay freezes etc.
Donald Anderson
Glasgow
IF Westminster taxed the rich cheats who threw money at Brexit so they could avoid the new EU laws on tax havens, they would bring in way more cash than they will get from hitting the poor and disabled.
They could close the loopholes the government deliberately creates and make everyone pay their tax. Loopholes are actually government-created corruption.
Labour could recover if they taxed the rich – as long as Israel doesn't mind, of course.
Bill Robertson
via email
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Welfare concessions to be set out ahead of crunch vote
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the Bill aims to deliver a 'fairer, more compassionate system' ahead of the legislation's second reading on Tuesday. The Government will amend the Bill at the Commons committee stage to put the changes in place. The original plans restricted eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit. The changes to Pip will now only apply to new claims from November 2026. Plans to cut the health-related element of universal credit have also been rowed back, with all existing recipients to have their incomes protected in real terms. Details of a review of the Pip assessment, to be led by disabilities minister Sir Stephen Timms and 'co-produced' with disabled people, will also be published. Draft regulations for the 'right to try', to enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment, will also be laid in Parliament. The Work and Pensions Secretary said: 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can. Too often, disabled people feel trapped, worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on. 'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it. 'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.' Some £300 million in employment support will also be brought forward over the next three years. Those with severe conditions who are unlikely to recover – about 200,000 people – will not be called for a reassessment of universal credit. From next year to 2030, all those who already receive the health element of universal credit and new claimants with severe conditions and 12 months or less to live will see an annual rise to their combined standard and limited capacity for work allowance at least in line with inflation. Ms Kendall had confirmed concessions to the plans after 126 Labour backbenchers signed an amendment that would have halted the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill at its first Commons hurdle. That is now expected to be withdrawn after the move appeased some rebellious MPs, but others are considering backing a similar amendment to be tabled on Monday. Health Secretary Wes Streeting told Sky News the changes 'have put us in a much better position' and give 'peace of mind' to those receiving Pip, but he did not rule out further concessions. Labour MP Rachael Maskell said she would sign the new amendment aiming to stop the Bill, saying it was not clear how the promised concessions would be brought in. 'There's no confidence… we're being asked to sign a blank check even with these changes,' she told the PA news agency. Vicky Foxcroft, who quit as a Labour whip over the reforms, told The Guardian there were 'areas where I still think there's need for movement' and that she had not decided how to vote. Olivia Blake, a Labour MP with a disclosed disability, told the paper the changes could create 'an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently'. The Liberal Democrats plan to vote against and have called for the Government to speed up access-to-work decisions to help people enter the workforce. Deputy leader Daisy Cooper said: 'Liberal Democrats simply cannot support any measures that make things harder for unpaid carers, disabled people who rely on support with daily tasks in order to stay employed, and those whose disabilities mean that they will never be able to work. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has called the concessions 'the worst of all worlds'. Shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately would not say on Sunday how the Tories would vote and that the party would wait to see what the Secretary of State sets out.
Western Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Disabled people ‘could face extra annual costs of £15,000 by end of the decade'
Disability equality charity Scope has warned that Government concessions on welfare cuts will simply lead to a 'two-tier system' where 'huge numbers' of people in need are still out of pocket. Its analysis has estimated average monthly costs – not taking into account welfare reforms – to cover extras such as higher energy bills or specialist mobility equipment, are likely to rise to £1,244 for disabled people in the UK, totalling almost £15,000 a year, by April 2029. 'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. James Taylor, Scope The annual disability price tag report comes just a day before MPs are expected to debate and vote on the Government's welfare reform Bill. Ministers were forced into an eleventh-hour climbdown on Friday in the face of a major backbench rebellion, offering concessions on some aspects of Labour's proposed cuts plan. The Government's original package, first presented in March, included restrictions on eligibility for personal independence payments (Pip), the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. But, in the face of pressure from more than 100 Labour MPs, the Government U-turned last week, saying existing claimants would be protected, with tightened eligibility only applying to new claimants. While Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said his welfare reforms now strike 'the right balance', Scope argued the changes will still result in 'catastrophic cuts', with some disabled people protected and supported but others not. The charity's latest report is based on analysis of the Family Resources Survey (FRS) and makes calculations using Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) inflation forecasts to show the likely extra costs faced by disabled people in the coming years. It does not take into account the impact of the welfare reforms, with the charity warning that the figures highlight that those people who do not get Pip could end up in a 'precarious financial position and will still face high extra costs'. It estimated extra costs for disabled people are currently at £1,095 a month, up from last year's price tag, which stood at £1,010. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has made concessions on his Bill in the face of opposition from Labour MPs (Paul Currie/PA) Scope said benefits do not cover the entirety of these costs, with a current monthly shortfall of around £630, likely to rise to a £704 shortfall by the end of the decade. James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Whether it's higher electricity bills because of medical equipment to power, or higher heating bills because of health conditions affected by the cold. 'Our latest analysis finds the price tag of disability is now £1,095 a month. A figure only set to increase in the coming years unless action is taken. 'The concessions put forward by Government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from Pip. 'The Government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.' Responding to the 'two-tier' claims from other critics last week, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said: 'The changes that we are introducing will make sure existing claimants are unaffected, but we also all agree that there do need to be changes in the future to make sure that people who can work do, so we protect those who can't but we make the welfare state sustainable for the future.' While all of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill applies to England and Wales, only the UC changes apply to Scotland. The Government said there are equivalent provisions to legislate for Northern Ireland included in the Bill. A Government spokesperson said: 'We're delivering one of the biggest packages of welfare reforms in a generation – including scrapping the Work Capability Assessment, rebalancing Universal Credit, and investing in tailored employment support. 'Protecting people is a principle we will never compromise on, which is why we're delivering long-lasting and meaningful change that puts the welfare system on sustainable footing so the safety net will always be there for those who need it. 'We're restoring trust and fairness in the system, ensuring existing Pip claimants will be able to keep their award and putting the voice of sick or disabled people at the heart of our plans, whilst ramping up support to help them into work.'
Times
40 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer's last-ditch effort to quell welfare cuts rebellion
Sir Keir Starmer will launch a last-ditch attempt on Monday to convince MPs to back cuts to disability benefits, but faces a stand-off with about 50 Labour backbenchers still set on rebelling. Ministers insist they have offered the rebels everything possible to back down after concessions last week staved off a probable defeat in the Commons on Tuesday. Starmer potentially faces the choice between removing the whip from the sizeable group of backbenchers still intent on voting against the government, or suffering a further blow to his authority, which has already been severely undermined by the row. Downing Street has not yet indicated what sanctions would be brought against the rebels. Instead, ministers will announce the terms for a review of disability benefits in the hope it will quell further rebellions. The Times understands government whips have told MPs over the weekend to wait and see what the review — to be led by Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister — can achieve before voting against the government. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, appeared to suggest on Sunday that there could be further concessions after the review. He said ministers have 'got to listen' and added that the changes already granted 'have put us in a much better position'. But government sources insisted on Sunday night that there would be no further movement. They indicated that ministers believed they had offered rebels everything they could, including having disability groups directly involved in the review, bringing forward employment support and exempting existing claimants from the cuts. • Fury of the Labour rebels: did Rachel Reeves go too far over welfare? They hoped the terms of the review to be set out on Monday would offer the 'reassurance and clarification' many had asked for. Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, said: 'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can.' She said it was 'about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system … which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances'. The review will promise a guarantee in law of a 'right to try', allowing claimants to take on work without fear of losing benefits if it does not work out. It will also confirm that the proposed changes will only apply to new disability benefit claims from November next year, and those who are never likely to recover will be exempt from reassessment. It was unclear on Sunday whether those who continued to oppose the government would be stripped of the Labour whip. Despite that risk, leading rebels said they would not be swayed. • Fraser Nelson: How Liz Kendall can stop this national sickness Rachael Maskell, the Labour MP for York Central and one of those leading the remaining rebellion, told The Times: 'I think the whips have been effective at saying to colleagues they need to wait and see what the Timms review is going to achieve. I think personally it makes the bill even more difficult [to support], because it is a blank cheque now. I just think there are too many unanswered questions.' Another rebel said nothing short of a delay of the bill would persuade them back down and that the government's handling of the row had bruised trust. Louise Haigh, the former transport secretary who had been planning to vote against, said she wanted to see the detail of what the Timms review would contain but added: 'Subject to that detail, I will be supporting the government on Tuesday in recognition that they have made significant progress and that they have protected the incomes of nearly 400,000 disabled people across the country.' Party insiders fear that Starmer's authority has been damaged by the revolt, which forced him to change his position to stave off a larger backbench rebellion of more than 120 of his MPs, more than enough to defeat the government in the Commons. It followed U-turns over the cuts to winter fuel payments and the decision to hold a national inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal. • Keir Starmer on the benefits U-turn and his toughest week yet One source supportive of the government's agenda said No 10 was repeatedly inflicting 'maximum pain for minimum gain'. The source said: 'The winter fuel stuff was the gateway drug for this. It was like the original sin of bad political decisions. It's like there's a masochism strategy at play.' Starmer told The Sunday Times he understood he had made mistakes during his first year in power and acknowledged he would have 'liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did' on welfare. He said: 'All these decisions are my decisions and I take ownership of them … my rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can.'
