War-weary Syrians and Lebanese watch from the sidelines as missiles fly in Israel-Iran conflict
DAMASCUS, Syria (AP) — In a park overlooking Damascus, 25-year-old Khaldoun Hallak has spent the past few evenings with his friends, drinking yerba mate, snacking on nuts, smoking hookah pipes and watching the sky for missiles streaking overhead.
'We've been through 14 years of war, and this is the first time Syria has nothing to do with it and we're just spectators,' Hallak said.
Since Israel launched a barrage of strikes on Iran last week and Iran retaliated with missile and drone attacks against Israel, neighboring countries have been in the flight path.
Outside the scope
Downed missiles and drones have fallen in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq, damaging houses, causing fires and reportedly killing one woman in Syria. But those countries have so far not been dragged directly into the conflict — which had killed at least 224 people in Iran and 24 in Israel as of Tuesday — and many in their war-weary populations are hoping it stays that way.
In Lebanon, which is still reeling from last year's war between Israel and the Hezbollah militant group, videos making the rounds on social media have shown revelers dancing and drinking on rooftops while projectiles flash across the sky in the background.
Firas Maksad, managing director for the Middle East and North Africa at the Eurasia Group, a New York-based risk consultancy organization, happened to be visiting Lebanon when the conflict broke out and was attending a wedding when a parade of missiles began lighting up the sky as the DJ played ABBA's disco hit 'Gimme! Gimme! Gimme! (A Man After Midnight)'. He posted a video of the scene that went viral.
'Certainly most in Lebanon and also Syria are very satisfied to be outside the scope of this,' Maksad said.
No longer in the spotlight, a sense of relief
For some in the region, there is also measure of schadenfreude in watching the two sides exchange blows.
There's a Syrian expression that literally translates as, 'The fang of a dog in the hide of a pig.' It means that two people perceived as despicable are fighting with each other. The phrase has surfaced frequently on social media as Syrians express their feelings about the Israel-Iran conflict.
Watching from a park
Many Syrians resented Iran's heavy-handed intervention in support of former President Bashar Assad during the country's civil war, but are also angered by Israel's incursions and airstrikes in Syria since Assad's fall. The Sunni-majority Syrian population also widely sympathizes with the Palestinians, particularly with civilians killed and displaced by the ongoing war in Gaza.
'May God set the oppressors against each other,' said Ahmad al-Hussein, 18, in Damascus, who was sitting in a park with friends waiting to see missiles pass overhead Monday night. 'I hope it continues. We've been harmed by both of them.'
Hallak echoed the sentiment.
'Every time we see a missile going up, we say, may God pour gasoline on this conflict,' he said. 'If one side is hit, we will be happy, and if the other side is hit, we will also be happy. We will only be upset if there is a reconciliation between them.'
In Lebanon, where last year's Israel-Hezbollah war killed more than 4,000 people, including hundreds of civilians, and left destruction in wide swathes of the country's south and east and in Beirut's southern suburbs, some see retribution in the footage of destroyed buildings in Tel Aviv.
Hezbollah remains largely quiet
A U.S.-brokered ceasefire deal brought an end to the latest Israel-Hezbollah war in November. The Lebanese militant group — which lost much of its senior leadership and arsenal in the conflict — has remained largely quiet since then and has given no indication that it intends to join the fray between Israel and Iran.
Israeli forces have continued to occupy several border points in southern Lebanon and to carry out regular airstrikes on what Israel says are Hezbollah facilities since the ceasefire.
'Of course I am against the Israeli occupation, and Iran is an Islamic country standing up to it,' said Hussein al-Walid, 34, a welder in the southern coastal city of Sidon.
Iran's axis
Despite the dramatic scenes of buildings reduced to rubble in Israel, Tehran and other Iranian cities have taken a worse pounding — and other regional countries, including Lebanon, could still be pulled into the conflict.
Caroline Rose, a director at the Washington-based New Lines Institute think tank said that while it seems 'clear that Iran-backed proxies across the region — particularly Hezbollah—just do not have the capacity' to enter the fray, Israel could decide to expand the scope of its offensive beyond Iran.
One of the goals announced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was to eliminate Iran's 'axis of terrorism' — the coalition of Tehran-backed armed groups across the region known as the 'Axis of Resistance.'
That goal 'is ambiguous and offers Israel the operational space to expand this war to countries it deems are hosting Iran-backed proxies, no matter how weak they may be,' Rose said.
Al-Walid shrugged off the possibility of a new war in Lebanon.
'The war is already present in Lebanon,' he said. 'Israel isn't abiding by the agreement and is striking every day.'
Shouts of jubilation
Hassan Shreyf, a 26-year-old student from the city of Baalbek in eastern Lebanon, where Hezbollah has a strong base of support, said that after last year's war in Lebanon and the heavy losses suffered by the militant group, many of its supporters 'were clearly anguished and didn't feel vindicated.'
'So anything, even a window breaking in Tel Aviv, is (now) a victory for them,' he said. Every time Iranian missiles pass overhead, he said, people in the area break out in shouts of jubilation.
At the same time, Chreif said, 'there's always a silent group hugging the wall as we say in Arabic, treading carefully and praying we stay out of it.' ___
Abby Sewell reported from Beirut. Mohammad Zaatari contributed to this report from Sidon, Lebanon.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
Lawmakers move to limit Trump's war powers as Israel-Iran war escalates
Washington — Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are looking to limit President Trump's ability to order U.S. strikes on Iran amid its ongoing war with Israel, emphasizing that only Congress has the power to declare war under the Constitution. "This is not our war," GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky said in a post on X Tuesday announcing that he had introduced a measure under the 1973 War Powers Resolution to block U.S. strikes. "Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution." The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war, and the extent of the president's authority to wade into conflict abroad without the approval of the legislative branch has been challenged in recent years. In 2020, Mr. Trump faced criticism for his decision to strike Iranian military leader Qassem Soleimani without notifying congressional leaders. Massie's resolution aims to force the president to seek congressional approval before entering a war with Iran and would terminate the use of U.S. armed forces against Iran without Congress' expressed approval. It's co-sponsored by Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who urged "every member to go on record" in a post on X on Monday. "Are you with the neocons who led us into Iraq or do you stand with the American people?" Khanna said. The privileged resolution would force a vote on the matter within a number of days. The House is currently on recess, but leaders will be forced to engage with the push upon their return. The vote would put Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, in a difficult position, given his strong support of Israel and the president. Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat, is leading an effort in the Senate and introduced a similar resolution on Monday that forces a vote on requiring Mr. Trump to get congressional approval or a formal declaration of war to attack Iran, unless the U.S. is defending itself against an imminent attack. "This resolution will ensure that if we decide to place our nation's men and women in uniform into harm's way, we will have a debate and vote on it in Congress," Kaine said in a statement. Kaine said Tuesday he didn't have any cosponsors to announce yet, but "I definitely have interest." Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri said he isn't backing Kaine's resolution, telling reporters that "there's very little danger" of Mr. Trump leading the U.S. into war. But Sen. Lindsey Graham, a South Carolina Republican, urged Mr. Trump to "go all in" if diplomacy fails. "If that means providing bombs, provide bombs," Graham said Sunday in an interview with "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "If it means flying with Israel, fly with Israel." Mr. Trump cut short his trip to Canada for the G7 summit on Monday, citing the Israel-Iran conflict. After returning to Washington, the president wrote that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran" and warned "we know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding." "He is an easy target, but is safe there — We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now," the president said. At least one Democrat said he plans to vote against Kaine's resolution. Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, who supports preemptive strikes against Iran, said he doesn't want to take any action that would curtail Mr. Trump's ability to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities. Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said his position is "no president can bomb another country without the permission of Congress." "It's always been my belief that you don't go to war without the approval of Congress and bombing other countries is obviously war. If you want to do that, you need to come to Congress and ask for permission," Paul told reporters Tuesday. Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, is pushing another measure to prohibit the use of federal funds or any use of military force against Iran without consent from Congress, except in the case of self-defense. It had a handful of cosponsors on Monday. , and contributed to this report.

Wall Street Journal
13 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Israel Built Its Case for War With Iran on New Intelligence. The U.S. Didn't Buy It.
WASHINGTON—Before launching its attack on Iran last week, Israel provided the U.S. with intelligence it deemed alarming: Tehran was conducting renewed research useful for a nuclear weapon, including on an explosive triggering system. But U.S. officials briefed by the Israelis weren't convinced that the information pointed to a decision by Tehran to build a bomb, according to a senior intelligence official, another U.S. official and two congressional aides familiar with the discussions.


CNN
14 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump increasingly warm to using US military to strike in Iran, sources say
President Donald Trump is growing increasingly warm to using US military assets to strike Iranian nuclear facilities and souring on the idea of a diplomatic solution to end the escalating conflict, two officials familiar with the ongoing discussions tell CNN. The new, more hawkish posture represents a significant shift in Trump's thinking, though the sources said Trump remains open to a diplomatic solution – if Iran makes significant concessions. Over the weekend and into Monday, discussions among Trump administration officials had continued to center on trying to find a diplomatic solution to serve as an off ramp, sources familiar with the talks said. But Trump signaled early Tuesday his patience for diplomacy was wearing thin. 'I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate with Iran,' he told reporters aboard Air Force One returning early from the Group of 7 summit in Canada. He added that his objective in Iran was 'an end, a real end, not a ceasefire,' or 'giving up entirely.' He later doubled down on Truth Social, calling for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' and asserting that the US knew the location of Iran's supreme leader – even though it would not kill him 'for now.' Officials said Trump had, for now, moved away from the idea of dispatching top officials to a mutually-agreed upon location in the Middle East to meet with the Iranians and attempt to hash out a deal. On Tuesday, after Trump abruptly returned to Washington, his vice president offered one of the clearest signals to date that Trump was weighing taking offensive action to eliminate Iran's nuclear facilities. JD Vance posted to X on Tuesday that the president 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment. That decision ultimately belongs to the president.' Trump was due to meet Tuesday with members of his national security team in the White House Situation Room. Israel has been pressing Trump to become more involved in its campaign to dismantle Iran's nuclear facilities, which top officials from the country have said would require American weapons and planes. Until Tuesday, the president had offered little clarity on whether he would accede to that pressure, which has been countered by loud voices within his own party encouraging him to avoid getting dragged into another foreign conflict. Trump had been wary of ordering the US to engage directly on behalf of the Israelis, beyond providing defensive support to intercept Iranian missiles and US intelligence. But in a string of social media posts Tuesday, Trump sounded increasingly combative and used the word 'we' to describe military action in Iran. 'We now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran,' he wrote. 'Iran had good sky trackers and other defensive equipment, and plenty of it, but it doesn't compare to American made, conceived, and manufactured 'stuff.' Nobody does it better than the good ol' USA.' In a separate post, Trump also used 'we' to describe information pinpointing the location of Iran's supreme leader. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now,' Trump wrote. The Trump administration had heavily relied on the Omanis in recent months to pass messages back and forth with Iranian officials and facilitate five rounds of negotiations as the US and Iran worked toward a possible nuclear deal. But when Israel initially began carrying out the major operation targeting Iran's nuclear sites, the administration's tactics changed, sources familiar with the matter said. Trump instructed special envoy Steve Witkoff to attempt to meet with Iranian officials as quickly as possible, and the administration engaged a wide range of regional players to get Iran back to the table, sources said, including the Qataris, the Egyptians, the Saudis and the Turks. 'It is not just the Omanis, it is everyone. Everyone is working,' said a regional diplomat familiar with the administration's outreach in recent days. 'Witkoff is texting everyone.' But those efforts on Tuesday morning had not delivered a breakthrough. Iran's Foreign Ministry told CNN on Tuesday that they know nothing about planned talks in the coming days. Trump administration officials have been closely monitoring private and public communications from Israel regarding their plans to escalate their offensive attacks on Iran in the next few days. An official said those signals were a driving force behind Trump's Monday directive for residents of Tehran to evacuate. It is still unclear whether the president will ultimately decide to aid Israel's effort to fully eliminate Iran's nuclear capabilities. Sources familiar with the behind-the-scenes talks have said the possibility is on the table, especially if the Iranians do not more proactively try and find a solution. In his message Tuesday, Vance sought to address concerns from members of Trump's own base of supporters about the potential for an escalating conflict that draws the US closer to war. 'And of course, people are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy,' Vance wrote, getting at the divide emerging among conservatives over whether to aid Israel in their goal of wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities or to avoid dragging the US into another foreign war. In a private phone call Monday, Sen. Lindsey Graham personally urged Trump to go 'all in' to end Iran's nuclear program, including using the might of the US military. 'I said, Mr. President, 'This is a historic moment. Four presidents have promised that they won't get a nuclear weapon on your watch. You can fulfill that promise,' the South Carolina Republican said a day afterward. Graham, who is one of the GOP's most hawkish voices on Iran, made clear to Trump he wants the US to intervene in the dismantling of Iran's nuclear program more directly with American military resources, alongside Israel's. 'If it takes bombs, bunker buster bombs, so be it. If we need to fly with Israel, so be it. The consequences of not getting this right are enormous,' Graham told reporters. A White House official said Trump understands both sides of that argument. But the official said the president firmly believes that his repeated statements that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and warnings that the US would ensure that never happens provide justification for any potential action. Upon arriving back at the White House Tuesday morning, Trump posted a message he'd received from his ambassador in Israel, Mike Huckabee, acknowledging the president had 'many voices speaking to you' but encouraging him to be open to divine intervention. 'I believe you will hear from heaven and that voice is far more important than mine or ANYONE else's,' Huckabee wrote. Trump has said previously that Iran must abandon its nuclear program, and alleged Tuesday that Iran was 'very close' to developing a nuclear weapon, despite assessments from his own intelligence chiefs that such an outcome was not imminent. Asked on Air Force One if there's any guarantee that US bombs could actually reach underground Iranian nuclear bunkers and destroy them, Trump said, 'There's no guarantee in anything.' And he issued a warning to Iran that targeting American troops in the region would lead to a dramatic escalation in the conflict. 'We'll come down so hard, it'd be gloves off,' he said. CNN's Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.