logo
Opinion - The UK is reassessing its nuclear deterrent because of Trump

Opinion - The UK is reassessing its nuclear deterrent because of Trump

Yahoo14-03-2025

The first seven weeks of President Trump's second term have unbalanced fundamental strategic assumptions that the United Kingdom and Europe have relied on for decades. It is too early to say with confidence whether these are passing tremors or a more lasting realignment, but we are living in a different world from the one that existed before Jan. 20, and we will be doing so for some time.
These geopolitical shifts have been acutely unsettling for Britain. There is a lot of cant about the 'special relationship' between the U.S. and the U.K., which has never been a straightforward bond, nor one of equals. Nevertheless, for more than 80 years, it represented a basic connection from which much else could flow. Suddenly, in 2025, political, diplomatic and military leaders in London are wondering if they can make any assumptions at all.
One of the most shocking conversations that can now be heard, even if only in whispers and corners, is about the U.K.'s strategic nuclear deterrent.
When the British government decided in 1946 and 1947 to develop its own atomic bomb, the foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin, arriving late to a cabinet committee meeting, went to the heart of the issue. 'We've got to have this thing,' Bevin said, referring to the bomb. 'I don't mind it for myself, but I don't want any other foreign secretary of this country to be talked at, or to, by the secretary of state of the United States as I just have in my discussions with Mr. [James F.] Byrnes. We've got to have this thing over here, whatever it costs. We've got to have the bloody Union Jack on top of it.'
Cynics will tell you that Britain's nuclear weapons are not independent in practice and that America could effectively veto their use. It is a nuanced picture: The Royal Navy has four Vanguard-class nuclear-powered submarines, each capable of carrying 16 Trident ballistic missiles; each missile can have up to eight nuclear warheads (though the U.K. has only around 225 warheads in total). The submarines, missiles and warheads are all being replaced over the coming years.
The Vanguard-class boats, like their eventual successor the Dreadnought class, are built in the U.K., as are the warheads. The Royal Navy crews are wholly independent and under the authority of the British government, and each boat carries handwritten instructions to the captain from the prime minister in case the very worst happens. The warheads are designed and manufactured by the Atomic Weapons Establishment, which is ultimately owned by the Ministry of Defence.
On the other hand, Lockheed Martin makes the Trident missiles, and they are stored and maintained communally with those for the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class submarines at Kings Bay in Georgia. The new Dreadnought-class boats will share a missile compartment design with the American Columbia-class, and the two countries are developing their new warheads in parallel. So the British nuclear deterrent at least relies on American support; if that were for any reason withdrawn, Britain would be seriously compromised.
For nearly 70 years, this interdependence gave no cause for concern. The U.S. and Britain signed a mutual defense agreement on nuclear weapons in 1958 — Harold Macmillan, the prime minister who negotiated the treaty with President Dwight Eisenhower, called it 'the Great Prize' — that underpinned the bilateral relationship and allowed the U.K. to punch above its weight globally.
There is no immediate reason to think that Trump might seek to disrupt the long-standing alliance. Yet last week, former British ambassador to Washington David Manning told a House of Lords committee that American withdrawal from the relationship or from NATO is no longer 'inconceivable.'
'I think we now have to address them,' he said. 'It doesn't mean that they will happen, but I think they are on the table.'
Trump's suspension of military aid and intelligence-sharing with Ukraine has been a wake-up call. The president showed no hesitation in using his military leverage to impose his will. It was not just stopping supplies of arms and equipment — Ukraine lost access to real-time satellite images and signals data, severely limiting its targeting and early warning capabilities. Its U.S.-supplied missile systems simply stopped working.
Britain's relationship with the U.S. is, of course, much closer and of longer standing than Washington's bond with Kyiv. Nevertheless, two things are clear. The first is that some of the U.K.'s most important defense capabilities — including the nuclear deterrent, the F-35 Lightning fighter aircraft and the Five Eyes intelligence alliance — are almost impossible to disentangle from the U.S.
The second is that, as far as Trump is concerned, history is bunk. Every day, every hour is its own miniature Year Zero, and 70 years of cooperation will mean nothing if the president sees a way to get what he wants.
There are some hard yards of demanding diplomacy ahead, and a rupture between Washington and London that could devastate Britain's military power and reach is neither imminent nor likely. But for the first time in generations, it is not inconceivable.
Eliot Wilson is a freelance writer on politics and international affairs and the co-founder of Pivot Point Group. He was senior official in the U.K. House of Commons from 2005 to 2016, including serving as a clerk of the Defence Committee and secretary of the U.K. delegation to the NATO Parliamentary Assembly.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"
Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"

CBS News

time32 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Mayor Bass, regional mayors call for end to ICE raids in Southern California: "Our communities are not battlegrounds"

After days of violent and destructive protests in Los Angeles, fueled by an increase in immigration enforcement operations, Mayor Karen Bass and other regional mayors called for an end to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. At a news conference Wednesday morning, Bass said the unrest in a portion of Los Angeles started last Friday after immigration operations were carried out in several parts of Southern California. Bass told reporters that LA and surrounding cities were "peaceful" before the raids. Mayor Karen Bass called on the Trump administration to end the immigration enforcement operations taking place across the Southern California region. KCAL News She explained that the raids have caused fear in immigrant communities, and accused President Trump of worsening the situation when he ordered the deployment of National Guard and U.S. Marine troops. She called for an end to ICE raids and the federalization of troops. "When you start deploying federalized troops on the heels of these raids, it is a drastic and chaotic escalation and completely unnecessary," Bass said. Mr. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform, claiming that his decision to deploy troops to LA saved the city from burning to the ground. "The great people of Los Angeles are very lucky that I made the decision to go in and help!!!," he wrote. Her speech came a day after she implemented a curfew in a portion of downtown LA after five consecutive nights of demonstrations, which have escalated to clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers, as well as hundreds of arrests. Since the start of the protests, parts of downtown LA have been covered in graffiti, businesses have been looted and public property has been vandalized. TOPSHOT - A car burns as a demonstrator waves a Mexican national flag during a protest following federal immigration operations, in the Compton neighborhood of Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. RINGO CHIU/AFP via Getty Images During an interview Wednesday morning on CBS Los Angeles, Bass explained that the curfew will be extended until it is necessary to ensure public safety. The curfew currently runs for one square mile in the downtown area from the 5 Freeway to the 110 Freeway and from the 10 Freeway to where the 110 Freeway and 5 Freeway merge from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. Bass has also taken to social media to share how the raids are affecting the city. In a post on X, she wrote, "Angelenos are trying to live their lives—going to work, caring for their families—while facing the constant threat of sudden immigration crackdowns." Other mayors from across Southern California joined Bass, calling for an end to the ICE raids. The Mayor of Huntington Park, Arturo Flores, a U.S. Marine Corps combat veteran, told reporters that the military neighborhoods. "The deployment of Marines on our U.S. soil is an alarming escalation that undermines the values of democracy," Flores said. "Our communities are not battle grounds." Flores said the ICE raids being carried out in his community and others across the region are a form of intimidation that traumatizes hardworking residents. He said fear-based tactics are being used to target immigrant communities. The Mayor of Paramount, Peggy Lemons, added that residents are choosing not to leave their homes or send their children to school out of fear that ICE will take them away. "For many in our city, this has been the most devastating time in recent memory," Lemons said. She said immigrants, who play such an important role in the makeup of the region, should not have to live in constant fear.

State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy
State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy

The State Department is ordering the departure of all nonessential staff from its embassy in Baghdad due to concern over increased security risks in the region, according to two State Department officials familiar with the matter. "President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies," one of the officials said. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce our Mission in Iraq." The embassy already has a very limited number of nonessential employees, so the order is not expected to impact many individuals. Under the current plan, one official said the U.S. military would not be involved in transporting the nonessential personnel out of the country, but that those plans could change if the situation on the ground calls for it. Another U.S. official said that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has authorized the voluntary departure of military dependents from locations across the Middle East as tensions ratchet up between Israel and Iran. -ABC News' Luis Martinez and Anne Flaherty contributed to this report. State Department orders departure of nonessential staff from Baghdad embassy originally appeared on

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions
Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions

All members of the Fulbright Foreign Scholarship Board announced their resignation on Wednesday, releasing a statement accusing President Donald Trump's administration of political interference in the prestigious exchange program. The 12-member board alleged the Trump administration "usurped the authority of the Board" by denying Fulbright awards to "a substantial number of individuals" who were selected for the 2025-2026 academic year. The board also alleged the administration is currently "subjecting" an additional 1,200 international Fulbright recipients to "an unauthorized review process and could reject more." "We believe these actions not only contradict the statute but are antithetical to the Fulbright mission and the values, including free speech and academic freedom, that Congress specified in the statute," the board said in its statement. MORE: State Department delivers crushing news to Fulbright scholar hopefuls in Afghanistan The board oversees the Fulbright Foreign Student Program, which offers international graduate students, young professionals and artists the opportunity to study and conduct research in the United States. The government-funded, non-partisan program -- which was established by Congress in 1942 under then-President Harry Truman's administration -- operates in more than 160 countries worldwide, providing scholarships to approximately 4,000 foreign students annually. In the joint letter on Wednesday, the board said the awards that were overridden by the administration were concentrated in biology, engineering, architecture, agriculture, crop sciences, animal sciences, biochemistry, medical sciences, music and history. MORE: State Dept. suggests Afghan Fulbright hopefuls seek other options as program stalls The board claimed it has raised "legal issues and our strong objections with" senior Trump administration officials "on multiple occasions," including in writing, but says the concerns have not been acknowledged. In a statement to statement to ABC News after the board announced its resignation, a senior State Department official called the decision "a political stunt attempting to undermine President Trump." "It's ridiculous to believe that these members would continue to have final say over the application process, especially when it comes to determining academic suitability and alignment with President Trump's Executive Orders." the official said. The board, however, said in its statement that the decision was not one "we take lightly," woth the board calling on Congress, the courts and future Fulbright Boards to "prevent the administration's efforts to degrade, dismantle, or even eliminate one of our nation's most respected and valuable programs." "Injecting politics and ideological mandates into the Fulbright program violates the letter and spirit of the law that Congress so wisely established nearly eight decades ago," the board concluded in its statement. Entire Fulbright Scholarship board quits, citing Trump admin actions originally appeared on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store