Mo. Supreme Court Chief Justice calls for better juror pay
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. – The Chief Justice of the Missouri Supreme Court expressed gratitude as she delivered the 2025 State of the Judiciary to a joint session of the Missouri General Assembly Wednesday.
Chief Justice Mary Russell told lawmakers that her 20 years on the bench has been 'something this northeast Missouri farm girl never thought possible, even in her wildest dreams.'
While mostly shying away from political issues, Russell did ask legislators to pass something: increased compensation for jurors.
'Last year, you considered changing jurors' compensation, in part by tying their mileage rate to that of state employees,' the chief justice said. 'This year, please send these changes to the governor's desk.'
'Doing so will demonstrate respect for our jurors,' she said.
No savings expected from nearly 40% of DOGE-canceled contracts
Russell's main theme circled back to the 'frontline heroes' of Missouri's court system.
'During this term as chief justice, my goal has been to visit all 46 judicial circuits,' she said. 'I've been to 36 so far, with just 10 to go.'
Russell said what she has learned is an overwhelming commitment to serve.
'In every county, work begins before the courts open,' she said. 'Staff show up early, unlocking doors, turning up the heat and quite a few times so far this year shoveling snow.'
She also praised the technology side of the courts.
'Your support allows us to continue providing the high level of online services Missourians expect and deserve,' Russell said.
She also encouraged lawmakers assembled as well as members of the public to participate in the process.
'Please go watch a court proceeding,' Russell said. 'Experience it first-hand and thank the court staff for all they do.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla stock rises as Trump-Musk feud cools and robotaxi launch nears
Tesla stock rose marginally in pre-market trading on Wednesday after CEO Elon Musk extended an olive branch to US President Donald Trump following their public feud. Shares were up over 2% by around midday CEST, at $332.76 (€290.98) 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far,' Musk said in a post on X on Wednesday. After spending millions backing Trump's successful presidential bid, Musk heavily criticised the Republicans' new tax and spending bill, creating a rift between the two men. Musk was previously appointed by Trump to lead DOGE, the US' Department of Government Efficiency. The tech billionaire argued that the new bill, dubbed by Trump as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', would irresponsibly raise the public deficit and undermine DOGE's work. Musk resigned from the department in late May after saying he was 'disappointed' with spending proposals. In an escalation of the conflict last week, Musk called for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vice President JD Vance. He also implied that Trump was linked with late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, an allegation the White House denied. Related The 100 ways Elon Musk and his companies allegedly benefited from working with Donald Trump Tesla's European buyers turn away? Sales slide amid Musk's political controversy As for the president, Trump threatened to terminate government contracts awarded to Musk's SpaceX firm. On Monday, the president then took a more conciliatory tone. Trump said he wished Musk 'very well' and claimed that he would retain Starlink internet service at the White House. Even so, the US President suggested that he might remove his own Tesla from White House grounds. The value of Tesla shares have been rocked by volatility as investors track the dramas playing out in Washington — and some dump stock in protest of Musk's politics. Both Argus Research and Baird downgraded ratings for Tesla stock on Monday, which has seen its value drop by more than 19% since the start of the year. Aside from the Trump-Musk feud, experts noted that risks to Tesla include the expiration of EV credits, which could dampen demand. A $7,500 tax credit for an EV purchase is set to be fully eliminated by the end of 2026, although restrictions will be applied before this. For those wishing to use the credit in 2026, they can only buy from manufacturers that haven't yet sold 200,000 EVs. This would disqualify Tesla. Other challenges include increased competition in the EV market, particularly from Chinese rivals such as BYD. Despite these storm clouds ahead, Musk's enthusiasm about robotaxis appears to be inflating the stock's value. The CEO is currently hoping to roll out the self-driving taxi service in Austin, Texas, on 22 June. In a post on his X social media platform, Musk said the date could change because Tesla is 'being super paranoid about safety'. Sign in to access your portfolio
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Trump's Revolutionary Logic Meets the California Protests
Revolutions have a logic. The revolutionaries start with a big, transformative, impossible goal. They want to remake society, smash existing institutions, replace them with something different. They know they will do damage on the road to their utopia, and they know people will object. Committed to their ideology, the revolutionaries pursue their goals anyway. Inevitably, a crisis appears. Perhaps many people, even most people, don't want regime change, or don't share the revolutionaries' utopian vision. Perhaps there are unplanned disasters. Smashing institutions can have unexpected, sometimes catastrophic, consequences, as the history of post-revolutionary famines shows very well. But whatever the nature of the crisis, it forces the revolutionaries to make a choice. Give up—or radicalize. Find compromises—or polarize society further. Slow down—or use violence. The bloodiest, most damaging revolutions have all been shaped by people making the most extreme choices. When the Bolsheviks ran into opposition in 1918, they unleashed the Red Terror. When the Chinese Communists encountered resistance, Mao sent teenage Red Guards to torment professors and civil servants. Sometimes the violence was mere theater, lecture halls full of people demanding that victims recant. Sometimes it was real. But it always served a purpose: to provoke, to divide, and then to allow the revolutionaries to suspend the law, create an emergency, and rule by decree. I doubt very much that Donald Trump knows much about the methods of Bolsheviks or Maoists, although I am certain that some of his entourage do. But he is now leading an assault on what some around him call the administrative state, which the rest of us call the U.S. government. This assault is revolutionary in nature. Trump's henchmen have a set of radical, sometimes competing goals, all which require fundamental changes in the nature of the American state. The concentration of power in the hands of the president. The replacement of the federal civil service with loyalists. The transfer of resources from the poor to the rich, especially rich insiders with connections to Trump. The removal, to the extent possible, of brown-skinned people from America, and the return to an older American racial hierarchy. Juliette Kayyem: Trump's gross misuse of the National Guard Trump and his allies also have revolutionary methods. Elon Musk sent DOGE engineers, some the same age as Mao's Red Guards, into one government department after the next to capture computers, take data, and fire staff. Trump has launched targeted attacks on institutions that symbolize the power and prestige of the old regime: Harvard, the television networks, the National Institutes of Health. ICE has sent agents in military gear to conduct mass arrests of people who may or may not be undocumented immigrants, but whose arrests will frighten and silence whole communities. Trump's family and friends have rapidly destroyed a matrix of ethical checks and balances in order to enrich the president and themselves. But their revolutionary project is now running into reality. More than 200 times, courts have questioned the legality of Trump's decisions, including the arbitrary tariffs and the deportations of people without due process. Judges have ordered the administration to rehire people who were illegally fired. DOGE is slowly being revealed as a failure, maybe even a hoax: Not only has it not saved much money, but the damage done by Musk's engineers might prove even more expensive to fix, once the costs of lawsuits, broken contracts, and the loss of government capacity are calculated. The president's signature legislation, his budget bill, has met resistance from senior Republicans and Wall Street CEOs who fear that it will destroy the U.S. government's credibility, and even resistance from Musk himself. Now Trump faces the same choice as his revolutionary predecessors: Give up—or radicalize. Find compromises—or polarize society further. Slow down—or use violence. Like his revolutionary predecessors, Trump has chosen radicalization and polarization, and he is openly seeking to provoke violence. For the moment, the administration's demonstration of force is mostly performative, a made-for-TV show designed to pit the United States military against protesters in a big Democratic city. The choice of venue for sweeping, indiscriminate raids— Home Depot stores around Los Angeles, and not, say, a golf club in Florida—seems orchestrated to appeal to Trump voters. The deployment of the U.S. military is designed to create frightening images, not to fulfill an actual need. The governor of California did not ask for U.S. troops; the mayor of Los Angeles did not ask for U.S. troops; even the L.A. police made clear that there was no emergency, and that they did not require U.S. troops. David Frum: For Trump, this is a dress rehearsal But this is not the final stage of the revolution. The Marines in Los Angeles may provoke more violence, and that may indeed be the true purpose of their mission; after all, the Marines are primarily trained not to do civilian crowd control, but to kill the enemies of the United States. In an ominous speech at Fort Bragg yesterday, Trump reverted to the dehumanizing rhetoric he used during the election campaign, calling protesters 'animals' and 'a foreign enemy,' language that seems to give permission to the Marines to kill people. Even if this confrontation ends without violence, the presence of the military in Los Angeles breaks another set of norms and prepares the way for another escalation, another set of emergency decrees, another opportunity to discard the rule of law later on. The logic of revolution often traps revolutionaries: They start out thinking that the task will be swift and easy. The people will support them. Their cause is just. But as their project falters, their vision narrows. At each obstacle, after each catastrophe, the turn to violence becomes that much swifter, the harsh decisions that much easier. If not stopped, by Congress or the courts, the Trump revolution will follow that logic too.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
DOGE Checks Creator Splits With Elon Musk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The creator of the DOGE dividend checks has condemned Elon Musk's treatment of President Donald Trump on social media. James Fishback, who first proposed the idea of a dividend for U.S. citizens based on the money saved by the Department of Government Efficiency, said that he was stepping away from DOGE, and that Musk "had to apologize" to the president after calling for him to be impeached. Why It Matters The clash between Trump and Musk on June 5 was a significant shake-up of the relationship that defined the first part of Trump's second administration. The two men, both of whom are avid social media users, escalated rhetoric against each other. Musk said Trump would not have won the 2024 election without his help, and the president said Tesla was "having a hard time" and that Musk had been "wearing thin" when he left the White House at the end of May. What To Know Fishback, who served as an adviser to DOGE and proposed the idea of "DOGE Dividends" of $5,000 to each American taxpaying household, said he was stepping away from the unofficial department after Musk overstepped the mark in his disagreement with Trump. "The truth is that Elon set expectations that he relayed to the president, me, and the country that he did not come close to fulfilling. That's disappointing, but OK," Fishback told Politico. "What's not OK is his baseless personal attacks against President Trump." Fishback has been critical of Musk for his clash with Trump on social media since it began, and has called for the tech CEO to apologize for his comments. "Elon Musk has to apologize to President Trump for two things. First, randomly calling for the impeachment of the duly elected president of the United States over a policy disagreement," Fishback said on X, formerly Twitter, Musk's own social media platform. Elon Musk, left, listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington Elon Musk, left, listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025, in Washington Getty Images "That's not OK. I mean, at least the Democrats had the common courtesy of making up the Ukraine hoax to then go after the president in his first term to impeach him. Elon Musk did so over a simple disagreement on a policy. "Second, and it just pains me to bring this up, is the slanderous accusation that somehow the president of the United States was a coconspirator in a multi-decade sex trafficking ring of minors." On Wednesday morning, Musk said that he regretted many of his comments from last week, and that "he went too far." He did not specify which of his posts he regretted, but he had deleted his post that said Trump featured in the Jeffrey Epstein files on Saturday, a move which Fishback praised as "another good step." Fishback did not become a formal employee of DOGE, but he popularized the idea of the DOGE dividend checks, which the Trump administration said were "under consideration." What People Are Saying James Fishback said in an interview with CNN: "President Trump is a father, a husband, and a grandfather. He has no association with Epstein whatsoever. He threw him out of his Mar-a-Lago Club because he was a scumbag. "And now to have Elon Musk drag him in the mud? It's not OK. As Americans, we are allowed to disagree on the substance of the issue—but ad hominem attacks have no place in the public square." What Happens Next Musk has stepped away from his government work and is resuming focus on his tech companies. Trump has not yet responded to his expression of regret.
